TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Prior to the election, the FBI was aware of the Burisma scandals and the Hunter Biden laptop, which implicated them in a bribery scheme. Instead of properly investigating, the FBI attempted to hide the information, punish the senators involved, and censor American citizens by pressuring Twitter and other platforms to block reporting on the laptop.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The most alarming thing was the organized communication between the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and tech companies, involving flagging content in large numbers. Four federal judges have ruled that this violates the First Amendment. Former FBI officials within Twitter and other groups worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, despite it not violating Twitter's terms of service. The FBI and CIA had their own internal groups within Twitter. The Aspen Institute held a workshop to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Content moderators at social media platforms have too much power in determining what Americans can say and see. This collusion between unelected bureaucrats and tech companies is inappropriate and a form of election interference. The censorship organizations tend to have a biased leaning.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The media allegedly censored certain COVID-19 related theories, including the virus's origin from a lab leak, the ineffectiveness of masks, and the Hunter Biden laptop story. Facebook banned the lab leak claim, but the FBI and Department of Energy later suggested a lab incident in Wuhan was likely. YouTube suspended Rand Paul for stating that masks don't work well, and Facebook throttled a science journalist who opposed mask mandates for kids. The media initially dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian interference, with Twitter blocking its sharing and Facebook suppressing it. While the media now admits the story's authenticity, they downplay its importance. The government also allegedly pressured social media companies to censor content. The White House urged Facebook to crack down on private messages, and various government agencies, including the FBI and DHS, made moderation requests to Twitter. The Department of Homeland Security created a Disinformation Governance Board, which was later terminated due to public backlash.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan informed Twitter and other social media platforms about a potential hack and leak operation before the 2020 presidential election, despite having no evidence. The government had possession of Hunter Biden's laptop for a year and pre-bunked the story that eventually came out. The Aspen Institute held a tabletop exercise to prepare for a story about Hunter Biden and Burisma, with journalists and big tech executives present. The exercise aimed to discount and censor the story. Fifty-one former intelligence officials signed a letter claiming the laptop story was Russian disinformation, with the intention of helping Joe Biden win the election. This coordinated effort to suppress information is concerning and undermines democracy.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Former military contractors, including those currently employed, along with individuals from the navy, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security, were involved in censorship and the use of psychological operations and disinformation tactics against the American people. These tactics, developed by the US military and allies, were turned against the American people after Trump's election in 2016. Social media companies, with potential government support, engaged in mass censorship. The Hunter Biden laptop in October 2020 played a significant role in this story. FBI personnel were working at Twitter when it censored the New York Post story about the laptop, creating the perception of illegitimacy. The laptop was later confirmed to be real, debunking the conspiracy theory of Russian manipulation. US intelligence officials spread disinformation about the laptop, leading many to be deceived.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
It appears that the efforts by the New York Post and Steve Bannon to dig up dirt on Joe Biden resemble a Russian disinformation campaign, as confirmed by the Trump intelligence community. Russian operative Andrei Derkash and Russian intelligence have been trying to denigrate Biden, with Derkash being identified as a known Russian intelligence operative by the Treasury Department. The warning that Rudy Giuliani is being manipulated by Russian intelligence, followed by the emergence of suspiciously obtained emails, suggests collusion with Russian intelligence by the President. This is collusion in plain sight, without the need for special investigations.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Emma Jo Morris, a politics editor at Breitbart. I reported on Hunter Biden's laptop scandal in 2020, revealing emails showing Biden's involvement in family business deals. Social media platforms censored the news as hacked or Russian disinformation, with support from former intel officials. Recently, it was revealed that federal agencies influenced social media to discredit the reporting. This included FBI directing Twitter's censorship operation and granting top secret clearances to Twitter management.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We learn about DC leaks and the connection to APT 28, a Russian military intelligence hacking group. The morning the Hunter Biden story broke in the New York Post, it was confusing. We didn't know what to believe, but it seemed like a possible hacking campaign by APT 28. Despite that, I didn't feel comfortable removing the content from Twitter.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There was a coordinated campaign by elite institutions in America to delegitimize Donald Trump. They portrayed him as a stooge of Vladimir Putin and spread disinformation about his election. However, the Russian interference in the 2016 election was exaggerated, with minimal effect. Organizations like the International Fact Checking Network and the Hamilton 68 dashboard claimed that fake news caused the election outcome and installed themselves as compliance cadres within platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Twitter executives, including Yoel Roth, who reviewed the Hamilton 68 dashboard, knew that the accusations were baseless but kept quiet. The mainstream press largely ignored this information, allowing the exaggerated narrative to become the official one.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Facebook and Twitter faced issues with a story from the New York Post containing lies spread by Rudy Giuliani. The story, known to be false, was Russian misinformation fed to Donald Trump and the New York Post. The FBI is investigating Giuliani, not the Bidens. The situation raises questions about the credibility of the source and the involvement of Russian intelligence. The October surprise appears to be a Russian disinformation campaign orchestrated by Giuliani. The use of a tabloid to smear a presidential candidate may lead to criminal charges.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it may be a disinformation campaign, possibly orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned about Russian disinformation efforts, and there are concerns that the story may be part of this larger campaign. The FBI is investigating the authenticity of the emails. Biden denies any wrongdoing.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump campaign accused Twitter and Facebook of censorship for blocking an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly containing his emails. Experts claim the situation has hallmarks of information laundering, reminiscent of 2016. This time, emails purportedly from Biden's son are being disseminated by a tabloid, with Rudy Giuliani claiming he obtained them from a computer repairman. Giuliani has admitted to working with a known Russian agent to find damaging information on the Bidens. A former FBI operative suggests the story resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially involving stolen emails placed on laptops left at a repair store to launder the information. He guesses Russians are behind it. Social media outlets limited the story's spread, with Twitter briefly suspending accounts that shared it. Allies on Capitol Hill cried censorship, while the Senate Judiciary Committee wants answers. The goal appears to be casting a cloud over the front runner using emails to create an air of scandal. Republican-led investigations have never uncovered evidence of wrongdoing by Vice President Biden.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook are censoring a damaging story about Joe Biden and his family reported by the New York Post. According to the speaker, these companies are blocking the president's campaign, cabinet members, and Republicans in Congress from sharing the story. The speaker claims that Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg intend to decide the election's outcome by silencing anyone or any media outlet that threatens Joe Biden. The speaker notes that executives from Facebook and Twitter recently joined the Biden transition team, including Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Manier, and former Facebook executive, Jessica Hertz. The speaker presents a photo from 2011 of President Obama dining with Silicon Valley executives, including Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Reed Hastings, Dick Costello, and Larry Ellison, as evidence of big tech's relationship with the left.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
They accused the FBI of warning Facebook and Twitter about Hunter's laptop, claiming it was Russian disinformation. When the New York Post revealed the laptop, it was censored by the platforms, citing the previous warning.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Aspen Institute held a workshop attended by major media and social media platforms to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. This was concerning as there was no evidence of the laptop's existence, yet efforts were made to influence media coverage. Content moderators on platforms like Twitter have significant power in determining what Americans can say and see. It is inappropriate for unelected bureaucrats or tech companies to collude in influencing speech and information. The government and big tech should not decide who can speak on social media platforms; it should be decided by the people. This censorship can be seen as a form of election interference, as seen in the CTI League case where individuals displayed strong partisan bias.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" in place of "interference." They allege that platforms censoring this information are complicit in election interference. The speaker discusses a letter signed by 51 former senior intelligence officials who suggested that emails from Hunter Biden's laptop had "classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." The speaker points out that the officials admitted they didn't know if the emails were genuine or if Russia was involved. The speaker identifies some of the signatories as known liars, including James Clapper, Michael Hayden, and Gina Haspel. The speaker claims the CIA is forbidden from interfering in American elections but does so anyway to discredit information, including information related to Hunter Biden. They reference court testimony alleging Joe Biden was aware of and influenced by Hunter's business dealings. The speaker also references Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies for meddling and lying, and praises those who seek truth and honesty.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
During the election, there was controversy surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story on Twitter. Facebook took a different approach, as they were warned by the FBI about potential Russian propaganda. They implemented a third-party fact-checking program to determine if the information was false. While the investigation was ongoing, the distribution of the story on Facebook was decreased, but people were still allowed to share and consume it. The ranking in the News Feed was slightly lower, resulting in fewer people seeing it. However, many individuals were still able to share the story.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Hillary Clinton paid Perkins Coie, who hired Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who hired Russians to create a fake dossier. The FBI used this dossier to undermine a presidency and overturn an election. When we questioned it, we were labeled as Russian bots. Then, during the election, the Hunter Biden laptop story broke. The FBI dismissed it as Russian disinformation, but it turned out to be true. If we talked about it, social media silenced us. On election night, suspicious votes for Biden flooded in, but questioning it led to losing social media accounts. The Durham report reveals that top government officials, including Obama and Biden, knew about the hoax. Yet, we're still called Russian bots. The Biden DOJ removed the IRS investigative team from the Hunter Biden laptop case. No one will be held accountable. We're living in a world of absurdity.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump has been promoting a New York Post report about Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son. However, there are concerns about the accuracy and origins of the story, with claims that it involves Russian disinformation. Intelligence agencies warned that Rudy Giuliani was used by Russian intelligence to undermine the Biden campaign. Republicans plan to subpoena the CEO of Twitter for blocking the unverified story. Some argue that the story has been disproven by reputable news organizations and has dubious sources. Fox News even refused to cover it. However, there are claims that Hunter Biden's former business associate has confirmed Joe Biden's involvement in shady deals with China, Ukraine, and Moscow. Experts warn of the continued use of Russian disinformation in the lead-up to the election.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump campaign accused Twitter and Facebook of censorship for blocking an unverified story about Hunter Biden's laptop. Experts suggest it resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially orchestrated by Russia, involving stolen emails and planted laptops. Social media limited the story's spread, even suspending accounts. Rudy Giuliani is identified as a key figure, with reports indicating intelligence officials warned the White House about Russia using him to spread disinformation to President Trump. The FBI is investigating whether the unverified emails are part of a broader Russian effort to denigrate Joe Biden's campaign. Giuliani's involvement and the story's timing raise concerns about Russian interference in the election. Intelligence agencies believe Russia is actively working to undermine Biden's campaign. Some suggest the President is condoning Russian interference. The Biden campaign dismisses the allegations as disinformation. Hunter Biden said he has no idea if the laptop is his.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the censorship surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and its connection to foreign policy issues. They mention Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company, and how Burisma signed a cooperation agreement with the Atlantic Council. The Department of Homeland Security then used the Atlantic Council to censor millions of tweets related to the 2020 election. This level of censorship is compared to deputizing the Trump Organization to censor Russiagate. The speaker refers to a detailed report on the censorship and its impact, which can be found on the Foundation For Freedom Online website. The conversation shifts to other topics, including a New York Times report on Ukraine and updates from Maricopa County.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A major American newspaper published a story about a presidential candidate, but tech monopolies censored it, preventing the public from reading it. The story involves emails detailing Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and how his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, intervened to help his son. The emails came from a laptop left at a Delaware repair shop. The shop owner gave the laptop to the FBI and a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani's office. Facebook announced it would censor the story, and Twitter locked The New York Post's account and prevented users from sharing the story, claiming it was potentially harmful. Hunter Biden referred to his father as "my guy" while trying to extract more money from Burisma. An executive at Burisma said they needed Hunter Biden's influence to stop politically motivated actions. Another email revealed that the executive met with Joe Biden in DC at Hunter's invitation. Joe Biden previously denied knowing what his son was doing at Burisma. In 2018, Joe Biden said he got a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma fired. A photo also surfaced of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a Burisma board member.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks how much the source of the Hunter Biden laptop story matters, given that the information is coming out through Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani. The interviewee responds that the source and timing matter a lot, and that this appears to be classic Soviet Russian tradecraft. According to the interviewee, the Russians understand that the president and his enablers crave dirt on Vice President Biden, so whether the information is real or contrived doesn't matter to them. The interviewee believes emails could be contrived, especially if they appear without metadata. The interviewee states that if the FBI has the computer, they will be able to determine if it is genuine or not, but the timing is curious.

All In Podcast

E10: Twitter & Facebook botch censorship (again), the publisher vs. distributor debate & more
reSee.it Podcast Summary
The All-In podcast discusses recent political events, particularly surrounding the upcoming election and the controversy over Hunter Biden's leaked emails. The hosts express skepticism about the New York Post's story regarding Hunter Biden, questioning its journalistic integrity and the circumstances under which the hard drives ended up with Rudy Giuliani and the FBI. They highlight the censorship actions taken by Twitter and Facebook, which blocked the story and raised concerns about bias and the implications for Section 230, the law protecting online platforms from liability for user-generated content. Chamath Palihapitiya suggests that the days of tech companies avoiding responsibility are numbered, as both political sides are pushing to repeal Section 230. The discussion shifts to the nature of algorithms and whether social media platforms should be considered publishers or distributors. The hosts argue that if these companies make editorial decisions, they should be held accountable like traditional publishers. The conversation also touches on the implications of the Supreme Court nomination process, the role of unions in California politics, and the potential impact of the election on female voters. The hosts conclude that Trump's approach may lead to a significant loss in the upcoming election, with Biden currently favored in the polls. They express uncertainty about whether America is ready to move on from the Trump era, noting that the excitement surrounding his initial campaign has diminished.

The Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

The Biden Dynasty Exposed | Miranda Devine | EP 386
Guests: Miranda Devine
reSee.it Podcast Summary
In this episode, Jordan Peterson speaks with Miranda Devine about her book *Laptop from Hell: Hunter Biden, Big Tech, and the Dirty Secrets the President Tried to Hide*. They discuss the implications of Hunter Biden's laptop, which he abandoned at a repair shop in April 2019, just before his father announced his presidential candidacy. The laptop contained not only personal material but also business documents related to Hunter's dealings with companies like Burisma, raising questions about Joe Biden's potential compromise due to his family's financial entanglements. Devine recounts how the repair shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, discovered the laptop's contents, which included explicit material and incriminating business documents. After failing to reach Hunter for 90 days, Mac Isaac took ownership of the laptop and sought to alert authorities, fearing repercussions due to the Biden family's influence in Delaware. His attempts to contact the FBI were initially rebuffed, leading him to eventually share the information with Rudy Giuliani, who helped bring the story to the New York Post. The New York Post published the story shortly before the 2020 election, but it faced immediate censorship from social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter, which claimed it was Russian disinformation. Devine highlights the involvement of former intelligence officials who signed a letter asserting the laptop's contents were likely part of a Russian operation, despite not having seen the evidence themselves. This suppression of information, according to Devine, represents a significant scandal, suggesting collusion between the government, social media, and the Biden campaign to influence the election. Throughout the discussion, Peterson and Devine explore the moral implications of Joe Biden's actions and the broader consequences of Hunter Biden's business dealings, particularly in relation to U.S. foreign policy and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. They conclude that the intertwining of the Biden family's financial interests with international affairs poses a serious moral hazard, especially given the current geopolitical climate.
View Full Interactive Feed