reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the misconception that sunlight causes skin cancer, emphasizing that lack of sun exposure can actually increase the risk. They explain that UVB is not the main culprit, but rather UVA. Sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, increasing cancer risk. Excessive use of sunscreen with harmful chemicals can harm the skin and potentially cause skin cancer. The speaker advises against washing off vitamin D-producing oils on the skin immediately after sun exposure. They also highlight the importance of maintaining healthy skin bacteria by avoiding excessive use of soap.

Skin cancers are the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the US, and the public is constantly told to avoid the sun to prevent them. However, while relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight. Sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body, as avoiding it doubles one's rate of dying and significantly increases their risk of cancer. A strong case can be made that the dermatology profession rebranded themselves to skin cancer fighters, allowing them to become one of the highest paying medical specialties. Despite billions spent each year, there has been no substantial change in skin cancer deaths. Sunlight is critical for mental health, and women with higher solar UVB exposure had half the incidence of breast cancer. Men with higher residential solar exposure had half the incidence of fatal prostate cancer. A study found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. Nonsmokers who avoided the sun had the same risk of dying as smokers who got sunlight.

Dermatology's war against the sun may be disastrous, as benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, while the deadliest skin cancers are linked to lack of sunlight. Sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient, and avoiding it doubles one's rate of dying and increases cancer risk. The dermatology profession rebranded itself as skin cancer fighters, becoming a high-paying specialty, yet skin cancer deaths haven't substantially changed. Sunlight is critical for mental health; nurses lacking sun exposure had worse mental health. Higher solar UVB exposure was linked to half the incidence of breast cancer in women and fatal prostate cancer in men. A study found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. The largest benefit of sun exposure was seen in smokers. The American Academy of Dermatology says skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US, but most diagnosed skin cancers are benign. They encourage staying out of tanning beds and using sunscreen. Basal cell carcinoma, linked to sun exposure, rarely metastasizes and has a near-zero fatality rate.

The speaker discusses the misconception that sunlight causes skin cancer. They explain that lack of sunshine actually leads to skin cancer and that UVB is not the main cause, but rather UVA. They mention that using sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, which increases the risk of cancer. The speaker emphasizes the importance of maintaining normal vitamin D levels, as 77% of all cancers can be avoided with adequate levels. They also mention that countries with high UV radiation have lower rates of skin cancer compared to countries with less sun exposure. The speaker warns against the harmful effects of sunscreens, which can contain carcinogens and lead to skin cancer. They advise against using soap immediately after sun exposure to allow the absorption of vitamin D and to preserve the beneficial bacteria on the skin.

We make energy from sunlight. People who are in the sun eat less food. Let your kids be outside in the sun. Take their shirts off. Let them run around barefoot on the grass. You know what you get from the ground? You get electrons. The same thing. It’s straight free energy. What runs through a mitochondria that makes all the ATP? The electron transfer chain. It’s not a fat acid train. It’s not a carbohydrate train protein. The sun is a nutrient. It is not out to kill you. The idea that the sun is giving you cancer is the most asinine, insane gaslighting, ridiculous statement on earth. It makes all life exist. It charges everything. We are alive because of the power of the sun yet you want to tell people to slather on carcinogenic chemicals, bake it into their skin with the suns and say, oh, that’s what’s aging you. I’m 51 years old. I’ve never used sunscreen. I don’t have anything done to my face. I eat a ton of meat. I drive a convertible. I want as much as I possibly can get. You know, because it makes me younger. They’re lying to you. They’ve lied about almost everything. Do the opposite of what the government says.

Speaker 0 argues that sunscreen is a product pushed by Big Pharma, which sells sunscreen while not promoting healthy choices like eating well or building a base tan. The speaker claims that pharmaceutical companies “took those chemicals and bake[d] it into their skin” and use fear of the sun to create a recurring customer base, including selling products for children and eventually pills later in life. The transcript contends that the real issue is diet and toxins: “What you're what you're eating,” and that consuming toxins leads to more burning, as the skin tries to expel these toxins with the sun. This creates a recurring cycle of exposure and illness driven by the supposed toxins in food and products. The speaker questions the ubiquity of sunscreen by contrasting humans with animals, noting that birds and other animals don’t wear sunscreen, even though humans are told to use it and follow doctor recommendations allegedly paid by Big Pharma. The implication is that consumer fear is manipulated and that medical professionals may be influenced by industry interests. The overall claim is that the sunscreen narrative is fear-based, designed to keep people buying sunscreen annually and to push products onto children, with a broader scheme to keep people sick and generate ongoing pharmaceutical sales. The speaker frames the sunscreen recommendation as a contrived protection tactic that benefits industry rather than solely protecting health.

People get energy from sunlight, and those in the sun eat less food. Children should be outside in the sun without shirts, running barefoot on the grass to get electrons, which is free energy. The electron transfer chain in mitochondria is powered by the sun. The idea that the sun causes cancer is false. The sun is a nutrient that makes all life exist and charges everything. Sunscreen contains carcinogenic chemicals. The speaker, age 51, has never used sunscreen, has had no work done, eats meat, and drives a convertible to maximize sun exposure because it makes them younger. The government is lying. Do the opposite of what the government says.

If any doctor ever tells you to stay out of the sun, you should fire that doctor immediately. 1,200 scientific research papers prove that the sun is crucial for our health, that you should never use sun protection products if you want to be healthy, And that you should go to the sun between eleven and one at the highest noon. Skin cancer is not an issue. There's only one important skin cancer. That's melanoma. And melanoma is protected thanks to the sun. The sun does not create melanoma, the sun protects us from melanoma according to science. That immediately should tell you that doctors have been lying to you. Because according to their logic, when they tell you to stay out of the sun because of melanoma, you should have melanomas on the face, shouldn't you?

Humans ask how long they can be in the sun because they've been brainwashed to fear it, unlike animals. The sun provides UVB, which has two main functions: manufacturing vitamin D, only one of thousands of photoproducts, and triggering warning signs when it's time to get out of the sun. The feeling of warmth indicates it's time for shade. Sunscreen prevents UVB from doing its job, causing people to stay in the sun too long and be exposed to damaging parts of the solar spectrum. Listening to your skin and avoiding sunscreen allows nature to guide sun exposure.

A Midwestern doctor discusses the negative impact of avoiding sunlight, linking lack of sun exposure to increased cancer risk and mortality rates. Sunlight is crucial for mental health and may reduce the risk of various cancers. The American Academy of Dermatology emphasizes the importance of sun protection to prevent skin cancer, but most cases are treatable if detected early. Basal cell carcinoma, caused by sun exposure, is not typically life-threatening. Sunlight avoidance may increase the risk of dying, especially among smokers. The speaker questions the dermatology profession's focus on skin cancer prevention and highlights the benefits of moderate sun exposure.

The speaker argues that tanning with a UV bulb has benefits and presents tanning as a solution while noting that government actions block out the sun. They claim that during Obama's administration tanning beds were targeted to be taxed to eliminate them, and that this tax “worked,” causing many people to stop tanning because they feared skin issues. The speaker contends the real factors were the lotions and what people are eating, and asserts that the government targets anything that could make people healthy, such as the sun or UV bulbs, especially in opposition to “big harma.” They recount a claim about Kellogg’s, stating Kellogg's was the creator of the first tanning bed in the 1890s, supposedly to find a solution to diabetes, and suggesting his cereal was causing diabetes while he actually wanted a solution. The speaker then references the early 1900s, noting that hospitals would put people out in the sun and that this was a natural method of healing, contrasting it with injections, radiation, chemotherapy, and pills, implying sun exposure was the preferred healing method.

UV light lowers blood pressure. UV light increases the efficiency of the heart. UV light improves EKG. UV light balances cholesterol. UV light assists in weight loss. UV light is a treatment for skin conditions. UV light is also an effective treatment for many disorders. Going back to light therapy of 1933 in Germany where they used to heal people with light, then you go UV light increases the level of hormones. People suffering from low testosterone or altered estrogen sitting in the sun. Then we go UV light activates important skin skin hormones such as vitamin d, natural sources. Now why do they tell people to stay out of the sun? Because all these industries exist to keep making money on the people. And if you tell people that UV is toxic and you better stay out of that sun, well, then these industries continue to keep just going about. And that's what we see because these industries have been going on for a long time. Hundred about a hundred years of being told lies. And all we're doing, debunking it one step at a time.

Speaker 0 argues in favor of using a tanning bed, citing sources and reasoning to support its benefits. They reference the book Light Medicine of the Future by Jacob Liberman, asserting that UV lights are beneficial and that the tanning bed’s benefits have been downplayed by government action designed to scare people away from tanning bed use. According to the speaker, the tanning bed actually provides the beneficial UV spectrums, and this is presented as a key point: the tanning bed can deliver UV exposure that is advantageous rather than harmful. The speaker suggests a practical preparation before tanning, recommending a little bit of tallow on the skin or organic shea butter. They advocate using a standing-up tanning bed and describe it as “your best bet” for achieving the desired effects. The advice is framed as especially relevant for someone living in a cold, miserable environment, where stepping into a tanning bed for a tanning session is presented as a way to improve mood and well-being. A nostalgic cultural reference is included to illustrate a lifestyle pattern, recalling the phrase “gym tan laundry” from the TV show Jersey Shore. The speaker connects this sequence—going to the gym, then tanning, then doing laundry—as an example of a recognizable routine that ties exercise, sun exposure, and routine activities together in a way that highlights a perceived relationship between physical activity and tanning. The speaker contends that the government targeted tanning beds after recognizing their healing potential, implying that the initial motive behind government actions was to deter what the tanning bed could achieve in terms of health benefits. They extend this claim to a general pattern: governments intervene against things that would make people healthy, using a causal frame that links sun exposure and tanning beds with overall health improvements. Sunlight, in this view, is presented as healing, with an emphasis on a very brief exposure time—“five to ten minutes a week” or “something simple.” The overarching message is that a small, simple amount of UV exposure can yield health benefits, and that tanning beds are a practical and effective means to obtain that exposure, especially in colder climates where natural sunlight may be limited.

The video discusses the misconception surrounding sun exposure and skin cancer. It highlights that while sunlight is essential for health, the dermatology industry has promoted fear of the sun to profit from routine skin exams. The most common skin cancer, Basal Cell Carcinoma, is not life-threatening, yet the industry profits from unnecessary treatments. The speaker urges viewers to read the full article for more insights. Additionally, the video promotes emergency food kits from My Patriot Supply for disaster preparedness. Visit preparewithvnn.com to get $200 off on food kits for long-term storage.

The speaker discusses the relationship between sunlight, sunscreen, and skin cancer. They argue that lack of sunshine, rather than sunlight itself, causes skin cancer. They mention a new study that suggests it is UVA, not UVB, that causes cancer. They explain that using sunscreens that only block UVB can lead to vitamin D deficiency, which increases the risk of cancer. They emphasize the importance of maintaining normal vitamin D levels to reduce the risk of cancer. The speaker also criticizes sunscreens for containing potentially harmful chemicals that can be absorbed into the bloodstream and cause liver and skin damage. They advise against washing off vitamin D from the skin with soap after sun exposure. Additionally, they mention the importance of maintaining healthy skin bacteria.

The speaker discusses an article by Midwestern Doctor arguing that avoiding the sun is harmful. While relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the deadliest skin cancers are linked to lack of sunlight. Avoiding sunlight doubles one's rate of dying and increases cancer risk. The dermatology profession rebranded itself as skin cancer fighters in the 80s, but despite billions spent, skin cancer deaths haven't substantially decreased. Sunlight is critical for mental health; nurses lacking sun exposure had worse mental health. Studies showed higher UVB exposure correlated with lower breast cancer incidence in women and fatal prostate cancer in men. A Swedish study found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. Nonsmokers avoiding the sun had the same mortality risk as smokers getting sunlight. The American Academy of Dermatology states one in five Americans will develop skin cancer, and approximately 9,500 people in the US are diagnosed with skin cancer every day. However, most are benign. The Academy encourages staying out of tanning beds and using sun protection. Basal cell carcinoma, linked to sun exposure, rarely metastasizes and has a near-zero fatality rate.

Ultraviolet light is portrayed as dangerous and something to avoid at all costs. People live and work in environments blocking UV light through glasses, contacts, sunglasses, cars, offices, and artificial lighting. When exposed to the sun, sunscreen is applied, further blocking UV light. However, UV light activates vitamin D, negating the need for synthetic supplements. UV light also helps lower blood pressure and benefits the heart, arteries, and cholesterol. Additional benefits include assisting in weight loss, helping with skin conditions and other diseases, and boosting melatonin levels for better sleep. The claim is that an industry has been created to promote sun avoidance to benefit other industries.

The speaker describes living an Amish-like lifestyle with his wife in a cabin. He claims artificial light disrupts the circadian rhythm, negatively impacting overall health. He urges viewers to get morning sunlight to counteract this effect, stating that artificial light tricks the eyes and is part of a deliberate plan to steal minds, bodies, and souls. He believes this manipulation makes people sick, pushing them towards Big Pharma, ultimately leading to premature death. He asserts humans are meant to live over 100 years and encourages viewers to prioritize sunlight exposure and minimize artificial light at night. He says LED lights, despite being marketed as energy-efficient, are flickering and further disrupting minds. He encourages getting sunlight despite concerns about "Kim Trails."

Vitamin D is described as a "God-given miracle" essential to our natural design. While dermatologists often warn against sun exposure due to skin cancer risks, the speaker claims that more people die from lack of sun exposure and related cancers. The speaker asserts that adequate vitamin D levels can reduce all cancers by 50%. While supplements can raise vitamin D levels, the ideal method is sun exposure with minimal clothing, allowing the body to convert a cholesterol precursor into vitamin D. This process affects 10% of our genomics, optimizing our genes. UVA radiation is identified as the more dangerous type, while UVB radiation enables vitamin D production. Sunscreens filter UVB, hindering vitamin D synthesis, while allowing UVA to pass through, potentially increasing skin cancer risk. Studies allegedly show that sunscreen use increases the risk of skin cancer.

Speaker 0 argues that it was not until the 1960s, with the SPF push, that people were told not to go out in the sun. The claim is that Big Pharma created SPF and told people to avoid sun exposure, promoting petroleum-based sunscreens with many chemicals perceived as linked to illnesses the sunscreen is meant to prevent. The speaker asserts that, once you look at lawsuits, there are many cases claiming sunscreen causes skin cancer because of the chemicals baked into the skin for hours. The speaker describes observing people at pools and beaches who spray sunscreen all over their bodies and then questions why they experience acne, hormonal issues, low energy, fatigue, and infertility, suggesting that these problems stem from absorbing chemicals through the skin, noting that the skin is the largest organ. The claim is made that sunscreen makes no sense and that the sun heals, while pointing to the government’s ongoing efforts to block sunlight. The speaker asks why the government spends so much time blocking the sun and offers a rationale: if there were lots of sunshine, people would have revolutions. According to the speaker, cold weather keeps people indoors, watching Netflix and cuddling up, reducing the likelihood of revolt, whereas abundant sunshine would incite revolts, which is presented as the reason behind extensive sun-blocking efforts. Throughout, the speaker ties sunscreen use to broader social and political manipulation, presenting a narrative where the sun’s healing properties are real, sunscreen chemicals are harmful, and public policy is driven by a desire to suppress dissent. The overarching theme is that the sun is beneficial and that the promotion of sunscreen by Big Pharma in the 1960s represents a deliberate attempt to control people and prevent revolutions.

The Wall Street Journal questioned why sunscreen is not used. The speaker promotes a tallow-based sun balm as a healthier alternative to chemical sunscreens. They were fact-checked by the Journal, revealing conflicts of interest with scientists funded by Johnson & Johnson. The speaker suspects financial motives behind sunscreen recommendations.

Speaker 0 says that if they wanted to destroy everyone’s health, they would make people pay extra for food not sprayed with disease-causing chemicals, dump toxins into the water that everyone drinks, and invest heavily in making and marketing hormone-disrupting perfumes, makeup, skincare, and shampoos. They would get both kids and adults to spend hours each day sitting at desks staring at screens under artificial light, convince people that the sun is harmful so they avoid it entirely or cover themselves with chemicals, and persuade people that their symptoms are lifelong with a pill as the solution. They would normalize stress, glorify burnout, and make rest feel lazy, while also making all of this seem completely normal. They add that anyone who questions it would be labeled crazy or a conspiracy theorist, and they ask if they missed anything.

Speaker 0 says: We make energy from sunlight. People who are in the sun eat less food. Let your kids be outside in the sun. Take their shirts off. Let them run around barefoot on the grass. You know what you get from the ground? You get electrons. The same thing. It's straight free energy. What runs through a mitochondria that makes all the ATP the electron transfer chain it's not a fat acid train it's not a carbohydrate train protein if the sun is a nutrient it is not out to kill you The idea that the sun is giving you cancer is the most asinine, insane gaslighting, ridiculous statement on earth. It makes all life exist. It charges everything. We are alive because of the power of the sun yet you want to tell people to slather on carcinogenic chemicals, bake it into their skin with the suns and say, oh, that's what's aging you. I'm 51 years old. I've never used sunscreen. I don't have anything done to my face. I eat a ton of meat and I drive a convertible. I want as much as I possibly can get. You know, because it makes me younger. They're lying to you. They've lied about almost everything. Do the opposite of what the government says.

The speaker argues that sunscreen is a product of Big Pharma. They claim pharmaceutical companies told people to wear sunscreen but did not tell them to eat healthy, build a base tan, or clean up their diet; instead, they can “bake” chemicals into the skin and make people afraid of the sun to create recurring customers, including selling chemicals to children and later selling pills as people get sick earlier in life. The speaker describes a business model based on telling people to stay out of the sun. They contend that the real issue is diet and toxins: if you eat a lot of toxins, you’ll burn, since the skin is trying to expel those toxins; thus there is a recurring cycle of burning tied to toxin exposure. The speaker criticizes the sunscreen message, saying “SPF can’t be too safe of that big ball of life,” and questions why birds and other animals don’t wear sunscreen, noting that they are outside all day while humans follow infomercials and doctors paid by Big Pharma. Overall, the point is that fear is central to the sunscreen narrative, driven by a pharmaceutical-backed agenda and consumer conditioning.