reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues that Democrats have been inconsistent on voter ID, particularly photo ID. He notes that for years Democrats claimed voter ID was a tool of voter suppression, then began hedging. He contends that Democrats now publicly say they support voter ID, with some leaders claiming their objection is not to a photo ID, but to other inclusivity formats like leases, utility bills, debit cards, or photocopies. He asserts that, in contrast, the Democrat floor leader said he objected to photo ID and called for inclusive voter ID options, but that Democrats have also supported photo ID in many other contexts (air travel, school enrollment, opening bank accounts). He argues this inconsistency shows Democrats “backpedaling” when pressed to support ID at the polls. The speaker cites severalDemocrats who have, at times, supported or stated favorable views toward voter ID, yet later qualified or avoided the position. He mentions a senior Democrat from New Jersey who said he would support a voter ID bill until pressed, then began avoiding the commitment. He references a junior Georgia Democrat who claimed, “I think you should have to prove that you are who you say you are before you vote. I support voter ID,” while also noting concerns about the specific requirements under discussion. He also quotes additional Democrats to illustrate what he sees as mixed messages: a Democrat from Arizona suggesting support for a strict voter ID approach; a Democrat from Rhode Island describing their state’s “sensible voter ID law” and frequent roll reviews as effective; the Democrat Senate leader stating that “Democrats support voter ID” ten days earlier; and a Georgia Democrat reiterating the expectation to prove one’s identity before voting and describing it as “basic.” The speaker announces an amendment vote on a clean voter ID bill, intended to require a photo ID at the polls, such as a driver’s license, tribal ID, military ID, veteran ID, or a passport. He clarifies that this amendment would not affect the Save America Act and would not obligate Democrats to vote for the final bill; they could vote for the amendment and against the overall act. The amendment’s purpose, he says, is to force Democrats to demonstrate whether they truly support photo ID in a concrete, real-world form. The speaker invites Democrats to demonstrate their actual stance by supporting the clean photo ID amendment and asserts that this would reveal where they truly stand.

We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. Illegal immigrants are given numbers to allow employers to withhold taxes. However, these numbers are often reused across multiple individuals working at various plants and factories, creating a system where the IRS only checks for employer use, not individual identity. This allows for fraudulent driver's license and voter registration acquisition. The government essentially ignores this, and a massive slush fund has been built up as a result – billions of dollars in interest alone. This explains why there are attempts to silence those who uncover this information. It reveals a uni-party system where everyone has benefited from this scheme at some point.

The speaker argues that Social Security cards are already widely used as identification. They claim that providing a driver's license and Social Security card is standard practice to prove eligibility for employment. The speaker characterizes the amendment as an anti-fraud measure to prevent illegal immigrants and others from obtaining jobs and benefits unlawfully. They believe the amendment is effective and doesn't alter government actions. The speaker expresses concern that the bill, despite good intentions, risks becoming ineffective due to opposition to rational proposals. They urge support for the amendment, stating that supporting it is the only way to stop fraud in immigration.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is the basis for retirement and retirement savings for 40% of all Americans. For 28 million Americans, Social Security is the only thing that they have. That's why we have to make sure that we are protecting it.

If a crime is committed by illegal immigrants, there should be an investigation. The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and Homeland Security investigations. We shouldn't let illegal aliens steal taxpayer dollars. Millions of illegal aliens have stolen Social Security, using fake Social Security numbers and identities, which are felonies. They will be investigated, prosecuted, and deported. When those deportations occur, Americans will get jobs, tenants, and houses. If a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If prosecution and deportation are justified, they will occur based on existing IRS protocols. No one is given immunity anymore. Illegal aliens freely stealing billions of taxpayer dollars should not be above the law.

Speaker 0 argues that the administration should ensure Social Security numbers are used for the right purposes and not on benefit programs. He notes that over 6,000 individuals have been identified through their work as being on the terrorist watch list or known criminals, and asks, "How does that happen, madam secretary?" He attributes this to the current presidency, stating, "It happens when you put a train wreck like Joe Biden in the White House, and it's gonna be a lot of work to clean it up." He presents figures to support his claim about misuse of Social Security numbers. In the last four and a half years, he says, there have been "over 9,000,000 people [who] get Social Security numbers that are not US citizens." He elaborates that these may be people with some sort of legal status, but a lot are illegals who were given a Social Security number in the same period. He asserts a need to determine whether they should be here "legally under a program" and, if they are here illegally, that they "certainly shouldn't be using that Social Security number to be on our programs." Speaker 0 concludes with a policy preference attributed to President Trump, stating that they should be given "the opportunity to go home on their own" if they wish to. He emphasizes two actions: identifying and addressing improper use of Social Security numbers by non-citizens, including those on the terrorist watch list or otherwise known criminals, and considering removal or voluntary return for those here illegally.

The speaker states that everywhere people go, they’re asked for a Social Security card, and that proving you’re a bonafide person who can have a job involves asking for a driver’s license and a Social Security card. This is described as an anti-fraud amendment. The speaker notes that people ask why we can’t stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here, and to constituents, the number one answer given is that when they come here, they can get jobs and benefits against the law because of fraud.

One person alleged that they were in charge of turning illegal immigrants into "clients" by asking them about headaches or back problems. The goal was to get them declared permanently disabled so they could receive Social Security for life. It's claimed that entitlements fraud, including Social Security, disability, and Medicaid fraud for illegal aliens, serves as a "gigantic magnetic force" pulling people in from around the world. Paying people at a standard of living above 90% of the Earth creates a powerful incentive to come to the U.S. and stay. Ending illegal alien fraud would turn off that magnet, causing them to stop coming and many to leave. It's believed that Democrats would lose a massive number of voters if this happened.

When a crime is committed, there should be an investigation. The federal government will find every illegal alien who is stealing American taxpayer dollars. If IRS investigators find illegal aliens stealing taxpayer money, they'll be referred to ICE and homeland security investigations. Illegal aliens in mass have fake Social Security numbers and fake identities, those are felonies. Why should there be an entire class in this country that is immunized from criminal prosecution and arrest for committing felonies? Yes, they will be investigated and prosecuted. Americans will get jobs, benefits, and houses. If it is found that a crime has been committed, they'll be referred. If it justifies the prosecution, they'll be prosecuted. If it justifies the deportation, they will be deported. No one is given immunity anymore. No one is given permission to break the law anymore because this is not a country if illegal aliens can freely steal billions of taxpayer dollars.

Speaker 1 criticizes Speaker 0's statement that undocumented immigrants with no criminal history pay into Social Security, arguing that this is impossible without a Social Security number. Speaker 1 claims that if undocumented immigrants are paying into Social Security, they are either committing fraud by using fake numbers or engaging in identity theft by using someone else's number. Speaker 1 asserts that both of these actions are federal crimes that harm everyday Americans, including children. Speaker 1 suggests Speaker 0's subsequent video was an attempt to cover up his initial error after being confronted with these facts. Speaker 1 concludes that there is no moral high ground because these actions are criminal.

Speaker 0 outlines two priorities: first, go after welfare fraud and rewrite how programs work by requiring states to send biometrics to the federal government proving that the person exists and they're eligible for the services in question, with a focus on fraud “rampant in Minnesota and throughout these blue states through reconciliation.” Second, implement an affordability package to make America more affordable for the hardworking men and women of the country.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

This proposal is a serious matter. People who register and vote illegally disenfranchise actual US citizens. The speaker objects to the suggestion that their motive is to disingenuously sow fear and uncertainty about election legitimacy, calling the accusation inaccurate and lacking proof. The speaker believes there is ample reason to bring the proposal forward and expresses deep disappointment that it cannot pass. It is not too much to ask to put teeth into existing laws stating that only US citizens can vote in US elections. The House passed it, and the Senate could pass it now. It is inexcusable not to.

The speaker argues that Social Security cards are already widely used as identification across America. They state that proving one's eligibility for employment often requires a driver's license and a Social Security card. The speaker characterizes the proposed amendment as an anti-fraud measure designed to combat illegal immigration and prevent unauthorized individuals from obtaining jobs and benefits. They claim the amendment is effective and doesn't alter government actions. The speaker expresses concern that the bill, despite good intentions, risks becoming ineffective due to opposition to rational proposals. They urge support for the amendment, stating that those who want to stop immigration fraud have no alternative.

Governor Tim Wall signed the driver's license for all bill into law, allowing all Minnesotans to obtain a driver's license regardless of immigration status. One speaker stated that instead of changing the politician, the goal is to change the voter. Allowing undocumented immigrants to have an ID is considered un-American, and the speaker believes the intention is to flood the market with illegal voters, given concerns about free and fair elections. The speaker claims this policy will allow millions of people to have an ID. The speaker believes that taxpaying and everyday Americans find this policy disgusting and outrageous, and that policymakers are not listening to the concerns of the public.

We need to protect Americans' privacy and Social Security. Social Security is crucial for many Americans; for 40% it's the foundation of their retirement savings, and for 28 million, it's their sole retirement income. We must ensure its protection. No one in the Republican-controlled House and Senate will challenge us on this.

Speaker 0 argues that illegal voting occurs with penalties in place, and asserts that it happens all the time. He contends that the claim of illegality not being widespread is not reliable, insisting that we do not know how widespread illegal voting is because it is not being detected. He describes the California voter registration process, noting on the section where a driver’s license number or the last four digits of a social security number are entered, there is a box underneath each one stating, “I don’t have one,” which allows a person to proceed to vote. He says this demonstrates that the notion of needing to present some form of identification to register to vote is not accurate and is not being implemented in California. Additionally, he states that people are being registered to vote at the DMV, and cites audits indicating that the DMV has improperly registered people, including illegal immigrants. He claims there is immunity in place that says if the DMV registers someone who is not eligible, they are immune from prosecution. Based on these points, he expresses the belief that there are not sufficient safeguards in place to detect and prevent people from committing voter fraud.

Some people believe claims about illegal immigration are fabricated, but this is untrue. New York tried to legalize illegal immigrant voting until the State Supreme Court blocked it. California provides healthcare to all illegal immigrants, with costs rising from an initial $3 billion to $9 billion. The real reason for attacks is that payments to illegal immigrants will be terminated. FEMA funds were used to house illegal immigrants in luxury New York hotels with welcome packages and $10,000 debit cards. The speaker believes this is the biggest voter fraud in history. The asylum-to-citizen timeframe is roughly five years, so if the "Kamala puppet" machine had won, all those people would have been legalized, eliminating swing states. Benefit programs are ending, but this doesn't include the other 7.5-8 million illegal immigrants that ICE estimates are in the country. Voter ID is crucial because the Social Security number, while not a federal ID, is used to access benefits. One can obtain a Social Security number by answering questions and showing non-federal IDs like a medical bill and school ID, then get on voter rolls, and then operatives will form the vote.

Speaker 0 argues in favor of an amendment described as the most effective anti-fraud measure found, asserting that the Social Security card is already used across the country as identification. He contends that passing a law against using the Social Security card would be misleading, and he questions why the chairman and the distinguished minority member of the Social Security committee would oppose such a law. He emphasizes that everywhere people are asked for a Social Security card, and that proving one’s eligibility for employment often requires both a driver’s license and a Social Security card. He labels the amendment as anti-fraud and notes that the problem of illegal immigration and fraud is often explained to constituents as people coming here and obtaining jobs and benefits illegally. The gentleman from Florida is credited with assembling what Speaker 0 calls the most effective anti-fraud measure found, described as not changing the actions of the government one bit. Despite its apparent effectiveness, there is substantial opposition to the amendment. Speaker 0 expresses concern that the bill, which began with good intentions, could become a political liability—something the public believes is a form of action without substance. He warns that whenever someone proposes a rational, small step to address fraud, opponents raise hypothetical concerns that derail progress. He stresses that addressing fraud in immigration requires support for the amendment, arguing that those who want to combat fraud have no choice but to back it. In closing, Speaker 0 urges support for the amendment and reiterates the urgency of stopping fraud related to immigration. His time ends with the call to back the amendment.

My colleagues claim that common sense voting laws, like requiring a government ID, are racist. I have multiple government IDs, showing personal responsibility. I have a global entry card, military ID, Texas driver's license, license to carry, congressional card, and passport. Obtaining these IDs is not impossible, it's personal responsibility. I fought for this country as a helicopter pilot to protect free and fair elections. Having a government ID is not racist, it's American. Translation: My colleagues argue that basic voting laws, such as needing a government ID, are discriminatory. I have various government IDs, demonstrating personal responsibility. I possess a global entry card, military ID, Texas driver's license, license to carry, congressional card, and passport. Acquiring these IDs is not impossible, it's about personal responsibility. I served as a helicopter pilot to defend free and fair elections. Having a government ID is not discriminatory, it's American.

Someone is allegedly going to be arrested for stealing 400,000 social security numbers and personal information from the Social Security database. This information was reportedly being sold to enable people to steal money from Social Security. The fraud is allegedly connected to illegal immigrants and voter fraud, as Social Security is the main way identification is established in the United States. Compromising the Social Security system can purportedly allow non-citizens to register to vote and obtain benefits. The speaker claims Democrats are using parts of the government to provide financial incentives for illegal immigrants to come to and remain in the United States, citing Social Security disability, Medicare, unemployment, and IRS refunds without income. FEMA funds meant for Americans in distress from natural disasters were allegedly diverted to pay for luxury hotels in New York for illegal immigrants, who are purportedly still there.

Let's admit the truth. Everywhere people go, they're asked for a Social Security card. In fact, one way to prove you're a bonafide person who can have a job is to ask for a driver's license and a Social Security card. This is an anti fraud amendment. All the over where we go, people say, well, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here? And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud.

The speaker thanks the gentleman and states that Social Security cards are already used as identification across America. He suggests passing a law to prohibit this if desired, but acknowledges the current reality. He argues this amendment is anti-fraud, addressing constituents' concerns about illegal immigrants obtaining jobs and benefits through fraudulent means. He claims the amendment is the most effective anti-fraud measure available without altering government actions. He expresses concern that the bill, despite good intentions, risks becoming ineffective due to opposition to rational proposals. He urges support for the amendment, stating that those who want to stop immigration fraud have no choice but to support it.

The speakers claim to have discovered widespread fraud within the Social Security system while mapping it to understand where the fraud was. They found that the number of non-citizens receiving Social Security numbers has increased from 270,000 in 2021 to 2,100,000 in 2024. They allege that under the current administration, illegal immigrants can enter the country and apply for work authorization and receive Social Security numbers without an interview or ID. They claim the system defaults to maximum inclusion and minimum collection for these individuals, with many already receiving Medicaid. They sampled voter registration records and found instances of this population registered and voting, which have been referred for prosecution. They assert that human traffickers have made $13-15 billion due to these incentives, exploiting people and leading to a human tragedy, including the trafficking of children. They allege that people become indentured servants to pay off debts to traffickers, creating a system of exploitation.

Antonio Gracias claims that the Social Security system has a massive fraud issue. He says that in 2021, 270,000 non-citizens received Social Security numbers, and by 2024, that number rose to 2,100,000. According to Gracias, illegal immigrants can enter the U.S. by claiming asylum at a port of entry or crossing the border and receiving a "notice to appear" in court. They can then apply for a work document (I-765 form), receive authorization (I-766), and automatically get a Social Security number without an interview or ID. Gracias alleges that the system defaults to "max inclusion" and "max pay" for this group, with minimal collection efforts. He says that 1,300,000 of these individuals are already on Medicaid. He also claims that some individuals from this group of 5,500,000 people are registered to vote and have voted, and that these cases have been referred for prosecution.