reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Chaque seconde, l'orateur réinvente son identité sur papier. Son genre importe peu; il est non genré le matin, dromadaire, et fraise de Cavaillon. Il veut être emmerdé et en zébés. **Translation:** Every second, the speaker reinvents their identity on paper. Their gender matters little; they are non-gendered in the morning, a dromedary, and a Cavaillon strawberry. They want to be bothered and in a state of disarray.

Teacher Darren's pronouns are z, zer, zer, zerz, and zerself, and they identify as gender neutral, neither female nor male. Students should refer to them as Teacher Darren, without "mister" or "missus." While Teacher Darren can be pretty or handsome, they are not a lady. A student questioned why they have to learn this, and Teacher Darren responded that the world is changing. A student stated that not the whole world is like this, and Teacher Darren suggested starting in the classroom. Another student asked if they could use "she, her" pronouns when talking to their parents about Teacher Darren, but Teacher Darren said no, and suggested the student educate their parents. A student stated that their parents might get angry and confront Teacher Darren, but Teacher Darren dismissed this concern, stating that these are their pronouns and that's the way the world is working. Another student asked if this was part of the curriculum, but the response was cut off.

The speaker discusses the concept of identity and ego, emphasizing that our roles and sense of self are social constructs. They explain that the feeling of a separate "I" is an illusion, and the true self is interconnected with everything else. The speaker encourages relaxation and acceptance of this interconnected nature, as it is the fundamental essence of existence.

The speaker expresses frustration about being misgendered and reacts strongly with disbelief. They attempt to correct the misgendering but are unsuccessful.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire to be respected for their unconventional choices, including killing from above and without reason. They accuse those who don't accept them of being intolerant and ask them to examine their privilege. Speaker 1 shares their personal experience of being born as a tank but feeling excluded from the numerous gender options available today. They question the purpose behind constantly inventing new genders.

My pronouns are they/them, but for this meeting, I'm sharing that I use she/they/him. This often leads to complex discussions about gender, which we don't typically have. I once asked my father, "Do you know what it means to be a man?" He said no. Then, "Do you know what it means to be a woman?" Again, he said no. And that's where I'm at too. My womanhood isn't defined by childbearing or feminine behavior, and my manhood isn't about my genitalia. Understanding gender identity is a key part of being in the LGBTQ community.

The speaker expresses assumptions about individuals who include their pronouns when applying for a job. They assume that these individuals are liberal, not hardworking, and require special treatment in the workplace. The speaker believes that everyone around them would have to walk on eggshells and that they would be lazy, entitled, and likely to sue. The speaker concludes that including pronouns does not benefit these individuals.

The transcript centers on self-expression, identity, and life at a colorful school and wedding setting. "When you're trying to decide, think about all the things you like to do. Just be you. Just be me." "He's the undisputed champion of my heart." "I can't wait for my mom to feast her eyes on this." "I'm trans, Norma. And everyone at school knows and everyone at home knows. And being here, it's like a whole new place. I can just be Barney, and I can choose if and when I tell people. I've never been happier." "I'm Frankie. Pronouns, they them." "My full name is Frankie Stein." "As a transberry, I love living out loud as my most authentic self, and I wanted to dress as bold and unique as I am, which, let's face it, is a tall order."

Speaker 0 introduces the topic and initiates the conversation. Speaker 1 acknowledges the person next to them as their friend and highlights the challenges they have faced to reach their current position. They affirm the validity of using preferred pronouns.

The speaker highlights that the question of gender identities is exciting because there are many more than just male and female. They state that there are over 100 gender identities, if not more. The speaker notes that some people may feel like they have two different genders, referring to bigender. They also mention individuals who identify as genderqueer, meaning they might not want to be anything in particular and choose to be themselves.

In a playful exchange, Speaker 0 asserts identity through a self-character lens: “I’m I’m a character. I’m my own character.” They declare, “Maybe I’m the main character, though,” signaling a sense of personal centrality. Speaker 0 also jokes about humility, adding, “I’m maybe the one of the most humble people.” The mood is light and introspective, focusing on how each person can feel like their own protagonist. Speaker 1 responds, “We all get you we all get,” reinforcing that the group understands this self-referential idea. In a moment of affection, Speaker 0 tells the group, “We like you, Sandy,” and then questions status within the group: “We like For Jim? We like you more than any of these other ones.” The dialogue crescendos with a humorous line: “Oh, shit. Am I the star in your own,” suggesting a shared recognition of who occupies the “main character” role. The exchange concludes with Speaker 0 affirming the self-centering motif: “You are your own you are your own.” Overall, the speakers explore themes of self-identity, humility, mutual understanding, and fondness within the group, highlighting the idea that each person can feel like the protagonist of their own story while expressing affection toward Sandy.

I love talking about what it means to be non binary. I'm non binary. And so I use they, them, their pronouns. So when we think about non binary, really what we're talking about is people of a variety of gender diverse identities that are outside of the typical traditional gender binary. Man and woman is typically what we think about as the gender binary. So non binary folks are those of us who live within that, outside of that, beyond it, and essentially transcend it in some way. So it might be folks that feel like they're a combination of masculine and feminine or that they're entirely outside of that construct or that context altogether.

The speaker states that despite a doctor saying they were a boy, they knew they were a girl. They acknowledge having male body parts but assert that this is acceptable.

The scene centers on a tense, improvisational act that mixes technical danger with the formation of a rebellious mission. Speaker 0 is shown building a closed circuit, insisting on keeping a cap shunted “so you don’t accidentally detonate your charge,” and pressing to “create a show,” framing the moment as “an announcement of revolution. The message is clear.” Speaker 1 responds with a chilling promise: “I’ll be seeing you very soon.” The conversation then pivots to a ceremonial claim: “for bringing justice to the vigilante group known as the French seventy five, we are here to award Steven Lockjaw with the medal of honor.” The dialogue hints at love and loyalty with the line “You have to understand who will love you.” A personal vignette emerges: Speaker 0 recalls, “Me and mom used to run around and do some real bad / They got hurt. Now they're coming after us. I'm sorry.” The exchange reveals a sense of fatalism, as Speaker 0 asserts, “I didn't ask for this. That's just how the cards were rolled out for me,” only to be corrected by the other voice: “It's not cards. You don't roll cards. It's dice.” A moment of familial friction follows: “Dad, what is wrong with you? You're right.” They prepare to move on with “Let's go.” The scene shifts to a tunnel-like tension: “Tunnel. What? What's going on?” and a practical but desperate plea for weaponry: “I need a weapon, man. All you got is goddamn nunchucks here. You know where I can get a gun?” The dialogue then reflects a concern to protect “you from all your mom's stuff, from all my stuff, even though I know that's impossible.” A stark line marks a turning point: “This is the end of the line.” “Not for you.” A new character arrives: “Woah. Who's this?” They explain, “Oh, they're just my friends,” and dialogue turns to pronouns: “Now is that a he or a she or a they? It's not that hard. They, them. Okay.” A brief courtesy follows: “I just wanna be polite.” Then an intimate moment: “Yo. Say it. Say it, baby.” Endearments are exchanged: “Love you, Bob. Love you too.” The closing vibe asserts a philosophy of freedom: “You know what freedom is? No fear. Just like Tom Cruise.”

In this video, the speaker talks about their different versions of themselves. They mention a "glam she" version and explain that it can be difficult to explain gender confusion to others. They describe feeling like there are two levels inside them, with the "she" version at about 60 and the "he" version at 40. Sometimes the "she" version is more dominant and their pronouns and attitude change. They also mention that there is something inherently soft about them when they express themselves in this way.

Speaker 0 begins with 'Of course. Morning.' They request, 'Can you switch Nightshade's pronouns are theythem.' They explain, 'He or she just doesn't fit who I am.' 'My apologies.' The speaker adds, 'Please switch their piece.' and ends with, 'Now the plan.' The exchange centers on changing Nightshade's pronouns to reflect a theythem preference, replacing traditional binary pronouns. The pronoun change is presented as a personal fit, followed by an apology for the disruption. A procedural directive—'Please switch their piece'—signals action, leading to the stated conclusion, 'Now the plan.' The emphasis is on pronoun customization and immediate plan execution here.

The speaker woke up feeling sorry for themself due to travel and believes in taking days off for recovery, but not due to a "slack jawed, poopy pants mentality." The speaker's self-talk was horrible, with one voice saying they deserved time off. The speaker advises developing another voice to fight the weaker voice when it's not a designated day off, whether it's running, swimming, biking, or studying. The speaker emphasizes that we all have one voice, and it's important to work on developing the other voice as well.

Jasper and Liana explain how to use they/them and demon pronouns. For they/them pronouns: "Liana is my partner. They are cute and I am theirs. I love them very much and I hope they love themselves too." For demon pronouns: "Liana is my partner. Dem is cute and I belong to Dem. I love Demon very much and I hope Dem loves Demon's self too." An interchange example: "Liana is my partner. They are cute and I am Dem's. I love Demon very much and I hope they love Demon's self too."

Today is gender reassignment day. I’m assigning new genders and pronouns. Jimmy, you’re now she/her. Carlos, you’re Carla, she/they. Rebecca, those shoes are non-binary. Jack, you’re now Jackie, she/her. Everyone at this table is non-binary. Sam, you’re non-binary Sam. Chad, you remain a Chad. Are you all happy with your genders? No? Too bad! For homework, if you’re a guy, listen to Nickelback and Joe Rogan. If you’re a woman, just keep being a woman. Non-binary folks, I expect colored hair by Monday. Thank you!

Speaker 0 asks about the price, to which Speaker 1 responds with $69. Speaker 1 then asks about the pronouns Speaker 0 goes by. Speaker 0 questions why it matters and Speaker 1 explains they need to attend a gender queer protest. Speaker 0 asks for the protest time, but Speaker 1 gives a vague response. Speaker 0 then asks how many genders there are, and Speaker 1 estimates around 930. Speaker 0 insults Speaker 1, who doesn't care and mentions having Speaker 0's clothes. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has always lived there, and Speaker 1 explains it's their trans wife's place. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 married a man, and Speaker 1 confirms it. Speaker 0 repeats the question, and Speaker 1 says it's up to interpretation.

There is a lot of trans hate in the world, and it's frustrating. Pride means being happy to be alive. The hate mostly comes from the government and from within ourselves. The speaker believes that the hate comes from self-perception and thinks that the ideology promoted is harmful. They speak up against it because they believe that people who transition are attention seekers. They want the spotlight back and play the victim. Stay true, my friends.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 about their pronouns. Speaker 1 identifies as "they/them" and Speaker 2 is interrupted before stating their pronouns. Speaker 2 then asks about the number of genders, and Speaker 1 expresses the need to address the issue seriously. Speaker 0 interrupts and says "enough." The conversation ends abruptly.

The speaker argues against the idea of self-identifying with different genders, stating that pronouns cannot be chosen like adjectives. They question the definition of womanhood and challenge the concept of trans women being considered women without a clear definition. Another speaker suggests that womanhood is an umbrella term for those who identify as women, but struggles to provide a concrete definition. The conversation delves into the complexities of gender identity and the appropriation of womanhood.

The speaker mentions their 15-month-old child, using they/them pronouns until the child expresses their gender identity. They emphasize the difference between sex (related to genitals) and gender (related to how one presents themselves in the world). Gender includes clothing choices, behavior, and identity shared with others.

The speaker opposes Bill C-16 and refuses to use gender pronouns demanded by transgender activists. They believe it is ridiculous and an invasion of personal rights. They mention the importance of the word "Ms." in the English language, which provided dignity and authority to women regardless of marital status. They criticize the political agitation to change everyday speech and express their frustration with people searching for their own identity and imposing it on others. The speaker asserts that the English language belongs to everyone and rejects the idea of being told how to use pronouns.