TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I'm running out of time. You seem to be pro-vaccine but have started a group, Children's Health Defense, which sells baby clothing with anti-vaccine messages, like "unvaxxed, unafraid" for $26. Can you assure us that your organization will stop selling these products? I have no control over that organization; I resigned from the board. You founded it just a few months ago. Are you supportive of these onesies? I support vaccines and want good science. Will you tell your organization to stop selling those items?

My daughter is an athlete who wants to play on the girls' soccer team, but we've faced some bigotry in Arlington and New Jersey. We thought people would be more progressive, but that hasn't been the case. Is there a way for her to play? Unfortunately, if the league is governed by UIL regulations, Texas has a law that requires students to participate in sports based on the gender listed on their birth certificate. This could limit her options significantly.

Adam Gillette from Accuracy Media confronts Tamara Nowitzky about DEI work at the university, alleging that the department was still engaging in DEI in defiance of state law and that only wording had been changed. Gillette asks if this is true. Nowitzky repeatedly responds, I can't comment, to questions about compliance with the law and whether the department has subverted it by altering language. Gillette presses further, presenting a video in which Nowitzky allegedly said she had to change the words because people are dumb. He asks if she said that, and whether the department is complying with the law or subverting it by changing words. Nowitzky again declines to comment, saying, I can't comment, and does not provide direct answers to whether there were thoughts or criticisms about taxpayers who oppose funding DEI, potential loss of state or federal funds, or a message to legislators who passed a law banning DEI at universities. Gillette notes that Nowitzky had commented extensively in the video, and asks for clarification about whether she misspoke or if the statements are accurate. Nowitzky responds with fragmented phrases: “I can't come,” followed by partial words from Gillette’s prompt, and then, “Most of your progressive. Of your faculty faculty,” seemingly offering insufficient, disconnected remarks. Gillette continues to seek any thoughts on whether a predominantly progressive faculty fosters a welcoming environment for students who don’t share those values, but Nowitzky again says, I can't comment. Gillette indicates that investigators spoke with several staffers and found that the psychology department and other departments had changed wording but were continuing the same DEI work. He asks Nowitzky for comments on these findings. Nowitzky states that the university is “fully compliant with House Bill four and all federal laws and policies and procedures with respect to that issue.” He acknowledges this while also noting concerns raised by Tamara Nowitzky in the psychology department about the claim that they “just changed the words because people are dumb.” In closing, Gillette mentions the recorded comments and complaints alleging that the university continued DEI work in defiance of state law, despite the purported word changes. The exchange ends with Nowitzky reiterating the university’s position of compliance and presenting the conflicting claim from a department member about altering wording, rather than altering the underlying DEI work.

Did you leak a letter to the Washington Post about me? You're the chief of staff, right? I’m James O’Keefe. You’re friends with the reporter, Yvonne Wingate Sanchez. Did you leak the letter? No, there was no leak. How did the Washington Post get it before I did? I don’t know how they knew. The letter was released under public records law. I haven’t received it yet. Your office seems to be working with the media to target journalists. It was released legally. But how did the Washington Post know to request it? There are many ways they could have found out. So someone in your office leaked it? No, that’s faulty logic. You’re saying someone knew about the letter and told them? I have other matters to attend to. You’re busy writing letters threatening journalists. This is about good versus evil in this country. The Wellness Company offers a first aid emergency kit to help you take control of your health. Order now and save 15% with code OMG.

Parents seek guidance from health leaders regarding vaccine decisions. I want to address a serious matter about character. You were accused of sexual harassment and assault by Eliza Cooney, who was initially hired as a babysitter. When confronted, you mentioned you weren't a "church boy" and acknowledged having "skeletons in your closet." You later texted Ms. Cooney an apology but claimed no memory of her account. Can you respond to these accusations in front of this committee? Did you make unwanted sexual advances toward Ms. Cooney? No, I did not, and that story has been debunked. Why did you apologize then? I apologized for something else. That’s not my understanding. You can read the text she published; it was not for that.

"Hi. Good evening. I'm a parent in the Davis Unified School District, and I'm here today to talk about the policies you have for the locker rooms in the junior high schools." "Right now, we require our students to undress for PE class." "depending on a child's transgender identity that they can pick which bathroom they want." "So we have right now at this school district, we have children self identifying into into different bathrooms just based off of No. Their You cannot." "I have my bathing suit on." "Excuse me. This this is allowed." "We're gonna recess. I'm gonna finish my comments." "So you are violating my first amendment right." "I am putting on my You are disrupt."

I'm Ally Benjamin, the director of public relations. We're covering a story about Les Beard, a physics teacher at Mariner High School, who discussed gender diversity in class. A student and parents recorded his comments, raising questions about whether it's appropriate for a physics teacher to teach biology. I can't comment on personnel matters or potential consequences for Mr. Beard. While I understand your concerns, I can only provide the statement I already gave you. You can reach out to other staff members for further comments, but I must protect the privacy of personnel matters. This situation is indeed extraordinary, and I appreciate your reporting on it. Please contact me if you need anything else. Thank you.

Did you coach a parent on how their biological son could spend the night in hotel rooms with girls during field trips? No, that did not happen.

Nick Shirley initiates the exchange by stating his name and pressing for permission to record, noting that the other person “doesn’t have any permission to record me, period.” He proposes, “Can we talk outside? Permission to record.” The other person counters that there is no permission from either party, saying, “She doesn’t either have she doesn’t have permission or … for me. You cannot stop people on the street and question them.” Nick states, “We can ask them,” and the other person repeats, “Have any permission.” The dialogue shifts to a concern about the whereabouts of children. Nick asks, “Where are the children?” The other person responds, “I will sue you. You don't have any permission. We have nothing to do with this. Okay, sir? And are there … So leave.” Nick persists, asking again, “Are there children here?” The other person repeats, “Please leave.” Nick inquires, “Where are the children?” and the other person insists, “Leave. Leave.” Nick questions, “We’re wondering what's happening. Tell us what's happening here then.” The other person commands, “I said leave.” Nick clarifies, “We're wondering what's happening.” The other person states, “We are not a childcare. We have nothing to do with it. We're the common people walking. Yes. We're not … we're not accusing you. We're asking where the children are at.” The other person repeats, “Don't ask me anything.” Nick emphasizes his intent: “We're not accusing you. We're asking the daycare centers.” The other person refuses to answer, “I am not gonna answer. You have.” Nick presses, “Where are the children … who do you work for? My name is Nick Shirley.” The other person asks, “Who do you work for?” Nick responds, “I work for myself. Nick Shirley.” The other person inquires, “Okay what are you recording?” Nick answers, “We're wondering where are the children $2,660,000 for the Minnesota child care center. You're not talking to the right person. Are there children that come here?” The other person demands, “Answer the question. Are there children?” Nick states, “There's no children inside the building.”

What’s your name? What are you doing here? I’m texting a friend. Who are you texting? A 15-year-old. No, I’m not. Yes, you are. If you don’t stand here and talk, I’ll call the police. Let me see your phone. You’re here to meet a 15-year-old. Where are you going? You can’t just leave.

What's happening at this hotel? Reports indicate that individuals have been filming children at a nearby primary school. Don't touch me; I'm just trying to understand the situation. You're pushing me away, but I need answers. This is unacceptable. Illegals have been filming children here. Why are you preventing me from getting information? It's ironic that you're calling the police on me when there are serious allegations about people filming children just up the road. You have no evidence? There is evidence. Where is it? The community deserves answers about what's going on with the children.

Byron Thedford? That's me. Oh, we received a report that you were pushing DEI in defiance of the state law and seeking loopholes to get around the law. Is that true? It's not. No, sir. You've never talked about pushing loopholes to get around the law? I haven't. No. What about this video?

My daughter plays sports, but there are concerns about fairness because she's bigger than other kids. When she performs well, some people claim it's unfair due to her being transgender. Incidents, like injuries, lead to accusations against her participation. We're trying to prevent such situations. If an accident occurs, would you support her? Absolutely. Is there any discrimination because she's transgender? No. We still need to adhere to Title IX regulations.

Speaker 0 warns someone about their statement regarding men competing as females. They ask the person to leave, as they continue to make the same statement. Speaker 1 acknowledges that they are right and thanks the person for being present. They mention the importance of everyone following their own rules and ask for those who interrupt to leave, as it infringes on their First Amendment rights.

My daughters will only compete against other women in sports. We need to stop allowing biological men to change in front of young girls. Let's fix this by 2024.

Are you saying parents cause problems? Should someone in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? I don't know what you're talking about. Is that me in that video? I have no idea. I have no comment, so stand back. You can keep your hands off me.

Once we get that birth certificate, she'll be entered as a female, and no one will know the difference. Oh, well, if she's entered as a female and no one knows the difference, that should affect athletic bones. Think. We've actually changed your birth certificate in New Jersey, so I don't know if that changes anything that It may help. Mislead you. Athletics will definitely help me then. Yes. Yeah. They'll know they'll know the rules. Yeah. And so forth. But if she's entering as a girl, I mean, I don't think there'd an issue. If she doesn't tell, no one will. Well, it's on the news. If you liked our work and you wanna see more investigations from Accuracy and Media, click in the link and make a tax deductible contribution right now. Your gift goes directly to pay for this work.

If you support girls and women's equality and sports, stand up. It's unfair and unsafe for males to compete in girls' sports. Don't be afraid of being called a bigot. Fight for women's equality, privacy, fairness, and safety. Be honest, brave, and stand with us in the fight for equality.

Adam Killeb from Accuracy and Media states he received a report that the staff is pushing DEI despite the board of trustees ban. He then addresses someone as Janique Sanders.

He's with a 15-year-old, someone should call the police. Oh, he works there? Yeah, he does. We have evidence of him having sex with a minor. Let's call the police. This is crazy.

Where's the leader? Who's in charge here? You’re treating us like criminals. This is unacceptable. That’s my father inside, and my wife is in there too. Can you please back up? I’m already backed up; I haven’t moved.

Are you prepared to wait here all night? Yes. Good. Stay there. Last year we could access that desk; can we do so this year? No. He's not a U.S. employee, just a politician. Did Elon Musk hire you? Who employs you? Are you even a lawyer? I work in education.

Did you read the file? Six women involved. Do you own a black Toyota Sienna, Miss Trevor? Yes. Why refer to him as a woman? The suspect identifies as female. Is that how you got into the women's shelter? I am a woman, and they must accept women. Nothing changes what you did. Where were you on April 17th? At home, washing my hair. We have a witness confirming that. You're just a psycho looking for a way out. I have to be an ally for my daughter. This guy is manipulating the system. DNA results show a man. Why waste time with her? She’s a man. You have ten minutes, then cut her loose. There’s a serial killer out there; we don’t want her to be a victim. Did you show him a TikTok video? Yes.

The speaker asks if requiring women to undress in front of Leah Thomas and allowing Leah Thomas to undress in front of female athletes constitutes sexual harassment. The other speaker responds that students should not feel unsafe in any locker room. The first speaker then asks if it constitutes sexual harassment to force women to undress in front of biological males, to which the second speaker expresses concern about forcing women to undress in front of biological males. The first speaker further asks if requiring female swimmers to dress with Leah Thomas, who identifies as male, would constitute sexual harassment. The second speaker requests the question to be repeated and states that it is not a yes or no question for them.

I'm just heading to the bathroom. What are you doing in the girl's bathroom? I'm a trans girl. But, you're not a girl. Oh, we're doing all of this now. Interesting. I've never heard of this before, and I don't know what to say. I'm sorry you feel that way. I pay a lot of money to feel safe in the bathroom. Me too. Excuse me. Weird. Do you think that's okay?