reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that they wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He also stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. The scientist discussed side effects, stating that the question was whether the benefit outweighed the worst possible side effect, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life is prioritized. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use and the company's strategic shift. The scientist was approached for clarification but denied his identity and evaded questions.

Justin Leslie, a whistleblower from Pfizer, reveals explosive information in an interview with Project Veritas. He discusses conversations with Pfizer employees about the mRNA vaccines and their side effects. The employees admit that mRNA vaccines have been known to have side effects for years and that Pfizer and Moderna used the emergency of the pandemic to push through the vaccines. They also discuss the lack of proper clinical trials and the use of the emergency authorization to bypass normal procedures. Leslie questions why safer vaccine formulations were not explored and highlights concerns about the impact on menstrual cycles and fertility. He also raises suspicions about the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccines. Leslie criticizes James O'Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, for burying the more significant information he provided.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted on hidden camera that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead of undergoing extensive clinical trials. The scientist stated that the government "kinda made a deal with pharmaceutical companies" to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, as they are "gonna die anyway." The CDC has announced they are pulling the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.

On 10/14/2021, Speaker 0 provided Project Veritas with a vial of modified RNA flu and a self-amplifying RNA chamber. Speaker 1 claims synthetic materials were observed that coalesce into spider web-like strings. Speaker 2 says Project Veritas didn't release the story, which included claims from Nick Warren that he gamed the FDA approval process for the 5-11 year olds vaccine by lying by omission. Speaker 3 says a nine terabyte drive of Pfizer evidence was handed over to Project Veritas, but they did nothing with it. Speaker 2 states someone died the same day after getting a booster shot and that there are reports of zillions of something in it. Speaker 3 references news about blood clots from the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and claims a recording indicates similar issues with other brands were being sneaky. Speaker 4 says Johnson & Johnson's side effects were revealed quickly, but other brands were sneaky. Speaker 4 also says vaccine trials skipped phases one, two, and three. Speaker 2 says their attorney advised them not to look at certain footage, and its release would have changed the rollout agenda in 2021. Speaker 3 then mentions Bohemian Grove, and Speaker 2 says they went to the Bohemian Club, which upset people.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

The speaker claims Pfizer documents reveal the COVID vaccines didn't work to stop the virus a month after rollout in November 2020. They allege Pfizer knew the third most common side effect was COVID. Within months, Pfizer supposedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker asserts Pfizer and the FDA knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The speaker states the CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed at the injection site, but Pfizer knew they biodistributed throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. Pathologist Dr. Robert Chandler allegedly found no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

They didn't see safety signals because they didn't want to see them and wouldn't report them. They lied about the vaccine staying in the arm, when they knew it wouldn't. They said the mRNA would dissolve in hours or days, but they knew it was modified RNA that stayed in the body with the spike protein. They continue to push this, despite evidence to the contrary. The science has been corrupted and the agencies have been corrupted, so they have no credibility.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab route models to "see if it works." He acknowledged the lack of research done on the products and stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. Rees also discussed weighing the worst potential side effects against the benefits, stating, "Cancer patient's gonna die anyway," so the focus is on quality of life. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use, but Rees was aware of its ineffectiveness. When confronted on camera, Rees initially denied his identity.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He claimed the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. According to Rees, "we basically just had a race to figure out who could solve it best. People wanted it. We gave it to them." He also stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and lab route models were used instead. Rees described a risk-benefit analysis where potential side effects were weighed against the perceived benefit, even in cases where patients, like those with cancer, were already facing a terminal prognosis. Confronted on camera, Rees initially denied his identity and then evaded questions. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the United States.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just threw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and testing was limited to lab models. He acknowledged potential side effects, stating that the risk was weighed against the benefit, using cancer patients as an example where quality of life was prioritized over curing the disease. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine due to declining use. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and evaded questions. The investigation aims to expose corruption and lies in government, corporations, and the pharmaceutical industry.

I recently heard stories of people losing their children to Pfizer injections, some experiencing immediate or gruesome deaths. The FDA knew about potential risks like cancer from as far back as 2013, but suddenly in 2020, these concerns were ignored. This seems like a premeditated crime, with regulators aware of the dangers. Military involvement in pushing these products is suspicious.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, allegedly admitted that the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." According to the scientist, the federal government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine, prioritizing speed over safety and efficacy. He claimed the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models instead. The scientist stated that the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also discussed weighing the worst potential side effects against the benefits for consumers, suggesting a different standard for cancer patients, who were "gonna die anyway." The CDC has previously announced they're pulling the J&J vaccine from use in The United States. J&J claims this is due to the vaccine's declining use and the company's strategic shift away from the vaccines.

you were promoted to the FDA classifies the vaccine as a drug. You were told it was safe. You were told it was effective. Mister Fauci, you made the statement that none of these shots will prevent transmission. You also stated that none of these shots will prevent you from getting the virus. So you're telling the people to take a shot that will will not prevent you from getting the virus and that will not prevent you from transmitting the virus if you do get it. The ultimate agenda is two things. One profit, which we all know is the pharmaceutical companies and agencies middle name. The word pharmaceutical comes from the Greek word pharmakia, which is in the bible. Pharmakia means sorcery and or witchcraft. You are now and have been experimented on. The Johnson and Johnson shot has aborted fetal tissue from aborted babies from the retina, as well as the kidney cells. Johnson and Johnson, you playing too much. You had over twenty five thousand cases of cancer racking up to over $4,000,000,000 of lawsuits. Why should we trust Moderna, the youngest one in the group? Ain't never created no vaccine, and this is not even a vaccine. We are getting banged on by institutions at high levels. We ain't got nothing on them.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

The speaker, a quality auditor at Pfizer, shares their concerns about the company's COVID-19 vaccine. They discovered that the vaccine vials were glowing and raised the issue with corporate, but received an unsatisfactory response. They also found documents in the company's database that mentioned the use of aborted fetal cell lines in the vaccine's development and the possibility of graphene oxide being present. The speaker noticed unusual security measures and a lack of proper quality control procedures. They also stumbled upon documents referencing depopulation and Satanism. Additionally, they discovered a Pfizer research and development lab in Wuhan with the address 666. The speaker believes that Pfizer, along with other organizations like the FDA and CDC, are aware of these issues. They express their distrust in vaccines and pharmaceutical companies in general.

Speaker 0: I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keep wait. There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 148 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 148 pages. The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier. Speaker 1: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world. Mhmm. So in The United States, our CDC, National Institutes of Health, and the FDA are actively involved in a cover up. And the same is occurring in The UK with the MHRA, Europe with European medicine agencies, and Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Something is going on that's very big. Each one of these companies that puts out a product has an obligation to produce ninety days of safety monitoring after their product comes out. It's a regulatory dossier. If somebody has a problem with the new product and they call the company like Pfizer, Pfizer has to report, write down what happened, and they have to collate that in a report and produce it and make it publicly available. When it came to ninety days with Pfizer, the first vaccine that came out, remember Pfizer was approved 12/10/2020. Pfizer didn't produce the report. And then people started asking, well, what's happening with your vaccine? And Pfizer would not disclose what happened. And then it went to court. And the lawyer for the FDA stepped in and said they don't wanna release Pfizer's dossier for fifty five years. Mhmm. Oh. Fifty five years. And the the the plaintiff pushed. And finally, slowly, the Pfizer dossier came out. Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty three deaths with their product within ninety days of release. People were calling Pfizer in desperation watching their family members die after taking the vaccine. Pfizer recorded over twelve hundred new adverse events, new problems that doctor Boden has talked to you about that we are grappling with the entire time. But the point is our FDA worked to cover this up. The FDA should be regulating this company. FDA should have been having at least monthly meetings and fully disclosing what was going on with these novel vaccines, which are a genetic transfer technology platform.

The speaker states that they believed Pfizer had two legal definitions for their jab for nefarious reasons, suspecting one would be used for FDA approval while the other, containing SV40, would be released to the public. This suspicion stems from the 1950s polio vaccine contamination with SV40. The speaker recounts how Dr. Ochsner tested the polio vaccine on his grandchildren, resulting in one death and one case of polio. Ochsner then alerted the "industrial military complex" to the problem. Dr. Bernice Eddy at the NIH discovered SV40 contamination in the polio vaccines but was silenced after revealing it. The speaker distrusted the COVID response due to this history and suspected Pfizer's use of the SV40 promoter. Kevin McKernan later tested expired vials and found SV40, suggesting a deliberate scheme to harm people who received the jab.

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the company's COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that J&J "just throw[s] the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. Rees stated that typical clinical trials were skipped, and the vaccine was tested on lab models to "see if it works." He also said that the lack of research should not be surprising. According to Rees, the government made a deal with pharmaceutical companies to solve the problem. He also stated that when considering side effects, the company weighs the worst possible outcome against the potential benefit, even if it means accepting that "cancer patients gonna die anyway." When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into the women's restroom.

A lead regulatory scientist at Johnson & Johnson, Joshua Rees, was secretly recorded stating the J&J COVID vaccine was "not safe and effective" and that the company wanted to "just throw the vaccine creation to the wind and see what happens." He said the government pressured pharmaceutical companies to quickly create the vaccine. According to Rees, the typical clinical trial testing process was skipped, and testing was limited to lab route models. Rees stated that the government and pharmaceutical companies were in a race to solve the problem. He also said that the worst possible side effect was weighed against the benefit to the consumer, and in the case of cancer patients, quality of life was prioritized over curing anything. The CDC has pulled the J&J vaccine from use in the US, citing declining use and a strategic shift by the company. When confronted about his statements, Rees denied his identity and went into a women's restroom.

Pfizer's claim of 96% efficacy for their vaccine was questioned. The study and data were not independently verified, and Pfizer wanted to keep the data hidden for 75 years. The true effectiveness of the vaccine, based on absolute risk reduction, is less than 1%. More people died and were harmed in their trials compared to the placebo group. The vaccine's safety was questionable from the start, and it is not effective. Additionally, appropriate studies were not conducted for new variants.

Pfizer has been forced to release previously secret documents, including FDA approval packages, due to court orders and successful FOIA requests. These documents reveal that Pfizer tested different versions of their vaccine during preclinical and clinical trials, which goes against FDA guidance. The different versions included modified RNA, unmodified RNA, self-amplifying RNA, and Spike protein alone. Surprisingly, all these versions were tested under the same investigational new drug number, despite FDA guidance stating that multiple versions should have their own individual numbers. Additionally, the toxicity of the mRNA active ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines was never studied. This raises concerns about the regulatory process and the lack of safety testing.