reSee.it - Related Video Feed

What happens if I don't take my hat off? If you refuse, you'll be arrested and fingerprinted, but then released. So, I'll be arrested just for wearing a hat that says "Make America Great"? Yes, that's correct. It doesn't even mention Donald Trump. We're trying to maintain order, but yes, that's the situation.

In the video, the speaker suggests using identifiers for non-uniform individuals. These identifiers include a wristband and a handy stripe on the barrel of their guns. The speaker is unsure about the color of the wristband, but emphasizes that it will be present.

Speaker 0 tells someone to get off of them and questions what they can do with them. Speaker 1 mentions that it's about a map, but Speaker 0 disagrees. Speaker 1 suggests calling someone, possibly the police, but Speaker 0 asks if they will arrest them. Speaker 1 doesn't think the person can be arrested for not wearing a mask. Speaker 2 tells someone named Raven to call the cops and asks if they will talk to them. Speaker 0 expresses uncertainty about whether the person is a real officer. Speaker 1 mentions that the person is harassing someone for not wearing a mask. Speaker 0 asks about their own mask. The conversation ends abruptly.

Look. Our local law enforcement, LAPD, sheriff department, every city who has their own police department, it is standard operating procedure to not wear a mask when you interact with the public, to easily identify yourself. So we're going to ask of them to adhere to the standard that we hold our law enforcement officers to here in Los Angeles.

Do not interfere with the police during arrests. If you do, you may be arrested. Please move away to ensure a safe working environment for the officers. We encourage you to film, but give them space while they perform their duties. Our goal is to maintain a peaceful First Amendment event without criminal activity. We will only intervene if criminal acts occur or if you obstruct the police. We want to return to a safe, lawful event, so please respect the officers and allow them to do their jobs.

Right now, there's no need to wear a mask. While it may provide some comfort and block droplets, it doesn't offer the level of protection people believe it does. In fact, there are unintended consequences as people constantly adjust and touch their masks.

I have tested negative for COVID-19 and have been cleared by the press. However, they still want me to wear a mask for another 10 days. But let's keep it between us that I didn't have it on when I entered.

Okay, I'm Officer Helen. We'll call you on your phone. I'm not going to stand out here to talk if you're going to speak to me.

A speaker asked if the department could use AI to identify non-City of LA agents from neighboring towns to warn the business and immigrant communities about potential due process issues and lack of warrants. The speaker clarified that they were asking what the department could do to warn them about outside agencies coming in from other cities, so they could warn their people. The department representative stated that they could not warn about an enforcement action being taken by another agency before it happens because that would be obstruction of justice.

We wear masks for protection and as a symbol of selflessness. Masks hide our identity to prevent attacks on our activists. They show that we prioritize the cause over personal gain. I, as a leader, remain unmasked to show my commitment and association with the organization.

The speaker is preparing for a disguise and asks for advice on what to wear. They consider wearing a mask and ultimately decide on an American-themed mask. They discuss the importance of blending in and having a visual identifier. The speaker mentions bringing both masks in their backpack and jokingly mentions working for Fox News, CNN, and another company simultaneously. The conversation ends with a comment about the need for a visual element to gain trust.

It's April 30, and I saw that yesterday the Department of Justice is suing New Jersey over the Law Enforcement Officer Protection Act, which restricts when law enforcement officers, including federal agencies like Immigration and Customs Enforcement, can have masks on. This stood out to me because this is exactly what Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia said was going to happen. Remember this clip? “The love of God and all that is good. Can you differentiate between the fact that we don't make laws that control the federal government? My God, what are we doing here? I'm not a lawyer. I was an English teacher and I comprehend that. My fifth grade middle school English students would understand it. I am coming to you not from a point of ideology because I know in the minority party, we already lost that argument. You guys are way, way out in the ether with that. I'm not even hoping to win the ideology. I'm hoping to win the logical argument to say, why do we keep passing laws that are gonna end up in court, we lose, and the taxpayer gets shafted over and over and over? You cannot vote yes for a law that controls local, county, state. Oh, oops. And federal. No. Federal's gotta come off for this to count. The only reason why you're passing it is to affect federal agents. Hello? Lights on. No one's home. I'm not an attorney. I need a freaking honorary degree after going through this for four hours yesterday saying, what? Don't a roomful of lawyers understand? Ludicrous. Oh my goodness.” What does that mean for us as taxpayers? I did see in New Jersey Spotlight News they reported that New Jersey's attorney general's office had spent over $53,000,000 in one year on outside private lawyers alone, on top of their in-house staff costs. Now for my question that came next, maybe somebody else would have a better source for this, but I just asked Rock about how much something like this would cost as a lawsuit. The initial response in motion practice is somewhere between $50,000 and $150,000 because that's mostly in-house attorneys. The discovery and hearings is $100,000 to $300,000 if it gets contentious. It says the common range for litigation is another $250,000 to $800,000. And then appeals, if New Jersey loses appeals, could range anywhere from $150,000 to $400,000. So that brings us in a range from $300,000 to $1,200,000 over this case. No matter where we stand on the issue, we should know how much it's going to cost us.

There is no need for masks in the United States currently. Wearing a mask is not necessary for normal activities like going to work or school. The use of masks and gloves must be done correctly to be effective. It is advised to walk away from someone coughing or sneezing rather than wearing a mask. Wearing a mask during an outbreak may provide some comfort but does not offer complete protection.

Wearing masks can be irritating and may actually make people touch their face more often. It doesn't provide protection if you're not sick and wearing it all day long is not recommended. Right now, we're not wearing masks and it wouldn't make us safer if we did. However, I have always supported wearing masks when it's appropriate.

People are shaking hands with the security guard. The security guards are wearing body cams. Someone notes there's "no balaclava tonight." They ask, "You forgot your balaclava?"

Hola, buenos días. Quiero aclarar que como policía local no estamos reportando a ICE sobre personas indocumentadas. ICE actúa de manera independiente y no tenemos información sobre a quiénes buscan ni cuándo estarán. La comunidad puede estar tranquila; no estamos colaborando con ellos. Nuestro enfoque sigue siendo atender emergencias y crímenes, y si encontramos a alguien indocumentado, no lo reportamos a ICE. Ellos están buscando principalmente a criminales violentos, pero no sabemos más sobre sus criterios. No tenemos información sobre redadas ni cuándo ocurrirán, ya que no nos avisan. Espero que esto ayude a tranquilizar a la comunidad. --- Hello, good morning. I want to clarify that as local police, we are not reporting to ICE about undocumented individuals. ICE acts independently, and we have no information on whom they are looking for or when they will be present. The community can be reassured; we are not collaborating with them. Our focus remains on responding to emergencies and crimes, and if we encounter someone undocumented, we do not report them to ICE. They are primarily looking for violent criminals, but we know nothing more about their criteria. We have no information on raids or when they will occur, as they do not inform us. I hope this helps reassure the community.

As a police officer with 21 years of experience, I want to reaffirm my support for the people I serve and protect. I stand with you, stand for freedom, and support a return to normal. Stay safe and god.

People in the United States currently do not need to wear masks. While wearing a mask during an outbreak may provide some comfort and block droplets, it does not offer the level of protection many believe it does. Additionally, frequent adjustments to masks can lead to increased face touching, which may pose health risks. Masks are primarily necessary for healthcare providers and individuals who are sick.

Authorities executed a search warrant and arrested an individual seen distributing face shields to suspected rioters in Los Angeles. Identifying, locating, and arresting those involved in organizing, supporting, funding, or facilitating the riots is a high priority. The riots appear orchestrated, coordinated, and well-funded, so authorities want to understand who is behind them. This arrest is considered a key one in that effort.

The speaker is questioning whether someone can be arrested for not wearing a mask. They suggest calling the police to confirm if the person is a real officer. The speaker expresses confusion and frustration about the situation, mentioning that the person is being harassed for not wearing a mask and telling them to wear one.

In the United States, wearing masks is not necessary. It may make people feel better and block some droplets, but it doesn't provide perfect protection. There are unintended consequences like people constantly touching their face. Masks should be reserved for healthcare providers and sick individuals.

Speaker 0 questions the masked individuals: “You guys covering your faces? You wanna take those masks off? Is this a kidnapping? Yeah. You don't look like it.” They continue, asking, “Why are you hiding your faces? Why are you hiding your faces? Can I see some faces here? How do I know this is the police? Seems like bullshit to me.” They conclude, “Certainly looks like it. Bit of a kidnapping going on here.”

Hey guys, can I pause for a moment? Are there any armed individuals here? Yes, the police. Law enforcement. Can you please provide your credentials? Okay. What was the reason for your call? You need to do...

I wear a mask not out of fear of coronavirus, but as a courtesy to others. People are overreacting, it's not a big deal. Just wear the mask.

The speaker wants the police to publicly state that the current situation is incorrect and that they will not enforce it. They believe that citizens have the right to bear arms and should not be arrested for it. They mention having seen this happen multiple times before.