TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asks if the Pfizer COVID vaccine was tested for its ability to stop virus transmission before being released. They request a clear yes or no answer and the data to be shared with the committee. The response states that they did not have prior knowledge of stopping transmission before the vaccine entered the market and had to rely on scientific research. Another speaker expresses outrage, claiming that people were pressured to get vaccinated based on the false belief that it would protect others.

The government is being questioned for covering vaccine injuries inadequately. Concerns were raised about mRNA vaccines being contaminated with DNA fragments, making them genetically modified organisms. Professor Delglish warns that these vaccines may cause cancer relapses. He calls for a halt on mRNA vaccines and demands full disclosure of data. The speaker urges for transparency and ethical principles in pandemic management. The debate emphasizes the importance of following scientific evidence.

The speakers discuss a contract between Pfizer and Canada regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. They claim that the contract reveals that the government knew the vaccine's safety and efficacy were unknown and that adverse effects were possible. They criticize Trudeau for distancing himself from the contract and accuse the government of lying and covering up the truth. The speakers also mention that the contract lacks anti-bribery and anti-corruption sections and highlight concerns about the vaccine's potential risks and uncertainties. They express their belief that the government's actions are criminal and express a desire to hold them accountable.

The speaker claims adverse events from the vaccine rollout were covered up and dismissed as rare and coincidental. They state that regulators approved the vaccines based on relative risk data (95%), which they describe as misleading, while the absolute risk reduction was only 0.84%, meaning 120 people had to be vaccinated to prevent one infection. The speaker alleges that Pfizer has 31 convictions, including withholding data, presenting false data, and bribing clinicians and regulators. They claim over 100 doctors have written to various health organizations, including the NHS and MHRA, about the vaccine program, but received only one response. The speaker concludes that science is dead because discussion, analysis, and debate are no longer allowed, and decisions are being made without scientific basis.

The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death compared to the unvaccinated. The speaker also mentions potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript ends with accusations of fraud and calls for criminal charges against vaccine manufacturers and government entities.

I informed Prime Minister Rishi Sunak about evidence from Dr. Josh Gutschko suggesting that Pfizer had conducted a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same as the one rolled out globally. The change in guidelines by the MHRA on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock, supports this claim. Anaphylactic shock occurs when there are endotoxins in the vaccines, which are present when they are cultured in Escherichia coli. This indicates that the vaccine distributed worldwide was not manufactured to the same standards as the approved one. Informed consent was therefore not possible, as people were given an untested vaccine. I am still awaiting a response from the Prime Minister regarding this crucial matter. (134 words)

The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.

The speaker questions the government's decision to continue with mRNA vaccines despite evidence suggesting they may not be effective for respiratory diseases. They mention the partnership with Moderna to build a manufacturing plant in the UK, capable of producing 250 million vaccines annually. The speaker also highlights Moderna's pipeline of 48 products, including ongoing trials for cytomegalovirus, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. They raise concerns about the contradiction between the vaccines' effectiveness and the push for more mRNA vaccines. The speaker wonders if this is a result of deception by big pharma.

Retired police constable Mark Sexton raises concerns about the contract between Pfizer and the South African government regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. He highlights that the contract states the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not known, contradicting claims made by the UK government. Sexton suggests that if the UK contract is similar, the government knowingly misled the public. He calls for legal action against the government and Pfizer, accusing them of fraud and crimes against humanity. Sexton urges the Metropolitan Police to investigate and emphasizes the need for accountability and justice for the victims. He provides a link to the contract for further examination. (147 words)

The speaker questions the effectiveness and safety of COVID vaccines, citing data on high death rates and adverse effects like myocarditis. They criticize the small sample size of Pfizer's clinical trials and argue that the benefits may not outweigh the risks, especially for young people. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparent data and larger studies to make informed decisions about vaccination.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

Andrew Bridgen, a member of the UK Parliament, discusses his concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and the manipulation of data surrounding excess deaths. He believes there is a cover-up happening on a global scale and that governments and institutions are complicit in misleading the public. Bridgen highlights the need for a new force in politics to challenge the current system and restore public confidence. He also mentions his legal action against former Health Secretary Matt Hancock for defamation. Bridgen emphasizes the importance of standing up for truth and protecting future generations. The transcript is already in English and contains 285 words.

Andrew Bridgeman raises concerns about the Pfizer COVID vaccine rollout, citing evidence from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He claims that the vaccine used in the rollout was not the same as the one trialed on volunteers and approved for emergency use. Bridgeman suggests that if ministers were unaware of this, it could be considered a criminal act by the MHRA. He argues that the public was misled, leading to a discrepancy between Pfizer's data and the UK's yellow card data on adverse events. Bridgeman requests a statement from the government on this matter.

In this video, the speaker discusses the Pfizer vaccine trial and raises concerns about the lack of long-term data. They mention that the trial was unblinded after only 2-4 months instead of the promised 5 years, which they consider deceptive. The speaker argues that without a longer placebo-controlled trial, potential long-term effects may be missed. They also highlight the number of deaths in both the vaccine and placebo groups, stating that the vaccine group had slightly fewer deaths from COVID-19 but more deaths from all causes. The speaker concludes that the vaccine may increase the risk of cardiac arrest. They express skepticism about recommending or mandating the vaccine based on the available data.

Andrew Bridgen, a former member of the UK Parliament, discusses various issues including excess deaths, vaccine safety, and government corruption. He highlights the manipulation of data by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) regarding excess deaths and questions the veracity of vaccine efficacy claims. Bridgen suggests a cover-up and a global conspiracy involving governments and institutions. He criticizes the lack of trust in mainstream media and calls for a new force in politics to challenge the current system. Bridgen also mentions his legal action against former Health Secretary Matt Hancock for defamation. He emphasizes the need for public awareness and action to protect democracy and individual freedoms. (150 words)

The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death. The speaker also mentions potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript concludes with accusations of fraud and illegal advertising, suggesting that the vaccines have not been presented with their associated risks.

Andrew Bridgen, a member of the UK Parliament, discusses various issues including excess deaths, vaccine safety, and government corruption. He highlights the manipulation of data by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) regarding excess deaths and questions the veracity of vaccine efficacy claims. Bridgen suggests a cover-up and a global conspiracy involving governments and globalist entities. He criticizes the lack of trust in institutions, the influence of big pharma, and the erosion of democracy. Bridgen calls for a new force in politics to challenge the current system and expresses concern about the future if the globalists have their way. He also mentions legal action against politicians for misleading statements and defamation.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID response and the involvement of the Medical Countermeasures Consortium, a partnership between Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US. They question the military's role in vaccine development and the use of fraudulent information. The speaker criticizes the dismantling of the COAG system and the creation of a secretive national cabinet. They highlight the military's involvement in COVID operations in Australia, the UK, and Canada. The speaker accuses Pfizer of fraud in their clinical trials and suggests a cover-up of COVID's origins. They call for a Royal Commission to investigate these issues.

Senator Roberts questions Minister Gallagher about the number of vaccines that have indemnity from the Australian government. The minister explains that indemnity arrangements were put in place for vaccines procured during the pandemic to ensure the national vaccine rollout program could be carried out safely. Senator Roberts argues that with low demand for boosters and multiple vendors, the need for indemnities is unnecessary. He questions why new indemnities were issued recently. Minister Gallagher defends the government's agreements with vaccine providers and emphasizes the importance of vaccination. Senator Roberts accuses the government of using taxpayers' money and not being transparent about vaccine harm. He criticizes the indemnity agreement with Moderna and raises concerns about experimental mRNA products.

On August 7th, the speaker wrote to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak with evidence from Dr. Josh Gochko indicating that Pfizer, enabled by the MHRA, carried out a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The speaker claims the Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same vaccine rolled out in the UK and worldwide. Evidence for this is allegedly the MHRA changing guidelines on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay at the vaccination center for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock. The speaker asserts the MHRA hadn't expected anaphylactic shock because it wasn't shown in the Pfizer trials. Anaphylactic shock occurs when there are endotoxins in vaccines, which are present when vaccines are cultured in bacteria like E. coli. The speaker claims this demonstrates the vaccine rolled out was not manufactured the same way or to the same standards as the vaccine that received medical approval, meaning informed consent was impossible. They state people were told the vaccines were safe, effective, and tested, but they were taking a completely untested vaccine from Pfizer. The speaker is still awaiting a response from the prime minister regarding the 44 pages of evidence supplied.

I wrote to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak with evidence from Dr. Josh Gutschko, indicating that Pfizer carried out a bait and switch operation with their vaccine. The Pfizer vaccine tested on 22,000 individuals was not the same as the one rolled out worldwide. The MHRA changed guidelines on the second day of mass vaccination, requiring people to stay for 15 minutes due to the risk of anaphylactic shock. This shock is caused by endotoxins in vaccines, which are present when they are cultured in bacteria like Escherichia coli. The vaccine rolled out globally was not manufactured to the same standards as the approved one, meaning informed consent was not possible. I'm still awaiting a response from the Prime Minister regarding this crucial matter.

The speaker raises concerns about the government of Canada purchasing and importing COVID-19 vaccines before they are approved by Health Canada. They highlight the conflict of interest in the government approving a drug they have already bought and distributed. The speaker suggests that a third party should have been responsible for the approval process to avoid this conflict.

The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of COVID vaccines, highlighting the lack of proper testing and potential side effects like myocarditis. They call for a thorough investigation into the misinformation surrounding vaccines and the unnecessary vaccination of children. The speaker criticizes the government's fear-mongering tactics and calls for a public inquiry.