reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether US citizens are being surveilled today and whether the photos and data of protesters are being collected and stored in some kind of database. The interlocutor, Speaker 1, repeatedly denies these possibilities. The dialogue centers on the idea of monitoring and database tracking of protesters or Americans. Speaker 0 begins by asking: “Are you surveilling US citizens today?” to which Speaker 1 responds: “No, sir.” The line of questioning then shifts to the handling of protesters: Speaker 0 asks whether “those people protesting,” who are exercising their First Amendment rights, have had photos taken and data collected and whether that information is being placed in any kind of database. Speaker 1 answers, “There is no database for protesters, sir.” This establishes the asserted position that protest-related data is not being accumulated in a dedicated database. The discussion then foregrounds a specific allegation from Maine: Speaker 0 references “one of your officers in Maine” who said to a person protesting, “we're gonna put your face in a little database.” The implied question is about the meaning and existence of such a “little database.” Speaker 1 reiterates: “No, sir.” He adds, “We don’t.” This underscores the claim that there is no database for Americans or protesters. Speaker 0 presses further by asking, “Then what do you think your ICE agent was doing to this individual when he said those statements?” In response, Speaker 1 acknowledges an inability to speak for the individual officer but reiterates the core assertion: “I can't speak for that individual, sir, but I can assure you there is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” He closes with a direct reaffirmation, “There is no database that's tracking United States citizens.” Throughout the exchange, the central claims remain consistent: there is no surveillance program targeting US citizens in the form of a database, and there is no database for protesters. The dialogue also highlights a contrast between specific statements attributed to an officer in Maine and the official denial of any such database, with Speaker 1 insisting that they cannot speak for the individual officer while maintaining that no tracking database exists for US citizens.

The speaker clarifies a headline, stating that three US citizen children (ages four, seven, and two) were not deported. Their mothers, who were in the US illegally, were deported, and the children accompanied them. The speaker asserts that if the children are US citizens, they can return to the US if their father or someone else wants to care for them. The speaker claims the US does not have a policy to deport children, even US citizens, without due process. The speaker explains that if someone is in the US unlawfully and has a young child, the parent can choose to take the child with them upon deportation. Alternatively, they can leave the child in the US. The speaker suggests the children likely have fathers in the US and that the family decides where the children go. The US deported the mothers who were illegally in America.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 are at a location in Florida, discussing the presence of noncitizens on federal property. Speaker 1 asks why noncitizens are allowed in the US while American citizens are not. Speaker 0 questions who is prohibiting them from being there and thanks Speaker 1 for their question. Speaker 1 reiterates their question and Speaker 0 explains that as Americans, they have the right to be on a public bridge under the first amendment.

An NBC News story reports that ICE agents raided an Oklahoma home, traumatizing a US citizen family. Immigration agents had a search warrant for the home, but the suspects listed no longer lived there. A mother and her daughters, all US citizens, had their money, laptop, and cell phone taken and were forced to wait outside in the rain during the search. The question was posed to Madam Secretary if DHS needs to rectify any mistakes and ensure the family gets its property back if this were a mistake. Madam Secretary responded that the warrant was for the house, which was allegedly being used for human smuggling, not the individuals, though some individuals present had similar names. She stated that everything was done appropriately and will continue to be handled appropriately.

Last night around 2 AM, I heard a knock at the door and saw three men outside. They were going door-to-door, and I knew who they were and who they were after, so I didn’t answer. I watched as they took people from their homes, mostly my neighbors, who are all Mexican. This morning, the usual five work trucks in the parking lot were reduced to just one. The place feels eerily quiet; I don’t hear my neighbors anymore. I’ve been looking outside, and there’s no one around. It feels like they took my neighbors away, and it’s strange because they usually don’t speak English.

A person says they had a good time. A Republican congressman appears and says that now that they're in charge, they're rounding up illegals. He is told that a woman he is targeting was born in the US and is a citizen, but he says he doesn't care because she looks like one of them. He says she'll have lots of company when she's in prison in El Salvador.

The discussion claims an “observable correlation” between Indian-born CEOs rising at major US companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing work to India. Examples given include Google: Sundar Pichai became CEO in 2015, when Google reportedly filed 2,896 H-1B visa applications, and by 2021 the number reportedly increased to 9,315. A participant describing work at FedEx says they noticed more Indians working internally and that the company outsourced work to India; they say that is what happened to their jobs and team after they were fired. They state that “They all went to India,” and describe being asked to train their replacement from India as “crushing,” adding, “if you go broke.” The conversation turns to job loss and difficulty finding work. One person says they had to sell a home in Sunnyvale that was custom made for them, and reports looking for a job for two years despite having experience and believing they “should have walked right into these corporate jobs.” They attribute their struggle to Silicon Valley being “flooded with people who work for two thirds of the price or even half price.” Another participant argues that the Indian community has helped America’s growth because Indians “come with a lot of academics” and have “always contributed very highly to the… American economy.” A further perspective describes dehumanizing and humiliating experiences, saying it felt like Google cared so little about the worker-investment that it would “just throw it… to any group” believed capable of doing the work. They also say forcing training for replacement workers “was sometimes kind of felt mean, you know, and harsh.” A different voice says they are an American and a US citizen but do not feel threatened about their job because they show up and perform their work, believe they have not replaced a US worker, and have adapted to the environment while continuing to work.

Speaker 0 is frustrated about receiving two tickets in one week for helping people in need. Speaker 2 joins in, expressing anger towards the feds and border patrol. Speaker 1 tries to calm the situation, warning not to damage equipment. Speaker 0 questions the treatment of his people and asserts his American identity. Speaker 1 emphasizes freedom in America. Speaker 0 urges them to go home, while Speaker 1 explains they are showing what's happening in El Paso. Speaker 0 insults someone named Perez. Speaker 1 blames illegal entry for disrespecting the country and criticizes Joe Biden's policies.

Speaker 0 describes a national targeting center that identifies individuals who have committed crimes, either in this country or in their home country, including those with criminal charges or convictions. He states that many of these individuals are already in jails or prisons in various states, and he emphasizes the request to local law enforcement to turn these people over to federal authorities. As an example, he notes that they have asked Governor Walz and Mayor Fry to hand over criminals they have in jail, alleging that 490 murderers, rapists, and drug traffickers have been released onto the streets instead of being transferred. Speaker 1 comments that some individuals have multiple names, creating a challenge. He explains that the problem includes people who enter illegally, may not have a social security card or a passport, and for whom there is no database in their home country because it is not a friendly country. Speaker 0 adds that some individuals have lied on their paperwork to enter the country, then overstayed and failed to appear for immigration court hearings after being notified. He mentions DUIs and other incidents as part of the context. He clarifies that their approach is to target those who have committed criminal acts, and if they encounter a TDA member in an apartment with 12 other people, they will ask those other people who they are and what their identity is, just as in any other law enforcement operation. He asserts that people misunderstand that they are doing the same thing law enforcement has done for years under the Biden administration, without changes to their methods in these situations. Speaker 0 reiterates that they ask everyone present who they are and why they are affiliated, especially when surrounded by criminals, and emphasizes that their actions are consistent with established law enforcement practices.

The speaker clarifies that a headline is misleading because three US citizen children (ages four, seven, and two) were not deported. Their mothers, who were in the US illegally, were deported, and the children went with them. The speaker states that if US citizen children are deported with their parents, they can return to the US if a father or someone else wants to care for them. The choice of whether the children accompany their deported parents rests with the parents. The alternative would be for the US to hold the children while deporting the mother, which would lead to different negative headlines. The speaker assumes the children have fathers in the US who can care for them. The US deported the mothers who were in America illegally.

During a hearing, Senator questions Mr. Morant from Homeland Security about the number of non-American citizens who have entered the country illegally or claimed asylum since President Biden took office. Mr. Morant and others admit they do not know the exact numbers. The Senator suggests there may be around 8 million individuals, with potentially half of them being children. However, the exact figures remain unknown. The Senator continues to inquire about how many of these individuals are still in the country, how many have claimed asylum but failed to attend their hearings, and how many have been deported. No one has the answers to these questions.

Speaker 0: Military assistance in illegal border crossings? Chris, come back up. We're in a public area. Immigrants are entering our country through the Texas border, Eagle Pass. The military is willingly aiding them. This includes men, women, and children. Let's approach them and ask why.

Senator Alex Padilla states that a half dozen violent criminals are being rotated. Someone states there is no recording allowed out here per the FBI. Another person says that you can record.

Is anyone affected by the president's order currently being held here? I was informed that no one else will be released tonight. Thank you.

Speaker 0 asks for an ID from Speaker 1, insisting, “Do you have an ID on you, ma'am?” Speaker 1 replies, “I don't need a ID to walk around in in my city.” Speaker 0 presses for IDs, warning, “If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you.” Speaker 1 refuses, saying, “I don't need to take out you take out your ID.” Speaker 0 presses again: “Hey, ma'am.” Speaker 1 asserts, “It's ma'am. Am US citizen. I am US citizen.” Speaker 0 asks, “Alright. Can we see an ID, please?” Speaker 1 repeats, “I am US citizen. I don't need to carry around an ID in my home. Well, where were born?” Speaker 0 questions, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “This is my home,” and then, “Minneapolis is my home.” Speaker 0 clarifies, “Ma'am, that's not that's we're doing an immigration check. We're doing a citizen check. We're asking you where you were born.” Speaker 1 insists, “This is where I belong. This is my home.” Speaker 0 pushes, “Ma'am, can belong here, but where were you born? Not gonna give you a ID.” Speaker 1 repeats, “I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point.” Speaker 0 presses, “Ma'am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct.” Speaker 1 protests, “You're making me a skirt. You're making me a Do you have an ID?” Speaker 0 again asks for an ID, and Speaker 1 repeats, “This is my home.” Speaker 0 states, “Ma'am, where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable.” Speaker 0 continues, “You guys, you terrorizing people.” Speaker 1 emphasizes, “Ma'am And it's not.” Speaker 0 asks again, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 states, “It doesn't matter where I was born. Belong here. I am US citizen.” She adds, “What else can I say? I am citizen. This is my home.” Speaker 0 warns, “Menia realize that if… [you] lie,” and Speaker 1 reiterates, “Menia, but this is my home.” Eventually Speaker 1 declares, “I am US citizen. I am not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?”

Do we know the origins of the individuals we're discussing? They're being treated as lawful US citizens, which they are not. I’m cutting this off because we have no reason to investigate or treat people differently based on appearance. Who said that? I did, and Tiffany mentioned it too. There’s no need to discuss this further. Concerns raised by individuals are valid, but we need to move on. I’m asking everyone to leave. I need a motion to adjourn. I motion. Second? All in favor? Good to know. Good to know. I don’t want to hear the truth. This car.

FBI agents arrested my husband in Coachella. This nightmare unfolded as we were simply trying to run errands. I want everyone to know that my family has been separated. According to my account, eight FBI agents surrounded us and stated that they had a deportation order for my husband, but they didn't show it to us. We have been married for 20 years, and he has lived in the United States for 30 years. He has lived in this country longer than his own. He wasn't perfect, but he paid for whatever he did.

Speaker 1: Mentions there are many things she wishes people knew, but mostly with the administration she wishes people knew that “we're letting in criminals daily.” Speaker 2: States the big issue for the region is migration, noting “we poured a lot of money into Central America,” amounting to “4,000,000,000 over four years,” but migrants are now coming from elsewhere, including Venezuela. Speaker 3: Asks, “So what is the end goal?” Speaker 1: Asks why aren’t they allowing children, noting “a lot of children travel to The United States, David.” Speaker 2: Explains aid goes to female presence in Mexico, training women, and mentions working with gender issues in Pakistan, aiming to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. Asks whether US taxpayers’ money should be spent in “our country on this issue,” implying women may not care about certain aspects. Speaker 2: Asks how close Secretary Lincoln is to him, “five degrees separation,” and notes migration is a niche industry that flies under the radar; the average American doesn’t know what they do. Speaker 1: Thanks the chairman, ranking member, and members for the opportunity to testify. Speaker 2: Mentions upcoming briefings in two weeks on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill. Speaker 0: States migration is the big issue for the Hill and asks, “Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?” Speaker 1: Responds that he’s not accountable for that and says, “We do stuff,” referencing the root causes strategy, which is about giving money to support and help people at the origins of migrants so they feel they can stay there instead of migrating. It’s “Central America, basically.” He says they poured a lot of money into Central America, and again mentions “4,000,000,000 over four years.” Speaker 2: Asks if it’s doing anything; response: yes, for them, but migrants are now coming from elsewhere like Venezuela, and acknowledges that outcome looks bad for the administration and for politics in general. Speaker 3: Seeks the end goal and asks again why there’s a limit on who’s allowed in. Speaker 1: Cites changes in demographics in the United States; notes that Nebraskans are traditional Americans not leftists, while Latin Americans are described as leftists, framing it as a system to try to change demographics.

Alright, a dozen or so people exited a van outside Piedra, assisted by two NGO workers. These are illegal aliens. This is happening in broad daylight, while unaccompanied children are moved at night. Many of the 500,000 unaccompanied children brought into our country are missing or dead from organ harvesting. The people are given neon bags by a Mexican NGO and are headed to Terminal A, likely for Frontier Airlines to travel into the interior. I found two illegals escorted by a faith-based NGO out of Mexico and Texas. One was dropped at Delta. Another dozen jumped off the van and one with arrest papers is heading into TSA. Airport employees received memos about my journalism. I'm recording a male from Colombia. He couldn't provide ID, so they sent him to another line, possibly headed to Atlanta via Dallas. He was escorted through the gate without showing ID. This is Kamala Harris's America, with TSA escorting illegals into our country.

We are currently being taken away as criminals, which is the main focus of the message.

"Whoever you are, get ready and sleep with your eyes open." The speaker believes the administration would deport US citizens, stating, "Oh, hell yeah." They claim it's already happening and that it happened to them with two kids, ages two and four, who were with their mom. The mom was not a US citizen.

Where's the leader? Who's in charge here? You’re treating us like criminals. This is unacceptable. That’s my father inside, and my wife is in there too. Can you please back up? I’m already backed up; I haven’t moved.

Do many of you speak English? We want to talk to as many workers as possible. There’s a lot of concern about immigration issues, but you should know that you don’t need to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office, or the police regarding immigration matters. We do not handle immigration enforcement.

They hope those people will be released soon, but no dates are available yet. The speaker notes that "it's millions and thousands" hitting those, and that "it's all but little kids," adding that they have to go through everyone. James O'Keefe got that video.

Speaker 0 described that one of the group has been released while the other three tribal members could not be located. Council members from the Oglala Sioux Tribe, who are elected officials, gained access to the facility but were unable to find the three tribal members. They claimed they were not classifying people by nationality, noting that tribal members are United States citizens since 1924 and that there is nobody more American than American Indians. They questioned how it could be possible to target Native Americans with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and then imprison them, stating that such an action is legally impossible.