reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker received a call that a car was found at 30 First, next to their farm, and authorities would be searching the area. They later received a text asking to set up a command unit on the property. The speaker discussed the terrain and buildings on the farm with law enforcement, mentioning an unlocked camper and house. They also informed them about an old, hard-to-access abandoned house on the hill. The speaker and a neighbor told the authorities that the buildings were unlocked. The speaker also heard reports of shots fired early in the morning. A neighbor claimed to have been awakened by a couple of shots while outside late at night.

I arrived 2 hours ago and saw a chaotic scene with cop cars and buses escorted in. Lots of police around. Suddenly everything went dark, then a mysterious event happened. QAnon hinted at something happening in the night sky. I believe people in the White House were arrested.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether the other is maintaining that there were no planes that hit the World Trade Center. Speaker 1 clarifies that this is not the claim they are making; rather, there is no significant wreckage from a large Boeing crash at any of the four events. This framing emphasizes a distinction between the presence of aircraft impact and the apparent absence of substantial debris. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 saw the videotape that others saw, prompting a response that encourages a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower. Speaker 1 asserts that what you will see is a “fake, a cartoon display,” arguing that an aluminum airplane cannot pass through a building like the South Tower as if it were thin air. In other words, Speaker 1 contends that the footage demonstrates a simulated or cartoon-like depiction rather than a real-time account of an aircraft penetrating the structure. Following this, Speaker 0 probes whether Speaker 1 is suggesting that the news media was involved in this fabrication, indicating a belief that media sources contributed to the apparent display. Speaker 1 affirms the suggestion by stating “Yes,” and notes that there was only one so-called real-time film, adding that “we don’t really understand how they did that.” This introduces a claim of media involvement and a mystery surrounding the production of the visible footage, implying manipulation or concealment of the true events. The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 mentioning that there are “video ex” (likely beginning to refer to video evidence or explanations) but the thought is cut off, leaving an incomplete reference to further material or evidence that would support the previous claims about the nature of the footage and the method by which it was produced.

After a choppy video call, an FBI agent visited my house regarding social media. They found nothing illegal but said it was a procedure. I referred them to my attorney, who tried contacting them with no response. Journalists also reached out with no reply. The FBI seems to be checking boxes at non-criminal homes. Share your thoughts on this.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they gained any evidence after a certain point, to which Speaker 1 responds that they weren't collecting evidence. Speaker 0 then questions if they should be able to recall such information. Speaker 1 clarifies that they presented themselves as witnesses, not investigators, when they approached the FBI. Speaker 0 suggests that they made a complaint without evidence, and Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that they believed a crime had occurred in good faith. Speaker 0 interrupts and asks why they didn't talk to Ken Paxton, but Speaker 2 requests that Speaker 1 be allowed to finish answering. The transcript ends.

James O'Keefe reports from Downtown Minneapolis that his team of undercover reporters is still inside the mob scene after covering a shooting this morning. He says they barely escaped alive as several hundred people surrounded them, threw ice bottles at their vehicle, and attempted to rip off his bulletproof vest. They were followed and tailed, and they received a message stating: “we know that you're in Minneapolis. You're with O'Keefe and his crew of Nazis. You're in a white Ford license plate. They actually wrote the license plate down from Florida. You have one hour to leave or you're dead.” They plan to produce their footage from the weekend along with hidden camera footage, while undercover teammates remain in the field. O'Keefe asks for prayers for his team's safety and mentions they have security with them—a former Marine—who said the situation was worse than overseas and worse than anything seen at the cartel border. He states they will contact law enforcement, DHS, and the FBI to try to exit safely and bring the news to viewers. He promises a report coming Tuesday at 01:00.

The speaker introduces Emmanuel Bearer as someone they consider extremely shady and outlines a request to obtain explicit footage of him, specifically who he was with in the crowd, and to identify every person in attendance. The speaker claims Bearer is a former Oracle engineer, likely from Germany, and notes that Bearer attended the event. They question how Bearer, a relatively obscure figure, became an eyewitness who appeared in Salt Lake City in coverage by the mainstream media, specifically mentioning PBS. The speaker asks how PBS or other media outlets knew to reach out to Bearer and whether Bearer tweeted or otherwise indicated he was there. The speaker describes a desire to understand the process by which Bearer was selected for media interviews and to replicate a method of on-the-ground reporting at the UVU campus rather than relying on Bearer’s account. They reference a prior incident involving Tiffany Barker to illustrate concerns about how media connections are made and how certain individuals gain attention. The speaker asks for clarification on how Emmanuel Bearer was chosen as an eyewitness and why mainstream media pursued him. The speaker then presents a clip of Bearer testifying on PBS, quoting Bearer: “I hear this loud sound, and I'm like, that wasn't what I thought it was, is it? I was like, no. This can't be happening right now. And we all ducked.” They note that Bearer appeared on nearly every news channel and mention that there may be a longer clip they could locate. Finally, the speaker appeals to anyone who attended the UVU event with Bearer to come forward to clarify who Bearer was with, to send photos, and to explain how Bearer became an eyewitness that the mainstream media wanted to speak to, expressing strong suspicion about the unattended appearance and coverage of Bearer.

Someone called the police about lights, claiming aliens were attacking. Police and fire trucks arrived at the scene. New cars were also present. People began to notice the activity.

Many people were detained in front of a house after a tip about possible child pornography. Authorities forced entry when the occupants refused to answer the door, finding illegal immigrants of Asian and Hispanic descent inside with restaurant supplies. Electronic devices were seized, but findings are unconfirmed.

- Inside the TCF center, Speaker 0 recounts that local media said the events didn’t happen. Patty called on November 4 from inside the TCF, saying: “I just heard that a van dropped off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night,” and she was working there that morning. - They filed a request to obtain the video, which took months to acquire, and they obtained the footage described as a gateway (likely a video) about the incident. They shared the video on Twitter and their site, and as a result they later lost their Twitter account after posting it. - The video shows a lead escort car arriving. Each time, someone adds something to one side, and then the van drives in. The van is said to have entered twice. - Local media, including one of the top reporters, is quoted as saying that this never happened, that he was there all night, and there was no fraud.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

Everything is blocked off, and there’s a heavy presence of military, police, and FBI agents. It’s strange that we’re being kept out of our own house. Things are definitely getting weird around here in Kelly.

Police are not releasing a suspect description at this time due to conflicting information received from numerous scared callers. The police are calling it a "fire hose of information." It is unknown whether the incident started with a brawl or involved more than one shooter. The situation is preliminary, and detectives are working to find a concurrent indication of what actually happened. A thorough investigation is underway due to people running in different directions.

Je ne peux pas confirmer si les onze maisons ont été fouillées ou triées. Il y a des enquêtes en cours et des tests en laboratoire à faire. Nous avons vu un véhicule partir, mais je ne peux pas dire s'il est lié à l'enlèvement. Tout est possible, merci pour votre compréhension. Translation: I cannot confirm if the eleven houses were searched or sorted. There are ongoing investigations and laboratory tests to be done. We saw a vehicle leave, but I cannot say if it is related to the abduction. Anything is possible, thank you for your understanding.

- The discussion centers on ballot processing in Maricopa County, with several shipments arriving after the initial belief that counting was near completion. Speaker 0 notes that the Wednesday before the Friday they quit voting, and ten days before they quit tabulating, more truckloads of ballots came in, leading to the question: “how can you not know how many ballots are still out there?” - Speaker 1 asks for clarification: “They thought they were done.” The conversation confirms multiple times that those running the counting rooms believed they were almost done, or would be done, on Wednesday morning, then Thursday morning, then Friday morning, and the process extended into the next week. - Trucks bringing ballots arrived on the third, fourth, and fifth days, continuing throughout the last week. The last day mentioned is the tenth, with ballots still arriving. The company involved is Runback, described as doing high-speed scanning and printing of duplications and military ballots. There was no observer presence at Runback, and Speaker 0 indicates she had not been called to work there; she does not know exactly what Runback was doing (printing vs. scanning). - It is stated that all high-speed scanning occurs at Runback, and the ballots go to Runback. There is uncertainty about off-site scanning and whether Dominion equipment was involved. Speaker 0 clarifies: “They were duplications, the ballots that wouldn’t read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas.” The number of additional sources for ballots beyond military/overseas is unknown, and Speaker 0 suggests this is a question for county employees to explain. - About the counting process: Speaker 0 confirms that the ballots went through tabulation machines and that adjudication work took place for those late arrivals. They observed the ballots being processed, but did not know the exact totals for certain days. - Daily volumes are described. Speaker 0 estimates: one day a shift might handle 90,000 ballots, and some days had similar volumes across three shifts; other days had fewer. There were days when as few as 15,000 ballots were processed. The “back door” arrivals are contrasted with the front door, with Speaker 0 noting that all back door ballots were received through back entries, not the front door. The remaining ballots in the latter part of the period continued to come in and be tabulated, with ongoing full-time shifts through the eighth, ninth, and tenth days. - The episode concludes with Speaker 1 seeking further explanation, and Speaker 0 indicating that some of the details were not fully known and that a county employee should clarify where the incoming ballots came from during the latter part of the period.

In Downtown Detroit at the TCF Center, a video discussion describes what a caller says happened during ballot processing. The account asserts that after precincts had counted ballots and were ready to close, three vehicles—a van, a Chrysler 300, and a Ferrari—arrived at about 4:00 a.m. with a claimed 130,000 ballots. The claim is that every one of these ballots were Biden ballots that had not been delivered to the precinct before its cutoff, constituting a “big irregularity” and suggesting voter fraud. The speakers say this is being contested by the president in a lawsuit for Michigan, with people who allegedly witnessed the event. Speaker 1 adds that back rooms at the facility enabled cars to drive in through a garage door, and that ballots appeared between 10:30 p.m. and 3:30 a.m. Approximately 38,000 ballots were said to have arrived in that window, with a reported count of 61 ballots described as being in USPS boxes. The boxes were not necessarily USPS-delivered; a white van with the city clerk’s emblem appeared to be delivering them, bearing the name Janice Winfrey and related tagline. The implication is that ballots arrived in an unverified, potentially improper manner. Speaker 2 notes possible additional vehicles present at the time and mentions that a mini panel truck with Detroit Elections Bureau regalia and a vehicle ID number was observed, with other people recording license plate information. The lack of verifiable chain of custody is emphasized: there was no confirmed Republican/Democrat presence during transfer, and seals on ballots were not verified. The speaker contrasts this with a suburbs experience where ballots were methodically processed, sealed, and tracked, implying Detroit’s process lacked similar controls. Speaker 3 explains that Gateway Pundit obtained video of the event after a delay, and that local media personnel claimed the event did not occur. The video shows an escort car and a lead car delivering items inside the facility, with the escort car reportedly from Pennsylvania and possibly a rental. The Michigan group, Patty’s group, counted drop-box ballots and reported about 1,340 to 1,400 ballots dropped in Detroit over the last two days. In contrast, after the shutdown, officials allegedly claimed 16,000 ballots were dropped in, with the question of where those additional ballots originated. Speaker 4 reinforces the Michigan group’s tally of roughly 1,340–1,400 ballots from drop boxes in Detroit in the adjacent period and points to the discrepancy between that count and the 16,000 ballots later cited, noting the eight-hour gap after the official closing time and the two separate deliveries to the TCF Center. The overarching claim is that these events indicate irregularities in ballot handling and raise questions about the source and legitimacy of the large ballot influx.

Inside the TCF center, Patty witnessed a band dropping off boxes of ballots in the middle of the night. After months of waiting, Gateway Point obtained the video and shared it on their site and Twitter. However, they lost their CLEAR account as a result. The video shows a lead car and an escort car arriving multiple times, adding something to the people inside. The van entered the center twice. Despite a top reporter denying any fraud or incidents, this video provides evidence to the contrary.

Currently, it is uncertain what will be decided. It is the first time this has occurred, and the speaker mentioned it twice. They met with a prominent local reporter who denied that this event ever took place.

The speaker claims that a video shows a van dropping off boxes of ballots at the TCF center. They put the video on their website and tweeted about it, resulting in the suspension of their Twitter account. The video shows a lead car and an escort car arriving, with people inside adding something each time. The van enters twice. However, a local reporter who was present all night denies any fraud or wrongdoing.

It is unknown what occurred in the final minutes or his intentions. However, he was present, and something seemingly transpired. The specifics remain unclear.

I was surprised this morning when the police came to my house with a search warrant. They informed me that not only my company, but several others are being investigated. I don't know the details of the investigation yet because it is still in progress. My lawyers will request access to the case so that I can understand what it is about. As one of the partners, I was subjected to the search. The company in question, which I am a partner of, was founded in 1980 and has a long history. It is a well-regulated company with all the necessary licenses and certifications. I want to thank everyone for their support and messages. I will share more information once I have access to the case. Thank you all for your messages.

We are currently locked inside the hotel for our safety, as I have taken the precaution of locking the entrance to keep them out. However, they are persistently attempting to gain access.

Inside the TCF center, a person named Patty claimed to have witnessed a van delivering boxes of ballots in the middle of the night. After obtaining the video footage, it was shared on their website and Twitter, resulting in the suspension of their Twitter account. The video shows a lead car escorting the van, which entered the center twice. Despite a local reporter denying any fraudulent activity, the video contradicts their claims.

Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.

Fox claims the area is being cleaned up because important leaders are visiting.