reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A man from another country demands resources from black Americans, wearing a shirt that says "all power to the people." He criticizes black Americans as lazy and says no more money for them. The speaker blames Joe Biden and Democrats for creating this situation, where migrants feel entitled to resources meant for black Americans. He questions why black Americans should continue supporting Democrats in 2024.

During a heated exchange, Speaker 0 claims he spoke with over 300,000 real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evince the Civil War or the Confederacy and to label law enforcement as a sickness, noting he has over a 150 sworn police officers on his detail. He asks what the other would say to these people and whether he would have CPD detail stand down if he or his wife Stacy were attacked. The other participant responds that numbers are increasing and brushes off the decline, saying, 'it's going up... check out your comments.' They discuss a critique, calling the addiction on jails and incarceration and militarism an evil, citing Doctor King. The conversation shifts to immigration, alleging incident: 'Illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman... and raped her,' and asks if ICE should deport that individual and the rapist, concluding, 'That's the answer... for real Chicagoans.'

Speaker 0 contends that there is no link between immigration and sexual violence against women and girls. They then raise a pointed question about grooming gangs, identifying them as being of largely Pakistani descent that are “blotting our communities,” and ask if there is anything the other speaker has to say about this issue. Speaker 1 responds by saying the question is perfectly valid, but notes that they have moved on to other topics. They request to stick with the subject at hand. They explain that they were not asked to come in, and that they have strong feelings about immigration, which they stated in their reply. They state clearly that they are not going to start injecting racial connotations into discussions about immigration or crime. The brief phrase “The woman behind” appears at the end, implying a note about a person present, but the sentence is cut off.

The speakers express concern about resources being allocated to people who have never lived in their communities before. They argue that the safety of their black communities, already plagued by crime, is being compromised by placing unvetted non-taxpayers near vulnerable populations. They call for an Office of Black America to address these issues. One speaker shares a personal story of being placed on a waitlist while immigrants were prioritized. They emphasize the importance of taking care of their own communities first. The speakers also highlight the negative impact of having a large number of migrants in their community without proper monitoring and housing plans. They urge others to stand strong and not sell their homes.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 recounts feedback from “real Chicagoans,” describing them as mostly Black and Brown, and claims they tell him that the other person does not seem to know the difference between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens. He asserts that these individuals feel the other person is siding with illegal aliens over their communities. He then pivots to a direct line of questioning. The real question, as Speaker 0 presents it, concerns a violent incident: “An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her.” He presses for a direct response about what would have happened “if that had been your wife, Stacy.” He stages the hypothetical to elicit a clear stance from Speaker 1 on how to respond to such a crime and its immigration context. Speaker 1, however, interrupts to steer the conversation away from the loaded scenario. He repeatedly signals a move on, indicating a preference not to engage with the hypothetical or to answer the pointed ethical dilemma on the spot. The back-and-forth centers on the tactic of addressing the question versus avoiding it, with Speaker 0 insisting on a straightforward answer “as a man, not as mayor, but as a man.” The exchange escalates as Speaker 0 urges Speaker 1 to provide a simple yes or no and to address the issue directly, effectively challenging Speaker 1 to commit to a position regarding ICE and deportation in light of the described crime. Speaker 1 responds by again stating to move on, resisting the direct yes/no framework. Throughout, Speaker 0 persists in pressing for a candid, personal response to the hypothetical crime and its immigration implications, while Speaker 1 maintains a boundary about continuing the discussion in that moment. Ultimately, Speaker 1 declines to answer the specific deportation question in the moment, and Speaker 0 reaffirms the demand for a direct personal answer. The segment ends with Speaker 1 thanking the audience and moving on, leaving the explicit yes-or-no question unresolved in this exchange.

Speaker 0 states: "Your big shots. Already have a nigger mare. We don't need any more nigger big shots. Already have a nigger mare. We don't need any more nigger big shots." Speaker 1 describes a future problem and the current crisis: "There's about a 100,000 of them who are the predators. A 100,000 of the kids you read about in the front page of the newspaper every day. Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, structure, without any conscience developing. A portion of them will become the predators fifteen years from now. And, madam president, we have predators on our streets." He adds that "They are beyond the pale, many of those people. We have no choice but to take them out of society."

The speaker states that an uninvited individual acted disrespectfully by being near the family, demonstrating their character. The speaker believes this person knows it is inappropriate to be near the family. The speaker asserts that actions speak louder than words. According to the speaker, political operatives are trying to turn the situation into a political issue involving hate, bigotry, and racism. The speaker claims that conservative operatives have been posting about the case nonstop.

Speaker 0: We already have a n-word mayor. We don't need any more n-word big shots. Speaker 1: Poor kids are just as bright and tall as white kids. Speaker 0: The first mainstream African American was clean and nice. Speaker 1: If you have a problem figuring out whether you're premier Trump and you ain't black. Speaker 0: A Black woman helped me stay sequestered by stocking shelves. Speaker 0: Our community is as diverse as the Bronx, Miami, and San Antonio. Speaker 1: The Latino community is incredibly diverse, unlike the African American community. Speaker 1: Cancel it, Miguel. That's how you play.

The speaker claims that current policies have caused America's housing shortage by allowing over 10,000,000 people into the country illegally and providing them with housing vouchers, food stamps, free plane tickets, and free cell phones. The speaker asserts that uncontrolled immigration and open borders have expanded the population, contributing to the housing crisis. The speaker also alleges that the person being criticized is responsible for the housing shortage and that their donors at BlackRock are buying up houses, while their donors at Airbnb are turning neighborhoods into transient areas with no social connection. The speaker finds it unacceptable for this person to lecture on the housing shortage that they allegedly caused.

Speaker 0: Oppose white supremacists. Don't single out the press. Speaker 1: We already have a black mayor. No need for more black big shots. Speaker 0: Determine if you support Trump, you're not black. Can't go to a 711 without an Indian accent. Speaker 2: We used to joke about that, but he was a friend, mentor, and a great guy.

Speaker 0 asks for an ID from Speaker 1, insisting, “Do you have an ID on you, ma'am?” Speaker 1 replies, “I don't need a ID to walk around in in my city.” Speaker 0 presses for IDs, warning, “If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you.” Speaker 1 refuses, saying, “I don't need to take out you take out your ID.” Speaker 0 presses again: “Hey, ma'am.” Speaker 1 asserts, “It's ma'am. Am US citizen. I am US citizen.” Speaker 0 asks, “Alright. Can we see an ID, please?” Speaker 1 repeats, “I am US citizen. I don't need to carry around an ID in my home. Well, where were born?” Speaker 0 questions, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “This is my home,” and then, “Minneapolis is my home.” Speaker 0 clarifies, “Ma'am, that's not that's we're doing an immigration check. We're doing a citizen check. We're asking you where you were born.” Speaker 1 insists, “This is where I belong. This is my home.” Speaker 0 pushes, “Ma'am, can belong here, but where were you born? Not gonna give you a ID.” Speaker 1 repeats, “I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point.” Speaker 0 presses, “Ma'am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct.” Speaker 1 protests, “You're making me a skirt. You're making me a Do you have an ID?” Speaker 0 again asks for an ID, and Speaker 1 repeats, “This is my home.” Speaker 0 states, “Ma'am, where were you born?” Speaker 1 responds, “I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable.” Speaker 0 continues, “You guys, you terrorizing people.” Speaker 1 emphasizes, “Ma'am And it's not.” Speaker 0 asks again, “Where were you born?” Speaker 1 states, “It doesn't matter where I was born. Belong here. I am US citizen.” She adds, “What else can I say? I am citizen. This is my home.” Speaker 0 warns, “Menia realize that if… [you] lie,” and Speaker 1 reiterates, “Menia, but this is my home.” Eventually Speaker 1 declares, “I am US citizen. I am not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?”

Two individuals are having a conversation about the presence of African immigrants in their communities. The speaker expresses concern about these immigrants being brought into their neighborhoods and suggests that something negative is about to happen. They emphasize the need for unity among their own community and criticize those who believe Africans and African Americans are the same. The speaker also mentions the dropping off of young men in fighting age and suggests a plan to remove African Americans from their communities. The conversation ends with a derogatory remark towards African Americans who do not recognize the alleged threat.

The speaker criticizes a comment about the 3rd world as race baiting and fear-mongering. They challenge the other person to explain the intended purpose. The other person mentions understanding potential consequences and asks for clarification on the term "3rd world." The conversation shifts to discussing victims of violence by illegal immigrants.

Speaker 0 makes a controversial statement about being black and supporting Trump. They also make a comment about poor kids and white kids. Speaker 2 suggests bringing social workers into homes to help parents raise their children. Speaker 0 mentions needing an Indian accent to go to certain places. They also describe an ideal African American person. Speaker 1 talks about the challenges of registering and going online in the Hispanic and African American communities. Speaker 0 emphasizes the diversity within the Latino community. They also discuss the importance of taking action against criminals, regardless of their background. The transcript ends with a derogatory remark.

Speaker 1: Mentions there are many things she wishes people knew, but mostly with the administration she wishes people knew that “we're letting in criminals daily.” Speaker 2: States the big issue for the region is migration, noting “we poured a lot of money into Central America,” amounting to “4,000,000,000 over four years,” but migrants are now coming from elsewhere, including Venezuela. Speaker 3: Asks, “So what is the end goal?” Speaker 1: Asks why aren’t they allowing children, noting “a lot of children travel to The United States, David.” Speaker 2: Explains aid goes to female presence in Mexico, training women, and mentions working with gender issues in Pakistan, aiming to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. Asks whether US taxpayers’ money should be spent in “our country on this issue,” implying women may not care about certain aspects. Speaker 2: Asks how close Secretary Lincoln is to him, “five degrees separation,” and notes migration is a niche industry that flies under the radar; the average American doesn’t know what they do. Speaker 1: Thanks the chairman, ranking member, and members for the opportunity to testify. Speaker 2: Mentions upcoming briefings in two weeks on the FY 2025 budget request on the Hill. Speaker 0: States migration is the big issue for the Hill and asks, “Stop migration. What are we doing to stop migration?” Speaker 1: Responds that he’s not accountable for that and says, “We do stuff,” referencing the root causes strategy, which is about giving money to support and help people at the origins of migrants so they feel they can stay there instead of migrating. It’s “Central America, basically.” He says they poured a lot of money into Central America, and again mentions “4,000,000,000 over four years.” Speaker 2: Asks if it’s doing anything; response: yes, for them, but migrants are now coming from elsewhere like Venezuela, and acknowledges that outcome looks bad for the administration and for politics in general. Speaker 3: Seeks the end goal and asks again why there’s a limit on who’s allowed in. Speaker 1: Cites changes in demographics in the United States; notes that Nebraskans are traditional Americans not leftists, while Latin Americans are described as leftists, framing it as a system to try to change demographics.

The speaker states that an uninvited individual acted disrespectfully by being near the family, demonstrating their character. The speaker believes this person knows it's inappropriate to be near the family. The speaker asserts that actions speak louder than words. The speaker accuses political operatives of trying to turn the situation into a political issue of hate, bigotry, and racism. The speaker claims conservative operatives have been posting nonstop about the case.

Speaker 0 opened by saying that over the last week he has interacted with over 300,000 plus real Chicagoans who say it is hate speech to evoke the Civil War or the Confederacy, to say that law enforcement is a sickness, while the other person has over 150 sworn CPD officers on his detail. He asked what the other person would say to those people and whether he would ask his 150 sworn officers to stand down if he and his wife Stacy are ever attacked, shot at, or rammed with a protester’s vehicle. Speaker 1 responded with sarcasm about the large number, joking that the interactions had “gone down to 300,000,” and claimed he had checked the other person’s comments. He asserted that the addiction on jails and incarceration and the addiction of militarism is evil, referencing Doctor King, and said it is incumbent to ensure that “the real Chicagoans” or the real people of America receive attention, suggesting we should spend billions of dollars overseas on the people in Chicago instead. Speaker 0 pushed back, saying that the real Chicagoans he talks to, mostly Black and Brown, feel that the other person does not distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens, and that he is siding with illegal aliens over communities. He asserted that a recent incident involved “an illegal alien from Nicaragua” who grabbed a woman on the North Side, bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. He asked whether, if that had been the other person’s wife, Stacy, he would want ICE to deport that illegal alien, and asked for a yes or no answer. Speaker 1 pressed to get a direct answer, asking for a response “as a man, not as mayor,” and repeated the question about whether ICE should deport the rapist. Speaker 0 reiterated his question and stated that the answer for real Chicagoans is the deportation of the rapist, and that was the “answer for real Chicagoans.” Speaker 1 then apologized for being late, blaming traffic, and the other person quipped about the traffic, noting, “You’re not blaming me for the traffic, are you?” and said he had been watching.

"The president has been trying to provoke violence here, right here, in the black communities and in the brown communities, having ICE kidnap our neighbors, having black having the black community be harassed and profiled and want, want a response. We say, hell no. We won't go." "Today, we get today today, we gather to speak plainly about policy path that sounds strong, but in truth, it weakens the very safety we see." "Black people are more likely to be stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and harmed encounters with the law." "When we add the president of federal agents or the national guard to daily life in these neighborhoods, the burden can multiply." "We're fighting for freedom and safety for all people."

The speaker expresses concern about the impact of immigrants on the brown and black communities, stating that resources are being taken away from long-time residents. They believe that taxpayers will have to bear the burden of supporting these individuals, while struggling to pay their own rent. The speaker predicts a surge in voter turnout in the upcoming election, with many minorities leaving the Democratic Party. Another speaker emphasizes the importance of national security and supports Israel. They mention being a single-issue voter and prioritize the strength of a candidate's stance on abortion. Another speaker acknowledges their personal pro-choice stance but believes that the primary focus should be on preserving democracy and preventing the country from becoming like the Middle East. They mention that abortion rates decreased under President Biden. The conversation ends with two speakers expressing their dissatisfaction with the current president and urging him to retire.

An individual in Chicago accuses illegal immigrants of taking away money and job opportunities from the black community. They criticize those who labeled Donald Trump as racist for his stance on immigration, claiming that now the black community is being replaced by illegal immigrants. The speaker blames those who advocated for voting for Democratic candidates regardless of their policies, suggesting that they are now witnessing the consequences of their choices. The speaker concludes by stating that the situation serves as a lesson for those who previously supported open borders.

Speaker 0 claims real Chicagoans, mostly black and brown, say you don’t distinguish between illegal aliens and real Chicago citizens and that you side with the illegal aliens over them in their communities. The real question: I don’t know how to make it any more direct. An illegal alien from Nicaragua grabbed a woman on the North Side Was it question? Bashed her head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. If that had been your wife, Stacy Okay. We're not gonna answer it. Would you want ICE to deport her? Let's move on. Answer the question as a man, not as mayor. Would you call Thanks. My man. To the fourth back rapist. Mayor. That's the answer for real Chicago. Mayor, sorry for being late. The traffic's bad. Maybe the beds could help. You're not blaming me for the traffic, are you? It there.

Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 she will be taken too because she has brown skin. Speaker 1 calls this racist, stating she is an American citizen. Speaker 0 says it doesn't matter, and Speaker 1 accuses her of saying she will be deported because she is brown. Speaker 1 says she voted for Donald Trump, who she met and is very nice, and that Speaker 0 is racist. Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 is supporting mass deportation. Speaker 1 says she supports mass deportation of people who are not American citizens. Speaker 0 says she is Catholic. Speaker 1 says American citizens are not going to get deported. Speaker 0 says potentially, citing Raz Baraka's arrest, claiming he was targeted by ICE. Speaker 1 says he was charged with trespassing. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 a whole ass adult calling people Nazis in 2025. Speaker 0 says this is Nazi behavior. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 thinks it was racist to tell her she was going to get deported because she's brown. Speaker 0 says she doesn't know that happened.

Speaker 0 states they want Black businesses to survive and thrive and claims to do a ton for them. They cite their work with the Department of Transportation under Pete Buttigieg, saying they tried to insulate Black businesses from a "crazy regime" to ensure they could still get contracts for infrastructure projects. Speaker 0 also claims to have a great relationship with Black businesses in their community and works with the Black chamber of business. They invite Speaker 1's organization to join, but say they have to go and suggest calling their office. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of not having time for Black people and running away. Speaker 0 responds that they always have time, but the conversation is becoming too hostile, and they don't want to "pop off."

Two voices, Speaker 0 and Speaker 1, erupt in a heated argument filled with confrontation, insults, and conflicting accusations. Speaker 0 insists he did not assault anybody and denies any wrongdoing, repeatedly accusing others of criminal behavior and bullying. He berates the others as “piece of shit,” “fat bucks,” and “bunch of fucking pussies,” while predicting that they will die a “sad fucking lonely death.” He claims, “Arresting American citizens” and says, “You slam it on him,” denying that he slammed the door. He asserts that “you guys are abducting people off the streets” and challenges the group to meet him, asking for a street wave and directing them to a location. Speaker 1 challenges Speaker 0, urging him to avoid assault and to provide clarification on what just happened. He notes that they “exited here” and that they are “around you guys.” He and Speaker 0 discuss their location: “ Sheridan and Belmont. Sheridan and Belmont. We’re on the corner,” specifying the intersection to reach them. He asks for patience, saying “Hold on. Stand by.” He reports surrounding actions and voices concern about the confrontation, emphasizing they will soon be in contact with each other and that they are near the other party. The exchange grows more acrimonious as Speaker 0 continues to threaten and insult, telling the other party to tell a Facebook group where they are “Camping out like a bunch of buck bunch of fucking pussies.” He repeats the charge that others are “arresting American citizens” and asserts that the situation is not assault, while Speaker 1 maintains it could be considered assault “at the next stoplight.” The dialogue reveals a tense, personal clash, with Speaker 0 attacking the other side’s families and immigration background: “All your families came from different fucking countries.” As the tension escalates, both speakers exchange directions and indications of where they are relative to the others. Speaker 0 directs a left turn at various landmarks, asking, “Where do I turn? I turn left, turn left, right, turn left,” and acknowledges the need to communicate their location to the other group. The dialogue ends with continued dispute over the events, the concept of assault, and where each party should proceed, punctuated by raw insults and threats. The exchange centers on alleged abduction and assault, the fear of being targeted by authorities, and the urge to confront the other group at a nearby intersection near Sheridan and Belmont.

Some believe that many millennials, dreamers, and undocumented people, who contribute to the country, are fearful of voting because they worry immigration will find them and deport their families. One speaker claims that this is untrue because voting is confidential and voting rolls are not transferred for investigation. Another speaker expresses disbelief, stating that the President is questioning whether an illegal person is voting, and reminding people that only citizens can vote. The speaker believes the President is saying not to worry about being caught for illegal voting. The speaker emphasizes that undocumented people cannot vote because they are not citizens.