reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video features a conversation between Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discussing the testimony of two whistleblowers who revealed a two-tiered justice system in the federal government. They highlight how the Department of Justice intervened in the prosecution of Hunter Biden, delaying the statute of limitations and allowing him to avoid criminal penalties for unpaid taxes. They also discuss an encrypted message on Hunter Biden's WhatsApp account, which contradicts President Biden's claim of ignorance about his son's business dealings. The whistleblowers provide evidence of the DOJ's protection of the Biden family and the lack of independence in the department. The video concludes with Speaker 1 mentioning retribution against the whistleblowers.

The discussion centers on accusations about government actions and the handling of whistleblowers. Speaker 0 argues that the FBI is examining the situation “to chill speech” and to silence Democratic members of Congress and other elected leaders who speak out against Trump. According to Speaker 0, the motive is to stop them from speaking out. Speaker 1 pushes back by asking for clarification, wondering what exactly should be stopped. The question arises: “Stop what?” and “you’re saying that you believe that inherent in the video is that Donald Trump has given illegal orders.” Speaker 0 responds that he will speak about Congress’s role in whistleblower protections, noting that there have been whistleblowers in the Biden administration as well as in past administrations. He emphasizes that Congress has a responsibility to ensure that whistleblowers inside the federal government and the military have protections, wherever they are located in government. Speaker 1 suggests that the message might be read as Democrats encouraging the military to defy the commander in chief over current orders that cannot be named, but Speaker 0 contests this reading, implying a misinterpretation of the message. In trying to clarify, Speaker 0 states: “Here's what I believe. I believe that regardless of the president, no one in our military should actually follow through with unconstitutional orders.” He asserts this as his belief, though he concedes uncertainty about other specifics: “I’m saying regardless. I don’t know. Regardless of justice. I’m not. I’m not understanding.” Throughout, the exchange centers on the tension between protecting whistleblowers and the implications of political messaging about the president and military obedience. Speaker 0 maintains that Congress must safeguard whistleblower protections across federal government and military contexts, citing the Biden administration as an example and noting similar protections have occurred in other administrations. Speaker 1 probes the interpretation of the video and the intent behind messages that might appear to call for disobeying orders or challenging the president, while Speaker 0 reiterates a belief in the obligation to refuse unconstitutional orders, independent of which president is in office.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about investigating allegations, but Speaker 1 avoids commenting. Speaker 0 expresses concern on behalf of millions of Americans and criticizes Senate Democrats and the media for not addressing the evidence. Speaker 0 asks if the informant who accused Joe Biden of taking a bribe was previously relied upon by the FBI, but Speaker 1 evades a direct answer. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of refusing to answer and calls it disgraceful.

The whistleblower revealed that the CIA intervened to stop the Justice Department from investigating a major funder of Hunter Biden. This suggests Hunter Biden's ties to a sensitive CIA operation in Ukraine may be the reason for his protection. Various key players, including politicians like Joe Biden and Mitt Romney, along with organizations like the National Democratic Institute and the Atlantic Council, are linked to this complex web of interests aimed at shifting the European gas market away from Russia towards NATO. The involvement of CIA-affiliated individuals and organizations indicates a broader agenda at play in shielding Hunter Biden from scrutiny.

Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of discrediting herself by focusing on trivial matters concerning Biden, such as his ice cream preference, instead of investigating Hunter Biden's alleged financial dealings with foreign entities. Speaker 1 claims Hunter Biden received millions from Moscow and significant payments from an energy company despite lacking relevant experience. Speaker 0 states that the Hunter Biden laptop story originated from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani and cannot be verified. Speaker 1 insists the laptop's existence is known and that it's crucial to investigate potential corruption involving Biden and foreign money from China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 also alleges Biden's brother profited in Iraq without prior experience. Speaker 1 asserts this is a major scandal that Speaker 0 is ignoring. Speaker 0 reiterates the laptop cannot be verified.

The transcript discusses Joe Biden's involvement in Ukraine and his son Hunter Biden's connections to a Ukrainian energy company. It highlights a leaked email sent to Hunter Biden and another person named Robert L. Peters, questioning the reason for Joe Biden's use of a fake identity. The transcript also mentions Joe Biden's role in getting a Ukrainian prosecutor fired and his alleged protection of Burisma's owner, who was being pursued for assets by the United States. The speaker emphasizes the perception of a conflict of interest and criticizes the lack of media coverage on the issue.

This is a story about a politician, Hunter Biden, who joins the board of Burisma and gets paid a lot of money despite being unqualified. The executives at Burisma ask Hunter Biden for help with the pressure they face from a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden then goes to Ukraine and gives a speech attacking the prosecutor, leading to his firing. The Justice Department didn't want this committee to see the facts, but information from whistleblowers confirms the story. Hunter Biden's communication reveals that he put Burisma in touch with Blue Star Strategies to gain support from US officials. The plan was successful, and the charges against Burisma were dropped. The Biden Justice Department tried to cover it up by slowing down the investigation. However, two whistleblowers and a judge in Delaware prevented them from getting away with it. This inquiry is crucial to uncovering the truth.

A confidential human source is someone who provides useful and credible information to the FBI and is expected to provide more in the future. They are paid $42 million a year. The speaker questions the credibility of these sources and then discusses Hunter Biden's involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. The speaker mentions a document called FD 10/23, which states that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to protect them through his father. The speaker also brings up Victor Shokin, the prosecutor overseeing corruption in Ukraine, who was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of bribery and calls for action to be taken.

The speaker discusses allegations of payments made by an undisclosed country to the Biden family. They mention that the family created shell companies while Joe Biden was vice president to profit from his position. The speaker questions if Biden's compromised position affects his decision-making as president. They claim to have evidence of $10 million received by the family and suggest it could be between $15 and $30 million in total. The speaker highlights that the countries involved, including China, are not reputable and even major companies avoid doing business with them. They emphasize the need for Biden to explain why his family received money. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of media coverage and promises to continue investigating and revealing the truth to the American people.

The FBI informant who accused the Bidens of bribery was arrested by Biden's Justice Department. The informant, Alexander Smirnoff, is charged with obstruction and making false statements. This move is seen as an attempt to discredit him and silence whistleblowers. Former FBI agent Stewart Kaplan criticizes the FBI's actions, stating that the evidence against the Bidens is substantial regardless of the informant's credibility. Despite arrests of informants and associates, the Bidens have not faced consequences. Biden's ability to avoid accountability is acknowledged.

The speaker expresses frustration and accuses the person they are speaking to of protecting the Bidens. They criticize the FBI for lack of transparency and trustworthiness, comparing it unfavorably to the past. The speaker accuses the person of whitewashing corrupt conduct and concludes by stating that the people who work for the FBI deserve better than them.

The speaker makes derogatory remarks about the Biden family, accusing them of accepting money from China, engaging in illicit activities, and being involved in corrupt practices. The speaker specifically targets Hunter Biden, calling him a sleazebag who took bribes and filmed explicit content. The transcript ends abruptly after summarizing these allegations.

The speaker claims that the biggest scandal was when their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees, saying there is no evidence. The speaker insists that it is all over the place and that it was bad for Biden. The other person explains that they can't put on things they can't verify. The speaker continues to assert that it has been verified and that they got caught. The other person denies knowing about it.

Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of discrediting themselves by avoiding questions about Biden's son and alleged corruption. Speaker 1 questions the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop story, sourced from Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. Speaker 0 insists it's a crucial issue to investigate Biden's alleged corruption involving China, Ukraine, and Russia. Speaker 1 argues the story lacks verification. Speaker 0 counters by pointing out the laptop's existence and the Biden family's response. The conversation escalates as Speaker 0 emphasizes the significance of the scandal and Speaker 1 questions its validity.

The speaker criticizes a colleague for not asking serious questions and reveals a difference between the Trump and Biden families' foreign business dealings. They suggest that if the damning information on money laundering involved the Trump family, they would be in jail. The speaker addresses Miss Murphy, mentioning whistleblowers who have had enough and asks for her opinion. Miss Murphy expresses support for whistleblowers and the FBI. The speaker questions if she feels torn, but she denies it. The speaker expresses disappointment in her lack of torn feelings and suggests it reveals her allegiances. They mention their own service in the SEAL teams and praise those who prioritize their oath to the country over their organization. They criticize the FBI for not protecting the American people.

A confidential human source is someone who provides useful and credible information to the FBI and is expected to provide more in the future. They are paid $42 million a year. The speaker questions the credibility of these sources and then discusses Hunter Biden's involvement with a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma. The speaker mentions a document called FD 10/23, which states that Burisma hired Hunter Biden to protect them through his father's influence. The speaker also brings up Victor Shokin, the prosecutor overseeing corruption in Ukraine, who was fired after Joe Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees. The speaker accuses Joe Biden of bribery and calls for action to be taken.

The speaker criticizes someone for not taking a serious question seriously and suggests that it reveals their allegiances. They compare the Trump family's foreign business dealings to the Biden family's, highlighting that the Trumps actually own businesses. They argue that if the damning evidence of money laundering were against Eric and Don Jr., they would be in jail. The speaker mentions whistleblowers who have had enough and asks the other person's opinion on them. The other person expresses support for whistleblower protection and the FBI's work. The speaker questions if they feel torn like the whistleblowers, but the person denies feeling torn. The speaker finds this sad and suggests it shows their allegiances. They mention their own service and express pride in those who prioritize their oath to the country over their organization. They hope for change within the FBI to better protect the American people.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

Director Wray, the speaker expresses concern about the politicization of the Department of Justice and the FBI during the Biden administration. They believe that senior officials have allowed these institutions to be politicized. The speaker mentions FBI agents who are unhappy with the weakening of institutional integrity due to the DOJ being treated as a political weapon. They focus on the investigation into corruption allegations involving Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. The speaker presents a WhatsApp text message from Hunter Biden to a senior Chinese communist, suggesting that Joe Biden would retaliate if a commitment was not fulfilled. They mention an IRS whistleblower who testified that the DOJ blocked attempts to obtain GPS data on Joe Biden's phone. The speaker questions whether the FBI tried to determine the locations of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden when the text was sent. Director Wray defers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss. The speaker accuses the DOJ and underlings of trying to stop the investigation and allowing the statute of limitations to expire. They mention another testimony from the IRS whistleblower, alleging that an Assistant US attorney stated that a search warrant would not be approved due to political optics. The speaker questions whether the FBI allows political optics to hinder corruption investigations. Director Wray reiterates that they follow the facts and cannot discuss ongoing investigations. The speaker criticizes Director Wray for not doing the work and hiding behind the attorney general.

Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma, a Ukrainian company, is discussed in this video. The speaker presents four key facts: Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of Burisma and received a large salary despite lacking qualifications; Burisma executives sought his help with a Ukrainian prosecutor; Joe Biden visited Ukraine and criticized the prosecutor, leading to his dismissal; and the Biden Justice Department attempted to cover up the situation. The speaker refers to released communications between Hunter Biden and Burisma, which show efforts to gain support from US officials. The video emphasizes the importance of two whistleblowers and a judge in exposing the situation.

Joe Biden was accused of lying to the American people, with evidence allegedly found in bank statements. The speaker claims that the media covered up these lies. They also express concern about the Biden family making money from China, calling it highly unethical. The speaker questions the nature of the Biden family business, suggesting it is only influence peddling. They emphasize that Joe Biden has been involved in government for 50 years and has been dishonest with the American people. The investigations into these allegations are ongoing.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to elaborate on the statement "they'll be killed," referencing Tara Reid and John Paul Mac Isaac's claims of fearing for their lives under the Biden regime. Speaker 1 states they don't know the context, but the briefing indicated a 3-letter agency told the chairman they couldn't amass someone for that reason. Speaker 1 takes this seriously, as it came from the FBI and was witnessed by others. They find it interesting Fox News received no comment when inquiring about it. Speaker 1 believes individuals fear being harmed for revealing information, given the proven corruption and the billion-dollar impact of politics. They understand that two testimonies are needed for impeachment grounds. Speaker 1 concludes that the extent of the alleged wrongdoings of the Biden family and Joe Biden is worse than many people realize.