reSee.it - Related Video Feed

So while the rest of the country is told to beware, be cautious of the Trans Tifas, the radical left, the lone gunman with the impossible rifle, Well, the killer, just as I originally thought, was point blank and amongst us the entire time, but more importantly amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle. And that's how the nefarious ways of the Mossad of Israel control the narrative.

By comparing photos, it's clear to me that Maxwell Yurek is the alleged shooter who tried to assassinate President Trump. Yurek, an Antifa member, was arrested at a 2016 Pittsburgh protest and sentenced to jail. My sources within Pennsylvania law enforcement say Yurek is a suspect with a history of assaulting Trump supporters. He seems to more closely resemble the corpse photo. Eyewitnesses saw the shooter, a man in his 30s or 40s, on the roof with a rifle. Videos show Maxwell Yurek being taken to jail for assaulting officers and rioting outside a Trump event. The internet has found the shooter's Steam profile with a review of the game "Mr. President" stating, "I hope this will prepare me for the real thing." His bio says, "July 13, watch this space." He has 132 hours on "Mr. President" but zero on aim lab. This was intended to kill Trump and start a civil war.

Speaker claims the shooter is not a lone actor but a “hive,” and says Thomas Crooks was “on the federal radar,” with an “80 page document” of his accounts and statements to be released. Crooks allegedly started as a Trump supporter, then radicalized around 2020, publicly calling for violence against the left and posting videos of himself shooting with no bullets. He cites a comment about “lining up a bunch of socialist Jews … blasting their useless brains out with an AR.” The speaker notes Crooks' online history shows him “always calling for violence” and that he later targeted Trump while researching assassinations, including “best places for a a mass shooting” and other searches like “fertilizer bomb” and “how to molotov make a molotov cocktail.” He suggests this points to “a program” similar to MK Ultra, claiming “they find these candidates in schools.”

There's a lot of discussion about the UnitedHealthcare CEO being shot, with media outlets claiming there was no motive. However, it's noteworthy that he was scheduled to testify against Nancy Pelosi regarding insider trading just days later. The media is not highlighting this connection.

There is a video circulating about a BlackRock video from a year ago in a school setting. The shooter from a recent Trump rally, Crooks, was a registered Republican who made a donation to a Democratic super PAC at 17. The longer video is deleted, raising questions about why it was removed.

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

The speaker says the subject of the interview is not a Democrat and would be offended to be called one. The speaker doesn't believe a political issue would cause the subject to do such a thing. The subject never mentioned the senator or representative who were targeted. He didn't like Tim Walz and would say things like, "I don't like that Tim Walz did this." The subject mentioned a protest, but the speaker doesn't think he said anything about it. The speaker would tell him to surrender himself so he could be taken alive. The subject listened to Infowars, and the speaker told him not to take everything they say for granted. The subject was a Trump supporter, voted for Trump, and liked Trump.

This narrative is being promoted on Facebook and X. Milo Yiannopoulos was the first person to push the idea that it might have been a gripper, and he has gained 200,000 followers on X in the past twelve hours. Elon Musk replied to Milo on Twitter framing me as a fed twice in July; Eric Prince replied to Milo saying, "we need Eric Prince to protect the president. We need Eric Prince to protect everybody." Why is this guy now conspicuously being promoted everywhere and he was the first one to try to frame me? Was the assassination of Charlie Kirk regime change within the online right wing? Ben Shapiro said he's gonna pick up the blood stained microphone from Charlie Kirch's cold dead hands. Milo says, I'm coming out of retirement. Milo is a Jew; a pro Israel Jew. This guy's gonna replace Charlie Kirk with Ben Shapiro or Milo.

One month ago today, I witnessed my friend of ten years, someone who I considered a brother, a loving husband, a devoted father, a generational leader, get assassinated on a livestream by a left wing radical. Approximately one year ago, I witnessed the president of The United States get shot in the head by a left wing radical who also took the life of a transporter in front of his daughters and wife. Two months ago, Christian children kneeling and praying in a church Were slaughtered. By a left wing extremist. If it's happening every single week, is it that extreme, or has the Democrat party mainstreamed violence as a political tool? Violence has been mainstreamed by the Democrat Party. It is not extremist. Is any Democrat courageous enough to disavow violence? The Trump administration making America safe again. God bless them.

Speaker 0 raises a series of pointed questions and concerns about FBI and government actions surrounding the monitoring and reporting of online activity and potential threats, urging a demand for answers: - Why did the FBI present only early pro-Trump posts and hide the anti-Trump phase? Two answers are implied: under Biden, the existence of a narrative, and a need to ask who was involved in that decision and why it happened. - After the election, why did the FBI continue to toe that line, and who made that decision? - The speaker notes that authorities are monitoring people who ask how to build bombs or evade assassination scenes, and asks how such monitoring relates to successful assassinations and the future locations of political actors; suggests an algorithmic tie and notification so someone is watching. - Why did they ignore Crooks’s really unbelievable threats? Why were ordinary Americans arrested for memes, while Crooks’s behavior appeared to be ignored? - Why did intelligence agencies monitoring extremism miss a kid openly fantasizing about assassinations, who connected with a Swedish individual allegedly part of a large Nazi movement in Sweden? - Why was the scene cleaned prematurely? Why did every digital trace of his political shift get kept out of public discussion? Why did authorities claim he had almost no footprint when, in fact, the footprint seemed large but scrubbed? - The speaker notes a pattern: every single mistake by the FBI and government seems to point toward ignorance, negligence, hiding inconvenient data, and shaping a political narrative; questions whether the pattern indicates incompetence or intentional action. - Is this incompetence or something more problematic? The speaker says they aren’t asserting a conspiracy but emphasize something feels wrong and that the official story is hard to believe. They ask why the government that supposedly monitors everything would become blind, deaf, and mute when a presidential assassin emerges on their radar. - The question is posed non-partisan: under different presidents, why would the narrative stay the same if the government can see everything? What does that imply about the FBI, DOJ, and CIA—whether they are lying, incompetent, or selectively monitoring—since any of these possibilities should be unsettling. - The FBI and mainstream media, including MSNBC, are said to have referenced leaks from Crooks’s social media indicating pro-Trump and anti-immigration stances, while being described as having almost no online footprint; Crooks reportedly had Discord, Snapchat, and an active YouTube presence, with violent 2019 YouTube comments about decapitating government officials, followed by a shift. - The speaker asserts the iceberg is deep and suggests a broader pattern of concerns about oversight, control, and the potential overreach or misalignment of intelligence agencies, with a friend claiming the CIA may be completely out of control and implying limits to accountability, while noting it could extend beyond the CIA. Overall, the remarks center on questioning the completeness, transparency, and motivation behind FBI monitoring, narrative shaping, data handling, and the handling of Crooks’s threats and online footprint, while expressing concern about systemic issues within intelligence agencies.

"I don't know who did this. And I sure hope that it was not from the left that would be better." "But it doesn't matter because the first Trump assassination also was not from the left." "It was just a guy who was going to also had Biden on his target list." "And it's been made in the ideology of this far right that you're seeing online." "It's part of a line, Brett Kavanaugh, Trump assassination, how Charlie Kirk," "It doesn't matter that it wasn't from the left because that part has been erased in the common litany of grievances." "Absolutely." "I mean, it's just it's just about the, momentum of violence. Right?" "If one side keeps punching, that's bad, that's really bad." "But it's much worse when one side punches, the other punches back." "That causes an escalation."

Discussion centers on Charlie's views and reactions: "He was pro pro second amendment and so on." Speakers expect backlash: "People are gonna talk shit and say, see, is why." They reference a video "right before he gets hit," noting: "As a matter of fact, if I'm not mistaken, when I'm watching the video right before he gets hit, was." The talk shifts to mass shootings: "Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not counting gang violence. Great." One participant adds, "I didn't watch it except for So" while another says, "he's literally they're literally asking him about mass shootings. I don't find that to be a coincidence either." The closing claim: "If I had my guess, this is a deep state hit. 100%. Our country's on the brink."

There is a pervasive and dark organization that is well funded and evil. They are willing to kill people, as seen with the aide of Kelly Loeffler in Georgia who was blown up in his car. He was dating Governor Kemp's daughter. Governor Kemp was considering a signature audit, and the lead investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation suddenly died within a week. There is a lot of money and power at stake here, as it involves the leadership and control of the most powerful country in the world.

"They said come to Israel, meet with me. Charlie Kirk said no. Now he's dead." "Bill Ackman is a Wall Street Jewish billionaire." "after October 7, Bill Ackman shifted to the right. He put a million dollars behind Trump and became very active in Republican politics even though he's a lifelong Democrat." "When the FBI could not locate the alleged gunman on Wednesday, do you know who stepped up and offered a $1,000,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of Charlie Kirk's assassin? Bill Ackman." "the $1,000,000 will be paid out to the alleged killer's father." "Tyler Robinson was allegedly turned into law enforcement by his father." "I see a bit of a conflict of interest there." "That needs to be investigated."

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not a lone shooter, citing messages they've received. The speaker questions why many Americans find the situation "doesn't add up," listing details such as the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone use, and being spotted with a rangefinder. The speaker, identifying as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. They ask if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt, imprison, and depict the target as "a modern day Hitler." The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, and if they received reports of anything "fishy" there, such as silverware or trash. They ask if the home was extremely clean, "almost like a medical lab," stating that's what they are hearing.

The speaker describes a coordinated smear campaign against him, asserting that after he announced he would challenge Trump, a lineup of public figures began attacking him or being described as “feds.” He cites Ian Myles Chong, Tucker Carlson, and Milo as examples, saying the criticism revolves around insinuations that he is connected to or controlled by federal agents. He argues that these accusations are part of a broader effort to silence the American people and dismiss his voice. He contrasts the public’s reaction to his campaign with what he regards as a coordinated “fed” narrative, claiming that Tucker Carlson has insinuated he is a fed, and noting that Carlson’s father was a CIA agent who ran Voice of America for forty years, along with Carlson’s collaborations with people he labels as CIA assets. The speaker provides a cascade of biographical and investigative claims about people connected to Carlson and others: - Eric Prince, described as a CIA asset, appeared in a group chat with Tucker Carlson; Carlson had on Joe Kent, a green beret, who is described as intelligence. - Curtis Yarvin is described as the son of an American diplomat who works with Peter Thiel, who is described as a federal informant. - Peter Thiel is claimed to be an FBI informant; Thiel’s Palantir is said to have contracted with the CIA for almost ten years (2001–2008) and now contracts with the NSA and FBI. - Thiel funded JD Vance’s Senate campaign, giving $15,000,000 to help him secure the Trump endorsement; Carlson allegedly helped persuade Trump to make Vance the vice president. - Carlson is said to have invited Kevin Spacey, described as a close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, on a Christmas interview. - The speaker contends that a social media ecosystem includes many who see nothing suspicious about these connections, including CIA involvement, green berets, and intelligence ties that push certain candidates on Trump. He asserts he's been demonized for years: banned from social media, banks, airlines, and credit card processors; subpoenaed; and money frozen. He claims this is because he has grown a substantial, loyal following and uses it to organize and mobilize swing-state voters rather than taking advertising or sponsorships. He says his followers are genuine and committed, which frightens those who want influencers who can be paid to push narratives. The speaker reflects on Charlottesville and white anxiety, suggesting others only recently acknowledge these issues. He asserts he would appear civil in an interview with Tucker Carlson and asks for a platform to “clear the record.” He contends he is being targeted for standing up to the GOP establishment and for criticizing both the right-wing establishment and the left. He predicts he will be “patsied” and that those opposing him will try to take him down, leaving him to be the “dark MAGA” guardian, not the hero, who nonetheless confronts the country’s problems and fights for real change. He closes by declaring he will be the villain if necessary, stating that the country will never give him the credit he deserves, but that he performs this role out of duty, not glory.

Senator Schumer is a monster. Elon Musk is a disaster for America. The speaker was disturbed that someone wouldn't disavow violence against Tesla products, suggesting they are on board with it. The speaker believes America is in the middle of a violent insurrection and being color revolutioned by the same people who do it elsewhere. This includes massive fake protests and corrupting judges, prosecutors, and attorney generals. The media is allegedly controlled to portray a populist leader as the devil. The speaker wonders if Musk has damaging information on corrupt leaders like Schumer, suspecting Schumer has a trail of money from corrupt sources.

These this lone shooter as it pertains to Charlie Kirk is not a lone shooter. It's a hive. I had been able to scrape everything about Thomas Crooks before the feds got rid of everything, and it's shocking there is no way this person was not on the federal radar. "the bait is to make me as a conservative hate you if you were on the left." The reality of Thomas Crooks is going to be a story that we should get familiar with. He was at first very angry against the left, outwardly calling for the murder of people that are on the left. "videos that he was posting of himself shooting with no bullets in the gun in his bedroom." We blurred the weapon. "That's funny because I always believed being patriotic was lining up a bunch of socialist Jews like the ones that booed Trump and blasting their useless brains out with an AR." "every one of the Trump hating Democrats deserves to have their heads chopped off and put on stakes for the world to see what happens when you f with America." His Google history includes "best places for a a mass shooting," "how to molotov make a molotov cocktail." He was fascinated with this stuff. Around 2020 he pivoted after COVID and "tried to assassinate him post COVID." "I think that this is a program. I do. I don't know know, but I know." "MK Ultra" and "I have no reason to believe that that program was ever discontinued." He suggests "they find these candidates in schools" and says he will post an 80 page document. We're never gonna be told what therapists he was seeing.

The speakers discuss the attempted assassination of Trump, questioning why the would-be assassin had no social media footprint and a professionally scrubbed house. They find it suspicious that CNN streamed the rally live and that the Secret Service deemed the roof he was on unsafe, while snipers occupied a steeper roof. They speculate it could have been a coordinated assassination attempt, with the shooter intended to be killed afterward. They highlight the suspect's young age and the possibility of radicalization or manipulation. The speakers are concerned about the lack of information released and the absence of a formal report. They mention leaked cell phone records showing a phone traveling from outside the FBI offices in DC to where the suspect lived. They find it odd that the suspect had multiple phones and no cutlery in his house. They suggest the suspect could have been under the influence of psychotropic drugs or hypnosis, referencing MK Ultra and Jolly West's experiments.

One of the largest political figures in America is assassinated on live TV, prompting the question: "was this a professional assassination?" The speaker says, "not usually are they planning out a carefully orchestrated hit that involves them getting away clean, and then giving a whole text message admission of guilt on regular old texts." He adds, "we have more than enough evidence to be asking the question, was there intelligence agencies involved." He notes, "the Israel conversation is not one. No one is claiming at this point that Israel was involved in this in any way," while claiming, "I have made that claim because I'm not involved." "This is not my case to solve. I was not involved. I didn't know Charlie." "Since day one, we have gotten more and more and more evidence that maybe we should be looking in Israel's direction." He cites, "an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to the list of Israeli assassinations." He states, "Epstein worked for Israel" and asks, "Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this?" He continues, "I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story. He wasn't one of ours." "So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI six, Saudi, or Mossad? Which one would you choose? I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell." The crowd cheers.

"Charlie Kirk's assassination has deleted evidence that Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson haven't mentioned once." "This guy told the cops to arrest him so the shooter could have more time to get away." "This guy was deployed for 09/11, deployed against Obama, for George Bush, and personally worked with senators and US congressmen." "And he personally admitted it, and they wiped everything, but I downloaded it just before. George Zinn," "These donors like Manafort, Berman, Ronald Weiser, they manipulate elections, create countries, and have personally admitted to taking money from all of these countries." "Zinn, the patsy, is an example of an actor they use." "I have a full twenty seven minute video going over exactly what happened, why people like Candace Owens might be lying to you, and the archive podcast link in bio."

It's stressful dealing with people online who say they want to kill me and desecrate my corpse. I think it's an overblown reaction, like calling me a Nazi. It's like they think I'm Hitler and should be assassinated. Remember that guy who tried to kill Trump? His online footprint was professionally scrubbed. I doubt corporations like BlackRock are directly ordering assassinations, but individuals might see it as beneficial. That kid at the Trump rally with the rangefinder raises a lot of questions. CNN streamed it live, which was unusual. The Secret Service said the roof was too sloped for people, yet snipers were on a steeper roof. If it was a coordinated hit, someone shoots Trump, then they shoot the kid, and it's all wrapped up. He's basically a suicide assassin. Something radicalized him. And how did he have five phones and no cutlery in his house? The whole thing is insane.

I've noticed some concerning activity from Elon Musk. He's now claiming that democracy in America is being destroyed by a judicial coup. Further, he's hired a 19-year-old, who goes by Big Balls online, to work inside Doge. My team and I investigated this individual's background and found he founded multiple companies, including Tesla dot sexy LLC when he was around 16. These young men, some as young as 19, now have access to private information about potentially hundreds of millions of Americans. I seriously doubt that Musk has properly vetted any of these individuals, especially given some of the names of these companies. This seems to be a feature and not a bug.

There is a pervasive and well-funded evil force at play, willing to kill people like Kelly Loeffler's aide in Georgia who was blown up in his car. This happened while he was on his way to a rally for Loeffler, and he was dating Governor Kemp's daughter. Governor Kemp was considering a signature audit at that time. Additionally, the lead investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, who was looking into this, suddenly died within a week. The silence surrounding these incidents is concerning. The stakes involve trillions of dollars of global wealth.