reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I learned about my uncle Jack's assassination when my mother picked me up from school and we saw the flag at half-mast. My father was distraught. The first person he called was the CIA desk chief, asking, "Did your people do this?" He then called Enrique Ruiz, a former Bay of Pigs Brigade commander and friend, asking the same question. CIA Director John McCollum visited our home that day and spent time with us. My father was devastated and walked around like a ghost for months. We hugged him under our yard's cedar tree, trying to comfort him during his grief.

I'm consumed by guilt; I should have done more, been faster. Something happened in the motorcade. The limousine sped up. Mrs. Kennedy screamed; they shot him in the head. "I love you, Jack," she cried. It happened at Dealey Plaza. People scrambled to escape. I saw women running barefoot, a father shielding his son with his body. We were incredibly close when he was shot in the head. My maternal instincts took over.

Speaker 1 states that he and Linda have had disagreements over Lyndon ordering Mike Wallace to assassinate the president. Speaker 1 says Lyndon should not have issued that order, but refers to Lyndon's embarrassment caused by Kennedy in Texas. Speaker 0 says Lyndon could have helped him, but Speaker 1 claims Lyndon only cares about himself. Speaker 0 says he was blackmailed to keep quiet about the Henry Marshall killing, and that 17 people were killed mysteriously. Speaker 0 says he has lost money and it has hurt his family. He is disgusted with Lyndon, but also feels sorry for him.

Life has been challenging lately due to tensions between Linda and me over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. It's been a hectic time, but we've managed to get through it. I’ve always been loyal to Lyndon, but this order is unforgettable. Reflecting on our past in Texas and the embarrassment Lyndon faced with Kennedy, I understand why he acted as he did. However, Lyndon is someone who prioritizes himself above all else. I felt pressured regarding the Henry Marshall situation, and I had to keep quiet due to blackmail. Many have mysteriously died in this mess, and it has caused me significant personal and financial distress. I’m left feeling disgusted with Lyndon, yet I also feel a sense of sympathy.

Having a spouse that's good at insider trading, like Paul Pelosi, is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how some people acquire wealth. Talking about the other methods is risky, and frankly, it's not lengthening my life expectancy to discuss this. I was supposed to go back to DC, but how am I going to survive? These people are going to kill me for sure. I actually have to be careful that I don't push too hard on the corruption stuff because it's going to get me killed.

I was at home after my lunch swim, about to return to the Justice Department, when the White House called. It was Ethel, my wife, who answered; it was J. Edgar Hoover. Hearing Hoover's name, I knew it wasn't good news. He told me the President had been shot, possibly fatally. The news was devastating. It was a shock, and it changed my life forever. My brother was the golden boy; if he could be killed, anything was possible. It instilled a sense of fatalism in me.

My boss yelled at me to call the White House. The operator connected me to Robert Kennedy, who asked what was happening. I told him both President Kennedy and the governor had been shot—it was as bad as it could get. He hung up. Mrs. Kennedy knew immediately, when he fell into her lap, that the President was dead.

Nixon, after a few drinks, revealed that Dallas was responsible for JFK's assassination. He admitted that both he and Lyndon Johnson wanted to be president, but Nixon wasn't willing to kill for it. This revelation inspired the speaker to write a book. They acknowledge that various theories exist, such as the CIA's involvement, as suggested by Robert Kennedy and Sam Gianconda's daughter. The speaker believes that within 84 hours of JFK's death, Johnson allowed the military-industrial complex to pursue their interests in Vietnam. Johnson also provided assurances to Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had recently fired for betraying him.

The first participant asks the second to identify who did each major event. For MLK Jr., the second participant says, “That was a CI operation because they considered him a dangerous communist. And but the FBI was bugging the, in churches where he was giving some of his speeches in churches. They were bugging the podiums and following him around. He was a top target, for elimination.” For JFK, the second participant states, “I think that was a CI hit. They they may have employed some mafia connections to carry it out because that was their mafia assassination program.” Concerning LBJ, the first participant notes, “LBJ was very involved in all that in Dallas. So,” and the second participant adds, “he an evil man.” The first participant affirms, “He was an evil man.” Turning to Pearl Harbor, the second participant claims, “They knew the attack was coming was coming. They knew where it was gonna happen in Pearl Harbor and when. And they they told no one, and they let it happen on purpose. That that's from the commander of the Pacific Fleet. I would say that's a pretty pretty credible witness.” He continues, “So, yeah, that that was a false admitted that. They admitted they had the and they heard it was gonna happen. And, you how know, else were you gonna get Americans to be on the side of this war that had nothing to do with us?” This leads to the discussion of 9/11. The second participant says, “My opinion. As a criminal investigator, as a former CI officer, nine eleven was not the act of a bunch of poorly flight trained terrorists that executed an unbelievably meticulous, piloting of those aircraft, even even pilots. There's there's pilots for nine eleven truth now, and they say, we could not have done that. Not possible.” He adds, “And then we go to the passport issue, and we go to the Tower 7, which was a controlled demolition.” The second participant further asserts, “You talk to any structural engineer, and and and I I have. And the fact I think George w Bush blacked out. I think it was 40 pages of the 09/11 report dealing with Saudi Arabia. So what wait a minute. This report was supposed to be for the American people on what happened, and you blacked all these pages out? What in the world?” He continues, “I do not think that it was a bunch of un poorly trained or untrained terrorists that did it. I think there was another source behind it. I think it was intentional, and I'm going just from a a criminal invest investigative perspective just looking at the evidence, what evidence we have, that that was an intentional act, And it would fall right into the MO that you and I are talking about.” He concludes that the event was “Horrible” and emphasizes that “the shadow government deep state or especially the CIA. It does not matter. Their pawns on their chessboard, they don't care that three thousand people were horribly killed that day, but it achieved the aim of gutting the US constitution, bringing in the horrific Patriot Act Mhmm. Giving the CIA unthinkable authority for secret prison prisons and torture beyond waterboarding and and secret renditions and all of that, the FBI, the ability to to, spy on Americans came out of the Patriot Act. So it was the perfect national security state, energizer that the Patriot Act was, and 70 of the congressmen and senators that read the Patriot Act didn't even read it. They just signed off on it without even reading the bill.”

I talk about my uncle's assassination and my belief that intelligence agencies were involved. Despite being aware of the danger, I don't live in fear but take precautions to protect myself.

The speaker lays out a narrative in which Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, is intricately connected to the CIA and to a longtime insider, James Angleton. The claim is that Mossad and Angleton formed an alliance “forever,” with Angleton described as “the mole” who was aligned with Mossad. In 1960, Angleton was the head of the CIA’s Directorate of Foreign Intelligence, and he is depicted as the person who was always searching for a Russian mole. The speaker asserts that Angleton was effectively the Russian mole because of his close friendship with Mossad, to the extent that he would share information with Mossad and Mossad would not relay it to Russia. The narrative then moves to 1963, referencing David Ben-Gurion, the Israeli prime minister, arguing that Israel decided to kill John F. Kennedy. The speaker quotes Ben-Gurion as saying that Kennedy’s threats of inspections of “demonic” (interpreted as a mispronunciation or coded term for dangerous issues) were unacceptable, and that Ben-Gurion said, “It’s none of his frigging business. I don’t wanna hear anymore from Kennedy. You kill him.” According to the speaker, Ben-Gurion issued this order to Mossad and then resigned so he could not be held responsible for it. The implication is that Mossad then went to Angleton, implying that the Kennedy assassination was not a CIA job, but was “greased by the CIA” because Angleton had his connections at Mossad. From there, the speaker claims that Corsican sharpshooters were hired by Mossad for the Kennedy assassination as part of a larger operation at Dealey Plaza, including the escape. The speaker asserts that public suspicion has misattributed the blame to the mob, Lyndon Johnson, or Castro, but maintains that it was Israel that carried it out. The stated motive is tied to Israel’s desire to avoid further inspections related to their nuclear program. The speaker claims this is connected to Israel’s nuclear and biological capabilities and asserts that plutonium was stolen from the United States to support their program. In summary, the speaker contends that the Kennedy assassination was orchestrated not by the CIA alone, but through a coordinated effort involving Mossad, James Angleton, and David Ben-Gurion, with Israel acting to prevent scrutiny of its nuclear activities by eliminating Kennedy, aided by Corsican shooters and a CIA-Mossad alliance.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

It's not just blackmail or bribery that makes people obey, but also the threat of violence. Every US president has been threatened with violence implicitly because of the murder of John F. Kennedy. Presidents understand the outlines of what happened, but no one has released all the files. The message is clear: if you get too far outside the boundaries, you could wind up like JFK. The forces that murdered the sitting president in 1963 probably placed those boundaries.

The Dallas crowd was enthusiastic, and I was relieved that everyone was behaving. I told President Kennedy that Dallas clearly loved him. Then, almost instantly, I heard a noise. I looked at the President; his hands flew to his neck, and he slumped in his seat. He didn't speak, but his eyes…

Life has been tumultuous lately due to disagreements over Lyndon's order to assassinate the president. Despite my loyalty to Lyndon, this decision is unforgettable. I've faced blackmail regarding the Henry Marshall case, and many have mysteriously died in connection to these events. The tape I've held for years reveals discussions about the JFK assassination and implicates Lyndon Johnson and his associates. This tape has been shared with influential figures, including Trump and others fighting for our country. The implications are significant; if they got away with this in the '60s, what does it mean for today? My grandfather, a key player in these events, recorded these conversations as insurance against potential fallout. This history is crucial for understanding the current political landscape and the deep state’s ongoing influence.

My uncle, President Kennedy, resisted pressure from the military and intelligence to start wars, including the invasion of Cuba. He refused to send combat troops to Vietnam, only allowing military advisers. After learning of American casualties, he ordered all troops out of Vietnam, but tragically, he was assassinated a month later. Kennedy's presidency was marked by his conflict with the military and intelligence apparatus, culminating in his efforts to end US involvement in Vietnam.

John Kennedy was a close acquaintance of mine. He had ambitions to become an actor but his mother pushed him towards politics. Despite their volatile relationship, he and his wife Caroline loved each other. Unfortunately, their lives were cut short in a plane crash. Kennedy had plans to run for the Senate, likely in New York, and his mother strongly supported this. He was a handsome and talented individual who had the potential to become president.

The speaker, initially uninterested in the JFK assassination due to its association with conspiracy theories, has since learned enough to believe "there's something actually there." Trump issued an executive order to release files on the JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and MLK assassinations, but the files have not been released. The speaker believes the CIA was involved in some way, but doesn't think protecting the CIA is the reason for the delay, especially after the Church Committee hearings. The speaker questions who is being protected and if a foreign government is involved, stating there is active pressure on elected officials to stop the disclosure. The speaker questions who is powerful enough to scare people into slow-walking the disclosure, as slow-walking the disclosure is the same as not providing the disclosure. The speaker believes it's important to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination.

The speaker discusses the assassination of his father and uncle, stating that his father was shot from behind despite always being in front of him. They mention the possibility of government involvement, particularly the CIA, and how his father, who was the attorney general at the time, lost investigative capacity after his brother's death. The speaker finds it remarkable that someone in such a position would suspect their own CIA, especially since documents related to the assassination are still being withheld. They also mention new evidence that raises doubts about the guilt of the convicted assassin, Sirhan.

Two years ago in Paris, I was known as the man who accompanied Mrs. Kennedy. Traveling through Texas now, I get a similar feeling. People aren't curious about Linden and my attire. Mrs. Kennedy had a difficult time the previous four months, grieving the loss of baby Patrick. This Texas trip was her first public appearance outside the White House since, and it was uplifting for people to see her happy and smiling. Before this trip, we never publicly displayed affection. Afterward, we held hands and hugged openly, changing our relationship completely. I've never seen her happier. In Fort Worth, we were given a hat to protect the President from the rain, which he doesn't usually wear.

I don't remember the details of cheating or the shooting. I started remembering things clearly when facing death row, maybe a year or two later. The crime was beyond tragic, impacting not just the Kennedy family but also the public and victims. It was a nightmare for everyone involved.

On one hand, I was praying for assassins to come back. On the other hand, how can we hire this nigga to get exactly who we want? He was so close. Now let's just try harder. Look at the pamphlet we sent out. There’s a *****

The speaker expresses concern that they might be killed if they fully destroy corruption and graft. They mention two separate incidents before they supported Trump where individuals traveled to Austin to kill them. One individual believed the speaker put a chip in their head, while the other had "chief serial killer" in their X profile bio. Both individuals, described as having severe mental illness rather than political motivations, were arrested and held in Travis County Jail simultaneously. They have since been released, though possibly with ankle monitors. The speaker believes the probability of being targeted by homicidal maniacs is proportionate to how often their name is heard.

You know what's interesting about assassination? Well, not only does it change those popularity polls in a big fucking hurry, but it's also interesting to notice who it is we assassinate. Do ever notice who it is? Stop to think of who it is we kill. It's always people who've told us to live together in harmony and try to love one another. Jesus, Gandhi, Lincoln, John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Medgar Evers, Malcolm x, John Lennon. They all said, try to live together peacefully. Bam. Right in the fucking head. Apparently, we're not ready for that. Yeah. That's difficult behavior for us.

Someone was clearly on their way to kill me, so I've required protective services essentially all the time. It is very troublesome to me, especially because they've involved my wife and my three daughters. How do I feel? Terrible. Do I continue to receive threats today? Yes, I do. Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world, the death threats go up.