TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Senator McCain is in Kyiv supporting peaceful protests for a legitimate society in Ukraine. He praises the peaceful demonstrations and calls for potential sanctions if the government continues repression. He believes the US should support those seeking freedom and democracy without military action.

As secretary of state, I was involved in the efforts to remove a prosecutor. The whole administration, including Obama, the vice president, and the ambassador, worked towards this goal. We believed that for Ukraine to succeed and overcome the revolution, known as the Maidan, it was crucial to get rid of that prosecutor. And they succeeded in doing so.

I went to Kyiv to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I had asked Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk to take action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't. They argued that I didn't have the authority to withhold the money. I insisted that they call the president and told them they wouldn't get the money unless the prosecutor was fired. Eventually, they agreed and the prosecutor got fired.

The US believes sanctions and threats of sanctions partly forced Yanukovych from office and wants to support the new Ukrainian government. US involvement included senators and State Department members on the ground, plus Obama administration sanctions. The US believes its clear position helped lead to the regime change. Supporting Ukraine allows it to determine its own future, though it may appear as a US-Russia conflict. The US has an economic interest in Ukraine joining the EU due to trade agreement benefits. Yanukovych was elected in 2010 with elections scheduled for 2015. Questions arise about foreign ministers supporting protests, and the presence of far-right politicians, including fascists and xenophobes, within the Ukrainian opposition who are against the EU. Yanukovych lost legitimacy by using force against peaceful protests, prompting US involvement. Foreign leaders were present to support the right to protest. While radical elements and anti-Semitism existed within the opposition, they were a small minority. There is confidence that the new government will be inclusive and tolerant. The Foreign Relations Committee will work to ensure radical elements do not have a central role in the coalition government.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in getting rid of a prosecutor in Ukraine. The entire administration, including Obama, the vice president, and myself, worked towards this goal. We knew that for Ukraine to succeed and win the revolution, they had to remove the prosecutor. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor wasn't fired, they wouldn't receive $1,000,000,000 in funding. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired, and Ukraine achieved their objective.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in getting rid of a prosecutor. The whole administration, including Obama, the vice president, and the ambassador, worked towards this goal. We knew that for Ukraine to succeed and win the revolution, they had to remove that prosecutor, and they did.

I believe our role, including sanctions and threats, partly forced Yanukovych from office. We've been very involved in supporting the new government in Ukraine. The clear US position has aided this regime change. If this is a peaceful transition, the US will be seen as a great friend. This is about supporting Ukraine in determining its future. While some see this as a US-Russia conflict, it's about supporting Ukraine's wishes. The US has an economic interest too. We're negotiating a trade agreement with Europe. With Ukraine potentially joining the EU, it could mean billions in economic opportunities for the US. We shouldn't hide this interest.

The speaker discusses the presence of a guest from the United States who frequently visited and supported protests in Ukraine. They express concern about the excessive use of force by the authorities during these protests. The speaker questions the appropriateness of supporting the protesters and creating conflict when they occupy government buildings. They also mention their contact with Vice President Biden and criticize the inconsistency between his words and actions in Ukraine. The speaker suggests that the US ambassador in Ukraine regularly met with representatives of the protests, giving the impression that there was a headquarters managing the process.

We will inform our colleagues about Russia's actions in the Baltics, Ukraine, and Georgia. We plan to make 2017 a year of offense against Putin, who we believe hacked our elections and is undermining democracy worldwide. We advocate for new sanctions targeting Putin personally, his energy and banking sectors. We just visited Ukraine, where we witnessed the impact of Russian interference. We will push for tougher sanctions on Russia for attacking the US through hacking, treating it as an act of war. We urge stronger sanctions on Russia for their attack on the US.

We believe our sanctions and the threat of more sanctions played a role in Yanukovych leaving office. We've been actively involved in supporting the new government, and the US has been seen as a friend in helping this transition happen peacefully. This is about supporting Ukraine in determining its own future. While it might seem like a US versus Russia situation, it's about supporting Ukraine's wishes. The US also has an economic interest, as Ukraine's potential inclusion in the EU could greatly benefit our trade agreement with Europe. Yanukovych lost legitimacy by using force against peaceful protests. Foreign leaders were there to stand up for the right to protest. While some radical elements exist within the opposition, the movement largely rejects those ideas. We're confident the new government will be inclusive, and we'll work to ensure those radical elements don't dominate.

I believe our sanctions and threats played a role in Yanukovych's departure. We've been actively involved in Ukraine, and our clear stance has aided the change in regimes. If this transition is peaceful, the U.S. will be seen as a great friend. This is about supporting Ukraine's self-determination. While some see it as a U.S.-Russia struggle, it's about supporting Ukraine's wishes. We also have an economic interest, as Ukraine's potential inclusion in the EU could boost trade with the U.S. Yanukovych was elected, but he lost legitimacy by using force against peaceful protests. Our presence, like that of foreign ministers, was to defend human rights. While radical elements exist within the opposition, the movement largely rejects them. We'll work to ensure these elements don't dominate the new government.

"Hopefully, what we're trying to do is bring about a peaceful transition here that would stop the violence, would give the Ukrainian people, what they unfortunately have not with different revolutions that have taken place, a real legitimate society. This is a grassroots revolution here. It's been peaceful except for when the government tried to crack down on them, and the government hasn't done that since. Well, I don't think that we would be taking on Russia. I am very pleased with secretary Kerry's statement, our deputy secretary Victoria Newland who was here. We're not talking about military action. We're not talking about blockades. We are talking about the possibility of sanctions if they continue to brutally repress their people. That that would require some action on our part just because that's what The United States Of America is all about."

We believe our sanctions and threats played a role in Yanukovych's removal. Now, we must support the new government. The US has been actively involved, with senators and State Department members present. Our clear stance has aided regime change. While some criticize our selective involvement, a peaceful transition in Ukraine will position the US as a key ally. This is about enabling Ukraine to determine its future. While it may seem like a US-Russia conflict, it's about supporting Ukraine's wishes. The US has an economic interest too as Ukraine potentially joining the EU could significantly benefit US trade. Yanukovych's use of force against peaceful protests is the reason we engaged. While radical elements exist within the opposition, the movement largely rejects them. We are confident the new government will be inclusive, and we'll ensure radical elements don't dominate.

I am not the pen pal, but the phone pal of Poroshenko and Arseny Yacineuk and now the speaker. For the past 4 years, I have been on the phone with them for 2 to 3 hours a week. Some in Europe argue that Russia already controlled Ukraine before these presidents came into power, so why bother with sanctions? Last year, I was authorized to say that we would provide $1 billion, but only if the chief prosecutor was fired. We are not playing games, we know that if we give the EU an excuse, at least 5 countries will want to leave. We are working on a detailed roadmap for Ukraine's political steps and security guarantees from Russia. It won't be easy, but I am convinced they will do it.

I established a foundation in Ukraine prior to its independence from Russia, which has been active and influential in recent events. I appreciate criticism, but it should align with my views. During the upheaval, members of Congress, notably John McCain, visited Ukraine, showing support for those challenging their government. McCain's presence reassured the protesters in Maidan that they had backing from the United States. He emphasized that the struggle was about the future they desired and deserved for their country. What about the US ambassador?

When the Maidan revolution happened, I was asked to advise the new Ukrainian prime minister on the economic crisis. I flew to Kyiv, and while there, I was told that the US had financed the people at Maidan. This supposed spontaneous revolution of dignity raises some questions. Where did all the media outlets come from? Who organized this? Where did the buses come from, and who called all those people in? It was clearly an organized effort.

The speaker discusses the transition of protests into a revolution aimed at toppling the elected government. Their agenda includes changing the president and signing an association agreement to strengthen Ukraine's business environment. They express support for Ukraine, stating, "The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you." They emphasize the importance of signing the association agreement soon and suggest Yatseniuk is the right person due to his economic and governing experience. They commend the Ukrainians for peacefully protesting against tyranny and expect the Ukrainian government to show restraint and avoid violence against peaceful protesters.

Senator John McCain addressed protesters in Kyiv, hoping to bring about a peaceful transition and a legitimate society for the Ukrainian people. He stated this is a grassroots revolution that has been peaceful, except when the government tried to crack down on them. Regarding the US role, McCain said he doesn't think the US would be taking on Russia by supporting the protesters. He expressed pleasure with Secretary Kerry's statement and Deputy Secretary Victoria Nuland's presence. He stated that these people love the United States and freedom, and supporting them aligns with America's traditional support for those who want a free and democratic society. McCain clarified that military action and blockades are not being considered, but sanctions are a possibility if the Ukrainian government continues to brutally repress its people, as that would require action from the United States.

When the Maidan happened, I was asked to meet with the new Ukrainian prime minister to discuss the economic crisis. I went to Kyiv, and while I was there, I was told that the US had paid for all the people at the Maidan. People call it a spontaneous revolution of dignity, but where do all the media outlets, the organization, the buses, and the people come from? It's clear that this was an organized effort.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in the effort to remove the prosecutor. The entire administration, including Obama, the vice president, and myself, worked towards this goal. We believed that Ukraine needed to get rid of the prosecutor in order to succeed in the revolution. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor was not fired, they would not receive the $1,000,000,000. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired, and Ukraine was able to move forward.

I have been in regular contact with Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk over the past four years, spending 2 to 3 hours weekly on the phone. There's a strong sentiment in Europe questioning the need for sanctions against Ukraine, given its past under Russian influence. Last year, I withheld a $1 billion aid tranche until Ukraine fired its chief prosecutor, emphasizing the importance of forming a new government committed to reform. We are developing a roadmap outlining security guarantees from Russia and necessary political steps for Ukraine, which include difficult constitutional amendments. These changes are essential to prevent any EU member states from seeking to withdraw from sanctions. Ukraine has already made progress in areas like energy, and I believe they are willing to undertake the necessary reforms.

As secretary of state, I was deeply involved in getting rid of the prosecutor. The whole administration, including Obama, the vice president, and the ambassador, worked towards this goal. We knew that Ukraine needed to remove the prosecutor to succeed in the revolution. I made it clear to them that if the prosecutor wasn't fired, they wouldn't receive the $1 billion. Eventually, the prosecutor was fired.

A foundation was established in Ukraine before its independence from Russia and has been functioning since, playing a role in current events. A member of congress stated that members of congress, including John McCain, visited Ukraine during that period. According to the speaker, some individuals challenging their elected government were told by a senior US official, who had run for president and was a top official in the US Congress, that the US was with them. Senator McCain said it was always a pleasure to be back in Ukraine and stated, "This is about the future you want for your country. This is about the future you deserve." Another speaker claimed that Senator McCain gave the people in the Maiden a feeling that they had the backing of the most powerful country on earth.

Senator John McCain is in Kyiv supporting peaceful protests for a legitimate society. He praises the Ukrainian people's peaceful demonstrations for change. He believes the US should consider sanctions if the government continues to repress its people, emphasizing America's support for freedom and democracy. This is not about military action, but standing up for what the US believes in.

In February 2014, the US actively worked to overthrow Yanukovych. You can hear this in the phone call between Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador Peter Piatt. It's fascinating. In the call, I mentioned that Klitschko shouldn't be in the government, it's not necessary or a good idea. Yatseniuk is the right person because of his economic and governing experience. Also, "fuck the EU." We need to do something to make this situation better.