TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In my 30 years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, I have never seen a witness torn apart like Michael Cohen. He lies constantly, including to congress, judges, and in court. Cohen claimed to have resolved an issue with Trump in 2016, but evidence showed otherwise. This case is a circus led by a liar. A judge should dismiss it before going to a jury.

On September 30th, the speaker and their group went to the FBI to report the state's elected attorney general for a crime. However, they admitted that they did not have any evidence to support their claim.

The speaker claims the famous photograph of classified documents was staged and the documents were placed by the FBI. According to the speaker, Jack Smith admitted in court to mishandling the classified documents and misrepresenting them to the court, which the speaker equates to evidence tampering and lying to the court. The speaker asserts that Trump's lawyers caught the discrepancy between the documents presented and the digitally scanned records. Smith allegedly admitted he doesn't know how the tampering happened and has blown the chain of custody. The speaker also alleges that lead prosecutor Jay Bratt met with White House counsel and a representative of the National Archives before Smith's appointment. The speaker compares this situation to Crossfire Hurricane, claiming the Obama-Biden administration fabricated evidence and lied to the court to pursue Donald Trump. The speaker believes the judge hasn't dismissed the case yet because she wants to document it publicly.

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

The speaker claims John Brennan, Clapper, and Comey pushed the fake Steele dossier into intelligence assessments, forming the basis for Crossfire Hurricane. According to the speaker, underlying intelligence, soon to be declassified in the Durham Report annex, will show Hillary Clinton and the FBI amplified the fake Russia collusion claims. Brennan, Clinton, and Comey testified within the last five years, and their testimonies are allegedly inconsistent with the soon-to-be-declassified intelligence. The speaker suggests there's an opportunity for indictments and prosecutions of those who may have lied under oath, and that referrals have been made. The speaker believes the individuals discussed conspired against President Trump and the American people. The statute of limitations may not apply because the conspiracy is ongoing, as those involved haven't admitted wrongdoing in 2016 and 2020.

One speaker asserts Brennan may claim a statute of limitations as a defense, but in a 2023 deposition, Brennan said he had no role in getting the Steele dossier into the intelligence community assessment. The speaker claims whistleblowers at CIA and John Ratcliffe say this is false. The speaker believes Brennan should be charged for lying to Congress, stating intelligence chiefs have avoided perjury charges, citing James Clapper's testimony on bulk domestic intelligence collection followed by the Snowden leaks. The speaker argues there needs to be accountability at the CIA, otherwise, people will feel emboldened. The speaker believes Russiagate hamstrung the entire presidency, leading the world to believe Trump was a Russian asset. They claim that in a July 2019 congressional hearing, Mueller had nothing, and they took down key elements of an entire presidency.

Charges have been filed against the state of New York, Kathy Hochul, Leticia James, and Mark Schroeder of the DMV. This action is being taken by a new DOJ to protect American citizens and angel moms. New York is accused of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens.

A reliable source claims that someone from Washington called the Atlanta district attorney on Friday, urging them to indict on Monday to cover up mistakes made with Weiss. The district attorney explained that the jurors wouldn't return until Tuesday, but the caller insisted on Monday, regardless of the time. The purpose was to manipulate the news media. The identity of the caller is unknown, and this information is hearsay. The speaker believes the claim due to the leaked clerk document, the exhausted state of Weiss, and the late-night press conference.

On September 30th, the speaker and their group went to the FBI to report the state's elected attorney general for a crime. However, they admitted that they did not have any evidence to support their claim.

Brandon Straka claims he was wrongfully charged and convicted by the DOJ and FBI for actions on January 6th, despite being innocent. He states that his apartment was raided, and he was arrested and charged with felonies, including knowingly occupying restricted grounds and impeding law enforcement, plus a misdemeanor for disorderly conduct. Straka says he attended a permitted event on Capitol grounds and filmed the scene, observing open barricades and no visible law enforcement. He repeated "We're going in" after hearing another man say it, but the government omitted this context. He also says he told people to "go" to create space for women exiting the crowd, but the government falsely claimed he was encouraging people to storm the building. Straka denies shouting "take the shield" during an incident with a police officer, but claims he was pressured to take ownership of saying "take it" to avoid felony charges. He says he left when the building was evacuated. Straka believes the government's lies have damaged his reputation, career, and personal life, and led to his placement on terrorism watch lists.

Alvin Bragg says influencing elections illegally is a felony. Hillary Clinton and DNC violated laws, fined $1,000,000 but no indictment. Trump not found guilty of election law violations but indicted. FBI used unverified dossier to spy on Trump, commit treason. FBI suppressed info to influence election outcome. When will future indictments happen for these crimes? No clear underlying crime in Trump's case. Excuses awaited.

I was part of a group arrested for a plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer, but it was a setup by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be about the governor's cottage. I got charged with material support terrorism for taking a video. The government lied about my involvement. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice prevails.

The speakers discuss whether or not Donald Trump lied about his knowledge of the Stormy Daniels payment. Speaker 1 argues that it wasn't a lie because acknowledging it would violate the confidential settlement. Speaker 0 challenges this, stating that Trump did know about it. They also discuss allegations against a former prosecutor, Pomerantz, who allegedly violated grand jury secrecy laws. Speaker 1 believes Pomerantz's actions will lead to criminal charges. They then debate the validity of the Stormy Daniels case, with Speaker 1 arguing that it doesn't constitute a crime. Finally, Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 would defend Trump in the January 6th case, to which Speaker 1 responds that it depends on the allegations.

Speaker 1, Julie Kelly, asserts that the new leadership at the DOJ and FBI may not be aware of who Jocelyn Ballantyne is, describing her as lead prosecutor who "led the team of government lawyers, DOJ lawyers, who went after the Proud Boys" and labeling her as "among the worst of the worst." Kelly references her experience covering the Proud Boys trial in 2023 and states that Ballantyne was near the top of Kelly’s list of j-six prosecutors who should be fired. Kelly recounts a scandal from the Proud Boys trial involving a spreadsheet of FBI correspondence in which agents discussed destroying evidence, surveilling, and eavesdropping on communications between Proud Boys who were in pretrial detention federal prison and their attorneys. She notes that the defense, during the trial, discovered this spreadsheet accidentally and intended to use the information as evidence. According to Kelly, the defense attempted to question an FBI agent who was a government witness and planned to present what they found in the spreadsheet. She describes that, as the defense began to present this evidence, Judge Tim Kelly—who, she says, is good friends with Jocelyn Ballantyne and had worked with her in the DC U.S. attorney’s office on cases—abruptly cut off the questioning. A day or two later, Ballantyne went into court and claimed that the communication represented classified secrets and should be withheld from the jury, a move Kelly characterizes as being aligned with Ballantyne’s actions. Kelly asserts that Judge Kelly went along with this claim to withhold the information. Kelly emphasizes that Ballantyne led the team of prosecutors against the Proud Boys, who were convicted of seditious conspiracy. She notes that Ballantyne then pursued severe sentences, including some defendants receiving life terms, such as Lindsay Attario, who Kelly says ended up with a twenty-two year prison sentence before those sentences were commuted by the president. Speaker 0 interjects multiple times with questions and expressions of disbelief, urging Julie Kelly to explain how such actions could be true and challenging the notion that Ballantyne’s conduct was inappropriate, while Kelly maintains that the described conduct and the actions taken by Ballantyne and the DOJ were part of the Proud Boys prosecutions and related cases.

Donald Trump and the other defendants committed persistent and repeated fraud. This was proven in the motion for summary judgment last week. The other claims will be proven today. No one is above the law, no matter how powerful or wealthy they are. It is the speaker's responsibility and duty to enforce the law. The law is both powerful and fragile. The case will be proven in court today, and justice will prevail.

Claims include that "we're not getting the cooperation that we need" from the Department of Justice, where "Pam Bondi sits as the head of it" but "the COO" is "Todd Blanche," whom the speaker says is "failing on all measures." "Because of him, we haven't had a pardon granted since May" and "Because of him, the he wants the j sixers to not be compensated for all that we put them through." He adds, "we're not, getting the things that we need for Dominion machines, etcetera, etcetera." He notes Blanche "used to be until 01/04/2024, he was a Democrat, a registered Democrat" and "then he represented Donald Trump on the Stormy Daniels case that any Democrat would have done the same job," and argues that "everything that needs to be going forward in order to make Donald Trump's presidency work is being stalled intentionally by this man." "It's not because of ineptitude." "This is a smart guy. This is a very capable guy." "It's because he's intentionally, doing things the opposite of what Donald Trump has ordered to be done."

The transcript centers on a report from NBC News about the man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th attack. The speaker cites NBC’s article, which states that the suspect told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter. The speaker notes that NBC provides no direct quote or further context beyond that single claim. The speaker asserts that their own sources indicate the word used by the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., in his FBI interview was that he believed the 2020 election was stolen. However, the speaker claims there is a widespread belief within the FBI that this comment was a legal maneuver rather than a genuine belief. According to the speaker, the FBI allegedly thinks the statement was coached by Cole’s lawyer to secure a pardon from President Trump, specifically a retroactive pardon because Trump had issued a pardon for individuals convicted of January 6–related crimes. The speaker emphasizes that there is no additional evidence in Cole Jr.’s background, as far as their sources can determine, indicating he is a Trump supporter. They remark that NBC is one of the few outlets making this claim, noting that the article contains several paragraphs but only repeats the initial sentence without further detail. The speaker suggests that even within liberal media, there is a belief that the comment was a legal maneuver rather than a reflection of genuine political conviction, and argues that NBC’s reporting is selectively presented to push a particular narrative. Throughout, the speaker contrasts this with a broader media portrayal, arguing that while Brian Cole Jr. did make the comment about the 2020 election being stolen, the context is missing, and the media narrative is being shaped by selective reporting. The speaker frames the situation as an instance of media cherry-picking intended to influence perceptions about the suspect’s political affiliations and the nature of his statements to the FBI, rather than providing a complete account.

Brandon Straka claims he was wrongfully charged and convicted by the DOJ and FBI for actions on January 6th, despite being innocent. He states that his apartment was raided, and he was arrested and charged with felonies, including knowingly occupying restricted grounds and impeding law enforcement, plus a misdemeanor for disorderly conduct. Straka says he attended a permitted event on Capitol grounds and filmed the scene, noting open barricades and a calm crowd. He claims he repeated "We're going in" after hearing someone else say it and that the government omitted this context. He also says he shouted "Go, go" to help women exit the crowd, but the government misrepresented it as encouraging the crowd to storm the building. Straka denies shouting "take the shield" during an incident with a police officer, but says he was pressured to take ownership of saying "take it, take it" to avoid felony charges. He says he left when someone announced the building was evacuated. Straka believes the government's lies have damaged his reputation, career, and organization, and seeks to share his story to prevent similar injustices.

Earlier today, a federal grand jury returned an 18 count superseding indictment charging New Orleans mayor Latoya Cantrell and former New Orleans police department officer Jeffrey Paul Vappi the second. They are charged with a series of fraud, obstruction of justice, and false statement offenses for their role in a nearly three year fraud scheme that we allege exploited their public authority and positions. The indictment alleges that in October 2021, mayor Cantrell and Jeffrey Vappi, a member of her executive protection team, developed a personal, intimate relationship. From that time until mister Vappi's retirement in June 2024, they embarked on a scheme to defraud the city of New Orleans and the New Orleans Police Department by exploiting Vappi's job and Cantrell's authority as mayor to have the city and the New Orleans Police Department pay Vappi's salary and expenses during the times that Vappi claimed to be on duty, But when he he was actually engaged in personal activities, usually with miss Cantrell, but sometimes alone at the Pantalba apartment. The indictment describes the steps Cantrell and Vappi took to hide their scheme.

The speaker discusses the importance of the rule of law and the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. They accuse the state prosecutor of leaking the indictment against Donald Trump before it was presented to the public. The prosecutor denies any knowledge of the leak and claims it was a clerical error. However, the speaker argues that the prosecutor must have been involved since the clerk only receives the indictment after the prosecutor's approval. They suggest that the leak was intentional to create a negative narrative against Trump. The speaker concludes by stating that Trump's team should challenge the indictment as unlawful and seek to have the entire case dismissed.

Prosecutors are accused of tampering with evidence by changing document sequences from Mar a Lago. The attorney general denies this claim, stating it is an ongoing dispute in court. Jack Smith admitted mishandling documents in a court filing, leading to questions about his role as special counsel. The attorney general defers to the court for resolution. The case is now stalled due to errors made.

We've filed charges against the state of New York, Kathy Hochul, Leticia James, and Mark Schroeder of the DMV. This new Department of Justice is committed to protecting American citizens and angel moms. New York is prioritizing illegal aliens over its own citizens, but this ends now.

In this video, Patrick Byrne discusses the legal maneuvering in Michigan and the involvement of attorney Stephanie Lambert. He highlights the importance of women in fighting for the future and mentions a study that shows how increasing women's income leads to improved well-being for children. Byrne explains how Lambert was hired by sheriffs and town clerks to investigate election fraud in Michigan. He criticizes the special prosecutor and attorney general for their unethical behavior, including fabricating evidence and threatening witnesses. Byrne suggests that those involved in the coup against election integrity may be committing capital crimes and warns that they may face consequences in the future.