reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the global population. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal organizations. They provide evidence of unethical practices, including the murder of children in vaccine trials and the manipulation of funding and research. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and urges viewers to share this information.

The video claims that the French government ordered doctors to use a restricted drug on the elderly, while in the US, hospitals were allegedly bribed to diagnose COVID and use ventilators that caused deaths. The World Health Organization and governments are accused of suppressing successful treatments and preventing autopsies that could reveal the true cause of death. Mask-wearing is said to be ineffective and harmful, and the UK lockdown is criticized for causing more deaths than it prevents. The video also mentions a rise in suicides among young people and increased poverty worldwide.

Nicole Sirotek, a registered nurse with expertise in critical care and trauma, shares her experience during the COVID pandemic. She went to New York City to help with the crisis and witnessed gross negligence and medical mismanagement of patients. Poor public health measures and the handicapping of medical professionals have contributed to the current crisis. Sirotek highlights that many patients are not dying from COVID itself, but rather from negligence and medical errors. She questions the lack of interventions like Ibuprofen and steroids, which could have potentially saved lives. Sirotek emphasizes the need for better execution of early intervention strategies to prevent further deaths.

The video discusses the alleged financial incentives given to hospitals for COVID patients and treatments. It claims that hospitals receive money for each COVID patient admitted, for positive COVID test results, and for using the drug remdesivir. The video suggests that these incentives led to false positives and inappropriate treatments, such as putting patients on ventilators. It also shares personal stories of individuals who experienced mistreatment in hospitals. The video concludes by urging viewers to be cautious and avoid hospitals if possible.

In 2020, there have been reports of neglect, violation of patient rights, and mistreatment in hospitals, including Sarasota Memorial Hospital. Families have shared stories of loved ones being deprived of basic care, given unnecessary drugs like remdesivir, and put on mechanical ventilation. The speaker questions how healthcare workers can continue these practices and go home to their families. Nursing quality is judged by patients, not by magazines or journals. The speaker urges nurses and doctors to reflect on their actions as the public is watching.

New York, particularly Elmhurst Hospital, became the epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis, facing overwhelming patient numbers and dwindling supplies. Nurse Erin Olszewski, who worked there, observed troubling practices, including mislabeling patients as COVID-positive despite negative tests and the aggressive use of ventilators on patients who may not have needed them. She noted a high percentage of patients from marginalized communities and highlighted the lack of experienced doctors on the floors. Erin documented her experiences and raised concerns about protocols that seemed driven by financial incentives rather than patient care. She witnessed patients being treated without proper isolation, leading to increased infections. Ultimately, Erin felt compelled to speak out against these practices, believing they contributed to unnecessary patient deaths.

The speaker shares their experience working in the COVID ICU at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, New York. They emphasize that the situation was not limited to New York, but was happening nationwide, including in Florida. They describe witnessing a disturbing assembly line-like process where patients were treated poorly and family members were banned. The speaker criticizes politicians and government interference in the doctor-patient relationship. They mention financial incentives for admitting patients and the neglectful protocols followed. They recount seeing patients with severe bed sores and feces dried on their backs. The speaker reveals that full code patients were not being resuscitated and were ultimately placed in body bags.

This video criticizes the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). It argues that the WHO misrepresented the case fatality rate (CFR) and infection fatality rate (IFR) of the virus, causing unnecessary fear. The video also questions the validity of asymptomatic transmission and highlights the negative consequences of lockdown measures, such as increased poverty, mental health issues, and disrupted education. It criticizes the effectiveness of mask mandates and PCR testing, and warns of the erosion of civil liberties. The speaker urges viewers to push back against the threats to our civilization.

The video discusses various controversial topics related to the origins of the coronavirus, the role of organizations like the CDC and WHO, and the influence of individuals like Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates. It raises concerns about patents on the virus, the manipulation of information by media and fact-checkers, and the push for vaccines. The video also highlights the alleged negative impact of vaccines in India and Africa, as well as the connections between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein. It concludes by urging viewers to question the motives and actions of those in power.

The speaker discusses their experience as a nurse in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. They express their belief that there was a mass plan to promote fear and suffering, and to deny early treatment. They witnessed negligence in the treatment of patients and felt that the focus was on using ventilators instead of exploring alternative treatments. The speaker also raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, citing reports of adverse effects and questioning the rush to vaccinate. They criticize the censorship of medical professionals who express differing opinions and emphasize the need for people to wake up to the larger agenda at play.

In this video, the speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the global population. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provides evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They call for the dismantling of the WHO and condemn the actions of those involved. The video concludes with a call to share the information presented.

After working in critical care and directly caring for COVID patients in the ICU throughout the pandemic, the speaker says that after eighteen months of “chaos” they left the bedside because they could not “watch one more of [their] patients needlessly die” due to “deadly hospital protocols” and “denial of life saving medications.” They state that people were being told COVID was killing all patients, but they contend it was instead “complete and total medical mismanagement of COVID” that was killing them. The speaker asks why, if patients were dying of the virus itself, bodies were not being pulled from homes and off the streets “en masse.” They claim that the reality is that patients “aren’t dying at home” or “on our streets,” and that they are “dying in our hospitals,” which they say raises the question of why that is happening. They describe walking away from the bedside but say what haunts them are the faces of patients they believed did not need to die. They say they were never comfortable with death, but learned in nursing—especially in the ICU—that “there are fates far worse than death.” The speaker says they considered it an honor to provide compassion in patients’ last moments, but that this situation was different. They say these patients did not die from “a disease” or “a virus,” and instead died in what they call a “hospital holocaust.” They describe the system as “shamelessly corrupt,” using what they characterize as well intentioned nurses to carry out a “sinister plan.” They compare ventilators to “new gas chambers.” Finally, they state they witnessed “numerous alarming signs” that “these novel vaccines were causing great harm” to their patients.

The speaker, a former Pfizer employee, claims that the information and safety measures provided by governments regarding the virus are false. They argue that PCR testing is unreliable and that the public should disregard case rates and announcements. They warn of a hidden agenda and urge people to pay attention and take action. The video includes various news clips reporting on COVID-19 cases and deaths. The speaker questions the accuracy of COVID-19 death counts and compares the virus to the flu. They also discuss the lack of flu cases during the pandemic and suggest that flu cases were mislabeled as COVID-19. The speaker criticizes the PCR test and accuses governments of manipulating the results to drive their agenda. They highlight the potential dangers of the vaccines and express skepticism towards the medical establishment. The video concludes with a call to resist fear and manipulation and to seek the truth.

The speaker shares a disturbing experience where patients died and their bodies were stacked in freezer trucks, but not from COVID. Autopsies were banned and there were price hikes for ventilators and deaths. Feeling unable to speak up, the speaker decided to go undercover and recorded conversations for four weeks. They play a clip of a doctor who didn't properly care for a patient, wrote her death certificate before she died, and lied to her family. The speaker believes it's important for the public to know about these unethical practices. They question why the hospital staff didn't act differently if family or ethics committees were present. The speaker asks for opinions on what the right thing to do in that situation would be.

In this video, the host, Alex Newman, interviews two whistleblowers. The first guest, Melissa McAtee, is a former Pfizer employee who exposes the company's unethical practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. She reveals that Pfizer disregarded good manufacturing practices and withheld information from the public. The second guest, Ramona Bessinger, is a public school teacher who speaks out against the racially divisive and historically inaccurate curriculum being taught in schools. She highlights the removal of classic literature and the promotion of racist ideologies. Both whistleblowers provide evidence and call for action to address these issues.

The speaker expresses concern about the death of a patient and questions if the hospital staff may have caused it. They discuss the lack of proper care and negligence in the hospital, with patients not being coded and families being misled. The speaker decides to go undercover and record their experiences. They mention the inappropriate use of ventilators and the lack of qualified staff. The video also touches on the financial incentives for admitting patients and the suppression of alternative treatments. The speaker highlights the importance of early treatment and criticizes the focus on ventilators.

In this video, the speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming and killing the global population. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and uses a four-step process to execute their plans. The speaker also alleges that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and orchestrated by these criminal entities. They provide examples of unethical practices, such as conducting deadly experiments on children and funding gain-of-function research. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and urges viewers to share this information.

A nurse and a doctor discuss the use of ventilators in hospitals during the pandemic. The nurse reveals that some floors were carrying out actions that other floors refused to do, essentially causing harm to patients. The doctor mentions that ventilators were used to protect healthcare workers, even though they had a high fatality rate for patients. The lack of transparency with patients and families is highlighted, as well as the reluctance to explore alternative treatments like Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. The speaker also mentions the incentivization of using certain drugs and protocols that led to unnecessary deaths.

The video discusses various controversial topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the involvement of individuals such as Anthony Fauci, Ralph Barrick, and Bill Gates. It highlights the patenting of the coronavirus by the CDC and the manipulation of the virus for profit. The video also mentions the role of the World Health Organization and the Gates Foundation in promoting vaccines and their potential influence on global health policies. It raises concerns about conflicts of interest, the control of information by powerful organizations, and the potential harm caused by vaccines. The video suggests that there may be hidden agendas and manipulation of public opinion.

In this video, the speakers discuss the use of ventilators in treating COVID-19 patients. They mention that a high percentage of people put on ventilators have died. The first speaker shares that doctors in Wuhan admitted to making a mistake by putting too many people on ventilators for an extended period, which actually damages the lungs. The second speaker questions the demand for ventilators and suggests that non-COVID patients typically use them for 3 to 4 days, while COVID patients are kept on them longer to get them back to work. They emphasize the need for more ventilators and criticize the allocation of limited supplies. The video ends with a statement about the desire for businesses to make money.

The speaker discusses their experience as a nurse in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. They express their shock at the lack of treatment and negligence towards patients, leading to unnecessary suffering and death. They also highlight the financial incentives for hospitals to admit COVID-19 patients and put them on ventilators. The speaker criticizes the lack of early treatment options and the focus on vaccines as the only solution. They raise concerns about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing reports of adverse effects and deaths. The speaker emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the need for further investigation into the vaccine's impact. They criticize the censorship and suppression of alternative viewpoints by social media platforms. The speaker concludes by urging people to wake up to the agenda being pushed and the changes happening in society.

The speaker, a nurse, shares their experiences on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. They express concerns about medical negligence and malfeasance, particularly regarding the use of the drug Remdesivir, which they claim is causing patient deaths. The nurse also mentions the lack of advocacy for marginalized populations and criticizes the isolation and lack of basic care in hospitals. They highlight the importance of nurses as the link between doctors and patients and express gratitude for the opportunity to speak out.

In the video, the speaker discusses the mistakes made in Wuhan during the first wave of the pandemic. They mention that doctors in Wuhan admitted to putting too many people on intubated ventilators, resulting in a high mortality rate. The speaker posted about this on Twitter, stating that the treatment (ventilators) was causing more harm than the disease itself. Some people criticized the speaker for not being a doctor, but they defended themselves by mentioning their experience in building life support systems for spaceships. The video ends with the speaker expressing their indifference towards the criticism.

The video discusses the controversy surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and the suppression of alternative treatments like Ivermectin. It highlights the safety concerns and lack of efficacy of the vaccines, as well as the censorship of doctors and scientists who question the official narrative. The video suggests that there is a conflict of interest between pharmaceutical companies and the media, leading to biased reporting and misinformation. It also emphasizes the importance of individual choice and the need for open and honest scientific debate. The video concludes by urging viewers to take control of their own health and consider alternative treatments.

The speakers discuss a concerning situation in a hospital where patients are being given unnecessary medications to hasten their death. One nurse shares her experience of witnessing this practice and how it made her more vigilant about patient safety. The conversation also touches on the denial of certain treatments and the financial incentives for hospitals to label patients as COVID cases and potentially profit from their deaths. The speakers raise questions about the coordination and ethics behind these practices.