reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker's administration will implement "most favored nations" drug pricing, ensuring Americans pay the lowest price for drugs compared to other developed countries. Some prescription drug prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50% to 90%. Big Pharma must voluntarily comply or the federal government will ensure equal pricing. To accelerate price reductions, the administration will cut out the middlemen to facilitate direct drug sales to American citizens at the most favored nation price. The speaker believes the middlemen are worse than drug companies because they don't make a product but make a fortune.

The speaker claims the United States spends $1,126 per capita on drugs, while Britain spends about $240, approximately one-fifth of the U.S. figure, a trend seen across Europe. The speaker says drug companies claim America must pay for pharmaceutical innovation. President Trump is quoted as saying European partners need to increase their drug payments to cover their share of innovation, asserting the U.S. should no longer subsidize it. The speaker concludes that if Europeans raised drug prices by 20%, the resulting $10 trillion could be spent on innovation, improving global health.

Former President Trump claims that he was the only president to take on big pharma, but Joe Biden canceled his toughened pharmaceutical policies. Trump signed an executive order to ensure that the US government pays the same price for pharmaceuticals as other countries, saving American patients billions of dollars. However, Biden reversed this order, allowing other countries to negotiate lower prices while Americans pay high prices. Trump promises that if he is reelected, he will sign an executive order to end this unfair practice and make Big Pharma lower prices for American patients. He believes that rescinding his original order shows the power of Big Pharma, but he is determined to deliver savings for seniors and all American patients.

I am implementing a rebate that cuts out the middlemen in the drug industry, reducing costs and benefiting the people purchasing the drugs. Despite facing opposition from wealthy individuals, I believe this is our only opportunity to make a change. No other president would take the steps I am taking, such as implementing favored nations and buying from other countries at lower prices. These actions have made a lot of rich people unhappy, but I am determined to prioritize the well-being of the people over their profits.

The administration will secure "most favored nations" drug pricing, meaning Americans will pay the lowest price for drugs paid in other developed countries. Some prescription drug prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50 to 90%. Big Pharma will either abide by this principle voluntarily, or the federal government will ensure Americans pay the same price as other countries. To accelerate price reductions, the administration will cut out the middlemen and facilitate the direct sale of drugs at the most favored nation price directly to American citizens. The middlemen are considered worse than the drug companies because they don't make a product but make a fortune.

Under Biden, there has been a significant increase in shortages of essential medicines, with a 30% rise in new drug shortages last year alone. Currently, there is a shortage of at least 14 critical cancer drugs in the US. Delaying cancer treatment by a month increases the risk of death by 10%. It's shocking that this is happening in the US in 2023. China is the top producer of critical medicines, supplying 95% of Ibuprofen, 91% of Hydrocortisone, 70% of Tylenol, and almost half of all penicillin. This poses a national security crisis, not just a public health crisis. To achieve independence from China, I will implement tariffs and import restrictions to bring back production of essential medicines to the US, creating new American jobs.

Under Biden, there has been a catastrophic increase in shortages of essential medicines. Last year, new drug shortages were up by 30%, with 295 shortages by the end of 2022 alone. There is currently a shortage of critical cancer drugs in the US, which increases the risk of death by at least 10% with each month of delay. This is unacceptable in 2023. China is the top producer of critical medicines, supplying 95% of Ibuprofen, 91% of Hydrocortisone, 70% of Tylenol, and almost half of all penicillin. This poses a national security crisis. To address this, I will implement tariffs and import restrictions to bring back production of essential medicines to the US, creating new American jobs.

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, influenced by China, especially during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. The United States was paying nearly $500 million annually, significantly more than China's contribution. I ended this relationship, but Biden rejoined without negotiations, pushing for a pandemic treaty that could compromise U.S. sovereignty and promote censorship on public health issues. Under my next administration, that treaty will be terminated, and the U.S. will withdraw from the WHO, which failed during the pandemic. I aim to create a new coalition focused on health while preserving national sovereignty. I had the opportunity to renegotiate a lower fee to rejoin the WHO, but Biden chose the higher amount. This is just one example of the many issues facing our country. Thank you.

I am implementing a rebate that cuts out the middlemen in the drug industry, reducing costs and benefiting the people who purchase the drugs. This has made me a target for wealthy individuals who are not pleased with my actions. However, I believe that we have a unique opportunity to make a change that no other president would dare to do. By implementing a favored nations approach and buying drugs from other countries at lower prices, we can further reduce costs. Despite the opposition from these rich individuals, I am determined to continue with this initiative.

I will bring prices down starting on day one. But that isn't true. Since day one of my presidency, prices have not gone down. They're up, and inflation is getting worse, including the price of gas. Their plan is awful. The Republican plan is to win, families and families win, and billions win. That is the truth.

I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one. That is simply not true. Since day one of my predecessor's presidency, prices have not gone down; they have gone up. Inflation is getting worse. The prices of gas are high. Their plan is awful. The Republican plan is simple: Billionaires win, and families lose. That is the truth.

I aim to eliminate middlemen and reduce costs in the pharmaceutical industry, allowing the money saved to benefit drug purchasers. Unlike drug companies, who produce tangible products, these middlemen do not contribute in the same way. My enemies, who are wealthy individuals, are displeased with my actions. However, I believe this is our only opportunity to make a change, as no other president would take such steps. This may be my last appearance for a while.

Politicians have long promised to eliminate the discrepancy between drug prices in the U.S. and Europe. This was a key issue for Bernie Sanders, but previous leaders haven't acted on it. Politicians make these promises knowing they likely won't have to fulfill them. The reason is that Congress is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. There is at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every congressman, senator, and Supreme Court member.

We're paying too much for drugs compared to other countries, and existing laws make it hard to lower costs. The middlemen in the drug industry are profiting significantly without adding value. We're going to eliminate these middlemen to reduce drug prices to unprecedented levels. This topic dominated our discussions with executives and others involved.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes Joe Biden for reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies and promote censorship. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO and replace it with a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The speaker believes the government thinks Americans are too stupid to research executive orders. They claim many beneficial executive orders signed by Trump, including those benefiting minorities, women, children, and border protection, were revoked by Biden soon after he took office. Specifically, the speaker says Trump lowered prescription costs and capped insulin prices, not Biden. They also claim Trump signed an executive order called "safe policing for safe Americans" to hold police accountable for racial profiling and abuse of power, but Biden revoked it. Additionally, Trump signed an executive order against gender and racial stereotyping, which Biden also revoked, allegedly leading to DEI initiatives. The speaker accuses Biden of renaming similar policies and claiming them as his own. They urge listeners to research these claims themselves.

I'm committed to making America healthier than other countries. Will you guarantee the same healthcare coverage that other major countries provide? Corruption isn't just in federal agencies; it's in Congress too. Many members here, including you, accept millions from the pharmaceutical industry to protect their interests. I ran for president and received millions in contributions, but none came from pharmaceutical executives or PACs. My support comes from workers, not corporate interests. You were the largest recipient of pharmaceutical donations in 2020. No, I received support from workers across the country, not from corporations. You still haven't answered the last question.

Politicians have long promised to address the discrepancy between drug prices in the U.S. and Europe. This issue was central to Bernie Sanders' presidential campaigns. However, these promises were never fulfilled because Congress is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. There is at least one pharmaceutical lobbyist for every member of Congress, the Senate, and the Supreme Court.

As a presidential candidate, the speaker plans to set drug prices based on fair market value, charging American consumers the average global price for drugs. For example, insulin prices would be impacted. If companies don't cooperate, the speaker intends to address drugs developed with federal funding. For any drug that benefited from taxpayer-funded research and development, and where companies fail to comply with pricing rules, the speaker will seize their patent. The speaker asserts this action is permissible and expresses the determination to execute it.

Americans pay significantly more for prescription drugs than other countries, sometimes up to 10 times more. Pharmaceutical companies generate two-thirds of their profits in the U.S., effectively making Americans subsidize healthcare in other countries. The administration is introducing a "most favored nation" pricing model, ensuring the U.S. pays the lowest price available globally for drugs. For example, a breast cancer drug costing over $16,000 in the U.S. is a fraction of that price in Australia and Sweden. Similarly, an asthma drug costs almost $500 in the U.S. but less than $40 in the UK. The plan involves directing investigations into foreign nations that block drug products unless they accept low prices, and the U.S. will defend drug companies from unfair pricing demands. The administration aims to cut out middlemen and facilitate direct drug sales at the most favored nation price. If companies don't comply, the U.S. will use its trade powers and open the market to safe, legal drug imports.

Pharmaceutical companies spend three times more on lobbying than the next largest lobbyist. While many discussed the issue, nobody acted due to its controversial nature. President Trump, described as a man of his word, is willing to stand up to the oligarchs, unlike most politicians who can be bought. Despite allegedly receiving $100,000,000 from the pharmaceutical industry, Trump cannot be bought. The speaker praises President Trump for his courage and willingness to stand up for the American people.

The transcript centers on a critique of Democrats and the healthcare industry, framing the Capitol Hill hearing as evidence of a coordinated effort to undermine President Trump’s health care agenda. It asserts that Democrats and “the big insurance companies” are “combining forces to sabotage president Trump on Capitol Hill,” and claims this is exemplified by coverage and clips available on the speaker’s website and social media. Key points highlighted: - Democrats, Obamacare architects, and the pharmaceutical/insurance cartel are alleged to be “working in lockstep to block president Trump’s patient first health care agenda.” - Ahead of the hearing, the speaker says Loomer Unleashed warned how the proceedings would unfold, asserting that corporate health care executives aligned with Democrats against President Trump, Congressional Republicans, and the American people. - The speaker claims Democrats deployed Obama operatives—people featured on Barack Obama’s White House website—as “experts” on health care, alongside anti-Trump radical left activists who allegedly pretended to be health care experts, to blame Republicans for the health care crisis without addressing Obamacare’s effects. - Congressional Republicans, specifically Jason Smith and Randy Feenstra, are quoted as arguing that Democrats want to cast blame elsewhere because they do not accept responsibility for Obamacare, which the speakers say was always going to be a disaster. - A clip from Speaker 1 describes the hearing as “the first of more to come examining the entire health care sector.” The stated purpose is to question some of the largest health insurers about why costs are rising and how health care can be made more affordable for all Americans, asserting that Democrats in the majority previously ignored this issue. - The speaker claims that Americans are still struggling to afford basic care, with premiums “exploding” and patients being delayed and denied care “every day.” - The hearing is said to have shown that, instead of demanding accountability, a senior Democrat reassured CEOs with the statement, “it’s not your fault,” implying the Democrats’ recognition that costs rose under Obamacare. - The claim is reiterated that, after fifteen years of a Democrat-created health system under Obamacare, prices have “only gone up, not down.” The speaker indicates there is extensive video and article coverage of the hearing available online, including numerous clips and a summary article that highlights these points. The overall narrative portrays Obamacare as a disaster, accusing Democrats of avoidance of responsibility and of manipulating the hearing to deflect blame away from policy outcomes.

The speaker believes the government thinks Americans are too stupid to research executive orders. They were under the impression that executive orders signed by Biden were his own. They were also unaware that Trump signed executive orders that benefited the country, minorities, women, children, and border protection, but that Biden revoked them soon after taking office. Biden falsely claimed he lowered prescription costs and capped insulin, when Trump did it first. Trump signed an executive order called Safe Policing for Safe Americans to hold police accountable for racial profiling and abuse of power, but Biden revoked it. Trump also signed an executive order against gender and racial stereotyping, which Biden revoked, possibly leading to DEI. Biden revokes Trump's policies, renames similar policies, and claims them as his own. The speaker urges listeners to research this information.