reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A person confronts a group arriving by bus to protest Trump in Washington D.C. The person accuses the group of being an "AstroTurfed" crowd, implying they are not an authentic, grassroots movement. The person questions if they know what International Workers' Rights Day is, calling it "Socialist day." The confrontation escalates with insults exchanged. The person threatens physical violence.

I'm a 74-year-old Trump supporter from Palo Alto. Two days ago, a woman at a Starbucks confronted me, calling me a racist and a Nazi. She took photos and posted them on Facebook, intending to shame me and get me fired. Her actions had unintended consequences; people harassed her family and her employer, Griffin Stringed Instruments, leading to her termination. The store owner cited her Facebook posts as inconsistent with their values. She refused to discuss the matter with me, preferring to focus on her accusations. I wear a yarmulke under my MAGA hat; I'm Jewish, and being called a Nazi is deeply offensive.

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

Speaker 0 describes an encounter where a person tells her, “good luck to your husband dealing with you,” and she responds, “my husband loves me.” The other person replies that “that’s why we’re trying to get him fired,” indicating to Speaker 0 that this is not an isolated incident but part of an organized group aiming to destroy both her and her husband’s livelihoods because of her political criticisms of a foreign government. Speaker 0 emphasizes her husband has nothing to do with her career, works in athletics at a school, loves his students, and is not going to issue a statement condemning his wife. Speaker 0 explains that the group’s goal is to destroy her husband’s livelihood for failing to condemn her publicly. She notes that the husband wants no part in politics and is not responsible for her career. She decides to file a police report and asks for identifying information about a woman she encountered, including video of the woman and her dog, to corroborate the incident. Speaker 0 highlights the woman’s alleged attempt to sic her dog on Speaker 0 and her dog, pointing to the dog’s behavior as evidence. She asks the woman if it was appropriate to use her dog in that way, and the woman denies it, insisting she did not sick the dog on them. The conversation shifts as Speaker 0 presents a separate video that she claims proves her account. The other person attempts to interrupt, insisting, “You’re trying to get me fired,” and Speaker 0 counters that everyone is trying to get her fired and that the other person is part of that group. Speaker 1 admits that others are trying to get Speaker 0 fired and acknowledges that the other person is “part of that everybody.” Speaker 0 reiterates that the woman tried to sic her dog on them and threatens her husband’s livelihood, asserting she will not be intimidated. Speaker 0 emphasizes she will continue her commentary and will not apologize for her actions or stance, even if the confrontation involves threats or stalking behavior online. Throughout, Speaker 0 frames the situation as an organized effort to silence and ruin both her and her husband over her political critique of a foreign government, while defending her husband’s innocence and his separation from her professional life. She asserts resolve to document the incident and press charges, and to persist with her public commentary despite the confrontation.

A person is upset about two different styles of paper and a paper truck. They claim to have been trying to get an answer since 2022 and are a taxpayer at Hobby Troney. They say they are sick and tired of the game being played and that the situation is horrible. Another person asks what they have and tells them to go to the office. They tell someone named Pam to stop and to take everything off. The first person demands they take their hands off and let them get their stuff, calling the situation disgusting. They state they are a taxpayer in Palm Beach County and are trying to inquire about styles of paper. They are told they are no longer welcome. The first person then says they have a purse and proceeds to grab a phone.

A woman driving a Tesla was run off the road by a man in full fatigues who threatened her, telling her to get rid of the car. The incident was captured by the Tesla's cameras. The speaker described the incident as terrorism, noting the woman was thankful she didn't have children in the car. Another person, Al Moter, a Democrat, said he fears for his life and wouldn't buy a Tesla out of fear. One of the speakers said the incidents are making them want to buy a Tesla, while another said they don't want to buy one out of spite.

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They claim MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. According to the speaker, they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. They are asking MAGA supporters to leave their former job, coworkers, and managers alone. The speaker is upset that MAGA supporters are allegedly trying to target them at their job because they said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food.

The speaker addresses the audience and points out a waitress named Shay. He explains that Shay asked him about his hat, which supports Trump, while he was at Hooters. He expresses frustration that some women don't act professionally and mentions that he was spending money at the establishment. The speaker believes that Shay's behavior was triggered by his hat and mentions that he is filming the incident. He mentions calling the police and continues to express his frustration. The speaker plans to inform the manager about the situation and hopes Shay brings the manager.

A woman states she doesn't think children should be taken away from these girls without her kids present. She asks how white people feel about stopping a Black woman from going to work, pointing out the line of people they are causing. She claims she is not trying to cause problems and that they are just trying to be.

An individual with a "Trump hat" is confronted by others, with one person repeatedly calling them a "fascist" and telling them to "go home." The person wearing the hat asks why it matters where they are from, then states they are from Poland and love Americans, while accusing the others of hating Americans. One person says they love immigrants. The person with the hat says that most Americans voted for Trump. The person wearing the hat questions why someone is wearing a mask if they are proud. They accuse someone of being "self loathing" and "unattractive." They also say someone following them is "orgasmica." They state they fought for the flag. The person wearing the hat yells that someone is going to jail for spitting on them and scaring their baby.

A person confronts an individual, accusing him of keying a Tesla, stating there's video evidence online. The accused denies the act, but the accuser claims to have witnessed it, noting the license plate was recorded. The accuser questions the motivation, pointing out the accused was wearing a USA t-shirt while driving a Korean car. The accuser speculates the Tesla owner is likely a Democrat. The accused and his companion remain silent. The accuser expresses disbelief, mentioning the accused is handicapped, and wishes him luck, hoping he learns a lesson. The encounter ends near a Chase bank.

The speaker is wearing a MAGA hat and is being followed and "belly bumped" by someone. The speaker tells the person to not touch them and to get away. The speaker accuses the person of being a "freak" and wanting "some action." The speaker threatens to call the police and plans to complain to the management about the person's behavior. The speaker believes the person's actions are due to the MAGA hat.

This lady claims to be a poll worker, while a man is preventing her from casting her ballot. She asserts that he cannot touch her and demands he remove his headgear, insisting it’s inappropriate. She identifies herself as an elected libertarian and accuses him of being obscene. The situation escalates as she continues to assert her right to vote, stating that using political tools is legal. Tensions rise as she insists on her rights and confronts the man about his behavior.

Is there a problem here? Excuse me? You're blocking the signs. I was moving my signs. You can't block them like that. I mean, you might think you can, but you can't. I'm in public, so I can record you. Well, that's okay. I'm an elected official. I don't care, but thank you. My name's Mary Anne Minnick, the elected committee woman for the Democratic Party in Moon District 6. Good for you. Thank you.

A woman states that she, her daughter, her 5-week-old grandson, and her almost-5-year-old grandson were followed at Walmart in Lake Worth. She advises viewers to watch their babies and not go out alone. She blames Kamala Harris for letting in "Haitian bullshit" because the people who followed them "weren't from here." She expresses frustration that the police couldn't do anything because no crime was committed, implying that only if her babies had been abducted would the police have acted. She again blames Kamala Harris.

I am with a Biden supporter who is criticizing someone for wearing a face mask while being sick with COVID-19. The supporter accuses the sick person of spreading the virus by being in a crowd. The sick person defends themselves, calling out the supporter for labeling them a Nazi and fascist. The situation escalates as they argue, and an officer is called to intervene.

Okay, here's the concise transcript: Hey, why are you getting so emotional? Let's just talk. What do you think of my hat? It's just a US flag with hunting stuff, Cabela's. It's not political. It looks political, and I've seen the flag used disrespectfully. My parents were in World War II. I think it's a statement. I promise it's not. It was a gift. It has geese and elk. It's an Oregon thing. You act like I have Trump's face on it. What do you think of Elon Musk? Let's get over the hat first because you're thinking I'm out here trying to— Elon Musk has bad intentions. Elon Musk should be president in 2028! He has no skills or ability. He cheats, lies, steals, and bought a presidency. If you're that upset, don't call me "ma'am." Call me "sweetheart". Why are you letting politics get you so upset? You treated me so disrespectfully.

A confrontation unfolds over a flag on someone's property. One person is upset, accusing the other of taking their flag and getting too close to their vehicle. They demand the other person to leave, expressing frustration and threatening to involve the police. The situation escalates with insults exchanged, and one person comments on the other's age, urging them to get back in their vehicle. The argument centers around political differences, with one party labeling the other as a "crazy Democrat." The tension highlights a clash of opinions and personal boundaries.

Kamala Harris was heckled at a Detroit rally with chants of "Donald Trump." The speaker claims Harris became visibly angry and asserted that everyone's voice matters, but she would speak at that moment. She challenged the hecklers to state their support for Trump directly. The speaker alleges Harris looked like she was going to cry and was yelling about an attack on fundamental freedoms. The speaker contrasted this with Trump rallies and stated Harris was done.

Speaker 0 states, “J 6 Insurrection is right over there. What? I'm at this fucking scene. This” as they indicate being at a scene related to January 6. The conversation shows they are physically present at the location and reacting to the surroundings. Speaker 1 describes the situation as “harassment. Stalking and harassment,” and expresses a desire to file a police report, saying, “I’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment.” They repeat the request, asking, “Can I file a police report for stalking and harassment?” They claim, “She won’t leave leave me alone,” and state they’d like to file a police report for stalking and harassment, adding, “I’d like to follow a police report.” They ask for guidance about the legality of the behavior: “If she follows me, will she be arrested for stalking?” They further describe the immediate scenario as occurring “Across the street.” Speaker 0 interjects with further location detail, saying, “the street,” and then adds a string of hostile remarks including, “Bug pussy bitch,” and “There you go. My Rolly Pole. Back to blue. White is right. Get the fuck out of my country, Patricia.” These lines convey aggression and attempts to assert identity or affiliation. Speaker 1 continues with a distressed tone, muttering, “Oh my god. Take that stress,” before being told, “Shut up, cunt” by Speaker 0, indicating continued hostility and verbal abuse. Overall, the transcript captures a confrontation at a scene that centers on concerns about stalking and harassment, with Speaker 1 seeking a police report to document the alleged stalking; Speaker 0 responds with aggressive commentary and insults, including politically charged and profane statements. The exchange conveys an urgent emotional confrontation regarding harassment, with explicit requests to file formal complaints and questions about potential arrest for stalking.

Speaker 0 questions Nicole about online posts to the Prime Minister of Canada, asking if she has anything to say about that. Speaker 1 asks for specifics: what post, what she specifically said, and whether there is a screenshot. Speaker 0 cites that she online said something specific and asks for clarification. Speaker 1 replies that she said, "he's a Zionist scumbag, and he's not my prime minister," adding that she believes she is not spoken to properly and questions whether she looks like a threat. Speaker 0 explains that they came to talk because those threats were made. Speaker 1 pushes back, saying that the officers should be busy addressing real crime rather than harassing her over things she says online, and questions whether she seriously looks like a threat. Speaker 0 acknowledges and continues. Speaker 1 accuses the officers of wasting tax dollars and asserts that they should not be harassing her for what she says online because she dislikes the prime minister. Speaker 0 states Nicole should be aware that if such behavior continues, there will be consequences, implying potential arrest for threats. Speaker 1 asks what kind of threats they are referring to and demands to see what she said, noting that she still has not been shown. Speaker 0 attempts to explain what she said and what constitutes threats, warning that if those threats continue, she could be arrested and charged. Speaker 1 complains about being interrupted, asking to show what she said, and then launches into a hostile remark, calling the situation Communist Canada and asking how the officers can take pride in their work. Speaker 0 reiterates that she may have her opinion, but she insists she cannot say what she says. Speaker 1 refuses to discuss further, telling them not to touch her door. Speaker 0 says a report will be filed, stating that the search behavior continues, and mentions Trump in a dismissive way ("the Trump blah blah blah blah blah"). Speaker 1 asserts she will say whatever she wants about the prime minister and that they cannot control her speech, calling it just words. Speaker 0 responds that they are asking for non-threatening language. Speaker 1 concludes by stating they will continue to speak freely and that the conversation is over, wishing them a nice day and goodbye.

The speaker states they don't respect someone's vote or shirt. They then ask if someone's clothing has anything to do with the situation, mentioning their own "car horn shirt" and blue-collar status, and that they spend hundreds of dollars a month. The speaker concludes by asking if they are being kicked out because they are a "trumper."

Speaker 0 tells someone to get in the car and take off their hat because they don't want to go to a Trump rally. The person refuses and says they will take it off if it bothers the speaker. The speaker insists and calls the person difficult. The person explains they need the hat for sun protection while kayaking. The speaker offers to get another hat and expresses disbelief at experiencing discrimination. They leave to get another hat.

A person confronts a group arriving by bus to protest Trump in Washington D.C. The person accuses the group of being an "AstroTurfed" crowd, implying they are not an authentic, grassroots movement. The person questions if they know what International Workers' Rights Day is, calling it a "Socialist day." The confrontation escalates with insults exchanged, including calling the protesters "losers." The person threatens physical violence. The presence of children at the protest is mentioned.

A woman in Washington DC is seen tearing down signs advocating for peace in Palestine. When confronted, she expresses support for bombing Gaza and shows disdain for free speech. She is called out for her actions and beliefs, revealing a lack of empathy and understanding. The conversation escalates with insults exchanged before the woman walks away.