TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."

In 2016, the autism rate was one in fifty-four, and in 2000, it was one in one hundred and fifty. A study in Wisconsin looked at 900,000 kids and found the rate to be point seven out of 10,000, which is less than one in 10,000.

The current ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is one in thirty-one, with an extreme risk for boys. The risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is one in twenty, and one in 12.5 in California. Two years ago, the prevalence was one in thirty-six. Since the first ADDM report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8, or 480%. Twenty-two years ago, prevalence was one in 150 children. In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward, and most cases are now severe. About 25% of kids diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, and have stereotypical features like head banging, tactile and light sensitivities, stimming, and toe walking.

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

"autism is such a tremendous, horror show what's happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country." "We will have announcements as promised in September." "We're finding interventions certain interventions now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism." "In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study in history was done in Wisconsin." "They looked at 900,000 children and they were looking for autism." "incident rate of point seven." "Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids." "California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen children American children as autism, one in every twelve point five boys." "So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys." "We will."

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

A study of 900,000 children in Wisconsin established the baseline for autism in the US. The study found that .07% of children had autism, which is seven in ten thousand, or less than one in ten thousand. Today, the rate is one in thirty-one. The Wisconsin study also confirmed a four-to-one male-to-female ratio for autism. At the time of the study, just over sixty children in Wisconsin had autism. Today, that number is around twenty thousand.

Autism rates have significantly increased over the past 25 years, from 1 in 100,000 to 1 in 100. Some attribute this rise to improved identification methods, but concerns about childhood vaccines persist. There are various theories about potential causes, including environmental factors like chlorine in the water. Many people are exploring different possibilities to understand this trend.

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

The current ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is one in thirty-one, with an extreme risk for boys. The risk for boys of getting an autism diagnosis in this country is one in twenty, and one in 12.5 in California. Since the first ADDM report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8 (480%). Twenty-two years ago, the prevalence was one in 150 children. In all the core states, the trend is consistently upward, and most cases are now severe. About 25% of kids diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, and have stereotypical features like head banging, tactile and light sensitivities, stimming, and toe walking.

Autism rates are rising, currently estimated at one in thirty-one and one in twelve, a significant increase from one in ten thousand in the speaker's childhood. A large-scale testing and research initiative involving hundreds of scientists worldwide has been launched. By September, the speaker claims they will know the cause of the autism epidemic and be able to eliminate the exposures responsible.

The documentary follows a growing concern: the rise of chronic illness and neurodevelopmental disorders in American children, with speakers outlining striking statistics, personal stories, and contested science around vaccines. Key facts and patterns: - A shift from decades ago to today: more than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition; estimates cited include that over fifty-four percent of kids have a chronic disease, up from twelve point eight percent in the 1980s. One speaker emphasizes that in forty years there has been “the greatest decline in human health ever recorded.” - Autism rates have surged: just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism; today, one in thirty-one. Other listed conditions include ADD/ADHD, tics/Tourette’s, narcolepsy, sleep disorders, IBS, autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile diabetes, lupus, Crohn’s), eczema, asthma, seizures, and various neurological issues. - The central question raised: what is causing this epidemic of chronic illness in kids? The film argues that rapid increases in incidence cannot be explained by genetic change alone, which would take generations. Story and study arc: - The narrative centers on a scientist who was willing to conduct a study into vaccine safety and vaccine injury, but who faced career-risking consequences when attempting to publish or disseminate results. - The film’s narrator and investigators say they compiled hidden-camera testimonies, interviews, and raw stories from parents whose children experienced serious adverse events after vaccines (eczema, seizures, chronic GI issues, sleep apnea, language loss, autonomic and neurological symptoms, and death in some cases). Stories include a child who lost language after vaccination, triplets who regressed into severe autism after their pneumococcal shot, and families describing chronic, ongoing medical crises following vaccines. - The film frames a broader debate: vaccines are safe and effective, with extensive global use and long-standing public health endorsement. Yet it argues that the vaccine safety narrative lacks certain types of trials, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled trials for childhood vaccines. It claims that, in some cases, no such trials exist prior to licensure, and that post-licensure safety surveillance is limited or incomplete. Vaccine safety testing and regulatory claims: - The film argues that none of the 72 vaccine doses on the childhood schedule has ever been subjected to a pre-licensure double-blind placebo-controlled trial, which is presented as the gold standard of safety testing. It asserts that safety assessments and post-licensure surveillance often rely on observational data rather than randomized trials. - A critical example is the hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB): the FDA-approved trial cited shows safety monitoring for only five days after each dose, with no placebo control. The film argues this is insufficient to detect autoimmune or neurodevelopmental issues that could emerge years later. - Dr. Stanley Plotkin, a leading vaccine expert, is interviewed regarding whether five days of safety monitoring captures potential autoimmune or neurological adverse events; the dialogue suggests concern about the adequacy of such safety windows and controls. - The documentary presents the notion that the absence of a placebo-controlled vaccine safety trial is used to argue safety, while retrospective studies and unblinded cohort analyses hints at potential signals that would merit more rigorous testing. Henry Ford Health System and the “vaccinated vs unvaccinated” study: - Dell and others pursue a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study using Henry Ford Health System data, with the aim of comparing health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children. They argue that this kind of retrospective cohort study can reveal safety signals when randomized trials are unavailable. - The study reportedly found that vaccination exposure was associated with higher risks of several chronic conditions, including asthma, atopic diseases, autoimmune diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, Guillain-Barré syndrome), and neurodevelopmental disorders. They summarize that by ten years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health condition versus 17% of unvaccinated children; overall, two to four times higher risks across several categories were reported, with notable differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes. - The study reportedly found zero chronic conditions in the unvaccinated group for several categories, though the vaccinated group showed higher incidence in many categories. Autism did not reach statistical significance in this study due to small numbers. The presenters emphasize that retrospective studies have limitations (confounding, follow-up length, healthcare-seeking behavior), but argue that the signal deserves publication and replication. - The Henry Ford study reportedly faced professional and institutional barriers: a threat of defamation, failed attempts to publish, and internal resistance. The documentary showcases a dinner meeting where Dr. Marcus Zervos expresses willingness to publish but ultimately faces career risk, leading to discussions about “Galileo moments” and whether data should be released despite pushback. Industry and public health responses: - The film juxtaposes the public health consensus—vaccines save lives, the schedule is well tested, and billions of people have been studied—with dissenting voices from physicians, scientists, and parents who argue that independent, large-scale vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated analyses are necessary to truly assess safety outcomes. - It includes testimonials from doctors who faced professional pushback after expressing concerns about broader vaccine safety questions or demonstrating adverse effects in patient populations. - The documentary frames a call to replicate the retrospective study in other large health systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente, Harvard Pilgrim, CDC’s VSD) to determine whether the Henry Ford findings hold across populations, and whether impaired health outcomes correlate with the breadth of vaccination exposure. Conclusion and call to action: - The film asserts that if the data are valid, this would constitute a sea-change in our understanding of off-target and nonspecific effects of vaccination and would necessitate reconsidering how the vaccination program is designed and implemented. - Viewers are urged to consider the evidence, demand replication, and reflect on the moral and ethical implications of vaccine safety research, balancing public health benefits with potential risks, and exploring alternate strategies to protect child health.

Speaker 0 notes anecdotal data and studies suggesting improvement of Parkinson’s disease with fecal microbiota transplant, mentioning China studies and that Johns Hopkins will start a study on it. They say we’re at the beginning of all this and, in the future, people may look back and see how archaic some early practices were, such as operating on a kidney instead of changing the microbiome. They reference data showing a signature microbiome in anxiety, noting that during COVID people were very anxious, and that this could be related to the media, the disease itself, or treatments. Speaker 1 observes there is open-minded thinking around health, especially preventative medicine, and a strong focus on autism at the moment. They ask for recommendations on approaching autism through the biome or more broadly. Speaker 0 responds that they would love to work with this government and governments worldwide to address autism, which affects every country and its children. They propose that COVID eroded trust in agencies, government, and pharmaceutical companies, and position themselves as someone who could rebuild that trust by driving proper research, focusing on the microbiome, and understanding diseases thoroughly. They advocate for international collaboration among clinicians and researchers, recounting experiences with colleagues in Italy and Germany who were conducting clinical trials. They express a willingness to coordinate with international colleagues to apply successful approaches to patients in the United States. Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of global collaboration among clinicians to understand and fix autism in children, arguing that with one in twelve and a half boys in California affected, the issue demands attention. They ask, when is the right time to act—if not now, when? They conclude that the only way to fix this is for humanity to come together for the sake of children and future generations.

My son, born in 1991, has Asperger's, and I've heard from many parents of children with similar conditions. Since 1989, the vaccine schedule increased significantly, exposing children to much higher levels of mercury than deemed safe. For instance, newborns receive a hepatitis B shot that would require a child weighing 275 pounds to safely absorb under EPA guidelines. In 1988, 1 in 2,500 American children had autism; now it's 1 in 166, with many also facing learning and neurological disorders. Despite the alarming trends, the federal government claims there's no solid science linking vaccines to these issues. While we can't definitively prove a connection now, I believe future research will reveal a link between vaccines and autism.

In 1989, the vaccine schedule increased from 10 to 24 vaccines, all containing thimerosal with mercury. Children are injected with 400 times the amount of mercury considered safe by the FDA or EPA. A newborn receives a hepatitis B shot, but under EPA guidelines, would have to be 275 pounds to safely absorb it. In 1988, autism affected 1 in 2,500 children; now it affects 1 in 166. Additionally, 1 in 6 children have learning, neurological, speech, or language disorders, ADD, or hyperactivity, all connected to autism. The federal government claims there's no good science linking vaccines to autism, but science is often diluted in politics. While it can't be proven now, intuitively, the speaker believes that thimerosal causes autism.

As a long-term autism researcher and director of the New Jersey Autism Study, the speaker discusses the dramatic increase in autism prevalence. When the study began with the CDC, it was expected that autism prevalence would remain stable, unlike other neurological disorders. However, autism rates have increased significantly, from a rare disability affecting 1 in 10,000 to being present in every community. The speaker asserts that this increase is real and not solely due to better awareness. In New Jersey, rates have increased by 300% in 20 years, a trend confirmed by CDC reports and other data sources. The speaker believes future reports will show even higher rates, suggesting an urgent public health crisis. The speaker urges a focus on understanding the environmental or risk factors triggering autism, claiming that despite data collection, there has been a lack of real progress in understanding the causes, prevention, or effective treatment of autism. The speaker encourages a careful review of the CDC report and its supplemental tables to recognize autism as a true phenomenon requiring investigation into its root causes.

CDC data indicates autism rates are now 1 in 31, but California, with better data collection, shows 1 in 20 children and 1 in 12.5 boys are autistic. Minority numbers are even worse. Approximately 25% of autistic children are low functioning, exhibiting nonverbal behavior, lack of toilet training, and stereotypical behaviors like head banging, biting, toe walking, and stimming. This population with severe intellectual disability is growing as a percentage of the total autistic population.

CDC data indicates autism rates are now 1 in 31 children, but California, with the best data collection, shows 1 in 20 children are autistic, and 1 in 12.5 boys. Minority numbers are even worse. About 25% of autistic children are low functioning, meaning they are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors like head banging, biting, toe walking, and stimming. This population with severe intellectual disability is growing.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

The ADDM report indicates an alarming increase in autism prevalence. The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now 1 in 31, with a higher risk for boys, 1 in 20 overall, and 1 in 12.5 in California. Since the first report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8. About 25% of diagnosed children are nonverbal and have severe symptoms. The speaker disputes the idea that increased prevalence is solely due to better diagnoses. Referencing table three of the ADDM report, they claim the rates are genuinely increasing year by year. They cite a Wisconsin study of 900,000 children that found autism in less than 1 in 10,000, compared to today's 1 in 31. A 1987 North Dakota study found a rate of 3.3 per 10,000. A national collaborative perinatal project between 1959 and 1965 found 4.7 cases per 10,000. A UC Davis MIND Institute study concluded that the autism epidemic is real.

In 1988, the movie Rain Man introduced the public to autism. It explained that autistic savants, previously called idiot savants, have certain abilities and deficiencies. Autism was rarely discussed until recently when the number of diagnoses started increasing rapidly. The news reported a 57% increase in pediatric cases, surpassing AIDS, diabetes, and cancer combined. The CDC revealed that 1 in 68 children in the United States, approximately 1 million, are diagnosed with autism. This global epidemic requires a cure.

In 2016, the autism rate was 1 in 54, and in 2000, it was 1 in 150. One speaker asks what the rate was in the past and what is causing the change. Another speaker cites a peer-reviewed study in Wisconsin that looked at 900,000 children and found the rate to be 0.7 out of 10,000, which is less than 1 in 10,000.

At one time, not too long ago, one out of a hundred thousand children were diagnosed with autism. Now it's one in thirty one. The speaker calls that "ridiculous" and describes it as a "'massive spike in autism'." The opposition claims the rise is due to better ways of diagnosing it. The speaker counters that if that were true, then you would look into every single nursing home and they would be filled with autistic people, and you don't see that. If you personally had a child with autism, wouldn't you want someone to look deeply and widely at every possibility? I mean, that's just common sense.