reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Bill Gates and his foundation are advocating for a specific type of agriculture that excludes animal-based proteins and small farms. This is leading to the consolidation of farms into large corporate mega farms, displacing small and medium-sized farms. Similar trends are happening in China, where small family farms are being replaced by government-controlled mega farms. The global agenda to target farmers is part of a larger plan to implement the same policies worldwide. This consolidation of agriculture and food supply is concerning because it can lead to food shortages and higher prices. The ultimate goal seems to be control over the food supply, as controlling food means controlling the people.

The food supply is being shut down worldwide, with livestock being culled and farmlands bought up. Restrictions on water usage and backyard farming are increasing. The goal is to reduce carbon emissions, but it's destroying the ability to produce meat and fish. This is seen as a war against nature and humanity.

In the nineteenth century, many Americans used homeopathic (naturopathic) remedies that were widely available at low cost. The American Medical Association (formed in 1847) allegedly opposed homeopaths becoming AMA members and sought to control the medical profession by excluding them, while homeopathy remained a minority alternative. The transcript then claims John D. Rockefeller identified “great potentialities of profit” in the medical industry and, after turning the U.S. medical system from homeopathic to allopathic medicine, became the “kingpin of the medical monopoly.” It describes allopathy as centered on radical surgery, heavy drug use, and lengthy hospital stays, and alleges that control of legislatures, hospital accreditation, physicians, and medications became the basis of the modern system. It further claims health care costs multiplied and became unaffordable for most Americans, leading to the rise of medical insurance, portrayed as “another tax,” administered through Social Security and Medicare, with Medicare costs deducted from Social Security benefits. The transcript asserts that money from the health industry funnels into a Rockefeller-style medical and drug monopoly and that the Rockefellers allegedly control major drug companies by placing people from institutions like Chase Manhattan Bank and Exxon oil among directors and officials of large drug firms. A separate segment shifts to an oil-drilling conversation emphasizing drilling control: a man claims he does his own drilling with workers he knows, avoiding lost tools, failed cementing, and ruined leases—contrasting his approach with speculators who rush contracts and rely on contractors. Speaker 6 and others then expand the theme of “mainstream medicine” as Rockefeller creation, adding claims of global institutional dominance and “eugenics” programs (including forced sterilization, water fluoridation, abortions, and vaccinations). They argue that a “Flexner Report” (linked to a Carnegie-funded investigation) helped establish modern allopathic medicine by standardizing medical education, closing many medical colleges, and marginalizing holistic and natural medicines; the transcript alleges curricula were altered to focus on patented drugs and to remove emphasis on herbs and nutrition. It then cites the Hill-Burton Act of 1946 as giving hospitals funds conditional on providing free care, followed by a system shift into paid, long-term pharmaceutical dependence. The transcript also alleges the American Cancer Society (founded in 1913) and major philanthropic grants to medical schools served to advance allopathic-only curricula and ensure board influence. The transcript further claims big pharmaceutical firms use “biopiracy,” researching plant compounds, copying or slightly modifying them to patent synthetic analogs, then marketing pills while discrediting the original natural sources. It asserts that the Rockefellers travel with naturopathic doctors who allegedly use homeopathic remedies first and pharmaceuticals only as a last resort. It also cites David Rockefeller’s 1994 statement at a UN business conference that “the right major crisis” could be used to achieve a “new world order.” Long portions of the transcript then follow a conspiracy narrative about global governance and “lockstep” authoritarian control. A document from the Rockefeller Foundation is introduced as “Scenarios for the Future International Development,” with a scenario called “lockstep” describing tighter top-down government control, increased authoritarianism, limited innovation, and “growing citizen pushback.” The transcript reads passages implying a pandemic scenario that leads to economic disruption, isolation, and restrictions on mobility, along with mandatory quarantine and mask policies that continue after the pandemic fades. It claims Ebola is treated as a tool to advance control and asserts that oppressive measures like quarantines and curfews are part of a broader “tool kit.” Another segment alleges that John D. Rockefeller and associates “pirated” the blood banking industry and administrative leadership of the American Red Cross to advance eugenics management, and it discusses the founding of the General Education Board (GEB), an “Occasional Letter,” and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory as centers for eugenics and genetics research. It connects alleged Rockefeller funding to eugenics institutions in Germany and describes supposed links to organizations and individuals across military intelligence and government. The transcript further claims wrongdoing involving blood contamination (including AIDS), reliance on contaminated blood for HIV infections, and neglect of technologies to remove viruses. It also discusses population “culling” targets attributed to a population council and a negative population growth organization. The transcript then includes a conversation about vaccines and alleged future mass harm, mentioning a nasal mist “live attenuated virus,” “squalene,” a large number of “injection stations,” and the idea of a “great culling.” It references FEMA and population relocation in the context of civil disorder or pandemics and includes claims about a “council of seven men” making long-term decisions. It ends this section by stating that “her message” is that “everyone” must decide what to do with the information. The transcript also describes the Georgia Guidestones, portraying their construction details (including multilingual engraved messages and population-reduction themes) and interpreting passages as advocating maintaining humanity under 500,000,000 and guiding reproduction and disputes in a world court. It states that the structure’s “population control” passage has drawn attention and compares the required reduction to the 1979 world population. A segment attributes a “master plan” to “Agenda 21,” claiming it is designed to reduce independence by moving people into cities and making them dependent on the state, limiting private property and land ownership, and controlling food production via corporations while discouraging rural living. Toward the end, the transcript shifts into additional conspiracy claims about climate change, featuring a discussion in which John Coleman argues that climate change is “not happening,” and the transcript asserts that climate research funding and institutional selection bias support a particular position. It includes an argument between speakers about global warming and future sea-level impacts. Another speaker claims that “ClimateGate” emails demonstrate manipulation and that climate change was renamed from “global warming” after Earth’s cooling period. The transcript also includes assertions that carbon dioxide cannot significantly drive warming and that climate change theory is connected to Marxism and socialist goals. Finally, there is a mix of other claims: references to a swine flu vaccine scare in 1976 with alleged neurological injury and death claims; a discussion of a patent for a COVID testing “system and method”; and allegations about biological weapons contracts, fortifications like Fort Detrick and Lytton Bioinetics, and disputes over HIV origins. The transcript contains an extended exchange with Dr. Robert Gallo, including claims about what experiments did and did not involve, and ends with additional statements urging unity, “the Great Awakening,” and concluding remarks about ongoing struggle between “wrong and right.”

Bill Gates is the largest owner of ranches and farmland, raising questions about the trend of big companies buying up farmland. This is seen as a form of fascism, now being promoted as Build Back Better or The Great Reset.

I warned you all about the coming EIDs when this bird flu stuff started. Now the USDA is saying that within six months, all cattle will need mandatory EID tags. It sounds like all beef cattle, every kind of cattle, is going to have to be tagged. But calves and yearlings should be okay, it sounds like its breeding cattle. The only way the USDA could implement this in six months is if they've already had a stockpile of tags. It feels like they knew this was coming and accomplished what they wanted to do. This really sucks for the guys that don't have facilities and just want a few head of cows in their backyard. We better get our taggers ready because I knew it was coming.

They fear a push towards centralized digital currency and a social credit score system controlled by those in power. The potential use of a vaccine app for control is concerning. The effectiveness and financial gains from recent events are alarming. The idea of a social credit system like in China, where dissent can limit your access to basic needs, is frightening. Self-censorship becomes a means of survival.

As a Texan rancher with a political science degree, I believe the electronic ID legislation threatens our autonomy. Firearms and livestock ensure sovereignty. The government aims to tax cattle and control our assets. This legislation undermines our freedom under the guise of health and safety. Washington and the NCBA are stripping away our sovereignty.

The speaker expresses concern over the mandatory electronic ear tag bill in the pharma community and on TikTok. They are puzzled by small-time farmers who support it, believing that it is a Trojan horse to control and put small farmers out of business. They advise always saying no to bills that increase government control and urge listeners to look at who supports the bill to understand its true motivations. The speaker warns against allowing government interference in running businesses and predicts that even if the bill starts as voluntary, it will eventually become mandatory. They encourage contacting representatives and cattlemen's associations to oppose the bill.

The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to oppressive agricultural practices by companies like Monsanto and Bill Gates. Farmers use fertilizers due to financial pressure, not by choice. The Great Reset exploits green agendas to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. Support for farmers should come from the community, not globalist bodies, to make sustainable transitions together.

They are concerned about financial transaction control leading to the promotion of lab-grown meat. The fear is that controlling transactions could dictate health policies and limit food choices. There are plans to eliminate farmers and switch to synthetic food. Those in power would still enjoy quality food while the rest would be forced to eat lab-grown meat. This control extends to healthcare policies and injections, suggesting a reduction in population.

The speaker argues that AI excels at simulating anything that can be expressed mathematically, and since financial transactions can be expressed mathematically, AI can be used to monitor and influence financial behavior. The core concern is that with programmable money and close tracking of individuals, it becomes possible to turn money on and off and to use AI and surveillance systems to manage and control behavior. The speaker gives a provocative example: a question about what happens if authorities demand a transgender change for a child or threaten to turn off money, illustrating a system in which programmable money is integrated with surveillance and behavior-modification mechanisms. The proposed system would enable surveillance, tracking, and conditional access to money—financing incentives or penalties tied to behavior—and could be integrated with digital ID. The speaker argues that once programmable money is paired with digital identity, it amounts to complete control. This is framed as a problem because, on a global scale, there are divide-and-conquer tactics masking the underlying issue: a political struggle between the mega rich and everyone else. According to the speaker, the megacorporate or ultra-wealthy perspective would try to control the many when they are few, and programmable money is the tool to achieve that control. The claim is that for programmable money to function effectively, everyone must be on the grid, allowing the system to track and observe behavior and influence it, thereby exerting total control. The speaker emphasizes that this is not limited to wearables or an Internet of Bodies; it represents a coup d'etat and the end of human liberty in the West. Key points emphasized include: - AI’s strength in simulating mathematically expressible phenomena, including financial transactions. - Programmable money enabling on/off control of individuals’ finances when coupled with surveillance. - The potential for incentives and penalties to be tied to behavior through money. - The necessity of a digital ID to realize complete control. - The notion that such a system is tied to political and economic power dynamics between the mega rich and others. - The idea that universal inclusion on the grid is required for programmable money to work, leading to pervasive tracking and behavior influence. - The assertion that this would constitute a coup d'etat and threaten the end of human liberty in the West.

This administration aims to control food and people. Biden wants extreme heat rules for outdoor workers at just 80 degrees Fahrenheit. They're targeting American farmers, regulating land and water rights. Support local farmers, buy local to fight back against these threats.

Speaker 0 argues that control is in the hands of unelected officials at supranational organizations who want all of the world’s resources in their pocket. They claim there is a global push to portray a catastrophic climate story and to push toward a system where “they” can control with rules and no currency, effectively an inverted prison where freedom to access things is behind lock and key. They say this represents a global war on agriculture and a move to deindustrialize Europe, with politicians deliberately impoverishing ordinary people. Speaker 1 contends that there is an ongoing attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy. They describe this as a coup and assert that a system can be run by rules without currency. Speaker 2 states that the plan is to substitute currency with a system of credits and to control the entire agriculture and food system. They claim this would allow complete control if everyone is switched from real food to “pharma food,” enabling control through publicly traded stocks. They describe the vision as something that the general cannot fathom and label it as a coup and a strategy of social control. Speaker 3 characterizes the situation as an inverted prison where freedom to roam is illusory because everything one wants access to is behind lock and key. They believe this is the “biggest public relations scam in the history of the world,” but also describe it as a blueprint and an action plan, predicting that the digital ID will be game over for humanity. Speaker 4 outlines a plan to commandeer land, reduce farming, radically change the food we eat, transform the electricity supply, and dictate its use, while replacing currency with credits. They assert all three strategies are built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. They foresee comprehensive monitoring of every human action and environmental consequences of every decision. Speaker 5 rejects the notion of a climate crisis, basing this view on climate data sets and evidence built to answer such questions, and asserts that there is no conclusive science proving that humans control most of the global climate. Speaker 6 describes the damage caused in the name of saving the planet as tremendous and questions what is being saved if it results in paving over the world. Overall, the speakers portray a global conspiracy to replace democracy with a technocratic, credit-based system driven by climate-change narratives, with aims including centralized control of land, farming, energy, and personal data, culminating in a digital ID that they fear could be irreversible for humanity.

In 2020, a powerful organization known as stakeholders initiated a 10-year shift towards stakeholder capitalism, marking the decline of shareholder capitalism. Their agenda includes controlling the food supply chain by 2030, with Bill Gates becoming the largest individual farmland owner. They promote GMO foods and aim to ban livestock, suggesting alternatives like artificial meat and insects as food sources. Climate change is used as a justification for these changes, with warnings about food insecurity and famine. Protests by farmers are escalating globally, with thousands demonstrating against government policies that threaten family farms. The situation raises concerns about food security and the future of agriculture. For more information, visit yellow.forum.

My cattle friends, did you see the news about mandatory EID tagging for all cattle within 6 months? The USDA announced that all beef cattle will need visible and electronic tags, affecting breeding cattle. This seems rushed and unfair, especially for small-scale farmers. We'll have to wait and see how this unfolds, but it looks like we need to prepare for tagging soon.

Speaker 0 contends the US Forest Service Agency is added again, targeting "half a million acres" of Cimarron And Comanche National Grassland and, importantly, "coming after your private property land." The process began in 2023 under Biden administration guidelines; "we have new guidelines now," and "the secretary of ag ... has the power to stop it." "'Drivers and stressors is code for why they need your land." "Herbivory, which is code for cattle grazing." They claim "Land ownership is a stressor on what the US Forest Service Agency wants to accomplish here with this new assessment so they can take this land from the public and so they can take private land." They state "Land ownership patterns in the Cimarron And Comanche National Grasslands are highly fragmented" ... "This fragmentation poses challenges to us taking over the land is what they wanna say, but they can't." "The private landowner is in their way." "They take land from ranchers, and once they perfect the process, they go after anyone that's in their way." "You're in their way." "Please share this. This must stop. We gotta get the word out. We gotta stop this crazy crap."

The cattle industry has changed due to meat processing consolidation by 4 giant companies, two of which are controlled by foreign governments (China and Brazil). This raises concerns about national security and control over our food source. It is alarming that countries outside the US have significant influence over our meat processing, posing a risk to our geopolitical situation.

A situation is unfolding in Colorado where urban residents are allegedly controlling the state, potentially ending farming, ranching, and private land ownership. A proposed committee, excluding farmers and ranchers, would decide the fate of public and private lands under the guise of conservation. This committee could designate any species as endangered, imposing restrictions on land use if that species is present. This could lead to hundreds of restrictions, dictating activities like tree cutting or cattle movement. The speaker characterizes this as an activist environmental proposal to seize control of the entire state, enabling them to dictate land use, both public and private, in the name of conservation.

The government is restricting access to over-the-counter antibiotics and dewormers for farmers, increasing costs. This will require more veterinary care, raising expenses for farmers, ranchers, and homesteaders. The speaker advises stocking up on supplies before the changes take effect. They also mention concerns about potential bans on apps like TikTok being sneaked into other bills.

The cattle industry has changed due to meat processing consolidation by 4 giant companies, two of which are controlled by foreign governments (China and Brazil). This raises concerns about national security and control over our food source. It is alarming that over 85% of the industry is now controlled by these companies, impacting who gets what, where, and when. Allowing foreign control of such a vital industry poses risks to our economic and geopolitical stability.

Several speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view of a global move toward centralized, technocratic governance: - A long-standing desire to control others is fueling a push toward globalization and centralization of power in unelected officials at supranational bodies. They claim the aim is to have all the world’s resources “in their pocket.” - The larger project is described as an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with a global technocracy. A “coup” is alleged, with the argument that rules could replace currency, creating a system of control without money. - The situation is likened to an inverted prison: people may seem free to roam, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” The potential for social control is described as gigantic and potentially irreversible. - The plan reportedly includes commandeering land, reducing farming, radically changing the food we eat, transforming the electricity supply, and dictating how it is used, while replacing currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are said to be premised on a climate-crisis narrative centered on carbon dioxide. - One speaker disputes the climate-crisis premise, stating they do not think there is a climate crisis and that the government pushes a catastrophic story; another adds that no single science paper proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the climate. - Europe is criticized for a “mad dash towards net zero,” described as economic suicide that deliberately impoverishes ordinary people and de-industrializes Europe, raising questions about what is being saved if it’s being paved over. - A global war on agriculture is claimed, with many farms selling up and concerns about looming food shortages. There is a suggestion that shifting people from “real food” to “pharma food” would enable control through publicly traded stocks. - The speakers call the movement “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and, more broadly, a blueprint and action plan. They warn that life on Earth will be radically changed and that everything will be monitored, with environmental consequences of every human action. - A chilling point is made that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity,” and that the general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision they describe. Overall, the discussion centers on a perceived coordinated effort to centralize power globally, erode traditional democracy, redefine currency, reshape agriculture and energy systems, and surveil all human activity under a climate-justified technocracy.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen advocates for digital IDs and a global digital infrastructure, claiming it can boost emerging economies. Nigel Farage criticizes this as a dangerous move towards global government control and wealth redistribution. He highlights the potential risks of personal data falling into the wrong hands. The discussion also touches on the development of individual carbon footprint trackers and the programmability of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for targeted policy functions. The speakers express concerns about loss of privacy, potential debanking based on political opinions, and the surrendering of sovereignty to international organizations. They emphasize the importance of democratic nation states cooperating and trading together while preserving liberty and freedom.

Bill Gates and his foundation are acquiring farmland and promoting a specific type of agriculture that excludes animal-based proteins. Small and medium-sized farms are being replaced by corporate mega farms due to excessive regulations. This trend is not limited to Holland, but is happening globally as part of a larger agenda pushed by governments. The globalist agenda aims to control national governments and parliaments. The focus should be on the top 20 countries responsible for 80% of emissions, and money is seen as the solution. However, these policies are leading to higher food prices and potential food shortages, which will impact not only farmers but also the food supply and national security. The ultimate goal seems to be the consolidation of agriculture and control over the food supply.

The World Economic Forum's biggest fear is that people will not comply and will fight for freedom by making individual decisions. Digital control is key to enforcing mandates and controlling lives. The speaker claims that issues like carbon emissions and experimental injections are secondary to the desire to control people from the outside in. A digital process that restricts movement, behavior, and decisions with the click of a button would mean the end of individual autonomy.