reSee.it - Related Video Feed

C. Bradley Thompson discusses the founding fathers' views on slavery, emphasizing that not all were slaveholders and many opposed the institution. He expresses concern about the current authoritarian tendencies in the U.S. government, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, advocating for individual rights and freedoms. Thompson argues that the government should protect the vulnerable but not impose widespread lockdowns. He highlights the Declaration of Independence as a summation of American principles, focusing on its four self-evident truths: equality, rights, consent, and revolution. He contrasts the revolutionary generation's belief in objective truth with today's post-truth society. Thompson explains that the founding fathers viewed slavery as a necessary evil and were morally conflicted about it. He believes the American spirit of liberty is still alive, urging small acts of disobedience against government overreach. Ultimately, he sees the current moment as a potential awakening of the revolutionary spirit, emphasizing the importance of voting and civic engagement.

The 2016 election is entering a chaotic phase, with political discourse becoming increasingly unpredictable. The hosts discuss the rise of Donald Trump, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding his potential presidency and the disillusionment with traditional politicians. Many voters are frustrated with the status quo and are turning to Trump as an alternative, despite concerns about his unpredictability and executive power. Milo Yiannopoulos, a provocateur and supporter of Trump, joins the conversation. He argues that liberalism has contributed to issues like radical Islam in Europe, claiming that the media and politicians downplay the connection between these attacks and Islamic beliefs. He expresses fear about mass Muslim immigration and its implications for Western values, asserting that the silent majority of Muslims do not resist extremism. The discussion shifts to the importance of free speech and the role of social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook in censoring conservative voices. Yiannopoulos shares his experiences with being banned from Twitter and how these platforms manipulate discourse to favor certain ideologies. He emphasizes that the left's obsession with political correctness stifles genuine debate and expression. Both hosts agree that the current political climate is a cultural revolution, with Trump representing a break from traditional politics. They note that the establishment is struggling to respond to the grassroots support for Trump, which includes diverse groups like the working class and younger voters who are disillusioned with the political elite. The conversation concludes with a recognition of the need for a cultural shift towards libertarian values, emphasizing individual freedom and the rejection of authoritarianism. They believe that the current moment presents an opportunity to challenge the prevailing ideologies that have dominated public discourse, advocating for a society where people can express themselves freely without fear of censorship or backlash.

Whitney Webb hosts episode 33 of Unlimited Hangout, outlining how secret societies, and particularly the Fabian Society, helped shape modern policy, imperial strategy, and today’s global governance projects. The discussion argues that some groups have long operated openly about influence and aims, and that corruption can hide in plain sight, with events like the Jeffrey Epstein scandal as a recent example. The Fabian Society is presented as among the most influential, with a model later echoed by the World Economic Forum through its penetration of cabinets via networks like the forum’s Young Global Leaders. The aim is to examine how organizations other than the WEF have sought to influence governments and policies, often at public expense, and to understand their historical impact on Western imperialism and related dynamics. Matthew Ehret, editor of Canadian Patriot Review and a contributor to Strategic Culture, joins the conversation. He discusses current events in Canada, notably the Freedom Convoy and the Trudeau government’s crackdown. He notes the reframing of the convoy by some as “Nazis and white supremacists,” contrasts it with the ironic posting by Kristia Freeland of a flag associated with Ukrainian neo-Nazism that she later removed, and highlights perceived hypocritical self-reflection failures among technocrats. Ehret describes the convoy as having an organic, peaceful, and significant impact, including mandates being repealed in many parts of Canada, while warning against viewing the outcome as a total victory or as confidence to stop vigilance. He mentions ongoing protests and political reverberations, such as a coup within the Canadian Conservative Party and a court challenge by former Nova Scotia premier Brian Peckford regarding Charter rights, signaling broader pushback against centralized state power and the World Economic Forum narrative. The conversation then shifts to the Fabian Society’s origins and methods. The Fabians emerged in 1884, with Beatrice and Sydney Webb among its founders, and developed permeation theory to infiltrate institutions via the London School of Economics and related channels. They sought long-term social transformation through a mass behavioral-change program, drawing on repackaged Marxist ideas and Darwinian natural history concepts. The Fabians promoted gradualism, indirect influence, and the creation of a civil service and educational networks that could reorient governance without overt force. They collaborated with (and overlapped with) other groups like the Round Table movement established by Cecil Rhodes, which emphasized a global governance framework and the creation of a world federation through think tanks, the Rhodes Trust, and Oxford-centered scholarship. The discussion links these networks to the creation of the Labour Party and to strategic plotting around how to preserve British empire influence, including through reshaping nation-states into a global governance structure. Ehret traces the Canadian Fabian imprint into the Commonwealth Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCCF), later the NDP, and connects these currents to Pierre Trudeau, Maurice Strong, the World Economic Forum, and the Davos ecosystem. The talk emphasizes a pattern of philanthropy-turned-influence via foundations (Rockefeller, Macy, Carnegie), think tanks (CFR in the United States, Canadian Council on International Affairs), and a broad NGO complex designed to steer policy, economics, and culture toward a techno-global governance model. They discuss transhumanism and Silicon-Valley narratives as modern extensions of this project, including critics like Harari and Schwab, with warnings about data-driven controls, digitization, and the potential to bend technology toward total management and feudal-like governance. The episode closes with calls to follow Ehret’s work at canadianpatriot.org, Rising Tide Foundation, and his Substack, and with reflections on how Fabian-era strategies continue to inform contemporary dynamics.

Bari Weiss, a former journalist at the New York Times, discusses her resignation and the broader societal changes she perceives as a "great unraveling." She argues that the post-World War II consensus about America’s role and goodness has collapsed, with elite institutions now promoting a narrow worldview. The internet has transformed information dissemination, exposing disconnects between elite narratives and public experiences, especially highlighted during COVID-19. Weiss critiques the ideological rigidity in universities and media, where dissenting views face severe backlash. She emphasizes the need for new institutions, like her Substack, Common Sense, and the University of Austin, to foster genuine discourse and education. Weiss connects the rise of wokeness to a resurgence of anti-Semitism, noting that Jews are uniquely positioned outside the binary of oppressor and oppressed. She expresses optimism for a counter-revolution that revisits foundational democratic principles, aiming to create spaces that encourage independent thought and diverse perspectives.

John Stossel reflects on a long arc from a left-leaning graduate of Princeton to a prominent advocate of individual freedom and skeptical of heavy-handed regulation. He explains how his early reporting on consumer abuses led him to support government oversight, only to see firsthand through investigative work that many rules created unintended consequences, raised costs, and sometimes failed to protect the most vulnerable. Over time, he describes a shift toward prioritizing voluntary cooperation and competition over top-down mandates, arguing that rules often proliferate because politicians and bureaucrats chase visible action rather than measurable outcomes. The conversation weaves between his personal evolution, the challenges of staying true to principled limited-government ideas while navigating a complex political landscape, and the practical reality that societies need some framework to keep the peace and ensure fair play. Throughout, he emphasizes that true progress tends to come from empowering individuals and lower barriers to entry for new ideas, rather than expanding centralized power. The dialogue also delves into technology, platforms, and how information flows in the digital age. Stossel concedes that monopolistic concerns are real but cautions against overreliance on regulatory clamps that could stifle innovation. He argues that competition remains a powerful regulator because people can opt for alternatives, and he warns about the risk of bureaucrats crafting rules that entrench incumbents. The talk touches media, the rise of online content, and the evolving role of journalism in a world where audiences increasingly curate their own feeds. Personal anecdotes about family life, the importance of civil disagreement, and the balance between free inquiry and social cohesion pepper the interview, underscoring that the themes of liberty, responsibility, and prudent governance are not merely abstract ideals but practical questions about how we live together and where to draw the line between solving problems and creating new ones.