reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"Perhaps thousands of young women have been drugged, raped, and beaten across dozens of UK cities by men belonging to so called grooming gangs." "December 2020, British authorities charged 32 men in a grooming gang with 200 sexual exploitation offenses against eight girls, some as young as 13." "Most perpetrators convicted so far are reportedly Muslim. The majority of their victims are white." "because she was white, a non Muslim, a virgin, and didn't dress modestly, that she deserved to be punished." "She escaped a year later, becoming part of The UK's largest ever child sexual abuse investigation." "In her new book, Pray, Somali born women's rights activist Ayan Hirsi Ali argues that immigration and Islam are major factors threatening women's safety."

Here's where we are. Just this week, The UK's National Health Service released new guidance to appease their Muslim invaders. According to the Brits, incest is not only unnecessarily stigmatized, but it actually leads to, quote, stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages. A 2002 study showed Pakistani babies who, at that time, accounted for just barely four percent of UK births, accounted for thirty percent of the birth defects. A 2013 study showed thirty seven percent of birth defects were found within first cousin marriages in the same group, a rate 37 times that of the national average. The American Journal of Human Genetics confirms offsprings of first cousins results in a doubled risk of congenital defects. Double. The UK's own health department estimated that it cost the British taxpayer £8,000,000,000 per year to treat these kinds of births.

The speaker references the Catholic Catechism as found in the library, noting that it states, "the church's relationship with the Muslims is the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the creator. The first place among whom are the Muslims. These profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us, they adore the one merciful God." They mention an “excellent little bitty comic book” called The Prophet by Jack Chick, available for about $2, which "goes through the history of the Muslim church and how they started." The speaker asserts that "Very few people realize it was the Catholics that started Islam." They claim Catholics "started the whole religion purposely to try to get the holy land back for the Catholics," "built up the Islam," "funded Mohammed," and "trained him." They say a Catholic nun was sent "out of the monastery" to "find a young promising Muslim, marry him, and train him to raise up an army of Arabs to go take back the holy land for the mother church." The speaker acknowledges this is "Quite an interesting story if you wanna read about that." They assert that it "started to work, but then it failed because Islam got so big," and conclude, "they said, well, forget you, Catholics. We're doing what we want." Finally, they state a statistic about Muslims, noting there are "now, what, 10%, 20% of the world population," and claim that "Islam" is not known by most Muslims to have "started off as a front for the Catholic church."

Amsterdam, The Hague, and Rotterdam have high migrant populations from non-Christian, non-Western countries. London and Brussels also have a majority of migrants. The speaker believes the great replacement theory is now reality, with native populations being outnumbered. They criticize leaders for celebrating this shift as "diversity" meaning fewer white people. They question why leaders would be happy about their people no longer being the majority in their own country.

The speaker asserts that organized grooming gangs, mostly of Muslim origin, exist in various locations, citing Rochdale, Rotherham, Telford, and Norfolk. They claim court cases reveal most perpetrators are of Kashmiri Pakistani origin. The speaker alleges police and social workers avoided addressing the problem due to fear of being labeled racist. In response, another speaker accuses them of turning a question about sexual violence into one about religion. They state that the majority of rapes and sexual violence in the country are perpetrated by white people.

Speaker 0 claims that someone was put in solitary confinement for more than a hundred days for speaking about what was happening inside his country. He says he knows why this is happening: purely for votes and to keep people in power. Speaker 0 adds that after visiting Europe and making videos about what was happening, he anticipated similar moves in the United States. He recounts a sit-down interview with Tommy Robinson, who explains that the Labour Party in the UK, and the Democrat Party in the US, stay in power because they “tell these Muslims they can go ahead, do whatever they want.” He says a Muslim “should be more conservative than they would be a liberal” because they don’t stand for much of that progressive stuff, and that “they have Sharia law” above everything. According to him, if someone goes to a mosque with a thousand people, the mosque leader is told, “we’re gonna let you guys do whatever you want, just make sure you vote for us.” He asserts that, as a result, the leader of the mosque will lead everyone in the mosque to voting centers to vote for that candidate. He claims this is why in London the mayor is Muslim and many surrounding towns are Muslim, and that they actually have courts practicing Sharia law. He says he anticipated this would happen in America as well, and mentions Mundami as an example. Speaker 0 then notes Mundami advocated for making childcare more affordable when running for office. He questions what is known about childcare now, describing daycare centers as “complete frauds.” He says he anticipated the current development and that people are now starting to see it in America. Speaker 0 explains that after he was pressed to give his opinion, people began loving it, even though he had not intended to speak out. He says he was originally just going to ask people questions, but they turned his journalism into activism, which he says forced his hand. He says he feels compelled to continue. Speaker 1 cautions, advising not to let them force him into something he thinks they don’t want him to do, referencing what he is currently doing. He concludes that they would rather have an activist than a competitor.

The speaker discusses a map by the Institute for Immigration that charts the “invasion of Europe” over the last twenty years. They claim the map’s orange dots represent “one hundred illegal migrants” each and that the overall picture would be worse if legal migration were included. The speaker says migrants are “crossing illegally” into Europe without a visa or permission, “by the millions,” and that the “dark orange” areas correspond to Africa and the Arab states. They further claim that “all the Muslims that want to live in our Christian society” are driving national loss. The speaker concludes that this is visible in everyday life, stating that in places like gyms, public transport, and public spaces, “out of ten people” in many cases they have become the only native European left in their own city.

The speaker states that Europe is currently undergoing an invasion consisting of the mass Islamization of the continent, which has been ongoing for 50 to 60 years. They claim this is a global political agenda by powerful entities to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, ultimately aiming to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. A sociologist calculated that in 30 to 40 years, the majority of Europe's population will be Islamic if the current trend continues. This is attributed to European people having few children compared to Muslim families, who have five to ten children.

I can't believe the rapid Islamization in the UK. Voting for the Labor Party will speed it up. Muslim population doubles every 10 years, leading to Sharia law. LGBT rights will vanish, men will be softened, and women's rights will be at risk. A move towards communism, digital currency, and social credit scores is coming. British patriots must choose: give up or protest for change. Let your voices be heard.

The English Defence League is defending England from Sharia law and the spread of militant Islam. There are allegedly 100 Sharia law courts operating in the country, which were outlawed by the European Court of Human Rights in 2003. A Muslim could join the EDL, but the organization is against Islam taken in its "century barbaric form." Specific issues, such as Muslim gangs and the pimping of youth, are allegedly coming solely from the Islamic community. The root problem is claimed to stem from the Quran, which needs to be revised. 97% of Imams in the country are from abroad and teaching the same form of Islam taught in countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The EDL is frightened by militant Islam and Sharia law. The leader of the Luton Council of Mosques called for Sharia law for the Islamic community.

The episode opens with Nate Friedman describing his arrival in London and filming life around him—mosques, train-station signage, advertisements, children leaving school, political candidates, and everyday scenes in and around Whitechapel. He says the UK has become “unrecognizable,” and frames the street interviews as an effort to understand “why and how this happened,” including whether the UK has “fallen” and whether similar changes could happen elsewhere. In Whitechapel, Friedman interviews Muslims who describe the community as “tight-knitted,” saying they hope others are “good” and emphasize blending in. One interviewee says people come from “a different country” and avoids specifics. When asked about claims that “Islam is not compatible with the West,” he says he is “not sure,” that people have different cultures and religions, and that everyone’s religion should be respected; he also says Islam has its own culture and way of life. He argues that people travel both directions—Western people going to Muslim countries—and that it is not “for us to say” who should come, because governments “let the Muslims come in this country.” Another interviewee outside a mosque says Whitechapel has many Muslims because it functions like a “ghetto,” with mosques and halal food. He claims children learn Islamic teachings at mosque facilities rather than through schools. He says right-wing concerns extend to all religions and responds that Muslim-majority countries lack democracy, while insisting democracy depends on education and noting he believes Muslims have been elected into UK parliament. He describes Trump as an “honest man” who “didn’t hide anything,” calling him an “honest right winger.” Friedman then enters a major East London mosque/Islamic center described as covering an entire street. A representative says attendance is about ten thousand on Friday and claims it is the “busiest mosque” in Europe, with “few millions” visitors each year. Friedman also recounts other mosque-related stories he says he learned from elsewhere: an East London mosque reportedly received an official warning from the Charity Commission after losing one million pounds in an investment involving an NHS-approved supplier, and he claims a charity fun run allowed boys and men of all ages but restricted girls to under twelve while excluding adult women and older girls. He further states that he sat down for an exclusive interview with Tommy Robinson, and claims Robinson asserts that mosques in Whitechapel are funded by Qatar and that this funding dictates forms of Islam promoted there, while also making claims about influence on politicians, economies, and organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood. As Friedman continues, he includes claims about language and demographics: Whitechapel is described as part of Tower Hamlets; he cites that many primary school students speak a language other than English at home, most being Bengali, and that one in three adults reportedly does not have English as their main language. He describes interactions where people respond with Bengali rather than English. He also references a police officer’s statement that the police should be diverse to reflect borough cultures and to handle calls where English is not the first language. Friedman introduces political and social materials he says he saw around Whitechapel—flyers about protecting the community from the far right, references to a hadith symbol described as “the Muslim is like a palm tree,” and messaging like “no to racism.” He reports that he sees police and political discourse using “far right” framing, and he contrasts that with what he describes as “right” language he says he did not see. Later, Friedman shifts to discussions of welfare, housing, and political representation. He claims the UK scrap of the two-child benefit cap would benefit Muslim migrants and cites statistics he says show Muslims in England and Wales living in subsidized housing, in overcrowded homes, and having different birth-rate figures compared with the wider UK population. He also includes a conversation where a shop worker says Islam is for anyone who wants to learn and claims no forced conversion, while discussing tourists seeking information about Islam and books sold in the area aimed at children. Friedman also describes calls to build more mosques and says he frames mosque growth as extending toward central London via a short train ride. The episode further portrays London as experiencing heightened crime concerns, including phone snatching warnings and road signs. Friedman contrasts this with what he describes as mutual support within the Muslim community via organizations he says raise large sums for aid in Gaza, Yemen, and Somalia. He returns to debates over immigration, framing one interviewee’s response that immigration has always existed because the UK “colonized the world,” and that incoming populations go to areas where they feel secure, leading to “ghettoized” clustering. He also includes claims that waves of hatred recur and says Brexit increased opportunities for hate expression, while one interviewee describes safety as partly tied to shared religious norms. The episode includes additional political conversation with American visitors comparing US leadership and London governance, and it features debate about Sharia law. One interviewee says she would respect others’ religion but rejects living in a city governed by Sharia law, including objections to violence within marriage. Friedman concludes by saying he plans a separate episode investigating Sharia law claims already existing in London and the UK’s future, and he ends with a call for viewer support and reference to an upcoming episode involving a “paid protester” and alleged lawbreaking.

The speaker claims that the mayors of London, Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Luton, Oldham, and Rochdale are Muslim. This was achieved with 4 million Muslims out of England's 66 million people. The speaker states there are over 3,000 mosques and over 130 Sharia courts in England, as well as more than 50 Sharia councils. It is claimed that 78% of Muslim women and 63% of Muslims do not work and receive state support and free accommodation. State-supported Muslim families allegedly have six to eight children on average, who all receive free accommodation. The speaker further claims that every school in the UK is required to teach about Islam and that Mohammed is the most common baby name in England. The speaker concludes this is not immigration, but invasion.

Mohammad's three steps were immigrate, increase, eliminate. The speaker frames immigration as a path to increasing followers and demanding political accommodation, then eliminating the previous culture. In Detroit, Fazl bought houses on the street, has a wife in each one; the wives go to welfare, and the more kids they have, the larger the checks get; he's living like a king at state expense, and the kids in the street are his. He's practicing Sharia law on his block. They take over blocks, vote in the school boards, police, and fire departments; in Hamtramck they gain influence, including the majority of the city council; minarets and calls to prayer five times a day are described as no different than Pakistan. The pattern is immigrants first seem nice, then burqas appear; neighborhoods change; random violence occurs with no witnesses; neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city, block by block, they take over countries—Egypt, Syria, Turkey, North Africa, Spain.

The speaker claims that Europe is experiencing an invasion, not a refugee crisis, but a mass Islamization that has been ongoing for 50-60 years. They assert that a global political agenda by the world's powerful aims to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, specifically to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. The speaker references a sociologist's calculation that in 30-40 years, Muslims will be the majority in Europe because European people have few children while Muslims have many.

The speaker argues that when people call the Crusades “unprovoked European aggression,” they should consider what occurred in the centuries before Pope Urban II called for them in 1095. By 1095, “the map of the Christian world” had been “violently redrawn.” Within a century of Muhammad’s death, Muslim armies are described as conquering Christian Syria, Palestine, Egypt, all of North Africa, and most of Spain and Portugal. The speaker adds that Muslim forces crossed the Pyrenees into France and were checked at the Battle of Tours in 732 by Charles Martel. The speaker also claims Constantinople was besieged twice, with the second siege reportedly involving around 200,000 men and failing “only just.” The speaker says the lived experience of Christians under expanding Muslim rule is “neglected,” describing a legal system called the Dimma that “classified non-Muslims as second class citizens” and subjected them to “extreme violence” if they resisted. The speaker states that the jizya, a poll tax payable by non-Muslims, was levied across the conquered territories, and asks what happened if it could not be paid. As an example, the speaker says that after Amr conquered Tripoli in Libya in 643 AD, Christians were forced to hand over their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of taxation. The speaker says slave raiding of Christian populations in Spain and North Africa continued for centuries, creating long-lasting demographic change that reduced some Christian populations to minority status and, in some regions, led to disappearance, “like in Arabia.” The speaker cites Eulogius of Córdoba, a priest and scholar, who recorded executions of 48 Christians in Córdoba between 850 and 859 AD, most beheaded under the emirs Abdurrahman II and Muhammad I for blasphemy and apostasy under Islamic law; the speaker says Eulogius was beheaded in 859 AD. The speaker then presents the immediate trigger for the First Crusade as following the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, when the Seljuk Turks are said to have destroyed the Byzantine army and swept across Anatolia. The speaker claims returning pilgrims reported harassment, robbery, violence, and murder, and that in 1095 Byzantine Emperor Alexius I formally asked Pope Urban II for Western military help. The speaker states that “roughly two thirds” of the land that had been Christian at the time of the first Islamic conquest had been taken before the First Crusade was launched. The speaker says this “doesn’t excuse everything that came after,” and notes that the massacres, opportunism, and the Crusader sack of Constantinople in 1204 are “a stain.” The speaker argues that explaining these earlier events shows what Urban II was “responding to” and why “hundreds of thousands of people” answered his call. The speaker then shifts to modern claims, stating that Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam estimates “60 million Christians” were killed, “80 million Hindus” were killed, “10 million Buddhists” were killed, and “120 million Africans as a whole” were killed, and adds that this was “in the name of Islam,” with “hundreds and hundreds of thousands of slaves.” The speaker claims the same process is occurring now, describing Muslims invading Western countries and stating, “Crusades will have to come back.” They also claim that prominent people say Britain is being “overrun,” that births by Muslims outnumber births to other religions, and that mayors controlling funding in capital cities are Muslim. The speaker points to mosque construction in Scotland and references Minneapolis and Dearborn, Michigan, describing “blue centers” with “multiple occupancy.” They say they will not claim “we’re done” because they are still “fighting,” and suggest a future in which British people will face choices: flee eastwards to Eastern Europe with stronger Christian neighbors (Poland, Hungary), seek asylum in America, or “stand their ground,” stating again that the time of the Crusades will need to come back “if we are to return.”

England has towns and cities with dense Muslim populations controlling housing and policing. In Glasgow, a woman on fire screamed for help in a Sharia-controlled area. A man saved her, showing the impact of dual policing systems.

The Muslim population in Britain is growing by approximately 75% every decade. If we politically alienate the entire Muslim community, we risk significant losses. It's crucial to find ways to include and engage with this population. By 2050, the consequences of failing to do so could be dire.

Speaker 0: “Isn’t it that Muhammad is the most common name in England? So we want it to be the most common name in England and that there be no Muhammad in England, in Sweden, in France—here, not here—that’s what we want.”

The mayors of London, Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Oldham, and Rochdale are Muslim. This was achieved with 4,000,000 Muslims out of 66,000,000 people in England. There are over 3,000 mosques, over 130 Sharia courts, and more than 50 Sharia councils in England. 78% of Muslim women and 63% of Muslims do not work and receive state support and free accommodation. State-supported Muslim families have an average of six to eight children who all receive free accommodation. Every school in the UK is required to teach about Islam, and Mohammed is the most common baby name in England.

According to data from the Department of Education reported by The Telegraph, there are 72 schools in England with no white British children, and in 454 schools, they comprise less than 2% of students. White British children are a minority in one in four schools. The speaker questions how assimilation and a shared culture are possible when children grow up in environments where white British identity is not the norm. They assert that white British culture exists, developed over centuries by white Anglo-Saxon people, and that mass immigration is eroding it. The speaker expresses concern about the implications for children growing up without exposure to the prevailing British culture, suggesting they may feel alienated. They argue that a new culture is replacing the existing one in Britain, which they believe is unacceptable. The speaker contends that the issue is about preserving British culture, not skin color, and that immigrants should integrate and embrace British culture rather than replace it with their own.

Muslims have raped over a million girls in the UK and beheaded innocent Christians in Syria for refusing to bow down to their rock. The same fate awaits Americans unless the speaker is sent to Congress, as they are the only one not afraid. The speaker, though not born in America or Texas, claims to care about Texas. They allege that radical Muslims have taken over entire cities due to the actions of the Texas House. They assert that there is an attempt to turn Texas from a Christian state into the Muslim capital of America. The speaker states that America is a Christian nation, and Muslims should go to any of the 57 Muslim nations because Islam has no place in America.

A speaker in the House claims there is a massive Muslim takeover of the United Kingdom occurring. The speaker anticipates scorn for this statement but expresses strong concerns about Sharia law potentially being forced upon the American people.

The mayor of London is Muslim, as are the mayors of Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Oldham, and Rochdale. This was achieved with 4,000,000 Muslims out of England's 66,000,000 people. There are over 3,000 mosques in England, over 130 Sharia courts, and more than 50 Sharia councils. 78% of Muslim women do not work and receive state support and free accommodation, while 63% of Muslims do not work and receive state support and free housing. State-supported Muslim families average six to eight children and receive free accommodation. Every school in the UK is required to teach about Islam, and Mohammed is the most common baby name in England. This is described as invasion, not immigration.

The speaker compares the current immigration situation to a Ponzi scheme, stating that the institution needs constant influx of immigrants to sustain itself. They mention that the number of immigrants coming into the country has reached a saturation point, using the example of Ugandan refugees and Afghan refugees. The speaker highlights that the rate of immigration in the last 25 years has surpassed that of the past 2000 years combined, contradicting the notion that Britain has always been a nation of immigrants.

The speaker presents statistics, urging viewers to verify them using their phones. In Pakistan, 40% of marriages are between first cousins. In Yemen and Iraq, girls can be married at nine. Saudi Arabia punishes women with death for witchcraft. 98% of women in Somalia have undergone genital mutilation. Renouncing faith, adultery, and homosexuality can result in the death penalty under Sharia law. Afghanistan restricts women's freedoms, and polygamy is legal for men. Rape victims may be jailed for sex outside marriage. The speaker contrasts multiculturalism in homogeneously European nations with what they consider gentrification or colonization elsewhere. They cite the popularity of the name Mohammed in England and increased bombings in Sweden. A Swedish study showed that 79% of asylum-seeking refugees returned to visit their home countries. The speaker believes these trends are intentional, not due to incompetence. They argue that adopting Sharia law and Muslim practices leads to morally abhorrent laws. The speaker concludes that governments provide resources to migrants while disliking their own citizens.