reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims to have evidence that Dominion voting systems were created to manipulate election results in Venezuela and were then used internationally, including in the United States. They allege that the machines were funded by Venezuela, Cuba, and China, and that some governors and secretaries of state had financial interests in the Dominion systems. The speaker believes that even if the states certify the votes, the fraud will be exposed and the votes will be set aside. They claim that President Trump won the election by a landslide and that there needs to be a criminal investigation into the alleged fraud, which they believe will affect millions of voters. They also accuse Silicon Valley, big tech companies, social media companies, and media companies of being involved in organizing and conducting the fraud.

To lower tensions and unite the country, we must investigate election irregularities. Allegations include ballots being backdated in Detroit, late unsealed ballots counted for Democrats, and deceased individuals voting. Whistleblowers in Nevada reported witnessing voter fraud. An election official in Georgia admitted to finding illegal and double voters on the rolls. False claims of fraud are harmful, so we must approach this issue carefully and responsibly.

The speaker emphasizes the need to investigate the legitimacy of the election and understand what happened. They express a willingness to work with anyone, regardless of party, to uncover the truth and make improvements. They mention the importance of knowing what laws need to be changed but acknowledge the lack of knowledge about the situation. The speaker concludes by thanking the chairman and Senator Heath.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

Governor Kemp is being challenged to prove the fairness of the election. The speaker suggests unsealing 150,000 mail-in ballots stored in a Fulton County warehouse for three and a half years. They claim that six affidavits state that 30,000 of these ballots were fake and ran through a scanner at night. The speaker urges the governor to order a forensic audit of these ballots, as they allegedly show signs of fraud. They argue that if the governor truly believes the election was fair, he should take this step. However, the speaker doubts that the governor will do so.

The speaker claims to have won the 2020 election "by a lot." They suggest reviewing tapes and "truth to vote" which allegedly shows ballot box stuffing. They also mention "51 agents" and "FBI Twitter." The speaker alleges cheating in the election, citing "all of the stuff ballots" and the "51 intelligence agents." They claim recounts were not "real recounts." They state Wisconsin "practically admitted it was rigged" and that other states are doing the same. When told a case review found fewer than 475 cases of voter fraud in six battleground states, the speaker claims "they didn't look at the right things," alleging fake ballots. They maintain the election was "very rigged." The speaker believes they are "winning very well" in the upcoming election, citing a recent poll.

Governor Kemp is challenged to prove the fairness of his election by unsealing 150,000 mail-in ballots stored in a Fulton County warehouse for three and a half years. Allegations of fraud and counterfeit ballots being run through a scanner at night are supported by six affidavits. The speaker urges the governor to order a forensic audit of the ballots, as they are said to be on pristine paper with matching squiggly marks and unfolded envelopes that don't match the quantity. By doing so, the governor can demonstrate the fairness of the election, but it is implied that he is unwilling to take this step.

The speaker highlights statistical irregularities in the election results, pointing out multiple batches where Biden received all the votes and Trump received none. They assert that this is a statistical impossibility and challenge the media to stop denying the evidence of election fraud. The speaker emphasizes that the incorrect information has been publicly available for months and urges the Secretary of State to acknowledge it.

The speaker accuses the attorney general of committing fraud and calls the entire case a fraud. They believe it is election interference and is preventing them from being in Iowa and New Hampshire. The speaker strongly asserts that the attorney general is a fraud who has committed fraud.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

The speaker discusses election fraud in Chicago, explaining that there are three levels of fraud: precinct level, mid level, and the highest level involving the Chicago Board of Election. They believe that corrupt individuals can manipulate the central tabulator, which is not connected to the internet, by running algorithms. The speaker mentions a lawsuit filed in 2016 that resulted in three key individuals leaving their positions at the Chicago Board of Elections. They recount a recount experience that they believe was fraudulent, with votes being manipulated in favor of Hillary Clinton. Overall, the speaker expresses their belief in the existence of a fraudulent scheme in Chicago elections.

The speaker argues that even if there were a large number of additional ballots, the plaintiff has not proven that any of them were invalid or should not have been counted. They explain that every ballot received by Maricopa County goes through a thorough process of verification, including checking against voter registration records and a multi-level signature review. The speaker also dismisses the plaintiff's concerns about chain of custody, stating that there is no evidence or reason to believe it affected the lawful counting of votes or the outcome of the election, which Katie Hobbs won by over 17,000 votes.

The speaker accuses the other side of welcoming fraud and illegal voting without evidence. If proof is provided, they will continue reporting. The claim of rigging and cheating is serious, but more details are needed before making conclusions. Stay tuned for updates.

The speaker states that the recounts support the correct election outcome, providing assurance that Donald Trump won without doubt. While there is no strong evidence of fraud or cyberattacks, the incomplete counts make verification imperfect. President Obama ordered an investigation into hacking before leaving office, with intelligence agencies agreeing that hacking likely influenced the outcome. Although the speaker can sleep at night, they cannot completely rule out fraud. Another speaker mentions that the recounts further confirm that the election was not hacked, increasing confidence in the election. However, they also discovered that hacking a US presidential election would be even easier than initially believed.

The Georgia legislature is presenting a set of facts to the court asserting widespread voting irregularities in Georgia. They claim: - 2,506 felons voted illegally in Georgia. - 66,248 underage and therefore ineligible people were illegally registered to vote before their seventeenth birthday, when the law requires 17 years old. - At least 2,423 individuals voted who were not listed as registered. - 1,043 individuals cast ballots who had illegally registered to vote using a post office box. - 4,926 individuals voted in Georgia who had registered to vote after their Georgia voter registration date, thereby canceling their Georgia voter registration. - 10,315 or more individuals voted who were deceased by the time of the election. - 395 individuals voted in Georgia who had cast ballots in another state, which is illegal in both states. - 15,700 individuals voted in Georgia who had filed a national change of address with the United States Postal Service prior to 11/03/2020. - 40,279 individuals voted who had moved across county lines at least thirty days prior to election day and had failed to properly re-register to vote in their new county, also in violation of Georgia law. The petition to contest will include affidavits of more than one hundred Georgia voters sworn under penalty of perjury, attesting to and confirming multiple violations of the Georgia election code. You will hear from several of those witnesses today. They also assert there are issues of outright lies and potential fraud. The speakers contend that the actual results of legal ballots cast in the November election in compliance with the Georgia election code cannot be known ever, not by the secretary of state, not by the governor downstairs, not by the voting public, and not by this Georgia legislature.

The speaker claims to have won the election but was robbed of the job due to cheating. They believe the election was stolen from the people of Georgia and that thousands of voters had their voices stolen. They refuse to concede because they believe the process was unfair and the result was not true or right. They acknowledge that their opponent won an adequate number of votes but do not consider them the legitimate governor. They still believe their opponent won through voter suppression. The speaker emphasizes that the election was not fair and accuses their opponent of dismantling democracy in Georgia. They do not consider themselves the governor of Georgia.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

The speaker discusses the FBI Twitter files, DOJ Facebook, and other evidence of election fraud. They claim that thousands of votes were recorded on tape and that this information will be revealed during the trial. The speaker asserts that they won the election by a large margin but were faced with allegations of a rigged election. They express their unwavering belief that the election was indeed rigged and stolen, and express disappointment in the country for allowing it to happen.

The speaker expresses frustration with the current situation, stating "count me out" and "enough is enough." Despite considering Trump a consequential president, the speaker accepts court decisions in Wisconsin (4-3), Pennsylvania (second circuit), and Georgia (federal judge), even when disagreeing with them. The speaker disputes claims of widespread voter fraud, specifically allegations of 66,000 underage voters in Georgia and 8,000 felon voters in Arizona, stating that providing evidence has been impossible. The speaker acknowledges problems exist in every election but believes the current situation needs to end.

The speaker contends that the war is a conflict that should never have begun and attributes its initiation to the 2020 US presidential election being rigged. They assert that the war would not have started if that election had not been rigged. They declare that it was a rigged election and assert that “Everybody now knows that. They found out.” The speaker further states that “People will soon be prosecuted for what they did.” They describe the situation as breaking news, though they add that it should be breaking news as well. The speaker reiterates that “Those are rigged elections.”

Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for the audience's presence and states that they believe it is a sad day for America. Speaker 1 asserts that challenging an election should be allowed, as they believed the election was rigged and stolen. They mention other individuals who have also challenged elections in the past. Speaker 1 claims they did nothing wrong and accuses others of election interference. They thank the audience and reiterate their right to challenge what they perceive as a dishonest election. Speaker 0 concludes by thanking everyone and suggesting a future meeting.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking beyond what is shown on TV or in generic reports about elections. They explain that these are just interpretations and not official counts, making it difficult to prosecute any wrongdoing. To truly address the issue, one must delve into the intricate details of the process. The speaker mentions that they have only mentioned about half of the auditable touch points involved in elections, with many more unknown to the general public. These touch points are all documented with date and time stamps, similar to the 2,000 murals mentioned earlier.

It seems like there are concerns about election integrity and potential fraud. The speaker mentions the Mesa Docks and dropbox, suggesting that there may be issues with these. They also criticize the reporters on TV for not being truthful. The speaker believes that if there are more votes than voters, it should not be questioned. They mention Georgia Claws and ballot mules, implying that there may be manipulation happening. The speaker accuses those in power of not caring about the truth and suggests that lawsuits are being used to delay the process. They emphasize the importance of holding those responsible accountable.

The speaker states that the "best of the best" are investigating election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers and exploitation, allowing for the manipulation of vote results. This allegedly supports the mandate to implement paper ballots nationwide, with the goal of restoring voters' faith in election integrity.

The speaker discusses a recent change in county procedures, implying guilt. They highlight missing reports and email admissions of lacking crucial data for verifying votes. Reference is made to a legal case allowing election invalidation without proof of fraud. The speaker emphasizes violations of statutes and the need for relief due to irregularities. They urge action to set aside the election, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation.