reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Economic Forum is often dismissed as a conspiracy theory, but the Federal Liberal Party seems to be copying its policies. Scott Morrison's trusted digital identity bill is a direct copy of the World Economic Forum's global digital identity project. This bill aims to shift the global economy towards an access model, where you rent goods and services instead of owning them. It essentially means a life via subscription. While they claim it will help sustainability, it actually leads to a closed loop economy where the rich get richer and you have less. It's like a form of slavery.

The speaker will use their 17 years of experience at T-Mobile to illustrate how corporate America has turned against the American people. While many news sources cover Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), the speaker aims to show how these initiatives have personally impacted their career. The speaker is passionate about exposing the Great Reset and the World Economic Forum. They claim that these entities are significantly influencing the future of individuals and their children, even more so than American politicians.

There is a political movement that has used climate change to scare people. It started with global cooling, then changed to global warming, and now they use the term climate change. They claim the world will end in 12 years, but that's not true. We will adapt. The pandemic is even better for them because they can gain control. They can implement vaccine passports and restrict travel. We should be concerned about a potential bank crisis and the possibility of a central bank digital currency that can control our purchases based on our social credit score. This happens in China, and some technocrats in the US might want the same. We should be skeptical and ask questions.

The speaker is discussing the World Economic Forum (WEF) Agile Nations Charter that the Government of Canada signed in November 2020 and how it relates to digital credentials and other technologies. The speaker notes that the prime minister did not tell Canadians that this would usher in the fourth industrial revolution by changing how policy is made in Canada. After outlining several Agile Nations projects—Coordinating National Standards Body of Agile Nations, digital credentials, preloaded air cargo targeting, consumer connecting products, experimental approaches, anticipatory regulation, digital health software devices—the focus is narrowed to digital credentials and related technologies. The Digital Credentials Project is described as being led by Canada under Agile Nations, aiming to make digital trust and digital ID technologies more seamless across borders. It involves workshops, proofs of concept, and pilots. The speaker asserts that there is a lack of transparency surrounding these initiatives and points to concerns about government abuse of centralized personal data. Canadians are presented with a request for the ability to opt out of privacy-intrusive digital IDs, artificial intelligence, and smart technologies. Examples cited to illustrate potential government overreach include the Emergencies Act usage to freeze protesters’ bank accounts and the ArriveCAN app, which the speaker claims discriminated against seniors who lacked smartphones. The central argument is that digital IDs should not be mandatory given past government actions, and that people generally use existing digital means (bank cards, online payments) without government control over all their data. The concern is that a digital ID could enable government surveillance or social-political control, especially if linked with other data such as driving records, health information, banking data, purchases, or even sensitive attributes like religion or political beliefs. The speaker connects digital IDs to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), suggesting that a move to digital IDs could enable CBDCs, which could allow governments to track purchases and impose limits or programmable constraints on spending, travel, or item availability. This leads to questions about ethical frameworks, governance, and safeguards. The absence of transparency, public engagement, or legislation is framed as evidence that the prime minister does not prioritize protecting Canadians from digital ID abuse. Further concerns include the lack of comprehensive privacy legislation to regulate both government and private sector use of digital IDs. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) is described as focusing on businesses, with government roles under-regulated. Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, is noted as addressing privacy only in the private sector, with responsibility shifted to businesses. The speaker argues for a national, overarching framework to protect privacy, rather than pushing obligations onto small businesses. The speaker asserts that the Agile Nations Charter demonstrates liberal government intentions and urges ongoing democratic involvement to prevent executive overreach. Pierre Poilievre is highlighted as listening to concerns and promising that digital IDs will never be mandatory. The message concludes with a call to contact federal representatives to support a federal digital charter that protects Canadians from digital ID abuses by government and corporations.

According to the speaker, figures like the head of the IMF, Cristalina Georgieva, Klaus Schwab, and Ray Kurzweil from Google knew about upcoming technologies and were pleased that COVID accelerated the shift to a digital world. The speaker claims these events were manipulated behind the scenes by powerful people aiming to control people's lives and take away their freedom. The speaker believes that the sooner people realize this, the better.

Good morning, Justin. I want to address your connection with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum's agenda. It seems you prioritize your own interests over the people of Canada. Many are becoming frustrated with your actions, and it's time we stand up against this. We have the power to reject mandates and decisions imposed on us. I’m out here wanting to live my life peacefully, but I can’t ignore what’s happening. It’s crucial for us to unite, regardless of our backgrounds, and assert that we’ve had enough of being controlled by a select few. I wish everyone a life filled with adventure and happiness, but we need to confront these issues first. God bless you all.

The speaker expresses disbelief that the government has enrolled in the known traveler digital ID program with the World Economic Forum. They believe the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention that Justin Trudeau spoke about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, but then denies any conspiracy when questioned about it. The speaker doesn't care about being labeled a conspiracy theorist and is determined to save their country and inform others. They will continue to speak out and provide information to Canadians about the government's plans.

The Federal Plan for Equitable Long Term Recovery and Resilience aims to use federal funding to make communities more resilient after the pandemic. This plan will bring radical policy changes affecting education, housing, employment, and more. It will measure resilience by collecting data on individuals and entities, resembling a social credit system. Critics argue that it aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, transitioning America to a "well-being economy" with government intervention for equal outcomes. The public is urged to call for a full investigation into the federal plan and its partners.

The great reset is not a conspiracy theory, but a set of proposals supported by influential people, including Prime Minister Trudeau. It was mentioned in a speech at the United Nations. Some leaders reject using a crisis to push a political agenda.

Bill Gates is described as a top donor to the World Health Organization and as calling for virus war games every five years. The transcript claims Canada’s top bureaucrats have committed Canada to “captured” WHO rules that will make this happen, while saying the United States rejected the same power grab last year but Canada accepted it without asking. According to the transcript, nations that accept the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) “are signing over their power in health emergencies” to an unelected international organization that can order “lockdowns, travel restrictions, or any other measures it sees fit.” The transcript adds that the organization “doesn’t even need to declare an emergency,” and that “potential public health risks” are enough to initiate action. The transcript says Canada’s acceptance occurred earlier this month when Governor General Mary Simon authorized Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand to take the actions necessary for Canada to accept IHR amendments adopted in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 1, 2024. It states this was done “without parliamentary debate,” with “no public consultation,” via “an order in council,” while “Canadians are being left in the dark.” The transcript argues that giving the WHO this power should involve “a thorough public debate,” and says the arrangement is not an official treaty. It also claims the process “bypasses the US Senate,” which the transcript describes as playing a role in democratic oversight of major international commitments. The transcript further claims the IHR amendments use “extremely broad language” that gives the WHO unprecedented power. It says countries are required to establish “systems of risk communication” so the WHO can implement unified public messaging globally, describing this as enabling “narrative management and propaganda and censorship” based on what the transcript says was seen during COVID. It alleges the amendments were rushed through in Geneva at the annual World Health Assembly in May 2024 “without a vote,” with only a “loosely defined quorum.” The transcript states the WHO is led by Director General Tedros Gabriese (Tedros Ghebreyesus) and asserts that “pharmaceutical profiteering partners” like Bill Gates and his foundation are involved. It says Tedros praised China’s early pandemic actions and response and promoted the “safe and effective narrative,” and that the changes are characterized as about “cooperation and collaboration.” The transcript claims the IHR amendments “grease the wheels” for faster emergency declarations and more coordination with global actors, reducing Canada’s ability to refuse. It says Parliament “hasn’t even debated this,” provinces are “barely consulted,” and it asserts Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada emphasize global health security while the transcript questions who guards against “global overreach.” The transcript also claims the text confirms military-style virus war games as a core part of meeting IHR obligations, describing “recurring simulation war game exercises” as built into a regular global preparedness cycle. It says this normalizes top-down scenario planning that could shape policy and erode local discretion. The transcript concludes by stating that the next health crisis “won’t be managed from Ottawa” but instead “directed to you from Geneva.” It identifies the speaker as Tamara Ugolini for Rebel News and calls for sharing the information, demanding debate and transparency, and signing a petition at nopandemictreaty.com (nopandemictreaty dot com).

The discussion opens by recalling Sweden’s microchip implant program, where RFID/NFC chips the size of a grain of rice were embedded in thousands of citizens to speed up daily life—opening doors, access to homes, offices, and gyms with a swipe. When the program began, demand was high, with waiting lists and rapid adoption by companies, and it even received praise from the World Economic Forum. The World Economic Forum portrayal described the implantation as a minor sensation, with “a simple like a slight sting” and nothing more. The conversation then shifts to 2026, examining whether these chips are tied to Sweden’s digital ID and digital currency ecosystem, and how they might integrate with Sweden’s dominant bank ID system, which reportedly has near-universal usage (approximately 8.7 million users). Marie Z of Z Media joins the discussion to provide perspective on how chip implantation relates to digital IDs and tracking across Europe, Australia, and the United States, and to comment on related legislation. She begins by downplaying concerns about microchip implants themselves, noting that uptake slowed significantly after an initial rush around 2018. Her primary concern, she says, stems from an MIT admission in November 2025. MIT News published a piece stating that new therapeutic brain implants could defy the need for surgery, describing microscopic wireless bioelectronics that can travel through the bloodstream to target brain regions, self-assemble after injection, and be wirelessly powered to provide electrical stimulation for precise areas—aimed at treating conditions like Alzheimer's. She emphasizes that the technology involves self-assembling nanotechnology administered via injections (potentially through vaccines) with no human intervention required once in place. Marie Z connects this to broader claims about smart dust and geoengineering, noting that programmable dust has been discussed for years and that graphene has been repeatedly observed post-geoengineering. She cites claims about graphene’s use in medicine as highly conductive and capable of sending data back to researchers, and references Albert Bourla’s statements about future pills that could indicate whether a person has taken them, supposedly enabled by graphene. She asserts that studies and literature indicate possible covert deployment of nanotechnology via vaccines, medicines, and possibly food, and that the threat extends beyond voluntary chip implantation. The conversation introduces a provocative piece of alleged evidence: Ilan University (Bar-Ilan) and its chief scientist Ida (Ido) Bachalet allegedly presenting a 2013 TED Talk about implanting hundreds of billions of nanorobots into vaccines, with the claim that the controller is connected to the Internet like an Xbox and remotely controllable. Marie notes Pfizer’s 2015 partnership with Bachalet and suggests covert applications of nanorobots, connecting this to Bill Gates’ patent O60606, which she says proposes mining cryptocurrency with the body’s data via sensors and quantum technology, and references Gates’ quantum dot microneedle patch for real-time bodily data and potential monetization of compliance. She discusses Canada’s Biodigital Convergence policy by the government’s Horizons publication, which imagines a future where AI inside the body prescribes supplements and prints them, and a system where access to cryptocurrency depends on living in an AI-governed societal standard. The hosts and Marie acknowledge that free will matters and emphasize awareness and informed choice as potential checks against participation in what they frame as a transhumanist agenda. Marie closes by reiterating why awareness and scrutiny are essential and thanking the hosts for the discussion.

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

Speaker 0 explains that these groups have invested heavily to find excuses to push digital ID, urging voluntary adoption. They argue digital ID is the cornerstone of the entire UN Agenda 2030; without it, programmable, surveillable money and many online designs won’t work, and they frame it as something people must comply with, even though it’s pitched as voluntary. They compare digital ID to vaccine passports, suggesting that to change the direction of the world, people must plan to live in a way that avoids compliance with digital ID, just as one might navigate around vaccine mandates. In the United States, conservatives are portrayed as being pitched digital ID as a solution to illegal migration and voter fraud, while claims are made that biometric digital ideas are presented as essential to solving cybercrime, hacking, cyberbullying, and other societal ills. The speaker contends that digital ID underpins social credit and other Orwellian designs that are part of the agenda. A key theme is that the push relies on convenience: opting in is convenient, having money on a phone and a life centered on a smartphone is convenient, and voting every four years is convenient but framed within a system of “two lesser evils.” The speaker argues this convenience is a carrot used to enslave people, while resisting adoption is inconvenient and requires changing one’s life to be more resilient and sustainable for families and communities. They call for reconnecting with neighbors, meeting in person, and reducing online dependence to build real human connections and solutions. The speaker notes that during COVID, lockdowns contributed to isolation and pushed people toward virtual-only connections controlled by those who own the infrastructure, software, and platforms. The claim is that the power to set up digital ID resides with those investing in it, and people should reclaim power by actions in neighborhoods and families and by saying no to digital ID and the surveillance state. There is concern that digital ID enables not only real-time surveillance but predictive capabilities about future behavior, with intelligence agencies pursuing predictive policing (precrime) and extending similar predictions to health care to prevent the next pandemic, potentially eliminating the need for pandemics to be declared to justify emergency use authorizations or mandates in communities. The overall message is to opt out of digital ID, recognizing that this is the world some are trying to create, and that opting out is possible.

The speaker criticizes the use of the term "conspiracy theory" as a way for politicians to avoid answering questions. They mention a United Nations program that encourages reporting conspiracy theories to editors, which they see as a form of bullying. The speaker, who has a PhD, emphasizes the importance of knowledge and documentation. They provide an example of the government's enrollment in a program called the known traveler digital ID program. The speaker believes that the government tries to make people feel embarrassed for questioning their actions. They mention Justin Trudeau's statement about resetting and reimagining the future after COVID, which some labeled as a conspiracy. The speaker is determined to save their country and inform Canadians about the government's plans. They are not concerned about being labeled a conspiracy theorist.

Prime Minister Trudeau and young lawmakers in Saudi Arabia have the power to shape change. We must prepare for a more turbulent world and take action to create a fairer society. The idea of going back to the old normal is unrealistic. We need a great reset. The pandemic will only go one way.

In 2016, the UN decided to give everyone a digital identity for daily use, integrating driver's licenses, bank accounts, media, and health records. A global vaccination strategy was also introduced. This laid the groundwork for a social credit system, similar to China's model. Currently, they are collecting medical data and basic information, with plans to include CO2 emissions, financial data, and personal IP addresses linked to biometric data. The goal is to monitor internet activity. They don't care about our arguments because there is a hidden agenda. It's not about climate, helping people, trade, or public health. They want to maintain pressure on healthcare to push vaccinations. We need to understand why ICU capacity isn't being increased. It's important to recognize the manipulation behind the housing crisis and the division caused by fabricated issues like nitrogen emissions. We must unite for our collective rights and freedoms.

I am Thomas Bintur, a doctor with 35 years of experience in respiratory infections. I believe there is a pandemic of severe illnesses and unexpected deaths from various causes. The modified RNA vaccine is a medical crime and a humanitarian disaster. It injects a foreign protein into the body without control over its production or duration. This vaccine should be banned immediately. The government is negotiating a pandemic treaty with the WHO, which would limit our freedom of choice. We need to stand up against the manufacturers, experts, government, and authorities who have failed us in the COVID scandal. It's not too late to take action for a better future for our children and grandchildren.

We are gathered here to discuss the World Health Organization and their proposed pandemic treaty. We believe our freedoms are at risk and want to protect our future and democracy. Please read our leaflet and research these institutions to understand the impact on Britain.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

I just left the negotiations on digital identity, and I have concerning news. The member states and the European Parliament reached an agreement, meaning the digital identity will soon be implemented in the EU. Commissioner Breton announced that we now have the digital identity wallet, which he intends to fill with the digital euro, or central bank digital currency. This is troubling, as they previously assured us there would be no connection between the two. Privacy and security experts have warned that this development poses significant risks to our privacy and freedom.

The National Citizen Inquiry is hosting its first online live press conference since the hearings earlier this year. The commissioners will release a part of their report, focusing on a critical piece of evidence. With new variants and possible mandates, the commissioners believe it is important to share their thoughts and recommendations. This historical event will take place on September 14th at noon EST. You can join on X (formerly known as Twitter), Rumble, or the National Citizen Inquiry website. Don't miss out on the truth coming out. - Michelle

The speaker discusses the so-called Great Reset, insisting it is not a conspiracy theory and noting that it has been referenced by prime minister Trudeau in a United Nations speech. The speaker explains that Pierre Polyev, the federal conservative finance critic, recently raised concerns about this concept and was criticized by some in the media and by liberals for allegedly promoting conspiracy theories. According to the speaker, the Great Reset is the name of Klaus Schwab’s book. Schwab’s thesis, as described, is that governments and societies should “seize the opportunity of the public health and economic crisis to reimagine the world and radically change policies.” The speaker characterizes the proposed changes as a “grab bag of left wing ideas” that would mean less freedom and more government intervention, including policies that would “create massive poverty,” with particular emphasis on energy policy. Klaus Schwab is identified as the president and founder of the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos Summit. The speaker labels Davos as “the biggest gathering of global hypocrites in history,” describing it as a ski village in Switzerland where, every February, thousands of wealthy individuals, including billionaires, millionaires, global CEOs, and politicians, fly in with private airplanes to spend a week lecturing the world, including working people, about reducing their carbon footprint. The speaker asserts that the Great Reset is advocated by influential people and even alluded to by Trudeau, though the discussion centers on what the reset entails and how it would impact policy, government power, and energy policy.

Bill Gates' digital IDs will soon become mandatory for societal participation. This information is no longer hidden. Feel free to pause and read the details on the screen. For more in-depth content on this topic, visit my Patreon page. Thank you and God bless.

The speaker discusses the European Union's vision for digital identity and the use of vaccine passports as a precursor. They suggest that digital identity combined with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could lead to increased control and monitoring of individuals. For example, if someone uses CBDCs to make a purchase, their carbon emissions could be deducted from their account. The speaker believes this could result in a society with limited freedom. They encourage viewers to visit the World Economic Forum (WEF) website to find information about personal carbon allowances, which they claim supports their argument.

The speaker states they won't take policy direction from Klaus Schwab. They assert the "Great Reset" is not a conspiracy theory, but a set of proposals advocated by influential people, including Prime Minister Trudeau. Klaus Schwab's book, "The Great Reset," argues governments should seize the public health and economic crisis to reimagine the world and radically change policies. The speaker describes it as a grab bag of left-wing ideas for less freedom and more government intervention, leading to poverty, particularly through energy policy. Schwab is the president and founder of the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos Summit, which the speaker calls the biggest gathering of global hypocrites.