reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 outlines concerns about governance and patient safety, stating that “the governor” is ultimately over the issues, with nurses and the medical board implicated. He recalls that the medical board “came in and Please please do from letting insurance are being abused,” noting that complaints would take up to eight months to be contacted back or would “vanish into a black hole.” He emphasizes that staffing was blamed despite unspent staffing funds and asserts the governor is ultimately responsible. He mentions that his staff queried the possibility of being an Israeli spy and calls for immediate hearings, adding that discussions have been ongoing and something will be done. He references news that Josh Shapiro, a Kamala Harris vice-presidential contender, was queried by her staff about being an Israeli spy, and contrasts this with the lack of questioning about Walsh being a Chinese spy or having a predilection to fraud. He references antisemitic lines of credit and notes receiving massive inquiries, saying they will host a seminar on how to fight back, including defamation lawsuits as a recourse for public figures, though acknowledging the difficulty of such actions. Speaker 2 states she does not know the person but notes a predilection for people close to the others, insisting the person is “not part of the club.” Speaker 0 recalls a podcast with a Christian podcaster and expresses that to do this line of work, one must believe God drives it because they do not make money. He remarks on being disliked for not chasing popularity and invites others to examine their Twitter feeds. He describes the harassment they face, including lawfare, stalking, threats, and the desire to “kill me,” recounting examples like Carrie Donovan. Speaker 2 agrees on the intensity of threats and emphasizes the importance of truth and accountability in their reporting, not wanting to be deterred by intimidation. Speaker 0 adds that belief in a higher purpose is necessary to endure the profession, noting that after October 7 his faith was shaken but returning to the idea that God orders their steps. Speaker 2 adds that the local community deserves to know when someone is not who they claim to be or has a criminal record, and that elected officials deserve scrutiny. Speaker 1 introduces Adam with Accuracy in Media, saying he is dealing with three defamation suits from wealthy individuals’ families and has faced 13 swatts and daily death threats, sometimes requiring off-duty police at college campuses. He highlights the value of anti-SLAPP laws and tort reform, noting North Carolina lacks an anti-SLAPP law, which would help dismiss frivolous defamation suits protecting free speech, and criticizes legislators for lobbying for lawyers. Speaker 0 announces a good development: a story they broke on Thursday prompted Brendan Jones, head of the real bulldog in North Carolina’s oversight committee, to request appearances before his committee in Winston-Salem. They plan to discuss the Winston-Salem event, North Carolina A&T, and the Western North Carolina story, which Margo finds triggering. Speaker 3 from the city notes DEI support and discusses terminology changes since the FBI’s ban, and Speaker 1 comments on leadership differences between states, suggesting better governance in other legislatures and hoping for improved leadership locally. The exchange ends with remarks about leadership and governance comparisons.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, recalling a previous incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, recalling a previous incident in November when they say a Zionist smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

In this video, the speakers discuss various topics related to Hamas, terrorism, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They debate whether Hamas is a terrorist organization and express different opinions on the United States military. They also touch on the issue of stolen land and the possibility of Israelis returning to their ancestral countries. The conversation becomes heated when discussing a specific event on October 7th and the Holocaust. The speakers emphasize the importance of context and education in shaping society. The video ends with a farewell and a mention of a significant event that occurred that night.

Speaker 0 describes repeated harassment: spitting in front of and behind him, spitting at him, saying bad words about Jesus, throwing stones through their windows, hate graffiti, and frequent death threats to Christians. He emphasizes that this was not a singular experience—“it happened again and again.” Speaker 1 argues that religious leaders must educate people toward tolerance, and that the government through the police must do their job to grant all citizens the right to live safely and in peace. Speaker 0 adds that he expects more from official Israel, and wants a very clear stance from official Israel, from the police, and from security, stating, “we have a problem. And this problem is called Christian hate from Jewish extremists. We have to face that problem.”

In this video, it is mentioned that over 3,500 people, mostly Jews, were killed in just two days in Ukraine. The speaker also talks about how the police were involved in these killings, and how they didn't know it was happening at the time. Additionally, it is mentioned that over 100,000 people were killed in another incident in 1943. The crimes committed in Ukraine during this time were never punished, and the Kiev regime is mentioned as being responsible.

In this controversial video, the speaker discusses the events that took place in Israel on October 7th. They believe it was an inside job due to various reasons. They mention that the Israeli government confiscated weapons from security teams in Gaza communities on September 1st, and that reports of increased tensions on the Gaza border were ignored by the army on September 10th. The speaker questions how the surveillance system failed to detect the attack and criticizes the response time of the military. They express concerns about the competence of the IDF and question the need for American aid in fighting against Gaza.

- Tom Alexandrovich is with the National Cyber Unit. He is the head of the Technological Defense Department. - The state prosecution received almost 30 I think it handled 26,000 and received about 40,000 inquiries starting from the October 7 regarding inciting content, about content that leads to demoralization, about some malicious content. - 90% of this data is all under the META group, which includes Instagram, Facebook, and so on. - There are organized campaigns on this issue. - We saw a lot, a lot, a lot of posts, a lot of posts that the prosecution removed, several 100 posts of content associated - It is an initiative that came from Iran. - It is not only about such enemies. We are also talking about activists or anti or other anti Israeli activities that are organizing against Israel. - I also encourage people to report to us so that others can benefit.

Speaker 0 states that “this right here was always the plan from day zero, and they just told us,” signaling that the plan has been in motion from the beginning and that the participants were informed about it. Speaker 1 asks the group to explain the plan in detail: how much it will cost, where the money will come from, and who will reward the contracts. The question centers on funding sources, cost, and accountability for contracts. Speaker 2 responds by saying the money-raising part is “the easy part,” but emphasizes that the real focus is the master plan. They say they are working with a group of people who have been developing master plans for two years, implying a long preexisting framework behind the project. They assert that “we have plans already. We have a master plan already,” and mention that Jared has been pushing this and that they are working together on it. They claim that if the world saw the progress so far, they would be impressed. Speaker 0 interjects with a clarification question about the two-year timeline, noting a perceived gap in the explanation and pressing for details on what was being done during that period. Speaker 3 explains the timing more specifically: the material was filmed before October 7 and released later, indicating that the planning had been underway prior to that date. They suggest that this means “they were working on the plans before October 7.” Speaker 0 adds, “So that means that everything else was a script that they already wanted to implement the whole time,” implying that prior material or discourse could have been designed to align with the planned actions. Speaker 3 references Charlie Kirk and asks, “Was there a stand down order?” This raises a question about whether a directive to halt actions existed. Speaker 0 questions the existence of a stand-down order, asserting that “Israel’s the side of new size New Jersey,” then shares a personal observation from a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, noting the distance as forty-five minutes, and mentions that “Six hours. They’re live streaming the killing of Jews.” They pose the question of whether someone in the government ordered a stand-down. Speaker 3 notes that “the sixty minute episode aired on October 19,” and that the material “was filmed immediately after October 7.” They add that the filming occurred “days after the Israel cease fire deal completion, October 10.” Speaker 0 reiterates the sequence by summarizing that the events were filmed immediately after October 7 and occurred in the days following the cease-fire agreement on October 10.

In this controversial video, the speaker discusses the events that occurred in Israel on October 7th. They believe it was an inside job due to various reasons. They mention that the Israeli government confiscated weapons from security teams in Gaza belt communities on September 1st, and that reports of increased tensions on the Gaza border were ignored by the army on September 10th. The speaker questions how the Shabak, known for their surveillance capabilities, did not know about the planned attack. They also dispute the theory that the command and control center was hacked, as there is video evidence of the breach. The speaker criticizes the Israeli army for not responding effectively to the invasion, suggesting either an inside job or extreme incompetence. They express concern about the military's ability to handle future conflicts and question the need for American aid.

Islamophobia is rising, particularly since October 7th, but it was already too high before then. Islamophobia is intolerable and can never be justified, requiring a zero-tolerance approach. More action is needed, especially regarding online content. The speaker hopes to leverage prosecutorial experience to develop strategies for taking action against those who break the law. Islamophobia significantly impacts people's lives, affecting their ability to move freely in their communities, workplaces, and streets. The impact is not low level.

In this video, the speaker shares a personal story about an incident at a school during the 2020 presidential election. They were with a blind friend who supports Trump when a group of Black Lives Matter activists started chanting and verbally attacking them. The speaker tried to get help from the police, but nothing was done. They also mention filing a complaint about the incident but never received a response. The speaker brings up other complaints they have made, including one about not receiving funding for a political campaign. They express frustration with the lack of action and mention sending the video to a specific email address.

The transcript centers on a heated exchange between two speakers, involving harassment, accusations of antisemitism, and a potential hate crime. The first speaker repeatedly hurls abusive remarks at Rabbi Smooley, calling him a “Zionist fucking pig” and “Zionist pig,” and asserts they have the situation on video. The second speaker interjects, asking for a phone number and insisting the other person is a Zionist, while also describing the situation as a potential hate crime and urging that the rabbi be arrested. Throughout the exchange, both participants claim to have video evidence. The first speaker states, “I have it on video,” multiple times, and describes being harassed by the rabbi at various times. The second speaker alleges that the rabbi is harassing them and labels the rabbi as antisemitic or involved in a hate crime, insisting, “He’s guilty of the hate crime and now looking at the NYPD.” The first speaker counters that they are simply expressing their opinion and exercising freedom of speech, asserting, “I have freedom of speech… I can call him a Zionist,” and, “I’m allowed to swear at you.” The dialogue includes claims about prior incidents, including a reference to an event at the Fountain Blue Hotel where the first speaker says they woke up with something and claims the rabbi is lying about it. The second speaker mentions that a woman witnessed the harassment, noting that the rabbi allegedly called them “fucking Jews upstairs,” while the first speaker maintains it is a matter of recording a video about antisemitism and that the rabbi attacked the speaker. Concerns about safety and dialogue are raised. The second speaker asserts, “Jews have to be safe in New York City,” and questions why the rabbi would walk over and escalate the situation. The first speaker defends the act as freedom of speech, insisting they are not in Israel and that they will present their video as evidence. The transcript includes back-and-forth claims of personal space invasion, threats, and the presence of a wife who was filming, with both sides asserting their versions of events. Towards the end, the first speaker reiterates familiarity with the rabbi, describing him as a Zionist and noting that this person began filming, prompting the first speaker to approach. The second speaker asks to review the video, and the first speaker offers to show what they captured, with the other party agreeing to view it. The exchange ends with an agreement to review the available footage.

Police reports and broadcasts describe a wave of anti-Semitic vandalism and threats, with several surprising reversals and hoaxes emerging over time. In New Orleans area coverage, police say 54-year-old Andrew King spray painted swastikas on his own Chillswell Street home, and the student who appeared to be the victim admitted, through interviews conducted with hidden cameras and increased patrols, that she was responsible for the incident. Authorities indicated Haddad, a person associated with a separate case, is the prime suspect in a rash of swastika incidents in a nearby area, and police sources say he is Jewish. Separately, Israeli police arrested a 19-year-old Israeli Jewish man as the primary suspect in hundreds of bomb threats against Jewish community centers in the United States. Elsewhere, a Winnipeg cafe owner—described as Jewish—faced allegations of anti-Semitic vandalism and threats after a video or report suggested that her family’s business had been battered and daubed with hate graffiti. Community members were shocked and offered support, but authorities later stated the cafe owners had staged the incident and were charged with a crime. The reporting emphasizes that signs of hate reappeared in Brooklyn, with swastikas found on houses and a chilling call reported to someone in the area describing a message that All Jews are going to die—all Jews must die one by one. Further, a sequence of threats was reportedly the work of a Jewish man who had a business dispute with family members; the exchange included denials that the vandalism was staged by the victims themselves, and mention that “We didn’t. We didn’t.” The family asserted they were victims of hate. Oksana Barron and her son Max Ham spoke on CBC Radio after being charged along with Oksana’s husband for public misjudgment or prejudice, insisting their actions contradicted their religious laws. They argued, “It’s against our Jewish law” and emphasized they do not joke about smiles and were not “woke.” A notable development centers on George Washington University, where a student initially believed to be the victim of vandalism was later identified as the person who painted the swastikas herself. The narrative shifted to indicate that “In the end, we found evidence of a crime. It just wasn’t a hate crime.” Media coverage notes the broader pattern of anti-Semitic threats and vandalism, including the claim that a Jewish man was arrested in connection with a spree of anti-Semitic vandalism, described as “strange but true.” Finally, reporters discuss the broader social context: “The Holocaust was just seventy years ago,” and voices recount personal memory and the historical danger of white supremacist violence, including references to Auschwitz and the gas chamber, underscoring the seriousness of hate crimes in the community.

- Speaker 0, John, announces: “A Muslim shooter out of Bondi Beach is apprehended by another Muslim. Could it be a false flag? Of course not. That would be crazy.” He hands off to Jessica. - Jessica reports: “The shooting took place at a Hanukkah celebration on Sunday, leaving 15 people dead. However, there was one lucky chosen person who survived not only October 7, but also a bullet grazing his head.” - Speaker 2 (unnamed in this excerpt) says: “I survived October 7. I lived in Israel the last thirteen years. We came here only two weeks ago to work with a Jewish community to fight anti Semitism, to fight this bloodthirsty, ravaging hatred. That’s why you’re here. That’s why I’m here.” - Speaker 3 quips: “Wow, who bandages a wound without cleaning it?” Speaker 4 replies: “Nobody, but it’s better theatrics that way after all. He is the chosen victim.” - Inside the hospital, Speaker 3 describes the chosen victim being treated for a bullet to the head, “turns out it’s just stage blood, corn syrup. You guys actually fell for that? Ridiculous. Oy, Ve, please don’t air this.” - Speaker 3 then identifies the “chosen victim” as “the president of the Australian Jewish Council and moved there two weeks ago.” Another speaker, Speaker 4, retorts: “Thanks, Ching Chong. I’m pretty sure Satan told him this would happen.” - The discussion continues with insinuations: “Right. Perfect way to take their guns too.” “I’m like 90% sure he was in the IDF.” “Every single time.” - Speaker 5 argues: “Your call for a Palestinian state pures full fuel on the antisemitic fire. It rewards Hamas terrorism. It emboldens those who menace Australian Jews and encourages the Jew hatred now stalking your streets. Antisemitism is a cancer.” - Speaker 3 responds: “Thanks, Satan. Blame the sand people. Am I right? Exactly. Let's all just forget about the fake weapons of mass destruction and genocide you committed.” - Speaker 5 adds: “This is the punishment that God gave us. We killed the Jews. We got instead of the Jews that were very good for us, we got these Muslim refugees from all over the world who destroying us, and the Christians cannot even celebrate Christmas now.” - Speaker 4 comments: “Holy victim. I don’t really trust people who only talk about what happened to them.” Speaker 3 counters: “But never what they did to anyone else. Right? That’s called accountability.” - Speaker 0 interjects: “Seriously, let's start with the 60,000,000 Christians in Russia they slaughtered.” Speaker 3: “Don’t get me started about the Rothschilds and nine eleven.” Speaker 4 supplies: “Let’s see what our investigation team thinks.” - Speaker 4 notes: “So official story says investigators found an ISIS flag in his car, which makes you think, why do they never attack Israel? Eric Warsaw, break it down for us. Israel actually admitted to funding and giving small arms to ISIS affiliated groups, and people still refused to see his controlled opposition.” - Speaker 3 asks: “What do you think of what happened today?” Speaker 4 responds: “Absolute tragedy, but I saw that Navid Akram was trending in Israel just days before.” - Speaker 2 signs off with thanks, and Speaker 3 introduces: “And this is the hero who risked everything, but the media refuses to talk about it. His name is Ahmed El Ahmed, which is obviously very sandy, so let's go ahead and change subjects.”

In this video, the speakers discuss the context of post-October 7th attacks and the increase in anti-Semitic acts. They mention that many people are afraid to report these acts due to fear of reprisals. The speakers explain that they have filed a complaint against individuals who have made inflammatory remarks, and they discuss the potential legal consequences for these individuals, including prison sentences and fines. They also mention that the severity of the punishment may vary depending on the individual's criminal history.

The speaker thanks everyone for attending the private viewing and promises to show evidence of deadly terrier attacks. One person expresses frustration about previous false information and losing followers. The speaker assures them that the evidence is coming but first mentions that the incident on October 7th is considered worse than the Holocaust. The group urges the speaker to show the evidence, emphasizing the urgency due to their declining credibility. The speaker hesitates, suggesting that the evidence is too disturbing to be shown. The group becomes more frustrated and demands to see the evidence. The transcript ends with someone acknowledging the overwhelming nature of the situation.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

The speakers were questioned about allegedly being members of Mossad. They state they are from a country that experiences terror daily and their purpose was to document the event. The five Israelis were detained for ten weeks and finally deported on immigration violations.

In this video, the speakers discuss various topics including current events, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the deep state. They mention Trump's civil case and the potential revelations that may come from it. The speakers also touch on the history of Israel, the involvement of foreign powers, and the corruption within the intelligence community. They express their concerns about the situation in Gaza and criticize the actions of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. The conversation ends with a call for people to stand up against corruption and for a peaceful revolution.

Islamophobia is rising, particularly since October 7th, but it was already too high before then. Islamophobia is intolerable, can never be justified, and requires a zero-tolerance approach. More action is needed from the government, especially regarding online content. The speaker hopes to leverage the prosecutor's experience to develop strategies for taking action against those who break the law. Islamophobia significantly impacts people's lives, affecting their ability to move freely in their communities, workplaces, and streets. The impact is not low level.

Today, three of us went to the Israeli consulate to watch previously unseen footage of the October 7th massacre. The 47-minute video showed deliberate and methodical acts of violence by Hamas, including burning victims and celebrating their deaths. This was a message to Israel, fueling their fears of genocide. While acknowledging the need for violence to stop and the civilian death toll in Gaza, it is difficult to ask Israel to be vulnerable when Hamas does not honor agreements and desires the destruction of Jews. The urgency to avoid further escalation is heightened, but finding a solution is challenging. Aid needs to reach Gaza, but Hamas has a history of diverting and misusing it. Understanding Israel's fears and our own history, the question remains: how do we make it stop?

Jacob Roth, an attorney with Dillon Law Group, addresses a troubling issue: YouTube blocked ads behind his recent episode of Anatomy of a Lawsuit, titled NYC's antisemitism emergency. He states the episode discussed a rising tide of antisemitism leading to assaults, harassment, and discrimination against Jews, Israelis, and people perceived as Jews and Israelis across New York City, in schools, on the subway, and in institutions. He asserts that YouTube is preventing people from hearing about it and claims the platform labeled the video as containing derogatory harassing content, which he says it did not contain. Roth explains that the episode was about how antisemitism on the streets and in schools imperils people and about legal options for addressing it that Dillon Law Group can help with. He argues that platform censoring speech about harassment does not make anyone safer. He calls it either a serious mistake or, if not a mistake, “really quite malicious.” He emphasizes that Dillon Law Group stands ready to help Jews, Israelis, and everyone else who’s attacked because they’re seen as Jewish or Israeli with any legal challenges they face. He reiterates that people have legal rights under federal, state, and local law, and that they can fight back. The only way this kind of situation stops, he says, is if people fight back. Roth urges anyone who has suffered antisemitic or anti-Israeli harassment at the hands of mobs rising across New York City to contact Illinois Group to see if they can be helped. He closes with a unifying message: they’re all stronger together and you don’t have to suffer alone.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, referencing a prior incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.