reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, James O'Keefe confronts the vice president of Pfizer, Josh, about whether Jordan Walker still works for the company. Josh avoids answering the question and instead talks about the virus mutating. O'Keefe continues to press him for a direct answer, but Josh remains silent. O'Keefe accuses Pfizer of prioritizing profits over public health, quoting Josh as saying COVID is a "cash cow" for the company. A whistleblower, Debbie Bernal, also speaks up, questioning Jordan Walker's employment at Pfizer and criticizing the school board for not addressing the issue. The school board members, including Josh, dismiss the questions and refuse to comment. O'Keefe tries to confront them further, but they ignore him and drive away.

James O'Keefe discusses his recent scoop on Fox News and the Murdochs. He reveals that a Fox producer, Sean, confirmed that Tucker Carlson's removal was part of a settlement with Dominion. Sean also admitted that big pharma has a massive influence on the network and that they take money from Pfizer. O'Keefe reached out to Fox for comment and plans to send the story to Matt Drudge. He also discusses his subscription-based news organization, O'Keefe Media Group, and their efforts to decentralize journalism by empowering citizen journalists. O'Keefe believes in doing the right thing and following the facts, regardless of outside influences.

In this video, the speaker discusses a story about Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, in relation to the media and the 2020 election. The speaker mentions Vivian Schiller, a former CEO of NPR and head of news at Twitter, who is part of a globalist think tank called the Aspen Institute. The speaker claims that Schiller organized a secret media exercise to prepare for potential leaks about Hunter Biden. The exercise coincidentally aligned with the release of the New York Post's article on Hunter Biden's laptop. The speaker also mentions Joe Biden's connections to Ukraine and pro-Israel PACs, as well as a photo of Hunter Biden's wife with a tattoo related to Mossad.

The speaker alleges Tucker Carlson is a CIA puppet due to his and his father's connections to various organizations. Carlson's father, Richard, was Director of Voice of America, a propaganda broadcasting division with ties to the CIA, and later U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles. Tucker supposedly attempted to join the CIA and later worked for publications with ties to individuals and organizations connected to the CIA, including the Heritage Foundation and The Weekly Standard. The speaker highlights connections between individuals associated with Carlson, such as Paul Greenberg, William Kristol, and Rupert Murdoch, to organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Rothschilds, and individuals with alleged CIA ties. The speaker claims Carlson ridicules 9/11 conspiracy theories and avoids discussing the Rothschilds due to his controlled opposition role. The speaker suggests media personalities and outlets are controlled, and encourages viewers to research independently and avoid blindly trusting mainstream media figures.

The speaker discusses the sophistication and self-taught nature of the audience, which is feared by the media and established order. They question why Rupert Murdoch paid $878 million to avoid trial, suggesting it wasn't a business or legal decision. They mention Tucker Carlson being fired by Fox News for his views and highlight the irony of paying him not to talk. The speaker emphasizes that Tucker was a valuable asset for populist nationalism. They also mention Governor Ron DeSantis' declining popularity and argue that Murdoch paid a large sum to perpetuate a false narrative. The speaker criticizes the use of threatening letters and the term "election deniers."

Particularly the new evening news shows are just bracketed one after the other by pharmaceutical ads. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference. Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper three sixty brought to you by Pfizer. And so, you know, you look at somebody like Anderson Cooper, I think Anderson Cooper makes about $20,000,000, you know, give or take. If you say he's got a $20,000,000 salary and 75% of that or 80% of that is coming from the pharmaceutical companies, that's who his real boss is.

Fox News has canceled MyPillow's advertising, leaving the CEO, Mike Lindell, shocked and confused. Lindell speculates that the cancellation may be due to his support for former President Donald Trump and his efforts to secure election platforms. He mentions that Lou Dobbs, who was also let go by Fox News, has joined Lindell's network, Lindell TV. Lindell expresses his frustration with the lack of explanation from Fox News and believes that the timing of the cancellation, just days before the Iowa caucus, is suspicious. He urges people to visit lindellplan.com to support his fight for election integrity. Independent journalist Laura Loomer expresses her support for Lindell and encourages people to pay full price for MyPillow products to help the company and its employees.

The speaker had a long-standing, if politically opposed, friendship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from time spent together in Africa. Despite their disagreements, the founder was loyal and ensured the speaker, an environmentalist, appeared on Fox News programs with hosts like Sean Hannity. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which resonated with him due to a personal connection. However, the founder said he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because doing so would lead to repercussions from Rupert Murdoch and potential firings, as pharmaceutical companies accounted for 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, a primary revenue source vital for the financially struggling networks.

The speaker had a close but politically opposed relationship with the founder of Fox News, stemming from a shared experience in Africa. Despite their differences, the founder, whom the speaker describes as witty, engaging, paranoid, and brilliant, would have Fox News hosts put the speaker on air to discuss environmental issues. In 2014, the speaker presented the founder with a documentary about mercury in vaccines, which the founder was convinced by, especially because he believed a family member had been affected. However, he couldn't allow the speaker to discuss it on air because pharmaceutical companies provided 75% of the evening news division's advertising revenue. The founder stated that 17 out of 22 ads on a typical evening news show were pharmaceutical ads, which was the principal source of revenue for many television networks.

Pharmaceutical companies buy TV ads not to influence people to ask for specific drugs, but to manipulate the news industry. The ads are a tactic to buy off the news and prevent them from investigating the pharmaceutical industry. The news acts as a referee, labeling anyone who questions vaccine safety as anti-science, while the two largest vaccine makers have been involved in criminal activities. People who have experienced vaccine injuries are silenced and labeled as anti-science. The media is funded by pharmaceutical companies at all levels, creating a dark reality. The speaker believes it is empowering to recognize this and calls for a shift away from trusting pharmaceutical companies, especially considering the massive government funding they receive.

Television networks are very dependent on pharmaceutical advertising. The speaker knew Roger Ailes, the founder and CEO of Fox News, who told him he couldn't allow him on the network to discuss his film about mercury in medical products and neurological injuries. Ailes said 70% of the evening news division's revenues came from pharmaceutical companies, with an average of 17 out of 23 ads being pharmaceutical ads. Ailes said any host who allowed the speaker on TV would be fired, and Rupert Murdoch would know within 10 minutes. The speaker claims networks are sensitive to advertisers, who dictate content and ensure compliance from those on news shows.

- A fucking MAGA person just bought Dominion Voting Systems. We are officially fucked. - his name is Scott Lienbecker. - the name of this company this man owns is called Liberty Vote. - Dominion, one of the biggest election equipment providers and was used in 27 states. - in his press release, he said they are gonna be in full compliance with Trump's executive order, like it's a fucking law or something. - And not only did he buy it, part of the agreement of the sale was that Dominion would reach undisclosed settlements with former Rudy mayor, New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani and Trump lawyer, Sidney Powell. - Nevada's Democratic secretary of state called Lyndecker open, honest, and transparent. - Do you fucking think that if a man who was appointed by a democratic governor was going around buying fucking voting machines the the Republicans would completely ignore it.

Mike Lindell claims Fox News was presented with evidence of 2020 election fraud, including information from Dennis Montgomery, but shut it down. He questions who paid Fox's $787 million settlement with Dominion, speculating about China, BlackRock, or the Murdochs' involvement. Lindell alleges that the timing of his $5 million loss in court was suspicious, coinciding with the Fox/Dominion settlement, and that this was used to discredit his election fraud evidence. Lindell insists he possesses extensive evidence, including voter rolls and cast vote records, available on lindelltv.com. He believes Tucker Carlson was "benched" by Fox because Carlson began to believe in the voting machine fraud claims and advocated for eliminating electronic voting machines. Lindell is appealing the $5 million arbitration loss, despite being told it's unlikely to be overturned, and is taking it to federal court.

In this video, Tucker Carlson covers a wide range of topics including his firing from Fox News, the influence of advertisers on news coverage, the state of American society, and the need for national cohesion. He expresses concern about the division and tribalism in the country, emphasizing the importance of finding common ground and de-emphasizing differences. Carlson also discusses the role of technology in exacerbating power dynamics and the need for responsible leadership in promoting social cohesion. He believes that focusing on what unites Americans is crucial for the country's future. Additionally, the video touches on declining birth rates, the impact of affluence on society, climate change, immigration, and potential presidential candidates. The speaker expresses concern about the negative effects of affluence and questions the belief that humans are solely responsible for climate change. They criticize current immigration policies and discuss the controversial actions of Gavin Newsom. The video also delves into the political culture in California, media bias, the control of information, and the future of Tucker Carlson's show. Carlson highlights the lack of diversity in news coverage and the impact of social media censorship. He emphasizes the importance of actions over virtue signaling and the need for a return to order. Lastly, the video discusses the recent events surrounding OpenAI, including the firing and rehiring of CEO Sam Altman. The speakers speculate on the reasons behind the board's decision and the potential implications for the company. They emphasize the importance of transparency and communication in such situations and anticipate more drama and leaks to come as the details of the situation unfold.

The video features a heated discussion on various topics. The speakers engage in arguments about Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin, selective memory, Elon Musk, John Cena, climate change, men's usefulness, trust in the government, immigration, COVID origins, and the consequences of a court ruling. The conversation is filled with personal attacks and strong language.

Tucker Carlson's departure from Fox News signals the mainstream media's decline. Their focus on self-promotion and serving corporate interests, particularly the pharmaceutical and military-industrial complexes, has alienated viewers. The massive settlements Fox News paid, while highlighting media hypocrisy, pale in comparison to the pharmaceutical industry's payouts. This highlights the mainstream media's compromised integrity and dependence on advertising revenue. The rise of independent media, fueled by social media and direct audience engagement, provides an alternative. This new model prioritizes audience connection, transparency, and responsive dialogue, fostering genuine democratic discourse and challenging the established power structures. The old media model is failing, and the future lies in a more decentralized and participatory approach to news and information.

The transcript centers on a heated, interconnected discussion about Tucker Carlson, U.S. politics, and the perceived influence of Israel, the Israel lobby, and foreign interests on American public discourse. The participants volley accusations, defenses, and conspiracy theories, with several notable claims and counterclaims. - The opening segment portrays Tucker Carlson as a target of powerful actors. Speaker 0 argues that Netanyahu and others have labeled Carlson a problem, suggesting that calling him a “fox in a henhouse” is a veiled call for violence and censorship. They warn that such rhetoric could provoke political suppression or harm toward Carlson, and they reference debates over whether Carlson’s anti-war stance and Iran policy have drawn attacks from prominent Israel-first voices. - The conversation shifts to alleged political interference and investigations. Speaker 0 references Kash Patel and a mid-September claim that Patel confronted J. D. Vance, Tulsi Gabbard, and others about an investigation, asserting Patel was told not to involve certain intelligence matters or foreign involvement in domestic issues. They describe “the Israel lobby literally run by Netanyahu” as attacking Carlson and pressing to “neutralize” him. There is also a claim that Democrats celebrated or advocated harm against Charlie Kirk and that “six trainees” in a town suggested Kirk would be dead the next day, though no evidence is presented for these claims. - Speaker 1 introduces a harsh critique of Carlson, saying he is “the most dangerous anti-Semite in America,” accusing him of aligning with those who celebrate Nazis, defend Hamas, and criticize Trump for stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The comment emphasizes that Carlson is not MAGA, and asserts a leadership role for Carlson in a modern-day Hitler youth narrative. - The dialogue between Speakers 0 and 2 (Adam King) delves into broader political positioning. Adam King says Carlson “left MAGA,” that MAGA is a big tent whereas Carlson seeks a smaller, more controlled sphere, and that Carlson is working against the Trump agenda by attempting to influence 2028 considerations. Speaker 0 counters, arguing Tucker covers a wide range of topics and remains central to the movement, not simply fixated on Israel. - There is debate about the influence of Jewish voters and donors on the 2024 campaign, with back-and-forth estimates of Jewish contributions and skepticism about the degree to which Jews will back Vance or other candidates. The participants discuss antisemitism accusations, censorship, and the difficulty of debating these topics. They criticize the idea of labeling people antisemitic as a manipulation tactic and urge more open dialogue. - The dialogue touches on the media landscape and the limits of speaking on both sides. Adam King argues for more balanced dialogue and warns that the current rhetoric—terms like “neutralize”—fuels violence. He expresses concern about online harassment of Jews and the normalization of violent language in political discourse. - There are tangential conversations about foreign influence in U.S. affairs. Adam King mentions Qatar, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and other foreign money; he cites a Newsmax report about Mamdani’s foreign funding and discusses debates over whether Qatar has a U.S. airbase or is primarily involved in training programs. The participants debate where influence truly lies, whether with Soros, the left, or other actors. - The segment ends with a mix of promotional content and entertainment, including a satirical insert about Ultra Methylene Red, a product advertised with claims about cognitive and physiological benefits, followed by fictional, humor-laden banter about “Batman” and “the Riddler” reacting to the product. In sum, the transcript captures a multi-faceted, contentious exchange over Carlson’s position in the MAGA movement, accusations of antisemitism and censorship, perceived foreign influence in U.S. politics, and the tensions within the right-wing ecosystem, all interwoven with promotional and humorous interludes.

The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies and junk food manufacturers. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta, Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which they claim are pushing the same narrative as the media. They emphasize that these companies are profit-driven.

In 1999, claims of a connection between autism and vaccines were met with media backlash. It's alleged that pharmaceutical companies, a major revenue source for media companies, buy protection. The U.S. is purportedly one of two countries allowing this. A Supreme Court case gave pharmaceutical advertising First Amendment protection, treating it as political speech. Direct-to-consumer advertising exploded after changes in the 90s. Roger Ailes, despite political differences, allowed the speaker to discuss the environment on Fox News. However, Ailes refused to air a documentary about mercury in vaccines, fearing repercussions from Rupert Murdoch. Pharma ads allegedly constitute 75% of evening news revenue, with 17 out of 22 ads being pharmaceutical. This revenue is purportedly keeping many television networks afloat amidst financial struggles.