reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Fox News reports new information that appears to contradict the Biden administration’s stance that it had nothing to do with DOJ investigations into then-President Trump’s alleged retention of classified material and the Mar-a-Lago raid. Correspondent David Spunt notes emails obtained by Fox News show coordination between the White House counsel’s office and the DOJ regarding an interview of Walt Nada, a current White House aide to President Biden who was then a former Trump aide in Florida. Nada was later charged alongside Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The May 10, 2022 email reads in part: “coordination with DOJ and White House counsel are in work to start the process to confirm and interview current administration employee Walt Nada. This event is dependent upon the timeline of president Biden's brief decision and coordination between White House counsel and DOJ and, in turn, Evan Corcoran's position on the override of privilege assertion and whether or not he seeks an injunction to prevent access.” The email was written by an FBI agent and Evan Corcoran, one of Trump’s lawyers at the time. The report notes that August would mark four years since the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Following this, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “I personally approve the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. Second, the department does not take such a decision lightly.” Reaction to the emails includes House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan stating, “it's always worse than we thought” and that the newly released documents confirm the Biden DOJ’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was politically motivated. Attorney General Pam Bondi weighs in, saying the more we learn about the DOJ weaponization under the prior administration, the worse the story gets. Bondi adds, “we will continue disclosing key evidence to our congressional partners to deliver the truth and bring those who committed crimes to justice.”

The FBI's alleged involvement with the Biden family has been confirmed by Senator Chuck Grassley. He revealed that the FBI had 40 informants within the Biden family for the past 15 years, providing criminal information to field offices. This suggests that the FBI has been aware of the Bidens' activities, including alleged blackmail and corruption. Grassley also claimed that FBI headquarters blocked attempts to investigate this criminal activity, labeling it as foreign disinformation. Meanwhile, the FBI has been accused of planting information against Donald Trump and manipulating evidence. The result is a compromised president and negative consequences for the American people, such as higher costs, open borders, increased crime, and difficulties managing international conflicts.

Speaker 0: You broke this incredible story about NSA intercepts showing Ukrainian officials basically discussing a plot to funnel back millions in American aid money back to the Biden 2024 campaign through, you know, none other than USAID. I mean Yeah. Really, I guess it shouldn't surprise us anymore, but it should shock us. You know, can you walk us through it and, you know, what else we need to know? Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's give everybody a little quick history lesson because the context of this is important. In 2016, we know that The US the Ukrainian embassy in The United States was advocating for Hillary Clinton's campaign. They the ambassador even wrote an op ed doing so. Yeah. In the period before that, they were enriching the Ukrainian gas company. Barisma was enriching Joe Biden's son Hunter. So Ukrainians generally have had a leftward lurch in their support in the American political system, sometimes very overtly, like putting Hunter Biden on the board or Burisma or their ambassador writing an op ed saying they would prefer Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump in 2016. Then we get through the whole impeachment scandal. We're told, don't believe any of that Ukrainian liberal preference. Turns out it was all true. It wasn't a conspiracy theory. Hunter Biden and the Democratic party were deeply entangled with the Ukrainian government, Ukrainian businesses. And we lived through that. Joe Biden's in the White House. And in 2022 and early twenty three, his fundraising is lagging even though he's the incumbent. He's got the problems with the Afghanistan withdrawal, questions about his mental acuity, enormous unpopularity, particularly when it comes to an open border. And so it's at that moment when NSA guys with headphones on are listening and they intercept a series of conversations. Some of these are probably on email. And it's a senior government official in the Ukrainian government of president Zelenskyy talking about a plot, that has been discussed with USAID workers, our foreign aid agency workers in Kyiv to give a $2,300,000,000 clean energy grant to Ukraine. Now Ukraine's in the middle of a war with Russia. The last thing they're gonna be building is some clean energy project. They're trying Speaker 0: to They're not building solar panels and you're getting bombed every day. It's probably not a great use of a panel. Speaker 1: Complete ruse. And they even say so. Listen, the intercept suggests that this is not gonna be a justified project. But you'll spend the money, and then by the time they discover it, won't it be recoverable. And the goal is take that money, then you're gonna give it to nongovernmental organizations, nonprofits, then they're gonna hire subcontractors with the USAID money. And then those subcontractors are gonna hire American companies. And those American companies are then gonna move the money into the coffers of Joe Biden's 2024 campaign and the Democratic National Committee. And they said they hope to arrange this in such a way that 90% of the money that originally came from you and I taxpayers through USAID to Ukraine would ultimately be laundered into the DNC and Joe Biden to help his 2024 campaign. That's what's been captured. That was only recently discovered. That intercept or series of intercepts were not ever brought to the attention of anyone at the FBI or anyone during the Biden years. Tulsi Gabbard just recently found it. She's asked the USAID to go look and see if they can find the contract. Did it happen? Was there some fraud involved? And so there's a beginning of an investigation to find out what whether whether what was discussed ultimately transpired, and we should know answers in a couple of weeks. Speaker 0: I mean, do we trust

A credible whistleblower claims that the Department of Justice has evidence of President Joe Biden's involvement in a criminal scheme with a foreign national. The whistleblower alleges that Biden exchanged money for policy decisions while he was vice president. Senator Chuck Grassley supports these allegations and is issuing a subpoena to the FBI and Chris Wray to release the document. The White House denies the claims, calling them unfounded and politically motivated. Former White House staffers and IRS whistleblowers provide additional evidence of Biden's involvement in corrupt activities. Hunter Biden's finances are also under scrutiny, with potential tax and gun charges being considered. Joe Biden has been absent from the public eye recently.

The FBI's alleged involvement with the Biden family has been confirmed by Senator Chuck Grassley. He stated that the FBI had 40 informants within the Biden family for the past 15 years, providing criminal information to field offices nationwide. This suggests that the FBI has been aware of the Bidens' activities, including alleged blackmail and corruption. Grassley also revealed that the FBI headquarters blocked attempts to investigate this criminal activity, labeling it as foreign disinformation. Meanwhile, the FBI has been accused of planting information against Donald Trump and manipulating evidence. This situation has led to a compromised president and negative consequences for the American people, such as rising prices, an open border, increased crime, and difficulties in managing proxy wars.

The transcript reports that the FBI recruited a member of Governor Gavin Newsom’s inner political circle to wear a wire as early as June 2024. The cooperating witness is identified as Alexis Podesta, described as a veteran Sacramento Democrat who worked under former Governor Jerry Brown. It says Podesta worked “under” Jerry Brown in 2020 and that Newsom appointed her in 2020 to the board of the State Compensation Insurance Fund, a position she still holds. The transcript states that Podesta later became a key cooperating witness in a federal corruption case against Newsom’s former chief of staff, Dana Williamson. It says Williamson pleaded guilty in May to federal fraud and tax charges. A major turn is attributed to a New York Post report, which the transcript quotes as saying that Democrat insider Alexis Podesta secretly recorded conversations during the criminal probe into Newsom’s then chief of staff, Dana Williamson. The transcript connects this timeline to why Sacramento political insiders and lobbyists were reportedly stunned to receive FBI letters last fall informing them their phone calls had been intercepted during the investigation. It states that the wiretap would have been authorized during the Biden administration. The transcript also describes the process for federal wiretaps, stating that investigators must establish probable cause, show a wiretap is necessary, and obtain DOJ approval, after which a federal judge must sign off.

I'm at the airport, fresh from a White House meeting with President Trump, Vice President Vance, Attorney General Bondi, and FBI Director Patel. We were presented with a binder labeled "Epstein Files Phase One," meant to be transparent, per the President's order to declassify everything. Initially, Attorney General Bondi expected bombshells, the "dark stuff," but the binder wasn't what she anticipated. It felt incomplete. Then, late last night, a source from within the Southern District of New York (SDNY) contacted Bondi, revealing that the SDNY was concealing hundreds, maybe thousands, of additional Epstein-related documents from everyone, including the President.

Transcript centers on accusations tied to WikiLeaks Podesta emails, noting alleged coded language and a claim about guests at a party. It links these allegations to prior reporting about a person connected to the Podesta family. It also mentions alleged patterns in art collected by John Podesta and extends to his brother Tony Podesta, who reportedly stepped down amid a legal issue. A Washington Post article from 2004 is cited describing Tony Podesta’s home as having controversial imagery, with the images later scrubbed online. The speaker presents censored interior photos to illustrate the point and questions whether either brother will face justice, framing the issue as a test of the administration’s commitment to the rule of law.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

Transcript describes allegations from a Daily Caller investigation regarding Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass. It claims Bass accepted campaign donations totaling over $1,000,000 from two bankers linked to the Chinese Communist Party and connected to the United Front Work Department, described in the report as China's primary intelligence and influence operation. The transcript states that immediately after receiving these donations, Bass appointed the two bankers to a mayoral transition advisory team, the group charged with guiding policy and staffing decisions for the entire administration. The summary notes that these materials are presented as findings from the Daily Caller investigation publicly.

The speaker mentions that an investigator's work was compromised due to political considerations. The investigator, referred to as Michael, does not provide specific details about his client or the target of the investigation. However, it is revealed that the investigation is related to Hunter Biden. The speaker also mentions that two years ago, Biden claimed to be cooperative when the Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an investigation into his finances. The FBI collected evidence to potentially charge Biden with tax crimes and shared their findings with the US attorney in Delaware. Since then, there has been no further information or updates.

Director Wray, the speaker expresses concern about the politicization of the Department of Justice and the FBI during the Biden administration. They believe that senior officials have allowed these institutions to be politicized. The speaker mentions FBI agents who are unhappy with the weakening of institutional integrity due to the DOJ being treated as a political weapon. They focus on the investigation into corruption allegations involving Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. The speaker presents a WhatsApp text message from Hunter Biden to a senior Chinese communist, suggesting that Joe Biden would retaliate if a commitment was not fulfilled. They mention an IRS whistleblower who testified that the DOJ blocked attempts to obtain GPS data on Joe Biden's phone. The speaker questions whether the FBI tried to determine the locations of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden when the text was sent. Director Wray defers to the ongoing investigation led by special counsel Weiss. The speaker accuses the DOJ and underlings of trying to stop the investigation and allowing the statute of limitations to expire. They mention another testimony from the IRS whistleblower, alleging that an Assistant US attorney stated that a search warrant would not be approved due to political optics. The speaker questions whether the FBI allows political optics to hinder corruption investigations. Director Wray reiterates that they follow the facts and cannot discuss ongoing investigations. The speaker criticizes Director Wray for not doing the work and hiding behind the attorney general.

Spencer Pratt released a new video, which was described as rocking the political world and triggering intense reaction in Los Angeles. The video was framed as more than a concession, presented instead as a declaration of war. It was reported to have reached 1.1 million views, 10,000 reposts, and 43,000 likes within minutes. In the video, Spencer Pratt claimed he would not leave the race or leave politics and said that after “they stole it from him,” he possessed criminal material involving lead candidates in the race, which he said would cause them to drop out and resign in disgrace. Spencer Pratt’s message also claimed that his mission to “save Los Angeles” was moving from a campaign phase to a more aggressive phase. He said he had ridiculed and “slayed everybody,” then announced he wanted to apologize to “absolutely nobody.” He rejected claims that he was in the race for a “grift” or to roll up and leave if he didn’t reach City Hall, stating that he aimed to expose a “corrupt machine” and said nothing had changed. He described the situation as “war” and “zero hour for Los Angeles,” attacking “two morons” he said were responsible for the city’s problems and predicting intensified harm if they received four more years. Pratt alleged that major developers, hoteliers, business owners, and entrepreneurs were texting him that they were packing up and leaving town, and said this would lead to fewer tax revenues and cuts to services, including more potholes, fewer firefighters, and less police patrols. He claimed there would be more criminals and drug addicts terrorizing communities. He cited images of the city as proof of worsening conditions, including weeds growing from cracks, graffiti across public spaces, and garbage, drugs, and abandoned storefronts. He said Angelenos were about to “reward the arsonists” with more destruction and claimed he would continue stopping “commie animals.” He stated that “we have some recordings” involving one of the “exalted candidates,” which he said would make her resign in shame, asserting he saved them for the general election. He repeatedly urged Karen Nithya to ask whether an employee may have a recording that would force resignation. He then claimed that the FBI was going to “bust in the door” and said they were coming. The transcript also discussed a comparison to Donald Trump and included claims of public excitement over Pratt’s communications. It stated that Steve Hilton had been doing television and interviews, saying he plans to run with Spencer Pratt. The transcript claimed this included on-the-record statements by Steve Hilton about running with Pratt, raising questions about Pratt’s role. It further stated that HUD Secretary Turner announced ending “fraud-filled homeless funding” for Los Angeles, and that HUD federal dollars were being used, per the transcript’s claim, to rig elections by paying for “infinity homeless people to live in Los Angeles.” In a separate exchange, one person asked whether they had talked to Spencer Pratt, and another replied they had not spoken with him since then. The discussion described support for substantive plans, especially on homelessness, and stated that the door would be open to working with Pratt without rushing. They added that they had not yet heard from him publicly.

The transcript centers on a long-form discussion of the Epstein case, the alleged “deep state,” FOIA operations, and political maneuvering around Trump, with frequent calls to aggressively release and pursue Epstein-related documents and other investigations. The speakers assert that the FOIA department is being used to shield deep-state ties and that many federal offices are filled with anti-Trump figures who have prevented full disclosure. - Epstein files and the role of the deep state - The speakers claim the Epstein files are being selectively redacted by FOIA departments to conceal deep-state connections. They state that FOIA personnel are controlled by deep-state actors and that Epstein’s case involves a “fleet of aircraft” and operations linked to major power centers. They argue Epstein’s activities connect to money laundering, information laundering, and a broader set of deep-state assets and operations. - They propose a remedy: appoint Tom Fitton as special counsel on the Epstein files, arguing he “knows how FOIA really works,” understands key personnel, and has litigated Epstein-related cases for years. They assert this would restore public confidence and expedite the exposure of Democratic ties and other actors alleged to be involved. - They advocate for Trump to have executive-privilege-style powers to declassify and release Epstein materials, suggesting a broad interpretation of “Epstein file law” that would allow him to disclose or appoint an ombudsman with power to release materials at will. They emphasize the need to disclose Democratic ties and to hold press conferences when releasing documents, avoiding the use of fake documents or videos. - Specific figures and institutions named - Kash Patel is cited as saying there are “open files on a dozen plus coconspirators” and as someone who has noted alleged misdirections by those handling Epstein-related material. - Kyle Serafin and Phil Kennedy are mentioned as documenting a person at the FBI capacity who is “an anti-Trump advocate,” implying that deep-state appointments control FOIA and related processes. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss replacing FOIA and related personnel who are deeply implicated; they specifically name Tom Fitton as the ideal choice and entertain other high-profile figures like Tulsi Gabbard as potential custodians of the Epstein disclosures. - Tulsi Gabbard is described as being in charge of broader investigations tied to the Epstein files and other major political issues (elections, COVID-19, etc.). They also reference “Epstein files” intersecting with other investigations they attribute to the deep state. - Epstein, Maxwell, and allied networks - Epstein is described as deeply embedded with Western intelligence agencies (French, Israeli, UK, and US) and tied to Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell’s daughter linked to Epstein. Epstein is portrayed as having been “recruited by Bill Barr” and as a central figure in a long-running intelligence and blackmail operation. - The discussion links Epstein to Leslie Wexner (Victoria’s Secret founder) and a French talent agency, portraying these connections as part of a large, interconnected network involved in money laundering, arms trafficking, blackmail, and intelligence work. - The speakers insist that Epstein’s activities extended to the late 1990s and beyond, including alleged involvement in “Shutters” in Santa Monica and other high-profile cases, with a consistent pattern of using underage girls and blackmail to exert influence. - They emphasize a broader motive: exposing the “deep state” to vindicate Trump and indict deep-state actors who allegedly engaged in illicit operations, including foreign intelligence services and Western governments. - The broader political frame and potential indictments - The Epstein files are presented as a potential hinge for indicting a wide array of figures across political lines, including references to Comey, Mueller, Hillary Clinton-era actors, and other “rogue actors” who allegedly hindered investigations. - The conversation ties Epstein to broader themes: the 2020 election, COVID policies, and anti-Trump actions by the “deep state.” They contend that the Epstein disclosures could demonstrate the depth of state interference in political processes and media, making Democrats and their institutions targets of accountability. - They argue the Epstien files could show criminal activity by multiple national actors, including Israeli, UK, and French components, and could reveal coordinated efforts to derail Trump and manipulate media narratives. - The Candace Owens angle and related criticisms - A substantial portion of the dialogue critiques Candace Owens, alleging she is running a “CIA-style” operation that distracts from the true conspiracy around the deep state and Tarantifa, and that she manipulates narratives related to Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk. - They accuse Owens of shifting narratives, fabricating alibis, and promoting disinformation, calling her a “SIOP” (psychological operation) and alleging her behind-the-scenes connections to MI6 or other international actors through her husband (George Farmer) and other associates. - They recount multiple incidents where Owens purportedly changed stories about meetings, alibis, and involvement in various investigations, asserting she uses “receipts” selectively and inconsistently to support divergent claims. - The speakers allege that Owens’s public warfare against Trump and TP USA is part of a broader intelligence operation intended to disrupt conservative momentum, link to Royal/MI6 circles, and undermine investigations into the deep state and its networks. - Tyler Robinson case and media dynamics - They describe Tyler Robinson as a Middle American figure whose transformation into a political actor is portrayed as a product of online radicalization and Tarantifa-linked influences. They claim there was a concerted effort to spoon-feed disinformation about Robinson and Candace Owens’ involvement. - They argue this is part of a larger pattern of media manipulation and disinformation designed to distract from real conspiracies and to target Trump and conservative movements. - Strategy and messaging guidance - The speakers advocate for Trump to go on the offensive with Epstein, releasing comprehensive, verified documentation, and pushing accountability for “rogue actors” in the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the NSA. - They stress the need for aggressive prosecution and the appointment of trusted figures to lead the Epstein disclosures, arguing that this could restore public confidence and pivot the political conversation toward accountability for the deep state. - They urge addressing the statute of limitations issues in COVID, January 6, and 2020 election-related cases before the window closes in early 2026, warning that delays by Bondi, Blanche, and others could jeopardize prosecutions and political support. - Promotional and logistical notes - The dialogue includes frequent mentions of promoting Alex Jones programs, products, and stores (alexjonesstore.com and infowarsstore.com) to fund operations, along with appeals to listeners to support the broadcasts financially and through purchases, framing financial support as essential to sustaining investigations, media efforts, and broader political action. In sum, the transcript presents an entangled, aggressively conspiratorial narrative: a claim that Epstein’s files illuminate a vast, deeply embedded deep-state apparatus spanning multiple nations and agencies; a call to appoint trusted figures (notably Tom Fitton) to supervise full disclosure; a push for Trump to declassify and publicly prosecute the implicated actors; a harsh critique of Candace Owens as part of a disinformation ecosystem; and a broader strategy to use Epstein, along with related investigations, to dismantle perceived institutional corruption while fueling political narratives and fundraising.

Last week, I spoke about the FBI hiding an unclassified document, known as the 10/23, from Congress and the American people. The FBI eventually agreed to show the document to Congress, but it was heavily redacted. The 10/23 allegedly involves a bribery scheme between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and a foreign national. The Justice Department then announced charges against former President Trump for mishandling classified records. This senator is committed to fighting political corruption in the Department of Justice and the FBI by promoting transparency. The 10/23 contains references to audio recordings of conversations between the foreign national and the Bidens. It is crucial for the American people to have access to the unredacted document to understand the truth and hold the FBI and Justice Department accountable. Congress must continue to fight for transparency and release the document without unnecessary redactions.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

The transcript centers on explosive allegations and questions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, and possible intelligence connections. It begins with a report that the Wall Street Journal obtained Epstein’s private calendar, which allegedly shows meetings with powerful figures who would seem unlikely to associate with a convicted sex offender. Epstein allegedly met Catherine Rumler, one of Barack Obama’s top lawyers, and Rumler reportedly met Epstein dozens of times. Epstein supposedly tried to set up Rumler to work for Bill Gates. The narrative raises the question: how could Epstein be a fixer between Obama’s lawyer and Gates? The account continues with Epstein meeting Joe Biden’s CIA director, though it notes that Burns was not CIA director at the time but Obama’s deputy secretary of state, working under John Kerry at the State Department, and later becoming CIA director. It is claimed that Burns went to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, where Epstein’s activities included sex with underage girls and video of others doing the same. The speaker speculates about whether Burns saw a portrait of Bill Clinton in a blue dress in Epstein’s parlor. The timeline suggests that Epstein was arrested and later hanged in jail with security camera failures and guards asleep, and that two years afterward Biden appointed Burns as CIA director. The implication drawn is that Epstein was an intelligence asset, potentially connected to the CIA, Israeli intelligence, and possibly Russian intelligence, and that he was allowed to traffic and molest girls for blackmail material. The speakers say they asked CIA director William Burns why he met with a convicted sex offender; Burns replies that Epstein was introduced as an expert in the financial services sector and offered general advice on a private-sector transition, and that there was no formal relationship. The narrative asserts that this interaction could explain a 2002–2006 sweetheart deal, a prison-cell cover-up, and why Epstein’s tapes went missing, with Fed seizure of tapes and only madam Ghislaine Maxwell arrested since then. There are testimonies about Epstein’s access to sex tapes and the belief that the CIA possesses them and has used them for blackmail, including “hours of video” from Epstein Island, the Manhattan townhouse, the Palm Beach estate, and a New Mexico ranch. Bill Clinton is said to have flown on Epstein’s plane multiple times and to have been close friends with him. Separately, Epstein is described as obsessed with transhumanism and life-extension technologies. The New Mexico ranch is claimed to be a base for impregnating women to seed humanity, with allegations of 20 women pregnant at once, and an 8,000-square-foot underground level at Zoro Ranch. A submarine license allegedly held by Ghislaine Maxwell and transport to Epstein Island via underwater submarine port is mentioned, as is proximity to a US military submarine base near St. Thomas and Water Island, owned by Joe Biden’s brother. The transcript also references various other strange claims: Epstein’s dinners with tech elites such as Bill Gates and attempted contacts with Elon Musk; a controversial SCNT discussion about using the DNA of “curvy, sexy black women from Africa”; questions about missing or underground locations for children; and a closing note that people may be acting under orders or threats related to tapes. Overall, the piece presents a tapestry of alleged high-level connections, missing evidence, blackmail material, and conspiratorial episodes surrounding Epstein and his network.

Host: Epstein is Pizzagate. Ten years ago, Pizzagate was the top Twitter trend, with the claim that pedophile elites preyed on children deemed insane by many. I was the first mainstream reporter to dare present the facts around Pizzagate; my corporate career was destroyed, and others who suggested it were blacklisted or shadow banned. But just days ago, the largest dump of Epstein files revealed what some of us have been telling you for a decade: Pizzagate is real. Not that there’s a pizza parlor at the center of a child trafficking ring, but that child trafficking rings run by powerful people do exist. Tonight, I want to remind you of what I told you then and compare it to what we have learned. Guest: Pizzagate became a major story when an armed man went to a DC-area pizza place to investigate for himself, firing a rifle at the floor. The media labeled the entire story a hoax or fake news. I spent the last month investigating. So what exactly is Pizzagate? The story known as Pizzagate did not begin with a rumor, nor was it created by Macedonian sheep farmers as CNN claimed. It began with WikiLeaks, authentic verified emails from John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Those emails were real, and within them were communications that researchers and former law enforcement found unusual. A group of self-proclaimed pedophiles on 4chan and 8chan claimed Podesta was using their coded language. An urban dictionary entry from 2010 confirms that “cheese pizza” is a commonly coded term for child pornography. Host: I want you to see these images. The triangle in the Besta Pizza logo was linked to a “boy lover” image, and Besta Pizza changed its logo after Pizzagate investigators pointed it out, removing the triangle. Guest: Ten years ago I was dismissed as a dangerous conspiracy theorist for suggesting pedophiles and possibly elite pedophiles might use coded language, even though online pedophiles themselves acknowledged it. The new Epstein release mentions the word “pizza” 911 times in emails, often paired with “grape soda.” Examples include: “Well, this is better than a Chinese cookie. Let’s go for pizza and grape soda again.” “Mister Epstein would like to see the menu from the pizza place. Could you someone send it, please?” and a 2014 note: “Are you sitting? Jeffrey says he wants to go out to a pizza place with you.” The emails range around 2014, similar to the Podesta emails published by WikiLeaks, which started the Pizzagate saga. Host: There was talk about the Podesta brothers; John Podesta’s email showed a close relationship with Dennis Hastert, who was sentenced to fifteen months for abusing boys. An email from John Podesta to his brother Tony, “last night was fun,” begins with “still in torture chamber.” A 2009 Epstein email asking “where are you? You okay? I love the torture video” gained attention. Guest: The Epstein files show communications between elites—from a co-owner of an NFL team to billionaires like Elon Musk—described in coverage as a closer look at connections from Hollywood to Washington and beyond. CNN and other outlets allegedly suppressed discussion for a decade, conditioning the public to ignore the topic. There has been no public investigation by local police, the FBI, or others, raising the question of why no investigation has taken place. This is presented as evidence that the establishment protected and sustained this evil by avoiding honest engagement in 2016, choosing mockery over investigation, thereby creating the environment in which the mystery could thrive. Epstein is Pizzagate, and Pizzagate is bigger than Jeffrey Epstein alone.

My team found evidence that former Vice President Biden kept classified materials after leaving office. In an audio recording, Biden told his ghostwriter he found classified documents in his home as a private citizen in Virginia.

The speaker mentions that a foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden has audio recordings of his conversations with them. There are 17 recordings in total, with 15 being phone calls between the foreign national and Hunter Biden, and 2 being phone calls between the foreign national and then vice president Joe Biden. These recordings were kept as an insurance policy by the foreign national. It is suggested that Joe Biden may have been involved in employing Hunter Biden. The speaker questions why the Justice Department and FBI haven't focused on the Biden family like they did with former president Trump. The relevance of these recordings to a bribery scheme is highlighted.

The transcript reports that overnight the United States government, specifically the National Security Agency, intercepted conversations of Zelenskyy’s government in Ukraine in late 2022. The conversations allegedly involved conspi­ring with federal workers at USAID to devise a plan to take $200,000,000 of USAID money, route it through a series of transactions, move it into the United States, and launder it into Joe Biden’s 2024 campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The presenter says there are intercepts for the first time and that Chelsea Gabbard’s team was willing to declassify them. An investigation is underway beginning with USAID to determine who was involved and whether any crimes were committed, with referrals to the FBI anticipated in the next few days. The documents are said to be declassified and available at justthenews.com, and members of Congress have been clamoring to access them. The presenter expects Tulsi Gabbard to make a statement later tonight on the investigation’s evolution. The discussion shifts to a framing of a transition from the era of weaponization, where prosecutors and FBI agents were used to target Donald Trump and his supporters, to a potential situation where there is conspiring with foreign powers to influence elections. The Ukraine matter is cited as the latest development. The speaker recalls a claim made three weeks earlier about FBI proof that China sent thousands of driver’s licenses to the United States with fake names to obtain fake ballots to vote for Joe Biden in the 2020 election, labeling these as words of the FBI informant in FBI documents that were made public. The presenter then notes that China may be conspiring with Joe Biden and the Democrats, and now possibly Ukraine, with two investigations underway. The speaker promises to keep listeners apprised of developments.

John Nance and Hogan DeGidley discuss a recent FBI case and press conference. Patel’s FBI has been extremely transparent, and that transparency will continue to reassure the American people that information regarding this subject will flow as appropriate without jeopardizing the prosecution of the case. A key takeaway is the suggestion that forensic evidence could be the linchpin to identifying the suspect, despite millions of data lines to review; pieces such as DNA or a fingerprint related to the pipe bombs themselves may have been the actual “smoking gun.” There is emphasis on teamwork and the idea that information had been left to collect dust rather than being newly uncovered. AG Merrick Garland’s remarks are cited, highlighting that the evidence leading to the arrest had been sitting at the FBI for years. The FBI, along with US Attorney Piro and prosecutors, worked tirelessly for months sifting through evidence that had been at the FBI with the Biden administration for four years. The point is made that there was no new tip or new witness, just diligent police work and prosecutorial effort. Hogan DeGidley asks why the case wasn’t cracked during President Biden’s four years in office. The response suggests that it either couldn’t be done or wouldn’t be done, and that the American people suffered as a result. It is stated that this did not come from new evidence but from information already in the bureau and departments being sifted through. The discussion frames the case as a win for the administration, the FBI, and the DOJ, and a step toward transparency, accountability, and justice. They note that the attackers placed pipe bombs at both the RNC and DNC locations; the motives remain unknown, and questions about a possible Antifa link or other theories are mentioned as preliminary. Cash Patel is quoted as saying the FBI has committed to being the most transparent law enforcement operation in U.S. history while ensuring accountability in the courts with U.S. Attorneys and prosecutors. The aim is to divulge information when prudent and constitutionally permissible, safeguarding the case, to secure the nation’s capital and allow Americans to live in safe, secure neighborhoods. This is attributed to leadership from the FBI Washington Field Office. John Nance comments that Patel is doing a very good job and that the director’s social-media transparency is notable. He expresses encouragement about the FBI’s reform efforts and notes that the White House press narrative around January 6 is seen as misaligned with the pipe-bomb case. The arrest took place in Woodbridge, Virginia, a wealthy DMV suburb, prompting remarks about why the dots weren’t connected sooner.