TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker received a letter from the IRS stating that because they closed the bank account used for payments, they now have to send payments by mail. There is a $225 user fee to cover providing an installment agreement. The speaker now owes the IRS $1,700, plus a $38 late payment, and the $225 fee. The IRS said that if the speaker doesn't pay, they can put a tax lien on their home. The speaker is angry because they were initially told they were due a tax return, but now the IRS claims they owe $1,700. The speaker expresses strong disapproval of the IRS.

Hi, I’m Carrie from Scotland, Ontario. My husband Rich and I, along with our dog Kenzie, have faced significant challenges over the past four years due to government overreach. We were forced to choose between an experimental vaccine and our jobs, which was traumatic. On February 18, 2022, I discovered our bank account was empty, leaving me panicked and questioning how we would pay our mortgage, bills, and buy food. Despite my shy nature, I feel compelled to pursue a lawsuit for accountability. No one should endure the fear and anxiety we experienced. We are fighting for all Canadians to prevent this from happening again. Your support is crucial in our quest for justice and accountability. Remember, this happened to me; it could happen to you.

Living costs in Canada are overwhelming, shifting from a cost of living to a cost of survival. A single mother, working 3 jobs, shared her struggles with debt to the government. The CRA criticized her for not maxing out credit cards to pay them, urging her to cut back on groceries for her 3 children. She confronted them, blaming the high prices on their actions. She emphasized that everyone is suffering together. Translation: The high cost of living in Canada is making it difficult for people to survive. A single mother working multiple jobs shared her struggles with debt to the government. The CRA criticized her for not using credit cards to pay them, telling her to cut back on groceries for her children. She confronted them, blaming them for the high prices and emphasizing that everyone is suffering together.

The speaker discusses taxation without representation in the US, highlighting how Americans pay roughly 50% of their income in various taxes. They break down the different taxes they pay, including income tax, property tax, and sales tax, showing how it adds up to nearly 50%. Despite this high tax burden, they express frustration at the lack of benefits and services they receive in return, such as affordable healthcare, nutritious food, and quality infrastructure. The speaker criticizes the government for not adequately representing the interests of taxpayers.

Speaker 0 outlines a stance of widespread tax resistance among Americans who deem the government corrupt and unrepresentative. He states, “there were so many people, mostly American patriots, who said, I don't care what the consequences are. I will not continue to pay taxes to a corrupt government that doesn't represent me.” He claims the IRS is already down “25% from last year.” He then criticizes those who have “never worked a day in their life but yet wanna make rules for the rest of us,” arguing they “overdo themselves and kill the goose that laid the golden egg.” He describes consequences of the government’s actions as not only crashing the economy but creating a scenario where people “have a choice” between basic needs and paying taxes: “Keep a roof over your family's head or pay taxes. Feed your children or pay taxes. Live a little bit like a fucking human being or pay your fucking taxes.” He asserts that many will be unable to pay taxes this year, and those who “just up and decide fuck them and file exempt on their fucking forms” will “totally overwhelm the IRS,” including “those 80,000 gun toting Nazi motherfuckers who have been harassing us for years.” The message implies a public record of asking the IRS for the law that states a wage earner must pay taxes, and claims they cannot provide it “because it was never legal in the first place.” He elaborates that “when you work and somebody gives you money or some form of compensation, that's not profit. That's an exchange, and it was never intended to be taxes.” The consequence, he says, is that “the government's gonna self destruct. It's gonna totally overwhelm the system.” He uses imagery to argue that people should resist, saying, “let those motherfuckers try driving their car with no gas in it.” In closing, he invites audience participation: “If you like what I'm saying, give me a hell yeah and a fuck you to their paperwork.”

The speaker claims to have released a Substack article and press release detailing IRS and judicial corruption. The speaker alleges that the IRS is targeting Ebenezer Howe, a legal non-filer, by fabricating returns in his name and manipulating his individual master file. According to the speaker, the IRS constructed a fraudulent debt, sued Howe through the DOJ (United States versus Howe), and is now foreclosing on his house due to these fraudulent returns. The speaker states that American Made Action is taking a stand against this and working with Michael Ellis. The speaker urges listeners to read the Substack article at annvandersteel.substack.com, which includes exhibits and the press release, claiming it reveals further fraud against Americans by the IRS and federal government. The speaker asserts that the government is stealing property, sovereignty, and freedom through a track and surveillance state.

The speaker insists on a real inquiry into everything that happened during COVID-19, stating that those responsible must be held accountable, but currently are not. The speaker accuses authorities of wanting to move on from what they did during the "COVID hysteria," but the speaker believes their actions were not okay. They claim their charter of rights was not respected.

The speaker initially believed that there was a law requiring people to file tax returns, but after researching for three and a half months, they couldn't find a clear statute that made a person liable. They realized that the government collects taxes to generate revenue, but they were unaware of the complexities involved. The speaker attended a meeting where someone argued that the IRS lacks authority, but they initially dismissed it as taking things out of context. However, after a conversation with the person, the speaker agreed to research the matter further. They delved into the Internal Revenue Code and found sections that seemed relevant but didn't provide a clear answer. The speaker's research led them to question their own authority to enforce tax laws, ultimately leading to their resignation. They discovered that the Internal Revenue Manual restricts enforcement due to constitutional issues. The speaker believes that if more people knew about the government's methods, they would stop filing tax returns.

Speaker 0 asserts that the IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without a search warrant or a crime claim, discovered by an undercover journalist. They claim the IRS has access to every person’s bank account, and that the agency has been working with the Department of Justice and has no problem going after the “little guy” to ensure taxes are paid. This is described as a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. Speaker 0 and Jim Jordan sent a letter to the IRS demanding information about how AI is used and how civil rights are protected. Speaker 1 asks what the end game is and how to protect constitutional rights given the inevitability of AI, seeking ways to safeguard Americans. Speaker 0 responds that a new administration is needed in November, accusing the current administration of being lawless in terms of surveillance of the public, members of Congress, local officials, protesters, and voters. They claim the administration has “weaponized the government against us,” and that protections of the Bill of Rights—First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments—have been ignored. Speaker 0 states that one of the goals is to address this perceived weaponization and surveillance.

The speakers in the video discuss their experiences and research regarding the requirement to file a tax return and pay income tax. Speaker 0 initially couldn't find a specific law mandating tax returns, leading to their resignation. Speaker 1 left the IRS after raising concerns about the agency's violation of the law and people's rights. Speaker 2 conducted research to win a $50,000 challenge, but couldn't find the law either. They believe that if the truth is revealed, it would expose a fraudulent system. Speaker 3 was surprised to hear IRS agents say there was no law requiring tax filing or payment. Both Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 admit to not filing tax returns, and they mention that millions of others also don't file.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

The speaker discusses the government's spending of $8 million on searching for unmarked graves at a school in Kamloops, BC, with no results. They criticize the wasteful spending and highlight the financial struggles of Canadians. The speaker expresses frustration at consistently being proven right about issues years before they are acknowledged, leading to backlash and cancelation. They predict being vindicated in the future.

The IRS has been using AI to access American citizens' bank accounts without warrants. They claim to have access to everyone's accounts and are willing to go after small taxpayers. Jim Jordan and I demanded answers from the IRS. We need a new administration to protect our civil rights from this lawless surveillance.

The speaker asserts that you cannot legally pay your taxes. They state: “tax dollars have been spent in a global crime syndicate,” and “you now know this and it’s provable,” which means “if you willingly pay your taxes you now are a willing participant and co conspirator.” The guidance given is for when you file an exemption: “This is what you’re gonna say when you file an exemption. Owe back taxes? This is what you’re gonna tell your agent.” The agent will threaten you, and you should respond with, “I said that I will not be a willing participant in a global crime syndicate.” The speaker says you should repeat it, “and you repeat it again.” They advise to “play the congress game” and claim that “you legally cannot pay your taxes now that you know this. It is against the law.”

"We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed." "They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed." "Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records." "A supervisor covered it up." "The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up." "That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law." "And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way." "Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system." "It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all." "Chew on this, America."

I refuse to pay taxes for the third year because I disagree with how the government uses my hard-earned money. I can't afford to live in Canada anymore, and I don't want to work 70 hours a week just to survive. I used to get money back from taxes, but now I have to pay. I don't want to support a system that I believe is flawed and run by incompetent leaders.

The speaker claims the prime minister is a climate zealot and eco extremist. They assert the prime minister has pushed for net-zero banking for decades, intending to prevent banks from investing in oil and gas. The speaker alleges the prime minister plans to increase carbon taxes on the oil and gas industry to eviscerate it, referencing the prime minister's book as evidence. According to the speaker, Canada's national identity, unity, freedom, and future are at a monumental crossroads.

The speaker, a truck driver, discusses the implications of carbon taxes on the goods and services that consumers buy. They share their fuel bill, which includes regular clear diesel, dyed diesel, and diesel exhaust fluid. The total bill for their fuel is $3,402, with $1,365 worth of taxes. This includes a federal tax, provincial tax, carbon tax, and GST. The speaker expresses frustration with the tax on tax on tax system and emphasizes that consumers are ultimately paying for it. They urge people to fight back against these taxes.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

The speaker, a former IRS agent, shares her experience working for the IRS and her realization that the income tax system is fraudulent. She explains how the IRS uses tactics to make people believe they owe more money than they actually do. After leaving the IRS, she researched and discovered evidence that the income tax is not necessary for running the country. She also discusses the Federal Reserve and its non-federal nature, as well as the media's influence in suppressing this information. The speaker encourages people to do their own research and make informed decisions about paying taxes. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the system and taking action to bring the country back on track.

Many people are refusing to pay their taxes this year, arguing that the government is breaking the law by using taxpayer dollars to support illegal immigration. They believe that the government is giving illegal immigrants voting rights, driver's licenses, and even land and homes, while veterans are being displaced. Some states are even allowing illegal immigrants to become police officers. The speaker encourages everyone to join this movement and not be afraid of the consequences, as the government cannot arrest everyone. They argue that paying taxes to a corrupt government is reckless and illegal, and that it is important to prioritize taking care of one's family in these difficult times. They declare that they will not be sheep and will not pay their taxes this year.

The speaker asks about penalties for not paying the carbon tax on home heating and wonders if the federal government can prevent Premier Scott Moe from stopping the collection of these fees. They question whether there will be penalties, fees, or even jail time for non-compliance. The speaker emphasizes that the federal government expects everyone in Canada to obey the law and highlights Canada's reputation for peace, order, and good government.

The speaker, a truck driver, discusses the impact of carbon taxes on the goods and services that consumers buy. They share their fuel bill, which includes regular clear diesel, dyed diesel, and diesel exhaust fluid. The total bill for their fuel is $3,402, with $1,365 worth of taxes. This includes a federal tax, provincial tax, carbon tax, and GST. The speaker expresses frustration with the tax on tax on tax system and highlights that consumers are ultimately paying for it. They urge people to fight back against these taxes.

In 2025, Canadians are allegedly still having bank accounts frozen, with People's Party of Canada candidate Megan Murphy as the most recent target. Murphy claims her bank account was frozen the same day her candidacy was confirmed, reportedly under government direction. The speaker recalls the freezing of bank accounts during the trucker convoy and criticizes the Conservative Party, particularly Pierre Poilievre, for not addressing this issue and other related incidents, such as political prisoners and election interference, with the same fervor that liberals use the "threat to democracy" label. The speaker suggests the Conservative Party's silence on these issues, including the cases of Chris Barber, Tamara Lynch, Randy Hillier, and Amy Hamm, normalizes what they see as far-left authoritarianism. They question what the Conservative Party is fighting for if it won't defend individuals with conservative ideas who are losing their jobs or getting their bank accounts frozen.

The speaker is the ex-wife of Philip Kramer and claims Kamala Harris destroyed her family. Philip Kramer was an attorney fighting for homeowners after the 2008 mortgage crisis. Kamala Harris raided Kramer's law firm and froze their assets, allegedly ruining his career and taking everything, including savings and children's college funds. The speaker claims her family was left with nothing and would be homeless without help from family and friends. She says Kamala Harris used Philip's theories to cut a deal with the banks, leaving her family in ruins while Harris claimed victory. The speaker states she is drowning in debt and her children paid the price for Harris's ambition. She believes Harris's actions were political manipulation, and her family is still living with the consequences.