reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During a White House gathering, Trump criticized Maine Governor Janet Mills over her state's policy on trans athletes, threatening to withhold federal funding. Following this, Maine faced multiple federal investigations from the Department of Education, Health and Human Services, and others, jeopardizing billions in funding. The Social Security Administration even altered processes out of spite, as its head admitted to acting against Maine due to Mills' stance. This situation exemplifies Trump's strategy of using government power to intimidate political opponents, raising concerns about the neutrality of federal agencies. Critics argue this marks a significant departure from the expectation of impartiality in government interactions, with potential implications for individual rights and federal support.

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly show. Megyn reflects on her vacation in Montana and expresses excitement to return to the show. She discusses the evolving understanding of COVID-19, emphasizing that vaccinated individuals can still catch and spread the virus, and that lockdowns and school closures have been unnecessary. She notes that hospitalizations and deaths are the relevant metrics, not case numbers, and argues that society must learn to live with COVID. Megyn critiques media figures like Nicole Wallace and President Biden for their shifting narratives on COVID, highlighting that the pandemic's realities are becoming clearer even to those who previously adhered to strict measures. She mentions Dr. Fauci's recent acknowledgment that the focus should shift from case numbers to hospitalizations and the need for balance in public health policies. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya joins the discussion, sharing insights from the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for focused protection of vulnerable populations rather than broad lockdowns. He discusses the early miscalculations regarding COVID's spread and the need for a more rational approach to managing the virus. The conversation shifts to the Omicron variant, which appears to be milder than previous strains. Bhattacharya emphasizes that while vaccination is important for vulnerable groups, the current vaccine mandates are unjustified, especially given the mild nature of Omicron. He argues that the focus should be on protecting those at risk rather than imposing strict mandates on the general population. Megyn and Bhattacharya discuss the politicization of public health and the need for trust in health institutions. They also address the ongoing debate around mask mandates, testing, and the implications of vaccine boosters for young people, particularly regarding potential side effects. The show then transitions to a discussion about the controversy surrounding transgender swimmer Leah Thomas, with guests Cynthia Millen and Nancy Hogshead-Makar. They express concerns about fairness in women's sports, arguing that allowing transgender women to compete against biological women undermines the integrity of female athletics. Millen recounts her resignation from USA Swimming in protest of the current policies, while Hogshead-Makar highlights the need for separate categories to ensure fair competition. The conversation concludes with a focus on the implications of these policies for young female athletes and the broader societal impact of prioritizing inclusion over fairness in sports. Megyn emphasizes the importance of protecting women's rights in athletics and the need for a balanced approach to inclusion that does not disadvantage biological women.

Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer, gained prominence after competing against Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete, in the NCAA finals. Despite placing fifth, Gaines faced backlash for speaking out against the unfairness of allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports. In her new book, "Swimming Against the Current: Fighting for Common Sense in a World That's Lost Its Mind," she shares her experiences and advocates for fairness in athletics. Gaines recounts a pivotal moment when she was assaulted during a protest, which solidified her commitment to fighting for women's rights in sports. She emphasizes that there are two sexes and that both deserve equal opportunities and safety. Gaines highlights the emotional toll on female athletes who feel their rights and privacy are being violated, particularly in locker rooms. She discusses recent legal cases, including a West Virginia court ruling against a young girl competing against a transgender student, illustrating the broader implications of these policies. Gaines argues that the current narrative dismisses the concerns of female athletes, who are often silenced. She calls for a return to fairness and safety in sports, urging society to recognize the inherent advantages that biological males possess.

In a recent episode of The Rubin Report, host Dave Rubin discusses the current political climate, emphasizing the radical shift within the Democratic Party, particularly under the Biden Administration. He highlights Tulsi Gabbard's insights from her appearance on Bridget Phetasy's podcast, where she critiques the administration's changes to Title IX, allowing biological males to compete in women's sports, which she argues undermines opportunities for women and girls. Gabbard describes this as an abuse of power, coercing schools into compliance by threatening essential funding for low-income students. Rubin reflects on the broader societal issues, noting that many Americans feel disconnected from their representation and are frustrated by the political landscape. He asserts that the power of the people can overcome the influence of money and political machinery, urging citizens to engage in the democratic process. The discussion also touches on Donald Trump's ongoing legal battles, suggesting that these prosecutions are politically motivated attempts to hinder his presidential campaign. Rubin critiques mainstream media for failing to provide honest coverage, instead perpetuating narratives that distract from substantive issues. He concludes by expressing hope for a political shift, advocating for leaders like Gabbard and Musk to influence a more balanced approach to governance, emphasizing the need for courage and integrity in political leadership.

Megan Kelly opens the show discussing the ongoing controversy surrounding men competing in women's sports, particularly highlighting the case of Algerian male boxer Eain Khalif, who has been boxing against women. She expresses frustration over being labeled transphobic for stating facts about Khalif's biological sex, emphasizing that he is a male competing in women's boxing and has been proven right despite backlash from various media outlets. Kelly mentions a recent incident in California where a male athlete, AB Hernandez, won first place in a girls' track event, forcing the actual female winner to share the podium with him. Link Lauren joins the discussion, recalling his own experiences with backlash for speaking out on the issue. They both criticize California's approach to accommodating transgender athletes in women's sports, arguing it undermines fairness and safety for female athletes. Kelly highlights the hypocrisy of politicians like Gavin Newsom, who claim to support women's rights while allowing men to compete against women. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of transgender athletes in sports, with both hosts expressing concern for young female athletes who are losing opportunities due to the presence of male competitors. They discuss various examples from different states, including Oregon and Minnesota, where female athletes have protested against the inclusion of transgender athletes in their competitions. Kelly also addresses the media's role in perpetuating narratives that dismiss the concerns of female athletes, citing examples of coverage that fails to acknowledge the biological advantages males have in sports. Stephen A. Smith joins the conversation, agreeing with Kelly's points and emphasizing the need for fairness in competition. He suggests that transgender athletes should compete against one another rather than in women's categories. The discussion touches on the political landscape, with Smith criticizing the Democratic Party for taking minority votes for granted and failing to present a compelling alternative to Trump's policies. They conclude by reflecting on the importance of fairness in sports and the need for accountability from both sides of the political spectrum regarding the treatment of women in athletics.

The discussion centers around the recent changes to Title IX implemented by the Biden administration, which have sparked significant concern among the hosts and guests. Megyn Kelly shares her personal struggle with voting for Donald Trump in 2020, emphasizing her worries about the impact of cultural shifts, particularly regarding women's rights and due process for young men on college campuses. She expresses horror over the new regulations that allow men identifying as women to access women's spaces, including bathrooms and locker rooms, without any legislative approval. Kelly criticizes the lack of due process protections for young men accused of sexual misconduct, highlighting how the new regulations undermine the rights established under previous administrations. She argues that these changes create a dangerous environment for both women and men, where accusations can lead to severe consequences without fair hearings or the right to confront accusers. May Mailman, a guest on the show, reinforces Kelly's points, stating that the new regulations effectively erase the protections Title IX was designed to provide for women. She explains that the redefinition of sex to include gender identity will force schools to allow men into women's sports and private spaces, fundamentally altering the landscape of women's rights in education. Inez Stepman adds that the changes represent a significant legal shift that could have far-reaching implications for parental rights and free speech, as schools may impose strict regulations on language and behavior to comply with federal guidelines. The conversation also touches on the broader cultural implications of these changes, with concerns about the erosion of traditional values and the potential for increased conflict on campuses. The hosts and guests express frustration over the lack of media coverage on these issues and emphasize the importance of fighting back against these regulations. They encourage parents to be vigilant and proactive in protecting their children's rights and safety in educational settings. The discussion concludes with a call to action for listeners to engage in the political process to restore protections for women and due process for accused individuals.