TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Using open source data, Eric Lutzen discovered that 17,327 Michigan voters above the age of 80, who were registered and voted, also had corresponding obituaries. Although I don't have the complete obituary data, I can provide you with the website containing the tabular data, which spans around 350 pages. If you have any specific questions about our findings, feel free to ask. Thank you.

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

These are examples of approved and failed ballots. The Voter Privacy Act prohibits inspectors from examining ballots to verify signatures. Many of the reviewed ballots have two different patterns of the letter "S" in the signature, even though some owners' names don't contain an "S." In total, 104,820 ballots were reviewed, with 20,232 having mismatched signatures.

A concrete example of alleged voter fraud in Pennsylvania is presented. The speaker highlights the case of Denise Ondish, who passed away on October 22, 2020. Despite her death, her application to vote was received the next day and her ballot was sent back to her two days after her death. The ballot was then received by the county office on November 2, 2020, and the state's website indicates that she voted on that day. The speaker asserts that this is hard evidence and encourages the media to investigate further. They mention that more examples will be submitted to the court.

In Arizona, there was a request to move the voter registration date to election day, but it was moved back to October 15th due to a court case. We found 3,981 individuals who registered after October 15th but their data shows that they have already voted in this election.

In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted but never marked as returned. About 96,000 of these ballots were never marked as returned but were still voted. This issue was not limited to just a few counties, as it was seen across the board. Additionally, some ballots were shown as voted before they were even received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities raise concerns about the legality of these votes.

A poll worker noticed that absentee ballot numbers were in sequence, which should not occur with mailed ballots. The worker noticed ballot numbers like 2232 next to 2233. The worker asked a supervisor about the envelopes lacking a specific date, showing only "November 0-2020," but was rebuked. The poll worker stated the sequential ballot numbers were all from the same area, Guarded Street in downtown Detroit, and the signatures looked alike. The envelopes had no date stamp and were missing the day of the month. The ballots were not in the system and were being entered manually, even though the details were not in the poll book.

There were duplicates found in the submitted ballots. A total of 16,934 voters submitted 2 duplicated ballots each, while 188 voters submitted 376 duplicates. In total, there were 34,448 duplicates out of 17,126 voters. This information was not included in the report. After removing the duplicates, there were 1,911,918,000 ballots received.

40,279 individuals who had moved across county lines within 30 days of the election failed to reregister in their new county but still voted. Additionally, 1,043 people used illegal post office boxes as their residences, 98 registered too late, 10,315 were deceased by election day, and 8,718 passed away before their votes were counted. Furthermore, 305,000 mail-in ballot applications were submitted more than 180 days before the election, with 13 sent to unregistered voters. According to the secretary of state records, 2,664 mail-in ballot applications were mailed too early, with 50 of them being voted too early and 217 requested, issued, and voted on the same day.

Due to AB 4, mail-in ballots surged from 70,000 in 2016 to over 690,000 this year. Despite facing accusations of fraud, our team diligently investigated every lead. Our experts discovered that over 42,000 individuals voted multiple times by comparing voter lists and identifying matches in names, addresses, and dates of birth. Additionally, approximately 1,500 deceased individuals were recorded as voting by cross-referencing male voters with social security death records. Moreover, over 19,000 people voted despite not residing in Nevada, excluding military and student voters. Our analysis also revealed around 8,000 votes from non-existent addresses and over 15,000 votes from commercial or vacant addresses. Astonishingly, nearly 4,000 non-citizens voted, as confirmed by comparing DMV records with the list of actual voters in the 2020 election.

Using open source data, Eric Lutzen discovered that 17,327 Michigan voters above the age of 80, who registered and voted, also had obituaries. The tabular data with this information is available on a website, spanning around 350 pages. If you need more specific details about our findings, feel free to ask.

Signature verification is a process used to determine the legitimacy of a vote by comparing the voter's ballot envelope to the affidavit. In the 2020 election, 420,987 ballot envelopes failed signature verification, and the system was never fixed. As a result, the same issues persisted in the 2022 election, leaving the system vulnerable.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s track when ballots are sent, and EB33s track when they are received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots were tied to specific individuals, but we lack proof they were sent to them.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

The speaker claims they were prevented from adequately observing ballot procedures, and that supervisors dismissed their concerns. They allege ballots were backdated from November 4th to November 2nd, and that data was entered into computers for these mail-in ballots. According to the speaker, poll workers entered ballot information from new mail-in ballots, including dates of birth of 01/01/1900, into electronic poll books and processed those ballots for tabulation, even though the information was not previously in the electronic or paper supplement book. The speaker also claims to have emailed Republican senators and House representatives information about dead people voting, referencing a website listing 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters over 80 who voted in the 2020 election and are listed in online obituaries. The speaker believes this is the most important election and urges legislators to fulfill their oath to defend the US and state constitutions, asserting there is massive evidence of voter fraud.

We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

After the election, it was discovered that 18,000 individuals who had voted were subsequently removed from the voter rolls. These individuals were initially listed as eligible voters, but their names were later taken off the rolls.

In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted without being marked as returned. Around 96,000 of these ballots were never shown as received back by the county. This issue was seen across multiple areas, indicating a widespread problem. Additionally, some ballots were voted before being received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities suggest potential illegal votes being counted.

We discovered through open source data that 17,327 Michigan voters above the age of 80, who were registered and voted, also had corresponding obituaries. If you're interested, I can provide you with the website for the tabular data, which is around 350 pages long. If you have any specific questions about our findings, feel free to ask. Thank you.

42,000 people in Nevada voted multiple times, including 1,500 deceased individuals, 19,000 who didn't reside in Nevada, and 8,000 from nonexistent addresses. Additionally, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. In our state, we prosecute individuals for voting twice, which occurs about 50 times a year. Of the 130,000 instances of potential voter fraud identified in Nevada's 2020 election, there have been no prosecutions yet. It's crucial to enforce voter integrity laws. While building a fraud case can take time, an honest investigation should lead to charges. Losing the principle of one person, one vote risks authoritarianism.

There were duplicates found in the submitted ballots. A total of 16,934 voters submitted 2 duplicated ballots each, while 188 voters submitted 376 duplicates. In total, there were 34,448 duplicates out of 17,126 voters. This information was not included in the report. After removing the duplicates, there were 1,911,918,000 ballots received.

Using open source data, Eric Lutzen discovered that 17,327 Michigan voters above the age of 80, who were registered and voted, also had corresponding obituaries. Although I don't have the complete obituary data, I can provide you with the website containing the tabular data, which spans around 350 pages. If you have any specific questions about our findings, feel free to ask. Thank you.

We found 74,243 mail-in ballots in Arizona with no clear record of being sent. In Arizona, EB32s show when a ballot is sent, and EB33s show when it's received. There should be more EB32s than EB33s. These ballots can be linked to specific individuals, but 74,000 came back without proof of being sent to them.