reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Dave Rubin discusses the consensus among climate scientists regarding man-made climate change, noting that while the exact percentage of agreement (97%, 86%, or 75%) may vary, the majority of experts acknowledge that climate change is influenced by human activity. He emphasizes the importance of trusting scientific consensus while remaining skeptical of the funding and motivations behind studies. Rubin expresses his acceptance of man-made climate change based on expert opinions, while also critiquing the polarized national conversation surrounding the issue. Rubin introduces his guest, Alex Epstein, president of the Center for Industrial Progress, who argues in his book, "The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels," that fossil fuels have significantly contributed to human advancement and remain the best energy source. Epstein challenges common perceptions about fossil fuels and discusses the importance of having open conversations about energy sources, even those deemed controversial. The discussion touches on the role of free speech in addressing climate change and energy debates. Rubin and Epstein argue against censorship and the suppression of dissenting views, asserting that a free society should allow all ideas to be discussed and debated. They express concern over government actions targeting think tanks and individuals who promote alternative viewpoints on climate issues, framing it as a violation of free speech rights. Epstein critiques the environmental movement for its anti-human stance, suggesting that it prioritizes minimizing human impact over maximizing human flourishing. He argues that this perspective leads to policies that hinder progress and innovation in energy production. The conversation concludes with a call for individuals to evaluate the underlying values driving discussions about climate change and energy, advocating for a focus on human well-being and progress.

Adam Cropp, a National Geographic expedition leader, shares his adventurous life shaped by his family's background in nature documentaries. His father, once a shark hunter, transitioned to conservation, influencing Adam's passion for wildlife. They discuss sharks, emphasizing their misunderstood nature and the rarity of attacks on humans compared to the millions killed by humans annually. Adam recounts his experiences swimming with bull sharks and the unique characteristics of various shark species. The conversation shifts to Adam's work with Lindblad Expeditions and National Geographic, where he leads expeditions to remote locations. He describes the perks of his job, including the opportunity to explore places like Antarctica and South Georgia, where he interacts with wildlife, such as king penguins and fur seals. They delve into climate change, with Adam expressing concern over rising temperatures and the impact of human activity on the environment. He highlights the urgency of addressing climate issues, citing the significant rise in CO2 levels and the potential consequences of inaction. Adam argues for a collective effort to combat climate change, suggesting that reallocating military budgets towards environmental initiatives could yield positive results. The discussion touches on the complexities of global politics, the challenges of implementing change, and the need for education and awareness to foster a more sustainable future. Adam shares his personal struggles with health issues stemming from decompression sickness after extensive diving, leading to a discussion about the medical system and the challenges of finding effective treatments. They conclude with a light-hearted conversation about cultural differences, including the absurdity of certain laws and societal norms, and the importance of understanding diverse perspectives. Adam emphasizes the need for a global shift in mindset to address pressing issues like climate change and resource management, advocating for a more collaborative and informed approach to problem-solving.

Dave Rubin discusses the World Economic Forum and critiques globalist figures like John Kerry and Bill Gates, who he believes want to control people's lives. He expresses skepticism about climate change policies, arguing that humans have always adapted to changing climates and that elite figures are out of touch with reality. Rubin highlights Greta Thunberg's recent arrest during a climate protest, suggesting it may have been staged for publicity. He contrasts Bill Gates, who he describes as a hypocrite for promoting climate policies while having a large carbon footprint, with Elon Musk, who he views as more genuine in his approach to technology and climate solutions. Rubin criticizes the World Economic Forum's alarmist rhetoric about climate change and mass extinction, asserting that humanity will find ways to adapt. He also discusses misinformation in media, particularly focusing on Leana Wen, a former COVID-19 spokesperson, who he believes has spread false narratives about vaccines. He concludes by praising Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis for protecting individual freedoms against COVID-19 mandates, emphasizing the importance of personal choice in health decisions. Rubin calls for continued resistance against what he sees as authoritarian control from global elites.

In this episode, Patrick Bet-David interviews Marc Morano, a prominent climate contrarian and founder of Climate Depot. Morano discusses his background as an investigative reporter and his skepticism towards mainstream climate change narratives. He highlights how he became disillusioned with environmental claims during the 1992 UN Earth Summit, where he learned that many alarming statistics about deforestation and species extinction were exaggerated. Morano argues that the consensus on climate change is overstated, citing his work compiling dissenting scientists who challenge the notion that human activity is the primary driver of climate change. He emphasizes that many climate models predicting dire outcomes are based on flawed assumptions and that historical data shows no significant increase in extreme weather events attributable to climate change. The conversation shifts to the role of influential figures like Elon Musk and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have previously supported climate change initiatives but are now seen as shifting their views. Morano expresses hope that these figures will publicly reconsider their positions on climate change, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which he believes has overshadowed climate discussions. Morano critiques the Green New Deal and similar policies, arguing they would not effectively address climate issues and instead serve as a means for government control over individual freedoms. He warns against the merging of climate and COVID narratives, suggesting that the pandemic has been used to push a broader agenda of government intervention. The discussion also touches on the geopolitical implications of climate policies, particularly how countries like China and Russia benefit from Western nations' commitments to reduce fossil fuel use. Morano asserts that these nations are not genuinely concerned about climate change and instead capitalize on the energy dependence created by Western policies. Towards the end, Morano discusses the potential dangers of digital currencies and government control over personal freedoms, likening current trends to historical abuses of power. He concludes by emphasizing the importance of questioning authority and the prevailing narratives surrounding climate change and public health. Morano's upcoming book, "The Great Reset and the Permanent Lockdowns," aims to explore these themes further, advocating for a return to open debate and skepticism towards established narratives.

The climate crisis demands urgent solutions, and while progress is being made, emissions continue to rise. Al Gore emphasizes the need to address the fossil fuel industry's opposition, which actively lobbies against climate legislation and misleads the public. He highlights the conflict of interest at COP28, where fossil fuel executives influence policy while planning to increase emissions. Despite some positive developments, like the Inflation Reduction Act and advancements in renewable energy, the fossil fuel sector's actions contradict their pledges to reduce emissions. Gore calls for reform in the financial system, as governments subsidize fossil fuels significantly, hindering progress. He asserts that with the right changes, emissions can be reduced by 50% in seven years. Importantly, achieving true net-zero could stabilize global temperatures within three to five years, offering hope for the future. Young people are demanding action, and Gore concludes that the will to act is a renewable resource.

In this discussion, Jordan Peterson engages with Dr. Patrick Moore, a founding member of Greenpeace, who expresses skepticism about current climate change narratives. Moore argues that the claims surrounding a 1.5-degree Celsius increase in global temperature leading to disaster are exaggerated, suggesting that such a change could actually benefit agriculture by opening up previously too-cold farmland. He reflects on his early environmental activism, which was initially focused on nuclear disarmament and protecting marine life, but notes a shift in the movement towards a more radical anti-human perspective. Moore emphasizes the importance of understanding long-term climate data, asserting that the Earth has been in one of its coldest periods during the current Pleistocene Ice Age, characterized by significant ice coverage. He challenges the notion that carbon dioxide is a primary driver of climate change, stating that historical data shows higher CO2 levels corresponded with flourishing life, and that the relationship between CO2 and temperature is not straightforward. He critiques the environmental movement's shift towards alarmism, particularly regarding nuclear energy, which he views as a safe alternative to fossil fuels. Moore also discusses the benefits of increased CO2 for plant growth, countering the narrative that it leads to desertification. He highlights the greening of the planet over the past two decades, attributing it to rising CO2 levels, and argues that human emissions are vital for sustaining life. Moore concludes by criticizing the politicization of environmental issues, suggesting that fear-based narratives distract from more pressing ecological concerns, such as overfishing and habitat destruction. He calls for a rational approach to environmental stewardship that recognizes the interconnectedness of life and the importance of human contributions to ecological health.

The episode of The Joe Rogan Experience features Shane Smith discussing various topics, including mobile service provider Ting, which offers a no-contract model that charges users based on their actual usage, potentially saving customers money. They also touch on the evolution of mobile phones, including the LG Flex and the future of technology, such as roll-up phones and electric cars like Teslas. Smith shares insights from his travels, particularly regarding the geopolitical tensions in the Arctic due to melting ice, which is opening up new shipping routes and access to natural resources. He discusses the military buildup in the region, with countries like Russia and China vying for control over these newly accessible areas. The conversation shifts to climate change, with Smith emphasizing the urgency of addressing it. He cites a NASA climatologist who stated that human activity is entirely responsible for the accelerating effects of climate change, warning that significant portions of the world's cities could be submerged due to rising sea levels. Smith critiques the denial of climate change, noting that many people cling to conservative ideologies that contradict scientific consensus, often influenced by fossil fuel companies. He highlights the disconnect between the realities of climate change and the public's perception, particularly in regions experiencing severe droughts. The discussion also covers the economic disparities exacerbated by the 2008 recession, the influence of money on politics, and the role of technology in shaping future economies. Smith argues that the current economic system is flawed, with wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, and suggests that a new approach is needed to create a more equitable society. They explore the implications of surveillance and the erosion of privacy in modern society, particularly in light of the NSA's activities. Smith expresses concern about the normalization of a police state and the potential for technology to be used against citizens. The episode concludes with a reflection on the importance of grassroots movements and the need for individuals to take action against injustices, emphasizing that collective efforts can lead to meaningful change. Smith encourages listeners to engage with the issues discussed, highlighting the interconnectedness of global challenges and the necessity for awareness and action.

In this Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Joe Rogan hosts Dr. Richard Lindzen, an atmospheric physicist, and Dr. William Happer, a physicist from Princeton, to discuss climate science and the prevailing narratives around climate change. Lindzen begins by outlining his extensive academic background in atmospheric sciences, noting his early enjoyment of solving tangible problems in the field before it became politicized by the global warming issue. Happer shares his background in physics and his experience as the Director of Energy Research under President Bush Sr., where he first became skeptical of climate science due to the dismissive attitude of climate researchers towards oversight. The conversation explores the history of climate change concerns, from early fears of an impending ice age in the 1970s to the focus on CO2 after Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth. Lindzen and Happer argue that the demonization of CO2 is driven by financial incentives in the energy sector, which involves trillions of dollars. They suggest that politicians exploit climate change to gain power and control, stifling rational debate and labeling dissenters as 'climate change deniers.' They critique the notion of a scientific consensus on climate change, pointing out that while the science is supposedly settled, major factors like water vapor and clouds remain poorly understood. The guests challenge the narrative that the Earth's temperature should remain static, arguing that natural climate variability is normal. They express skepticism about net-zero policies, which they believe harm developing nations by making electricity unaffordable and causing phenomenal damage and pain. They contend that modernized coal plants could provide cleaner energy solutions for these regions, but are being blocked by net-zero agendas. The discussion touches on the politicization of science, where politicians co-opt the reputation of science to push their agendas, often confusing technology with science. They highlight the Earth's increased greening due to higher CO2 levels and share an anecdote about a biologist who avoided discussing the role of low CO2 levels in past human population declines. Lindzen and Happer recount their personal experiences with pushback and censorship when questioning climate change narratives. Lindzen shares instances of having papers rejected or editors fired for publishing his work. Happer discusses his experience in the Department of Energy, where climate scientists were resistant to his oversight. They criticize the peer-review process as being used to enforce conformity rather than promote open scientific inquiry. They also address the financial incentives driving climate research, noting how universities benefit from overhead income from climate grants, creating a disincentive to challenge the prevailing narrative. The discussion shifts to the factors influencing Earth's temperature, including water vapor, CO2, methane, and the sun. Lindzen explains that climate is defined as temperature variations over 30 years, and most climate change is regional rather than global. Happer notes that the establishment narrative downplays the sun's role in climate change, despite evidence of its variability. They discuss past warmings and coolings, such as those during the dinosaur age, and the periodic nature of recent ice ages. They suggest that the focus on CO2 has hindered climate science by 50 years, creating a 'plagistan era' where alternative theories are ignored. The guests explore historical parallels, such as the eugenics movement, where flawed science was used to justify discriminatory policies. They discuss the role of politicians in exploiting fear and hate, and the impact of climate change anxieties on young people. They criticize the use of extreme weather events to scare people and question the validity of climate models, noting that even UN models predict only a small reduction in GDP by 2100. They suggest that a country like Germany, with its extreme green energy policies, may serve as a cautionary tale. They also touch on the influence of social media and AI in spreading misinformation and the lack of trust in mainstream media. The conversation concludes with a call for open inquiry and verification in science. Lindzen and Happer advocate for multiple funding sources to prevent a single point of failure and encourage a more balanced approach to climate research. They caution against the dangers of political influence in science and the importance of critical thinking and skepticism. They also touch on the history of defense research and the challenges of discussing sensitive topics in academia. The guests emphasize the need to separate ideology from truth and to promote open discussion and debate based on data and facts.

Joe Rogan and Mike Baker discuss various topics, starting with a humorous take on a recent eclipse where they mock the president for looking at the sun. They transition into a conversation about the lack of discipline in the White House communications department and the absurdity of some political decisions, such as Seattle's new tax on the wealthy. They share their experiences of moving from Connecticut to Idaho, highlighting the differences in lifestyle and governance. Baker discusses the exodus of companies from Connecticut due to high taxes, while Rogan emphasizes the importance of being financially comfortable rather than wealthy. The conversation shifts to the topic of wealth and the absurdities of extreme wealth, including the ridiculousness of owning extravagant items like yachts. They touch on the complexities of wealth distribution and taxation, particularly in relation to Seattle's new tax laws. As they delve into environmental issues, they discuss climate change and the polar bear population, noting that while some areas are experiencing challenges, others are thriving. They express skepticism about the extremes of both sides of the climate debate and the need for balanced discussions. Baker shares his excitement about an upcoming fishing trip to Alaska with his son, emphasizing the importance of outdoor experiences for children. They discuss the beauty of Alaska and the need to appreciate nature before it changes. The conversation then shifts to the political landscape, particularly regarding Trump's presidency and the implications of his policies. They discuss the potential for privatizing military operations in Afghanistan and the challenges of nation-building, expressing doubts about the effectiveness of such strategies. They reflect on the complexities of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to North Korea and Iran, and the historical context of U.S. involvement in these regions. Baker emphasizes the need for clear objectives in military engagements and the importance of understanding the long-term implications of U.S. actions abroad. The discussion concludes with a light-hearted take on societal issues, including the absurdity of cultural appropriation and the challenges of modern parenting. They highlight the importance of teaching children resilience and the value of hard work, contrasting it with the current trend of coddling children and avoiding competition.