reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The happiest moment of my life, the birth of my daughter, was also the scariest. I had an emergency C-section, and I had to leave my wife and newborn daughter an hour after surgery to go to Houston for a court hearing. We had no idea what was going to happen. Giving birth is scary because complications can arise afterward, and I couldn't be there. I felt like I was letting my wife down, even though she understood I had to go. If I didn't go to court, I mean, these people were going to send me to prison. To have my baby born and then go to trial the next day and see people lie, and the judge accept it. What kind of country is this? What kind of country are we delivering our kids into?

I flew on Jeffrey Epstein's jet twice. The first time was in 1993 when I went to Florida with my wife and kids to visit my mom. We were offered a ride to Palm Beach by Glenn Maxwell, whom my wife had a relationship with. The second time, I flew with my family to Rapid City, South Dakota for a weekend of fossil hunting. I never flew on his jet alone. This was 30 years ago, before Epstein's crimes were known. I believe all information about Epstein and the high-level political figures involved should be released to the public without any redactions.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

You spent five years in prison for failing to pay child support for Miss Seer's son, Dylan. Yes, I am his father and I still talk to him. She should be held accountable for some crime, but I shouldn't be. I didn't have a problem.

Footage shows rabbi Marvin Hyer, an activist for Jewish causes, outraged because last June Jackson sent him a letter of apology for singing those lyrics. The incident centers on the words “Jew me, sue me, kick me, kite me,” which Michael Jackson had told the press he would never use. Hyer and others insist the phrase is problematic, and the discussion emphasizes that “don’t you me” is part of the song’s controversy. During the segment, the conversation shifts to the issue of testimony in a child molestation case. Speaker 3 notes that, in general, a child will be able to recall and recollect with some detail the incident, and that such testimony is persuasive to a jury even if it is the only testimony available. The group then moves to Jackson’s legal proceedings. Jackson gave a wave when he was released after booking and was scheduled for arraignment in January. The report also highlights Michael Jackson’s longtime residence in Trump Tower and his ties to Donald Trump. Trump is described as strongly reiterating his defense of Jackson in an appearance with Larry King by criticizing the accuser’s mother. A speaker characterizes the mother as someone who has “had plenty of experience at going after people” and suggests she “goes after them viciously and violently.” The speaker adds that Jackson would spend time with Trump’s kids and that “he was not a child molester.” There is a pivotal claim from a different participant: “They murdered Michael Jackson after he started talking about Jews,” with a caveat that the speaker does not state whether the comments about Jews were right or wrong, but asserts it as a historical fact. The report notes that Jackson was in Brazil to shoot the music video for “They Don’t Care About Us.” It mentions that last year he angered Jewish groups by singing certain lyrics, and that he yielded to pressure to change the song, though in Brazil the controversial lyrics reappeared as he performed them in a particular way. The discussion then addresses the line “Jew me, sue me. And some people are saying that that is antisemitic.” One participant declares it is not antisemitic, insisting, “I’m not a racist person… I love all races of people” and clarifies that the line is about himself as the victim, not about others. Finally, the report closes with the update that Michael Jackson apparently suffered cardiac arrest that afternoon and was rushed to UCLA Medical Center.

‘I defamed you? How? How I defamed you? You just paid me all this money. You didn't mention that.’ ‘Go back up. You didn't mention that, but you also didn't mention that you were supposed to tell Hulu to take that shit down, bro.’ ‘These bitches already paid me $5,000,000, bro.’ This is hush money from a lie that you created. You made me shoot another dirty sex tape with your daughter, and you made me do dirty things. ‘This is bribery, and you keep pressing me every year. And I don't wanna take this shit no more.’ I don't have no lawyers. ‘America deserves to know.’ ‘Y'all trying to kill the black community.’ I have one year left to to make sure that they know who they dad really is.

It's incredible how some people either don't think or just want to hate me. Usually, when a famous person faces these accusations, many victims appear. Name anyone, and you'll find hundreds of victims, new lawsuits, and countless stories. But here I am, three and a half years into this, with the most media spin ever, and not a single girl has come forward. Every girl they contact says I'm nice. They like me, even defend me. No one's against me.

Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino led a double life as a satanic high priest. The colonel's cult is listed in the San Francisco telephone book and his phone answering machine, both of his affiliation. This is the temple of Seth. The temple is the only international satanic religious institution fully recognized by the United States government. Here at San Francisco's Presidio Army Base, charges surface connecting ritual child abuse at the Presidio Daycare Center to the Devil Cult. Parents and others allege that as many as 60 young children were ritualistically abused by soldiers of Satan. Is it not a fact that a three and a half year old girl identified you as the alleged perpetrator of molestation? No. As a matter of fact, is not the case. An accusation was made by her stepfather who was an army chaplain speaking on behalf of this child. In her original interview with the FBI, she denied ever being molested. Well, I've seen the affidavits for the search warrant of your home, and they indicate the child is speaking to the authorities, not the father. This was after she had been subjected to therapy. He was a lieutenant colonel who worked in military intelligence and led work in psychological operations. Aquino's interest in psychological warfare was of a piece with his occult work. Both dealt with how unseen forces, be they propaganda or magical will, can alter thoughts in reality. He coauthored a military paper titled From Psyop to Mind War, The Psychology of Victory. This paper, written with Colonel Paul E. Valioli in 1980, advocated for the US Army to extend psychological operations beyond tactical propaganda to a broader concept of mind war. Mind war is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war. Mind war must target all participants if it is to be effective. The goal of mind war is to get the mind to believe its own decisions, and to feel that it made those decisions without coercion. To be effective, whatever measures are used must not be detectable by ordinary means.

I'm not confrontational and find this attention uncomfortable. I never sought praise or recognition. The thought of someone getting hurt because I didn't act would haunt me. I would endure countless court appearances and face negativity just to prevent someone from being harmed or killed.

The discussion centers on the Epstein files’ implications for Michael Jackson, Hollywood power, and international intelligence networks. The speakers present a narrative in which Jackson is portrayed as a target of a smear campaign by those who themselves were implicated in abusive behavior, and where financial and institutional interests—labels like John Branca, Sony, and broader music-industry power structures—played a decisive role in shaping public misperceptions and legal outcomes. Key points raised: - Michael Jackson faced multiple accusations in the 1990s: one civil settlement for sexual abuse claims and a criminal trial in which he was acquitted. Jackson maintained his innocence, asserting that he had only tried to help children and that the accusations were a nightmare used to condemn him. - Macaulay Culkin and Corey Feldman provided counter-narratives about Jackson’s character, with Culkin stating that Jackson protected him from going to Epstein’s island. Aaron Carter recounted how FBI agents and his mother pressured him for statements about Jackson, which he resisted, arguing that Jackson was hospitable and kind. - Ian Carroll, an independent journalist, argues that the smear campaign against Jackson was sustained by media and industry interests, and that the FBI’s decade-long investigation found no credible evidence, despite persistent public narratives. He suggests the timing of accusations aligned with Jackson’s challenges to industry power. - Cui bono (who benefits) framing is used to trace Jackson’s fortunes to John Branca, Sony, and the broader record industry. Jackson’s contested revised will, signed while the family claimed he was not in Los Angeles, is cited as evidence of manipulated assets and power dynamics after his death. Carroll and others propose that Jackson’s death may have involved murder or entrapment tied to financial and industry interests. - The group discusses how Epstein’s network intersects with major power players, including Ehud Barak and Leslie Wexner, and how Epstein fostered a web of influence spanning entertainment, finance, and intelligence communities. They propose that blackmail—often leveraging sexual proclivities or drug use—was a tool used to control powerful figures, with Bill (Jackson’s long-time head of security) and Faheem Muhammad (who later joined Diddy’s security) highlighted as examples of how security teams can serve as leverage points. - The conversation connects Epstein’s trafficking network to Hollywood and music executives, arguing that the industry routinely uses celebrities and talent-disposition toward manipulation, entrapment, and blackmail to protect vested interests. - The panel raises questions about the role of media silence and biased reporting. They critique headlines and coverage (such as claims of Jackson being a pedophile) as sensationalist, arguing that some outlets published prosecutors’ opinions as facts and that this feeds broader misinformation. - They discuss the broader Epstein ecosystem—its links to Israel’s intelligence circles, transhumanist funding, Palantir and other surveillance technologies, and the potential for a global intelligence-driven “blackmail economy” that intersects with corporate and political power. They emphasize that Epstein’s network extended beyond celebrity abuse to technological and geopolitical frontiers, including genetics, cybersecurity, and digital governance. - The conversation also touches on how some public narratives attempt to shift blame or reframe individuals (for example, via racial framing or antisemitism accusations) to obscure the underlying structural abuses and blackmail networks. They caution against easy judgments based on identity politics, urging careful examination of the documented connections and the evidence. - Towards the end, they debate who might still benefit from reviving allegations about Jackson, noting that the Epstein materials resurfaced in late 2020s-era reporting and that some outlets used salacious Epstein-Jackson linkages to repackage old stories. They stress the difficulty of disentangling truth from manipulation when powerful actors have incentives to suppress or distort information. Additionally, the speakers highlight: - The existence of a broader, ongoing intelligence and corporate machinery behind Epstein’s operations, suggesting that the real story lies not only in salacious accusations but in how such networks influence media, politics, science funding, and technological development. - The importance of transparency and deeper investigation into the layers beneath public celebrity scandals, including the roles of security personnel, gatekeepers, and financial controllers who may shield or advance these criminal networks. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a pattern: prominent figures in entertainment and business become targets of complex, multifaceted suppression and manipulation by powerful interest groups, with Epstein’s and Jackson’s cases presented as illustrative of a wider system of control and blackmail rooted in money, media influence, and intelligence contacts.

I chose to go to trial instead of taking a plea deal, even though it would have been easier. The government offered me a lesser charge, but I saw it as a lie that would harm others. I refused to be a part of that deception.

You ever think about how you'd look on the news if you got arrested for protecting a child? I doubt it would be a problem getting bailed out. Many people would support you for standing up for what's right. The ACLU and others would likely step in to help.

I was part of a group arrested for a plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer, but it was a setup by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be about the governor's cottage. I got charged with material support terrorism for taking a video. The government lied about my involvement. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice prevails.

I bribed Hillary Clinton $18,000,000 on behalf of the FBI in 2016. The FBI wanted to set her up in a sting operation. They told me to facilitate a bribe from another government. I did this on January 14, 2016. The FBI later told me to forget about it because Hillary was going to win the election. They said Obama's people were controlling things. This was part of a plan called Operation Snow Globe to control Hillary for 8 years. I realized I was being used to manipulate her. The whole situation was a coup against Hillary that turned into the Russian collusion delusion when Trump won. I knew in 2018 they were planning to hijack the 2020 election.

The speaker recounts a sequence of events following a party, culminating in a confrontation with FBI agents. After leaving the party, the speaker says he smoked with someone nicknamed “nickel,” then got into a limousine and returned to the Sheraton Hotel at Universal, where four FBI agents were waiting in the hotel room. The speaker’s mom was present, urging him to tell the agents what happened. When asked to recount events, the speaker says the agents asked “super sexually exploiting, you know, questions, back backside questions,” and he immediately questions the premise: “are y’all crazy? I said, what do think I'm gonna do? Tell you that Michael did something bad so that we we can sue him for money?” He looks at his mom and expresses disbelief at why she would allow such questions, asking, “Why are you letting this happen?” The speaker states his perspective on Michael, saying, “That man did nothing but be hospitable, kind, loving, giving, everything you could think of.” He explains that they had spent time together riding four-wheelers for several hours in the mountains at night after Michael’s birthday party, and that he, Michael, and Chris Tucker hung out and talked “pretty much all” of the time. The speaker emphasizes that the encounter with Michael was positive and that he did not understand why the FBI was pressing the sensitive questions or why his mother suggested there might be wrongdoing. In summary, the speaker describes a night of hospitality and camaraderie with Michael (and Chris Tucker), followed by an FBI interview at the hotel room the next day in which intrusive questions were asked, prompting the speaker to defend Michael and challenging the motives behind the investigators’ line of questioning. The account highlights the contrast between the speaker’s personal memory of generosity and friendship with Michael and the formal, accusatory nature of the FBI interrogation.

The transcript centers on a controversial set of statements made by Michael Jackson and surrounding reactions. It opens with Speaker 0 stating, “I'm shocked. Jew me, sue me, kick me, kite me. Those are the words that he told us that he would never use,” highlighting a phrase Jackson allegedly defended as not something he would say. Speaker 1 adds, “I want people to get the picture. So they shut up talking about, don't Jew me. You understand? Yep.” The implication is that the language became a focal point in discussions about Jackson, not necessarily a verdict about his character, with Speaker 1 suggesting that people should stop saying “don’t Jew me” and that “Michael Jackson is a to be convicted of this child molestation because he said don’t you me in a storm,” though the phrasing is ambiguous in the transcription. Speaker 2 notes that “this can depend on the testimony of the child accuser,” while Speaker 3 discusses the general reliability of a child’s recall, stating, “In general, the child will be able to recall and recollect with some detail the incident, and that is persuasive to a jury even if it is the only testimony that is available.” Speaker 4 asks, “Should we light the candle?” and Speaker 3 confirms, “Yeah. Let's do it.” The scene shifts to Jackson’s legal status: “Jackson gave a wave when he was released after booking. He's scheduled for arraignment in January,” per Speaker 2. Speaker 5 mentions Michael Jackson’s long residence at Trump Tower and describes how Donald Trump defended Jackson in a Larry King interview by attacking the accuser’s mother, saying she has “plenty of experience at going after people, and she goes after them viciously and violently.” The speaker adds that Jackson spent time with Trump’s children and “loved children,” asserting, “He was not a child molester.” Another voice claims, “They murdered Michael Jackson after he started talking about Jews,” acknowledging that while the speaker does not judge the content of Jackson’s statements, it is a “fact of history” that he was in Brazil to shoot the music video for “They Don’t Care About Us,” and that he angered Jewish groups by the controversial lyrics—though he later changed the song under pressure, the controversial lyrics were back when performed in Brazil. Speaker 6 reiterates Jackson’s controversial stance, saying, “There’s been another issue raised in a song you say, and some people are saying that that is antisemitic. It’s not antisemitic because I’m not a racist person. I could never be a racist. I love all races of people from Arabs to Jewish people, like I said before, to blacks. But when I say Jew me, sue me, everybody do me, kick me, kite me, don’t you black or white me, I’m talking about myself as the victim.” Finally, Speaker 3 reports, “Apparently, Michael Jackson suffered cardiac arrest this afternoon. He was rushed to UCLA Medical Center.”

I have 7 kids, and 5 of them have allergies. I was asked by Donald Trump to serve on a vaccine safety commission in 2016. During a meeting, I asked if there was any vaccine that had been tested for safety, but they couldn't provide any evidence. So, I sued them to show us a study on vaccine safety testing, but they said they didn't have any.

I was canceled for speaking out about figures like Michael Jackson and R. Kelly, but it's not about race; it's about truth. In 2024, many will face exposure for their actions, regardless of who they are. The truth will come to light, and those who react negatively know why. I've spent 30 years gathering knowledge and secrets, and I know things I shouldn't. I’m not the villain here; I’ve raised my children well and lived a clean life. The industry claims I was blackballed for not showing up, but that's not true. My work speaks for itself.

It was an emotional time seeing his baby get ripped from him, and it wasn't right. You never went through what I went through. You didn't endure all the things I had to endure. You weren't sleeping on a couch trying to raise a hundred bucks here, a thousand bucks here. I'm invoking the constitution here. Every defendant has the right to a fair trial, and no justice can be done in Ferguson or New York City if a fair trial cannot be had. You didn't sleep on a mattress in Louisiana. You weren't falsely accused by the federal government, not once but twice. You didn't go through three jury trials. James O'Keith is facing federal felony charges, charges that carry up to a quarter million dollar fine and ten years in prison. You didn't bleed and sweat and cry the way that I did for fourteen years. And you come into my institution and you have the gall to tell me that you're not the bad guy. This was never about you.

I was offered a plea deal to admit guilt, which would have reduced my charges to a single misdemeanor, allowing me to avoid jail time. However, I refused because it required me to accept a false narrative that aimed to destroy not only me but also the integrity of our constitutional system. This decision was incredibly painful, yet it was clear to me that I had to choose right over wrong. I had to trust in God’s faithfulness and strength to bless my obedience, even when it was uncomfortable.

I no longer represent Epstein and haven't seen him in years. If his lawyers ask me about the deal, I have to answer as a lawyer. I was introduced to him by Lady Rothschild and we attended academic conferences together. We had no idea about his other life and ended our social relationship when we found out. I became his lawyer and defended him, which some people criticize. However, I deny ever meeting the woman who accused him and call it a complete lie. I will continue to say this until I die, and my children will say the same.

I want to address the lawsuit that has been brought to my attention. I want to make it clear that it did not happen. I don't remember ever meeting this person, and I would never harm anyone. This is not who I am. The credibility of the person filing the lawsuit is questionable, as they have filed many lawsuits and written a book on how to win them. I have been in public life for almost 40 years, and people know my character. I would never do anything to harm someone. Right now, we need to stay focused and let go of distractions.

People on TV claim to be experts on me, even though they don't know me. I knew Michael Jackson well, and he lived in Trump Tower. I've seen him perform and he was an incredible entertainer. He was a friend of mine, a perfect gentleman, and we never had any problems. He's gone through a lot, and I will defend him because nobody else is. He lived in Trump Tower for a long time and we had many great times together at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.

I called child services on someone because I was angry at them. I fabricated a story and exaggerated things to make it seem like their kids were being abused. Child services visited them and said they could lose their kids. I thought they deserved it for not being nice to me.

One little-known aspect of my case involves a federal agent who claimed they intended to plant child pornography on my husband's computer. This was part of an operation by the FBI. In a separate case currently in litigation, an FBI agent has testified that such actions have occurred before, although it didn't happen in our situation. They halted this part of the operation before it could be executed. It's alarming to think about the implications, especially knowing we had a young daughter at home and that there was an alleged conspiracy to carry out such a heinous act.