reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

In this video, a state legislator expresses concern about the lack of protection for parents. They highlight the assault on charter schools, which limits parents' choices in education, especially for children of color. The legislator also mentions government interference in medical care decisions. They argue that if parents don't support the government's ideology, they may have their children taken away. While the current focus is on divorce proceedings, the legislator believes this issue will expand beyond that. They urge parents who love their children to leave California, as they feel the state is becoming oppressive and reminiscent of "The Handmaid's Tale." The legislator plans to move to another state that values freedom.

My daughter was taken from me at 16 by CPS and a school counselor, with the help of an LGBTQ group. They claimed I was abusive for not affirming her trans identity. Despite promising to use a male name, it wasn't enough. Instead of therapy, she was given testosterone, and the LGBTQ group used her to raise money. Transgender kids end up in foster care because the state takes them from their families. Parents are forced to affirm their child's identity or risk losing them. The abuse claim against me was proven false, but it was too late. My daughter suffered mentally and physically, and eventually took her own life. I urge you to stop promoting gender ideology to prevent other parents from experiencing this pain.

The speaker describes a personal crisis surrounding his daughter’s gender transition. He says his daughter, who is 22, was indoctrinated in Ottawa schools when he was posted there, and recently had her breasts removed. She no longer speaks to him because he does not support the transition. He asserts he has stood on his principles throughout, resisting “the social pressure and Marxist tactics” she allegedly uses against him, and emphasizes that he loves her but the situation is “a pretty heavy price.” He notes he has two children, and this struggle centers on his daughter. He explains that it was Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, who was his member of parliament during the time this occurred in Ottawa. He says he called Poilievre and told him about having to sneak out of Iraq to return to Canada to deal with what he describes as “absolute maniacal monsters” at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) when they began calling his daughter directly. He states his daughter had turned 16, which he notes is the legal age of consent for medical treatment in Canada, and that she could receive a sex change “without your daddy’s permission anymore,” which led him to go to the hospital. He recounts feeling an extraordinary sense of evil at the CHEO, claiming he had “never felt evil like that anywhere in the world” while there. He frames these experiences as part of the broader conflict surrounding his daughter’s transition and the actions of the hospital staff, describing the hospital as a place where they confronted these demands directly.

I have an issue when it comes to targeting our kids and trying to change their gender. I don't care if a 40-year-old person wants to undergo gender reassignment, but I don't want to hear about it, pay for it, or be forced to acknowledge their chosen identity. Leave me alone and stay away from our children.

The speaker states they cannot support a party that wants to redefine family, which they consider the core of society. They cannot vote for laws that would allow children to mutilate their bodies, possibly without parental consent, or that would allow LGBTQ+ couples to marry. They also cannot support a party that favors parents losing custody for not affirming a child's transition, children of opposite sexes sharing bathrooms, or biological males competing against the speaker's daughter in sports. The speaker is not pushing their views on others, but sharing the reasons for their voting decision. They suggest voters should ask which party promotes values that are unbiblical and directly contradict a Christian worldview. While both parties may promote some biblical values, the speaker believes the listed issues are weightier matters and influence their vote.

HB 251312 is described as the worst bill ever proposed, defining misgendering and deadnaming as coercive control, which could lead to children being taken from parents who don't affirm their trans identity. The bill allegedly allows the state to intervene if someone doesn't affirm another's delusion. The speaker, who identifies as autistic, expresses heartbreak that the transgender ideology is targeting autistic people, claiming to have seen a post of an autistic woman whose breasts were cut off. The speaker believes half the victims of transgender ideology are autistic and that this bill will steal autistic children to castrate and mutilate them, taking away their bodies and families. The speaker says autistic people are targeted due to their vulnerability and are exploited for money and votes to make them dependent on big pharma. The speaker believes the real reason autistic people struggle is due to authoritarian government repression in schools, followed by the trans community telling them they struggle because they're trans.

"What greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom. If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the US government. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals being lined up by Farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with like mRNA technology which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end."

Puberty blockers are drugs given to children who wish to transition genders, halting their natural development. This practice can lead to lifelong dependency on hormones and sterilization, raising concerns about child welfare. The conversation touches on whether children can truly understand the implications of such decisions at a young age. One perspective argues that gender identity is a personal choice, while the opposing view emphasizes the importance of biological reality. The discussion highlights the risks of affirming a child's desire to transition without addressing underlying mental health issues. Ultimately, it questions the morality of medical interventions on minors, advocating for a more cautious approach that respects the complexities of gender identity and the well-being of children.

The speaker explains how their child's case ended up in court after a meeting with BC Children's Hospital. The hospital planned to administer cross-sex hormones to the child, but the speaker objected and halted the process. The hospital then sent a letter stating that they would proceed with the hormone injections unless the speaker took legal action within two weeks. The speaker ended up in court because they did not respond with legal action. The speaker also mentions that using the wrong pronouns for their child is considered criminal violence, and they were jailed for it. The speaker confirms that their child is now on hormone pills, as ordered by the court.

Some individuals are pushing for a bill in Illinois that could lead to children being removed from their homes if parents object to certain medical treatments. A mother who lost custody of her child due to this issue believes the bill is extreme and hopes for a change in perspective. She has not seen her daughter in over two years but remains resilient. The bill is facing opposition in Illinois, with many citizens against the concept of gender identity and the potential harm caused by certain medical procedures. The mother believes accountability should lie with the doctors and hospitals involved in such treatments.

California Governor Gavin Newsom's law requires schools to hide a child's gender dysphoria from parents, which Newsom claims protects the child-parent relationship. However, this law prevents schools from informing parents when their children believe they were born into the wrong body, potentially leading to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgery. Newsom's actions are attributed to weak leadership and caving into radical activist pressure. Newsom has increased homelessness by 40% and is allegedly enabling drug addiction, mental illness, and sexual assault. His government is accused of affirming mental illness and psychiatric disorders rather than treating them. A movement is organizing to fight back against these policies. The speaker urges people to sign up and subscribe to Public to combat California's disinformation and fight back against Newsom's policies. Newsom is accused of lying and weaponizing the government to attack the child-parent relationship.

Do you think that gender ideology should be taught to students in schools? No. The speaker mentions a partner who 'works for the feds' and fostered two kids, calling him a great dad. They asked themselves, 'if we had kids, would we be doing this, telling our kids about this stuff? Would we want them top that in school?' and decided against it, arguing that kids will learn anyway. He says, If I were a parent, I would not be teaching my children about transitioning. He wants kids to learn math, English, science, arithmetic, and to play soccer with neighbors. They'll learn that there's double daddy homes and double mommy homes. He is pro-family and wants the country to have a future, calling it the greatest country ever and opposing revamping systems that haven't worked elsewhere.

In 2021, our child was removed from our home by DCS, causing immense heartache. Despite efforts, we had limited visits with him during his time in foster care. We chose not to affirm his transgender ideology due to our Christian beliefs and research showing affirmation may not help. We believe parental rights must be protected in Indiana to prevent other families from facing similar challenges.

The speaker expresses concern about new policies targeting trans and gender diverse youth, calling them divisive and harmful. They criticize Danielle Smith for spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories about the care available to these children. The speaker argues that the policies will interfere with the doctor-patient relationship and strip away the rights of parents and children to make decisions about treatment. They believe this will further isolate already struggling youth and worsen issues like depression and suicide. The speaker accuses Smith of using these policies as a distraction from other government failures. They conclude by expressing support and love for trans and 2 spirited individuals and a commitment to stand with them.

In my 11 years in the state legislature, I've realized that we need to protect parents, not just children. Charter schools are under attack, limiting parents' choices and negatively impacting children of color. Government interference has also come between parents, children, and doctors in medical care. Now, if parents don't align with the government's ideology, they risk losing their children. While currently limited to divorce proceedings, this won't stop there. I used to encourage people to fight, but now I urge parents who love their children to leave California. The state is becoming oppressive, resembling The Handmaid's Tale. As someone born and raised here, it breaks my heart, but I believe in freedom and will move elsewhere after leaving the legislature.

I have a trans kid, my seven-year-old son is in the middle of unmedically transitioning. Thankfully, we live in New York, which is very accepting and a sanctuary state for trans kids. However, with Donald Trump and JD Vance gaining influence, I'm worried they'll prevent my child from getting the hormones she needs for her medical transition. My child has been exposed to a progressive learning environment, and the media she consumes emphasizes inclusion and acceptance. This has helped my son, Carl, realize that she's a girl named Carla. Now, I fear Trump and Vance will block her access to the hormones she needs to become the woman she wants to be. This is fascism and a human rights violation.

The speaker expresses concern about government overreach in education, citing critical race theory, critical gender theory, and transgender policies in schools. They claim schools are hiding gender transitions from parents via parental secrecy policies. The speaker questions the requirement to register children with schools and potentially disclose parental teaching methods. They worry about parents teaching creationism or the belief that life begins at conception being targeted. The speaker does not trust the Illinois governor and state government, believing these policies will be weaponized against those with differing beliefs, similar to how adoption has allegedly been restricted for some Christians.

The speaker, a pharmacist's husband and father, regrets taking the COVID vaccine to attend his daughter's volleyball games. He claims his neurologists diagnosed him with Barth syndrome, vaccine-caused paralysis, and severe ataxia. He states he is not anti-vax, but believes dissenting opinions were censored and labeled misinformation during the COVID threat. He feels vulnerable people were fooled into believing false medical information and that vaccine policies lacked a medical basis. He believes forced vaccination led to his condition. He argues that individuals should have autonomy over their bodies, referencing the "my body, my choice" slogan used in abortion debates, and criticizes those who support both abortion rights and mandatory vaccinations.

The speaker's ex-wife wants their son on puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, and the speaker is prohibited from discussing transgender issues with his child or the lawsuit the mother filed against him. He is also barred from contacting his child's medical professionals. The speaker says his child is in distress, and after a brief Zoom interview, the TRUE Center admitted him and contacted the insurance company. A doctor put an implant in his child. The speaker intends to fight this decision to save his child, because that's what parents and fathers do.

We are harming children with the current approach to gender identity. Young kids, often facing bullying or discomfort during puberty, are being rushed into gender transition without proper evaluation. They are sent to therapists who are instructed to affirm their feelings, leading to the administration of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, which can sterilize them and eliminate their ability to experience sexual pleasure later in life. This is happening to children as young as 9 or 10, who cannot provide informed consent. When they later wish to detransition, they often face abandonment and depression, having made irreversible changes to their bodies. This issue is critical, impacting both children and women's rights.

Speaker 0: The speaker argues that digital ID is bad and that the government is coming for children by announcing digital ID cards for 13-year-olds. They claim this is not a good thing because children have the right to grow up in privacy, to come of age, to explore, to experiment, and to make mistakes, with everything they do logged, tracked, and documented into a device that will follow them for the rest of their life and potentially discriminate against them. They say digital ID will document things like skill reports, mental health issues, behavioral issues, accomplishments, and failures, and that having so much information about a person before adulthood would make it easy to build systems that profile people based on socioeconomic background, behavior, and psychology, determining what type of citizen they are before they have a chance at life. They posit that as a parent you raise your children with boundaries, ethics, and moral, but the government has its own ethics, morals, and boundaries. They claim the government will have the power to give a child a bus pass, a bank account, access into entertainment venues, and a work permit when they turn 16, and the government can decide what makes a child applicable for that. They ask who should raise the child— you or the state. They argue that assigning a QR code to enter a playground and another to go skateboarding normalizes surveillance as safety for children, and that future generations could be convinced to accept more surveillance and control because they have been conditioned since childhood to see it as normal. They acknowledge pushback, noting some may call the concerns exaggerated, but they insist there is no reason to think digital ID will be used ethically, and they insist digital ID is forever. They challenge the idea that the last 500 years of humanity justify the next 500 years as superior, and say the government cannot provide a solid explanation for this institutional change. They dismiss migration as “bollocks” and claim the only justification given is convenience. The core claim is that the refusal to provide a straight answer hides a motive: control, plain and simple. The speaker concludes that there is an opportunity to change history in a positive way, and that opportunity starts with individuals choosing not to comply and saying no, for the sake of their kids and future generations.

Children making permanent decisions at a young age can lead to regret. The speaker's son was pressured into transitioning without full understanding, resulting in loss. They believe therapists promoting this should face consequences. The speaker plans to fight against the "woke mind virus" that led to their son's demise.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law preventing schools from informing parents if their children are on a medical pathway for gender transition. This law puts children at risk of irreversible medical treatments without parental consent. Similar actions in Britain have led to a ban on puberty blockers due to their harmful effects. Children and parents have the right to know about any potential gender dysphoria diagnosis. Schools should not promote the idea of being born in the wrong body. Action is needed to overturn this dangerous law in California to protect children and their parents.

The speaker expresses concern about what they perceive as harmful gender-related practices being imposed on children. They outline a plan to address this issue, including revoking certain policies, ceasing programs promoting gender transition, and prohibiting federal funding for related procedures. They propose consequences for healthcare providers involved in such practices and suggest investigating potential cover-ups of long-term side effects. The speaker also emphasizes promoting education about the nuclear family, gender roles, and the recognition of only male and female genders assigned at birth. They advocate for protecting parental consent and criticize the concept of being born with the wrong gender as a recent invention. The speaker concludes by asserting that they will put an end to these practices.