TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The president of Haiti told the speaker he thought he was going to be killed or taken away, but the speaker dismissed it. The president, Aristide, was then deposed and flown to the Central African Republic on an unmarked CIA plane. The U.S. ambassador walked him to the plane in broad daylight. The speaker, an economic advisor and friend, called the New York Times reporter on the beat to cover the coup. The reporter said her editor was not interested.

Speaker 0 states the following South American countries that have had their government overthrown by the CIA since 1947, with the years: - Costa Rica in 1948 - Guatemala in 1954 - El Salvador in 1979 - Nicaragua in 1981 - Panama in 1989 - Paraguay in 1954 - Brazil in 1964 - Peru in 1968 - Chile in 1973 - Uruguay in 1973 - Argentina in 1976 - Venezuela in 02/2002

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) may be the new central intelligence agency. USAID and the State Department are complicit in election fraud and child trafficking. They orchestrate coups in Guatemala, interfere in elections, and attempt to assassinate the attorney general. DHS and HHS collude with Mexican cartels and NGOs to traffic children internationally, covering it up with fraudulent elections. Over 452,000 migrant children have been trafficked to the US, with 340,000 missing. Children are given to unvetted sponsors, including gang members and sex offenders, with little to no oversight. The goal is to make people aware and expose what these evil people are doing. Dios nos ha dado la fuerza, la sabiduría y la voluntad para lograrlo.

They say "a decision has been made at the highest levels of our government to rid Guatemala of the R. V. S. Regime" and you will be "the chief of propaganda and political action." They claim "the CIA ... mobilize every facet of American power" and "used the techniques of social psychology" to create a "sense of crisis in Guatemala" to terrify troops "much as the German Stuka bombers terrified" Europe. They assert this was "so that The United States could control the economy of Guatemala, destroying the dreams of its people." "We sowed confusion through the countryside" with "aircraft flying over and dropping leaflets" and "doing a little harmless bombing." "A CIA terror campaign cost thousands of lives." Arbenz, "the Democrat now branded a communist," was "humiliated, stripped naked, and photographed before being forced into exile." Nixon "flew in to congratulate the new dictators." "General Rios Montt was to be one of Washington's faces of liberty" while thousands were murdered by death squads, most of them indigenous.

The United States government decides to send the CIA to Venezuela. They say the CIA will conduct operations against Venezuela, against the peace of Venezuela. This is claimed to be unprecedented; the speaker notes that never before has any government since the CIA’s existence publicly said it would order the CIA to kill, to derange, and to topple countries. A historian named Alejandro is invoked to support this claim. The speaker lists past Latin American coups, asserting that all involved the CIA and resulted in governments being overthrown and presidents assassinated, with documents allegedly published by the U.S. government that have since been declassified. Specific examples named are: 1974, Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz; 1965, Dominican Republic, Juan Bosch; 1964, Brazil, Joao Goulart; 1973, Chile, Salvador Allende. The speaker says these are “a few” among many coups in Latin America, all documented through declassified U.S. government documents. Additionally, the case of Mosaddegh in Iran (1952) is cited as another example of a national leader toppled. The speaker asserts that, over time, the CIA apologized for overthrowing these presidents, stating the pretenses were that they were communists or terrorists, but later acknowledging the deception. The speaker uses the term “immorality” to describe those past actions and contrasts them with the present claim, stating that for the first time in history, a U.S. government says it has given authorization and issued orders to attack a country. The speaker concludes with a call to the Venezuelan people, saying their people are clear, united, highly conscious, with “1000000 of eyes and 1000000 of ears,” and that they possess the means to defeat this “open conspiracy” against the peace and stability of Venezuela. The ultimate aim asserted is to restore the peace and stability to which the people of Venezuela have a right, and to ensure they regain and sustain that peace and stability.

"A shadow of things to come were these anti Castro pickets who heckled Jewelle Goulart as he returned to Brazil in 1961 to assume the presidency." "It was Goulart's leftist leanings on the fear that he would turn Brazil into a Castro state that led to an army revolt and his downfall." "Goulart had begun his regime as a middle of the rotor, but runaway inflation and worker discontent led him to institute land reforms and move to legalize the Communist Party." "He had also invited the Soviets to hold a trade show in Brazil, and he consistently wooed the red block after his country was unable to pay foreign debts to Western powers." "The deposed president fled to neighboring Uruguay, and it appears that the new rebel government will find quick recognition abroad."

Here's a list of South American countries where the CIA has overthrown the government since 1947: Costa Rica in 1948. Guatemala in 1954. El Salvador in 1979. Nicaragua in 1981. Panama in 1989. Paraguay in 1954. Brazil in 1964. Peru in 1968. Chile in 1973. Uruguay in 1973. Argentina in 1976. And Venezuela in February 2002.

The transcript presents a narrative centered on Alan Dulles and a network of Swiss-origin families and organizations allegedly controlling major intelligence and political power. It asserts that Alan Dulles is the figure behind the CIA, connected to the Geneva patrician Male Prevot family, and that the CIA and OSS leadership were drawn from Swiss-descended lineages. The speaker claims Dulles lived in Bern, Switzerland for many years, is of Swiss descent, and that the Genevan Male Prevot family, along with the Mallets, were uniquely powerful in international politics and finance, holding hereditary seats in Geneva’s Council of Two Hundred. This group allegedly formed a joint committee of spymasters with the British monarchy dating back to the eighteenth century, and the Male Prevot were said to inject the Scottish Rite of Masonry into the United States. The narrative continues that in 1921 Dulles was posted to Bern by his uncle Secretary Lansing, becoming chief of intelligence in the American legation, where he was met by cousins from the Male family. It asserts Dulles, under the name Duhl, rose to be the first secretary of the American embassy in Berlin by the mid-1920s and served as a director of Schroderbank, which allegedly handled Hitler’s personal funds. The speaker emphasizes that these Swiss ties span from Geneva to Basel, to Tessin, insisting they are neither Italian, French, nor German but a distinct Swiss lineage. It is claimed that a British ambassador to Switzerland, Victor Male, belonged to the same family as Dulles. The account asserts that Lenin lived in Bern and that Dulles met Lenin there, describing them as friends who shared beers in Bern. It states that during World War II, Dulles was the Swiss Director of the OSS (the predecessor of the CIA), working in Bern at Herngasse 23, near Lenin’s residence, and that he had many German Nazi officers among his associates, including connections to the OSS and “Swiss Red Cross” figures who facilitated their entry into the United States and the CIA. The claim extends that Dulles represented IG Farben in America and worked for Schroderbank, portraying him as Swiss rather than American. The speaker asserts that after the war, Dulles became the first civilian director of the CIA (1953–1961), with a Swiss sleeper- agent-like influence under Eisenhower, and that his brother John Foster Dulles became Secretary of State, placing “the Huns” in key positions. The narrative then depicts the Cold War intensifying with aggressive actions in Korea and Vietnam, the use of biological warfare, and a broader view of Octagon as controlling the Pentagon. It claims Dulles was fired by John F. Kennedy, who faced repercussions from “Oktogon’s men,” and that the Warren Commission covered up the events, allowing Dulles to return to power. The closing statements call for opposing Octagon and Swiss banks, accusing them of financing Nazi Germany, widening the gap between rich and poor, and promoting war, while proclaiming “freedom for the world” and a denunciation of Switzerland and Octagon.

Grant and Mike Benz discuss alleged U.S. and CIA involvement in drug trafficking connected to Venezuela and the implications for prosecuting Nicolas Maduro. - Maduro indictment history: The DOJ superseded its 2020 drug trafficking indictment of Nicolas Maduro in 2025. The conversation references the Bay of Piglets failed operation to capture Maduro in 2019 and the 2020 indictment linked to Jordan Goudreaux’s Silvercorp private mercenary firm. The discussion frames this within a broader Cold War context of U.S. actions in Latin America. - CIA and drug trafficking link: The speakers claim the “Cartel of the Suns” (Cartel of the Suns) was a CIA cartel. They state two Venezuelan military brigadier generals who started the Cartel of the Suns were on the CIA payroll. They reference a 1993 confrontation where the head of the DEA resigned in protest after the CIA allegedly greenlit the deliberate importation of 1,500 kilos of cocaine from Venezuela into the U.S. They allege the CIA and DOJ later granted immunity to Venezuelan military officials involved in the operation. This is presented as pre-Hugo Chávez era activity in the 1990s. - Broader historical pattern: The discussion situates these actions within a long-running pattern across the 20th century—U.S. support for pro-American groups (insurgent, rebel, or militia-type entities) funded by drug proceeds. They compare this to past episodes in Afghanistan (Mujahideen, warlords) and to narcotics and intelligence collaborations in South America (Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela). The speakers draw a parallel to a Noriega-style “smash and grab,” noting Noriega’s trial revealed decades of CIA association and payroll. - Implications for Maduro prosecution: Mike Benz suggests the case could be complicated because many allegations about Maduro are “thinly sourced” and relate to minor Venezuelan officials rather than Maduro directly. He notes that many points of evidence are tangential and question whether Maduro’s leadership directly sanctioned drug operations, despite the indictment labeling him as head of the Cartel of the Suns multiple times. The Bush family connections and historic CIA involvement are mentioned to illustrate the complexity of attributing direct responsibility. - Stabilization and funding argument: Benz outlines a three-part stabilization plan for Venezuela—stabilization, privatization, and transition. He describes stabilization as “hearts and minds work,” which in practice involves paying off military, civil society, and business leaders with cash. He cites the CIA’s reported $70,000,000 in drug-money bribes used to influence such actors in stabilization campaigns in Afghanistan and analogous actions in Latin America. - Closing notes: Grant appreciates Benz’s insights and asks where to follow him. Benz directs listeners to X (Twitter) at @mikebencyber, and also mentions YouTube and Rumble. - Notable names: Nicolas Maduro, Jordan Goudreaux, the Silvercorp firm, the Cartel of the Suns, Noriega, the head of the DEA who resigned in 1993, and George H. W. Bush’s historical CIA involvement are referenced to frame claims.

For centuries, the "golden billion" have lived off other peoples by exploiting Africa, Latin America, and Asia. This exploitation is remembered by common people, not just leaders. There's a strong desire in the West to freeze the current unfair state of international affairs. For centuries, they've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and their pockets with money. But this ball of vampires is about to end.

Speaker: The speaker argues that a “plan of pedophiles” aims to end democracy in Colombia, stating that despite the harsh reality, they would not allow themselves to be silenced or betrayed by invading neighbors. They claim people would not applaud invading a brother country or a neighbor, emphasizing that the Colombian people are not the enemy, and that invading Venezuela would be traitorous. Speaker: They reject the idea of Venezuela as a villain and say they do not mock the Venezuelan people or trap them in an invasion driven only by oil greed and violence. They warn that such actions would turn this corner of South America into a place like Syria, Iraq, or Libya, filled with slavery and slave trading, and would degrade the region. Speaker: They criticize those “friends of STEIN” who do not want the list to appear in the United States and assert that these friends want to use violence to force the United States to ignore its own government, fueling xenophobia, racism, and ideas of racial superiority to distract from domestic issues. Speaker: They state that the Colombian president has long denunciated narcotraffickers, but note that the narcotraffickers who have been denounced have always been in power in Colombia, in the State. Speaker: The speaker reiterates a stance against betraying bloodlines or supporting invasions of brother countries, condemning any move by the Colombian president to seize lands for invasion from Colombia into a neighboring country. They denounce the president as “maldito” (damned) for generations to come for such a betrayal. Speaker: They emphasize that they do not belong to those who wanted to kill Bolívar, defending Bolívar’s legacy and the dignity of the region, while criticizing external powers’ influence and urging a stance against internal complicity with narcotrafficking and imperialist motives. Overall: The speaker frames a narrative of political betrayal, invasion threats, and manipulation by external actors framed as defending democracy and regional unity, while opposing violence against neighboring peoples, denouncing narcotrafficking within Colombia, and calling out alleged foreign influence and manipulation aimed at destabilizing the region.

Speaker 0 describes a long, forty-year conflict described as a Third World War waged by the CIA and the U.S. National Security Complex against people of the Third World, not the Soviets. He states that at least six million people have been killed in this war. He emphasizes that these are not Soviets and notes no parachuting into the Soviet Union to kill since 1954, when the Soviets developed the capability of dropping atomic weapons on the United States. He references CIA, Marine Corps, and three CIA Secret Wars. He recalls his 1975 position as chief of the Angola task force within the National Security Council, describing it as the third CIA secret war he was part of. He mentions the National Security Act of 1947 creating the National Security Council, and the CIA being given a charter to perform duties and functions necessary to national security interests, with vague authority to protect sources and methods. He says, in the mid-80s, he coined the term the Third World War after realizing the U.S. was not attacking the Soviet Union but people in the Third World. He characterizes the Third World War as the third bloodiest war in history, with operations conducted globally and a license to kill, smuggle drugs, and violate international law and principles of nations working together for a healthier and more peaceful world. He alleges the U.S. legal system was being converted to give the CIA control of society. He notes there is massive documentation of CIA secret wars, citing the Church Committee investigation of 1975, which found 900 major operations and 3,000 minor operations in the fourteen years prior. Extrapolating over the forty-plus years of CIA activity, he claims 3,000 major operations and over 10,000 minor operations, all allegedly illegal and disruptive to other societies, with many bloody and gory. He asserts the CIA organized the overthrow of functioning constitutional democracies, created secret armies, and directed them to fight on multiple continents. He claims the agency encouraged ethnic minorities to rise up: the Mosquito Indians in Nicaragua, the Kurds in the Middle East, the Hmongs in Southeast Asia. He alleges death squads funded by the CIA, such as the Treasury Police in El Salvador, responsible for most of the 50,000 killed in the 1980s, and 70,000 before that. He describes orchestration by the CIA through secret teams and propaganda, leading to involvement in the Korean War and attacks on China from Quemoy and Matsu, Thailand, and Tibet. He notes drug trafficking, the Korean War resulting in about a million deaths, and the Vietnam War, with CIA involvement at every level, contributing to the creation of the Golden Triangle and the Golden Crescent, where heroin became a major outcome, with Air America aircraft shipping arms for allies and returning with heroin, and claims President Carter and Admiral Turner brag about the Afghanistan operation as the largest CIA secret war operation in history. He concludes that the Golden Crescent remains the largest source of heroin today. He summarizes that the Third World War, waged by the CIA, the U.S. National Security Complex, and the military, has resulted in widespread devastation, especially in the Third World, as opposed to Europe where there is no equivalent destructive capability. He notes that those regions rarely have the means to hurt the U.S., questioning the motive of targeting those who cannot defend themselves.

Speaker 0 asks about how common it is for the CIA to use drugs as a weapon or to create cartels for various purposes, and whether it sometimes works as a strategy. Speaker 1 responds that it continues to this day, with key US allies implicated in the drug trade. The Organization for Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, funded by the State Department, is described as an investigative journalist outlet that has a new report about the Noboa family’s ties to the Balkan mafia. The Noboa family controls Ecuador; Daniel Noboa, born in Miami, is the president, and his family owns a Noboa shipping company. The shipping company is alleged to have been involved in sending bananas through the Noboa Bonita Fruit Company packed with cocaine to Europe via routes overseen by the Balkan Mafia. Ecuador is described as the largest drug export center to the United States, per the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, while Venezuela is claimed to be responsible for about 5% of drug transit. Kristi Noem, identified as the DHS secretary, is said to have visited Ecuador to meet with Daniel Noboa and campaign for a referendum to bring US military bases back to Ecuador, a referendum that was rejected by Ecuadorians. Noboa is portrayed as strategically valuable to the US, described as friendly with Marco Rubio, who has touted him as a partner in the war on drugs, yet the claim is made that the issue is about geostrategic interests. Noboa is said to have ended the legacy of social democrat Rafael Correa and is purportedly supporting US military bases on Ecuadorian soil, aligning with US interests even as Ecuador becomes a center of narco-trafficking and cartels destabilize parts of the country. In Mexico, the narrative references Vicente Fox and Felipe Calderón, noting Calderón as author of Plan Mérida, a US military-directed program to combat drugs in Mexico. Gennaro García Luna, head of Mexico’s equivalent of the FBI, is described as now in a US federal prison for life for involvement in a conspiracy with the Sinaloa cartel to ship drugs to the United States. The State Department is said to have acknowledged knowing about Luna’s activities while valuing him as a political partner. The Fast and Furious program is mentioned, alleging that the US armed Mexican cartels to track guns, and a 2011 federal court testimony by a Chapo Guzmán lieutenant claimed the US armed the Sinaloa cartel to defeat rivals like the Guadalajara cartel. A recent raid in Oakton, Northern Virginia, on Paul Campo, former director of the DEA’s financial division, is described. Campo was in charge of money laundering investigations and was associated with a CIA asset named Robert Sensi to launder $12,000,000 for the Jalisco New Generation Cartel. The speaker notes ongoing exploration of these connections. Historically, the CIA is said to have worked with narco cartels to fund black operations, funding proxy wars in Central America with off-the-books money. The Guadalajara cartel allegedly funded the Nicaraguan Contras through cartel profits. Enrique “Kiki” Camarena, a DEA agent, reportedly discovered the Guadalajara cartel’s involvement in black operations and was captured and tortured, with alleged monitoring by CIA operatives including Felix Rodríguez, who supervised the capture of Che Guevara. This is tied to a documentary on Amazon called The Last NARC.

Dialogue centers on US‑Israel intelligence ties. "The CIA has never run counter to a Mossad operation. It's worked in tandem with them at times." They discuss coups: Guatemala "they were using Guatemala as a base for human trafficking as well," Chile under Pinochet with "labs there for the chemical weapons," and "Ari Ben Menachio was the guy that was making some of these deals." Israel sought "various chemicals for its nuclear program because, you know, they had to resort to South Africa as well," aided by Central America "blessed with natural resources" and "lab access." "The Golden Triangle, and it was Henry Kissinger that was overseeing that." Truman faced pressure: "I had to give up. I had to agree to this two state," and "the Zionist gangs then, whether it was, of course, Lehi Stern gang, Haganah, Ergon, etcetera, they would have killed him."

We've set out to overthrow functioning constitutional democracies in over 20 countries. We manipulated elections in dozens of countries. We created standing armies and directed them to fight. We went after to organize ethnic minorities to encourage them to revolt. In Nicaragua, "the Mosquito Indians ... given them more money than they had seen in the entirety of history and arms and training" were sent into Nicaragua to attack, kill, fight, rape, burn, pillage. This is an insidious thing. "This has been a technique the CI has used in Nicaragua, in Thailand, in Vietnam, in Laos, in The Congo, and in Iran Iraq with the Kurds." We created, trained, and funded death squads like the treasury police in El Salvador that are responsible for killing as many as 70,000 people according to the count of the Catholic church. "We've assassinated world leaders, including The United States president in 1963." Chile 1973: CIA organized the overthrow of Salvador Allende, Allende killed, Schneider killed, Pinochet in power. Kissinger: "the issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." "6,000,000 people killed" minimum; "22,000 in Nicaragua"—mostly "rag poor peasants, including a high percentage of women and children."

Speaker 0 discusses a secret report from the State Department and outlines two main points it contained about Grenada. First, the report characterizes Grenada as different from Cuba and Nicaragua, and, in one sense, its revolution as even worse than those of Cuba and Nicaragua, using their own language to express this assessment. The key distinction highlighted is linguistic: the Grenadian people and leadership speak English, which enables direct communication with the population of the United States. Second, the report also points out a potentially dangerous aspect related to Grenada’s demographics. It states that the people of Grenada and its leadership are predominantly black, noting that 95% of Grenada’s population is black, and that this statistic is correct. The implication the speaker attributes to the report is significant: because Grenada’s population is 95% predominantly of African origin, there is a potential for a dangerous appeal to a large audience in the United States. Specifically, the report suggests that such an appeal could reach 30,000,000 Black people in the United States. Throughout the excerpt, the speaker relays the report’s assessments about Grenada’s revolution, its linguistic accessibility to American audiences, and the demographic composition that might amplify its influence within the United States. The emphasis is on the combination of English-language communication and a Black majority population as factors the report described as potentially dangerous in terms of political influence across the Atlantic. There is no evaluation or commentary added by the speaker beyond presenting what the State Department reportedly concluded. The speaker’s framing centers on the contrast with Cuba and Nicaragua, the significance of language, and the statistic about Grenada’s racial demographics, including the stated percentage and the projected reach to a large segment of the U.S. Black population.

The speaker informs that the CIA accidentally overthrew the government of Costa Rica while overthrowing other governments in Central America. Due to a miscommunication, agents organized an anti-government militia and toppled the Costa Rican government. The deposed leader's body was found in the San Juan River, and the Prime Minister of El Salvador condemned the overthrow. However, no disciplinary actions will be taken against the agents as they are skilled at overthrowing and brought back interesting pictures. The speaker also mentions a time when a chimpanzee was installed as President of Honduras for fun.

The speaker argues that whenever a country defends its own people, the United States asks, “Who owns the resources?” and if the answer isn’t The US, a coup follows. The claim is that over 80 foreign governments have been overthrown or destabilized by the United States, and that most of them weren’t dictatorships, but democratically elected governments that threatened US corporate profits. The described playbook involves the CIA funding opposition groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda, planting stories in the media, bribing generals, arming rebels, or collapsing a country’s economy, with the coup replacing the leader with a pro-US dictatorship. The overarching assertion is that this is not about democracy but about power and control. Key historical examples cited include: - Iran in 1953: Mosaddegh attempted to nationalize oil; the CIA launched Operation Ajax, orchestrated protests, paid off politicians, and installed the Shah, resulting in twenty-five years of dictatorship and torture under US protection. - Guatemala in 1954: President Arbenz redistributed land from the United Fruit Company, a US corporation; the CIA branded him a communist, conducted a coup, and Guatemala descended into a civil war with over 200,000 deaths. - Chile in 1973: Allende was overthrown in a US-backed military coup, and Pinochet’s regime tortured and killed thousands after Allende’s attempts to nationalize copper. - Congo in 1961: Lumumba sought African control of African resources; the CIA helped orchestrate his assassination and installed a brutal dictator who was supported for decades. The speaker adds that there are “dozens of others” beyond these cases, including Haiti, Iraq, Libya, Nicaragua, El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Bolivia, and beyond, arguing that the motive is not fighting tyranny but profits and control. When a country attempts to exit the system or nationalize resources to reduce inequality, they threaten profits and the idea that another world is possible, so the CIA sabotages such efforts to prevent successful example-making, such as Libya. The conclusion is that many nations don’t trust the United States because “we’ve been the villains throughout most of our history.” The speaker invites readers to comment to receive a “forbidden reading list” of books and documentaries that “they never wanted you to find.”

My job was to identify resource-rich countries and secure large loans from organizations like the World Bank. However, the money didn't benefit the country but instead went to our corporations for infrastructure projects. These projects brought profits to our corporations and improved the lives of a few wealthy families, but the majority of the people suffered. The funds meant for health and education were diverted to pay off the debt. When the country couldn't repay the loans, we would step in through the IMF and arrange refinancing. This resulted in the country selling its resources cheaply to our corporations, without environmental or social restrictions, and aligning with us politically. This was how we effectively enslaved these countries.

Chiquita, a major banana company, has a history of smuggling guns and drugs. The banana industry's involvement in global affairs dates back to the early 1900s, with United Fruit Company orchestrating coups in Honduras and Guatemala. The CIA, founded by corporate lawyers, has been used by corporations to advance their financial interests through economic hitmen and covert operations. The Dulles brothers, key figures in the CIA's founding, were instrumental in shaping post-World War 1 and 2 financial systems, including the Bank of International Settlements. Intelligence agencies serve corporate, not public, interests, engaging in covert warfare in countries like Guatemala, Iran, and Vietnam. Mega corporations and banking interests control global affairs.

The so-called golden billion have lived off other peoples for 500 years, exploiting Africa, Latin America, and Asia. The common people in those countries feel what's happening and see the speaker's struggle for independence and true sovereignty. This connects with their aspirations to be truly independent. The West has a strong desire to freeze the current unfair state of things in international affairs. For centuries, they've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and their pockets with money, but this ball of vampires is about to end.

Speaker 0: We've set out to overthrow functioning constitutional democracies in over 20 countries. We manipulated elections in dozens of countries. We created standing armies and directed them to fight. We went after to organize ethnic minorities to encourage them to revolt. The first thing we did in Nicaragua was to go to the Mosquito Indians who had never gotten along with the other people in Nicaragua very well and give them more money than they had seen in the entirety of history and arms and training and rationales and sanctuaries in Honduras and sent them into Nicaragua to attack, kill, fight, rape, burn, pillage. And this has been a technique the CI has used in Nicaragua, in Thailand, in Vietnam, in Laos, in The Congo, in in Iran Iraq with the Kurds in different parts of the world. We created, trained, and funded death squads like the treasury police in El Salvador, and we've assassinated world leaders, including The United States president in 1963, and I'll get to that in more detail in just a moment. You can never be sure how many people are killed in the jungles of of Laos or the hills of Nicaragua, but adding them up as best we can, we come up with a figure of 6,000,000 people killed, minimum figure. It has to be more than that. These things are all done in countries of the third world where the governments don't have the power to force The United States to stop destabilizing the country and brutalizing their people.

Today marks the 200th anniversary of the infamous Monroe Doctrine, named after its author, James Monroe, the fifth president of the United States. Contrary to its supposed promotion of liberty, this doctrine has only led to the re-colonization of our nations. It has been a gross interference by American imperialism in the lives of Latin American and Caribbean nations. This aggressive policy has resulted in military interventions, wars, territorial seizures, brutal dictatorships, fraudulent elections, destabilization, sanctions, blockades, and resource exploitation. The US has also employed a strategy of division, as seen in the independence of Panama, Colombia, and the division of Central America. We must affirm that the history of the Monroe Doctrine is one of blatant intervention against our nations. However, our history also shows that our people have responded with rebellions and anti-imperialist revolutions. Today, the empire is weakened, and its capitalist system is in decline. It can only impose its hegemony through force, as seen in the brutal bombardment of Gaza. The culmination of our second and definitive independence is the long-awaited construction of a just, socially and environmentally sustainable, and humane global economic order. We can only achieve this through the unity of our great homeland. In the name of our heroes and martyrs, we continue to win battles.