TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They highlight one image with a little bubble and mention that it matches another image with the same batch number. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 2,304, image 59 and scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 19. They point out that both batches have the same little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They also mention that there are duplicate ballots in the batch, with one example being scanner 5,162, batch 2,305, image 92, which matches scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 33. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 59, and scanner 5,162, batch 235, image 19. They point out similarities between the two batches, such as the same little tail on a vote and the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't gone through all of them yet. They don't know the exact numbers of the total batches, but they believe that the duplicates occurred. The speaker concludes that the entire batch of ballots has been scanned multiple times.

The speaker points out duplicate ballots in the video, showing examples where the word "Republican" is written the same way on different ballots. They have a total of 62 images showing similar instances. The batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are provided as well. It is clear that the same batch was scanned multiple times, resulting in duplicate ballots.

The speaker discusses the issue of bleed through on ballots and its potential impact on voting. They mention that if the bubbles on the ballot bleed through, it can cause an overvote or result in voting for a different candidate than intended. They refer to a newsletter from Maricopa County stating that they use VoteSecure paper, which is thick and has a special coating to prevent bleed through. However, the speaker points out that they have observed bleed through on actual ballots, which raises concerns. They mention the need for further analysis to determine the extent of the impact on votes. The second speaker seeks clarification and confirms that Maricopa County's newsletter stated they only use secure paper that does not allow bleed through. The first speaker affirms this and adds that paper experts have confirmed the thickness of the paper should prevent bleed through, but they have observed thin paper stock being used on Election Day.

The speaker explains that when a ballot jams in the tabulating machines, an error message appears with the options to discard or recount. However, instead of following the correct procedure of discarding the entire batch and rescanning the already tabulated ones, they were repeatedly rescanning the jammed ballots without discarding them. This led to the ballots being counted 8 to 10 times, indicating a lack of understanding and confusion among the individuals involved.

The speaker expresses their intention to vote for Jason Shaw and confirms their ballot. They discuss the process of adjudication and admit to voting for someone who did not vote. The speaker, who is the election supervisor, mentions deciding to count only one candidate in the Trump and Biden race. They then express their preference for Biden and complete the ballot accordingly. They proceed to decide that a particular ballot should be left blank. The speaker confirms that they have scanned the same package multiple times. The transcript abruptly ends with the speaker mentioning having more to do.

There are two batches of votes being examined. The speaker points out that there are identical markings on different ballots, suggesting duplication. They show examples of the same markings and even a dot in the same spot. The speaker mentions having a total of 62 images, but didn't go through all of them. The numbers of the batches are not remembered, but it is clear that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail that appears on both batches, as well as the word "Republican" written in the same way. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. They highlight one specific image with a little bubble and mention the batch numbers that match. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots in the entire batch that have been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a tail-like mark on one ballot and explain that it appears on another as well. They also mention the presence of the word "Republican" on both ballots and a dot in the Fannie Willis. The speaker states that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they haven't reviewed all of them yet. They don't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batch numbers and scanner numbers match for some of the duplicate ballots. The conclusion is that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two batches of votes with identical markings. They point out a little tail and the word "Republican" written on both. They mention that there are 62 images in total, but they only highlight a few. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers, but they mention that the batches were fairly close. They also mention specific image numbers that match in both batches. The conclusion is that there are duplicate ballots and the entire batch has been scanned multiple times.

The speaker discusses the process of adjudication for a batch of votes. They mention a double vote and express uncertainty about whether completing the adjudication will accept both candidates or reject the vote altogether. They also mention the option to hide the box and express uncertainty about whether the check mark was accepted. The speaker then decides to vote for Jason Shaw and completes the process.

The speaker expresses frustration about a blank ballot that was not voted on. They mention being able to stop adjudication and scan and adjudicate all ballots, including the blank one. Misty asks if a ballot can be scanned more than once, and the speaker confirms that they have done it. They explain that they kept scanning the same batches of ballots. The speaker mentions that they have set the system to handle ambiguous marks and overvotes, but it should also handle blank ballots. They scan a blank ballot and accept it into the system, noting that the system does not know who touched the ballots during adjudication.

The speaker observed that when people received Republican straight ticket ballots, they often ignored them or circled Donald Trump's name and put them back in the envelope. The speaker noticed USPS boxes filled with these ballots on the floor. They questioned the legitimacy of the process, as it seemed impossible to count all the votes accurately. The speaker mentioned that only a small number of ballots were counted at a time, with each pile containing no more than five ballots. They expressed concern about the removal of many Trump vote ballots.

The speaker expresses frustration about a blank ballot that was not voted on. They mention being able to stop adjudication and scan and adjudicate all ballots, including the blank one. Misty asks if a ballot can be scanned multiple times, and the speaker confirms they have done so. They mention not receiving any more ballots until about 1. The speaker explains that the system is set to handle ambiguous marks and overvotes, but they want to see if it can handle blank ballots as well. They scan the blank ballot, accept it into the system, and mention that the system does not know who touched the ballots during adjudication.

The speaker expresses their intention to vote for Jason Shaw and confirms their ballot. They discuss the process of adjudication and admit to voting for someone where no vote was cast. The speaker, who is the election supervisor, mentions deciding which candidate to count in the Trump and Biden race. They express their preference for Biden and disregard votes for the other candidate. They proceed to mark a ballot as blank and discuss the ability to scan a ballot multiple times. The speaker mentions scanning the same package multiple times and receiving additional ballots later. The transcript ends abruptly.

The speaker witnessed someone using correction tape inside a tabulator machine, which caused the ballots to get jammed. The tape was placed back in the machine after being peeled off. The speaker explained that if a ballot goes through the machine with the tape on it, the machine won't read anything, and the user can override it. The speaker also mentioned that the ballots had no numbers at the top, but they assumed the machine wouldn't read them and the user could manually input the ticket type. The person operating the machine repeatedly put the same set of 27 ballots in instead of separating them, resulting in an inaccurate count. The speaker explained that the machine doesn't have a way to detect if the same ballot has been inserted multiple times, as the sensor and reader are covered.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, both from scanner 5162. They point out that there are similarities between the ballots in each batch, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they only highlight a few obvious examples. They also mention that the total numbers of the batches were fairly close. The speaker concludes that these similarities indicate duplicate ballots, suggesting that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

Both ballots show identical markings, including a distinctive tail and the word "Republican." The speaker points out the same dot in each image. They have a total of 62 images showing duplicates, with one example being batch 5162. The speaker highlights specific instances where the same batch was scanned multiple times, revealing duplicate ballots.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out specific similarities, such as a tail and the word "Republican" written on both. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. They highlight the occurrence of duplicate ballots and mention the batch numbers and image numbers that match. The conclusion is that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

The speakers discuss the flow of ballots and the involvement of a company called Runback. Trucks delivering ballots arrived on the third, then the fourth, and the fifth, continuing for days. The last day of the speaker’s involvement was the tenth, and trucks were still coming in. The ballots were coming from Runback, a company that does high‑speed scanning and printing of duplications, and the speaker mentions military ballots being produced or processed by Runback, though there is uncertainty about exactly what Runback was doing. When asked whether the ballots were printed or scanned off-site, the speaker is unsure. It is stated that all the high‑speed scanning occurs at Runback, and that those ballots go to Runback. There were no observers at Runback, and the speaker had not been called to work there. The question is raised about whether the scanning was done on-site at the Maricopa County structure, but the response indicates that scanning was not on-site and occurred at Runback where there are very high‑speed scanners. The question of whether Dominion equipment was involved is addressed: the ballots being scanned were not related to Dominion. The purpose of scanning the ballots in advance of tabulation on Dominion equipment is then explained: they were duplications of ballots that would not read through the tabulation machines, specifically ballots that came in from military and overseas. However, the speaker notes there were more ballots than just those, with trays of ballots being brought in, and uncertainty remains about where the rest were coming from. The speaker suggests that the remaining questions about the sources of these ballots should be answered by the county employees. In summary, the discussion centers on: a sequence of ballot deliveries over several days; Runback handling high‑speed scanning and duplications off-site; uncertainty about whether ballots were printed or scanned and by whom; the absence of observers at Runback; scanners used were not Dominion; the purpose of off-site scanning was to duplicate ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines, including military and overseas ballots; and unresolved questions about the origin of additional ballots, which require explanation from county staff. The exchange ends with a note that the remaining questions about the ballots’ origins are for the county employees to explain.

In the duplication room, the speaker witnessed a new ballot being prepared because the original one was damaged. However, when a Trump Republican ballot was entered into the system, it automatically switched to a Biden Democratic ballot. The speaker reported this manipulation to the supervisors, but it is unclear if any action was taken. The next day, the speaker was scolded by a supervisor for questioning the machines' accuracy and was warned not to discuss the issue. The speaker believes it is their duty to speak the truth.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, scanner 5,162, batch 234, image 59, and scanner 5,162, batch 235, image 19. They point out that both batches have the same little tail, indicating a potential mistake or coincidence. They also highlight another example where the word "Republican" is written the same way on both ballots. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't go through all of them. They conclude that the entire batch seems to have been scanned multiple times.

There are two different batches of votes being discussed in the video. The speaker points out that there are similarities between the ballots in these batches, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. They mention that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have time to go through all of them. The speaker doesn't remember the exact numbers of the batches, but they mention that duplicate ballots were scanned multiple times.

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes with duplicate ballots. They point out similarities between the ballots, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they didn't have a chance to go through all of them. They confirm that the batch numbers for the duplicate ballots are 235 and 304, both from scanner 5162. The speaker concludes that the entire batch has been scanned multiple times, indicating a potential issue.