reSee.it - Related Video Feed

During a conversation, the speaker expresses their frustration with Juan and mentions that Flynn is involved in setting up the events of January 6th. They claim that Flynn is working with the FBI and that they have evidence of an insurrection agreement. The speaker believes that the FBI wanted to keep them separate from Trump and threatened them. They also mention a deal involving Flynn replacing Trump and Joe Flynn's involvement. The speaker questions Juan about this deal and mentions a video by Nino suggesting that Trump's lawyers are negotiating with the deep state for immunity, followed by a mention of the assassination of Trump.

An unidentified speaker addresses General Michael Flynn, claiming a long history of betrayal, asserting "I go way back... you betrayed him. You betrayed his trust." He accuses Flynn of turning against the country, recruiting others, and twisting facts and intelligence. He references January 6, Calvert Cliffs, and "Miss Babbitt, Ashley Babbitt," stating "It wasn't a terrorist attack. It was a giant false flag with a specific intent designed to kill thousands of people, One that I broke up, got credit for it, but they called it a terrorist thing. Shut me up." He declares "Russian collusion. Yes. It happened" and asks, "Was there a link on a server to a bank in Russia, Alfa Bank? Yes." "But president Trump had nothing to do with it. But did it exist? Yes. You set it up." He adds mentions of "Lightning Rod" and proposes: "We can meet at a location and be deposed under oath... I will not take the fifth across the board." "Let's do that transcript. Let's be deposed. Your move."

The speaker believes Trump's poll numbers show Americans don't trust the media. The speaker claims Trump hasn't been charged with insurrection, and if there was any chance of conviction, he would have been charged. The speaker argues it wasn't an insurrection because those involved were unarmed, and Trump told people to protest "peacefully and patriotically." The speaker believes the focus on January 6th is because the Democratic party is scared of Trump. The speaker accuses journalists of being cowardly and part of a propaganda outlet. The speaker questions why the January 6th pipe bomber hasn't been caught and suggests looking at reporting from Revolver News.

The transcript centers on claims that the BBC manipulated coverage of a Trump speech in 2021, just hours before the January 6 Capitol riot. It alleges that the BBC’s Panorama segment heavily doctored Trump’s words, splicing together two quotes taken an hour apart to imply that he encouraged an insurrection. The narration asserts that the BBC combined two clips about fifty-four minutes apart to create a misleading impression. It presents the following clip as the BBC’s version: “We're gonna walk down to the capital, and I'll be there with you. And we fight. We fight like hell.” It then notes that this is not what Trump actually said at that moment. The sequence is then explained with the actual wording shown: “We're gonna walk down to the capital, and we're gonna cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.” The narrative claims that it wasn’t until nearly an hour later that Trump then said the second part of the BBC’s version: “We're gonna walk down to the capital. And we fight. We fight like hell.” The account characterizes the BBC as a “holier than thou” public service broadcaster, questioning its credibility in light of the alleged manipulation. It references BBC’s own fact-checking service, BBC Verify, described as counters disinformation, and labels this juxtaposition as irony given the alleged doctored footage. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes that the BBC’s portrayal, by mixing two separate moments from Trump’s remarks, appears designed to suggest that Trump called for an insurrection, despite the actual words differing significantly and the timing of the statements not aligning with a single, continuous message. In summary, the transcript claims that the BBC Panorama segment clearly doctored Trump’s speech by splicing two clips, creating a false impression of urging an insurrection, while also contrasting this with the BBC’s claimed role as an impartial public broadcaster and its BBC Verify fact-checking service. The allegedly altered lines and their precise ordering are presented verbatim to illustrate the supposed manipulation.

The Associated Press, or as I call them, the Associated Propaganda, ran an international news story that was completely false. They claimed that we fired air traffic controllers, but that is not true. We didn't fire any air traffic controllers. Actually, we're trying to hire more.

Many voters believe that the president was involved in his son's business dealings and that he lied about it. Over half of the voters surveyed by CNN expressed this belief.

The transcript follows a chaotic exchange among multiple speakers discussing information sources, political narratives, and protests, with several recurring themes and claims. - There is a pattern of questioning information sources and personal actions. Speakers repeatedly ask, “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and “Who the fuck is Jonathan? Where does he get his information? Why did he delete karaoke?” indicating a concern with source credibility and content deletion. - A speaker (Speaker 2) describes a sense of purpose from sharing information, claiming that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, you know, under oath in, you know, a senate… Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” -Jeremy Oliver (Speaker 3) promotes alternative information channels, stating he has a YouTube page, a personal Facebook page, and that viewers can see “at the last protesting.” He frames mainstream media as unreliable, promising to “stream live and show exactly what's going on at the protest and really just support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - Several participants discuss plans to act on protest grounds, including references to “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs” (Speaker 4) and “we’re basically ready to storm the capital with us in a couple of minutes” (Speaker 5). - There are assertions that “we’re all actors, but I wanna direct and act” (Speaker 6) and depictions of confrontations with others during protest or media interactions, including exchanges where people demand to speak with others about Mary Fenix/Fanning (Speaker 5). - A series of critical assertions target then-President Donald Trump and link various individuals and organizations to a network. A speaker states: “Donald Trump has no business being president,” followed by further claims about a coalition “super think tank of Biden, Harris, a couple intellectual figure behind them… Mike Flynn… and two economists,” including Simon Johnson, described as IMF chief economist, with English birth. - The conversation introduces the America Project and Patrick Byrne, claiming Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from Stanley McChrystal’s home and associating McChrystal with the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects opposing viewpoints for Trump, and then shares those viewpoints to counter them. The system is said to target the Patriot movement. - There is a claim that the Flynn network included Ali Alexander and Michael Flynn, and that their aim was “to create instability as they're trying to carry out a color revolution,” listing criteria such as “a united and organized opposition,” “an ability quickly to drive home the point that voting results are falsified,” “compliant independent media,” and “capable of mobilizing tens of thousands or more demonstrators.” - A discussion on 2020 voting numbers is presented as a comparison to the midterms. It is stated that “2020, they reported 395,000 in-person voters on election day,” with debate about whether that figure was statewide or in Maricopa County. Projections speculate on how many Republicans intended to vote but did not cast ballots, with estimates ranging from around 150,000 to 700,000. - Additional claims connect groups and individuals to broader political finance and media ecosystems, including mentions of the US Agency for Global Media, prior Hillary Clinton and John Kerry involvement, and references to propaganda concerns. - Toward the end, the discussion touches upon Wisconsin politics again, with commentary on a state supreme court candidate and voter ID emphasis as a Democrat-leaning position contrary to expectations, followed by a shift into a more personal debate about a case involving a mother’s tragedy and media attention, ending with a tangential accusation of sympathy manipulation.

During a conversation, the speaker expresses their frustration with Juan and mentions that Flynn is involved in setting up the events of January 6th. They claim that Flynn is working with the FBI and handed over an insurrection agreement to intentionally fail. The speaker believes that the FBI wanted to keep them separate from Trump and threatened them. They also mention a deal involving Flynn replacing Trump and mention a video by Nino suggesting Trump's lawyers are making a deal for immunity, followed by a mention of the assassination of Trump.

The speaker reacts to “General Flynn” and says it seems like the “department of justice” is acting improperly. They say that a couple of years earlier, if they had to go into the DOJ, it would have meant going in “handcuffs,” and they claim the DOJ tried to bring them into that place in handcuffs.

General Michael Flynn, a highly respected former general and intelligence officer, recounts a lifelong connection to the ocean and service to the country, describing his career as a path that led him to become the deputy and later national security adviser to President Trump. He frames his experience as a stark contrast between his duty and a perceived betrayal by the U.S. government and its institutions. Key points and sequence of events: - Early career and worldview - Flynn describes growing up near the ocean, surfing, and a commitment to service. He says he loves the country and entered the service to defend it. - He recalls facing what he calls the “worst enemy” in America after returning from service and becoming a target of accusations of treason and being called a Russian spy. - War, policy, and intelligence critique - Flynn discusses the costs and consequences of war, praising sacrifice but arguing that war is a failure of policy, diplomacy, and leadership. - He portrays war as a constant state driven by money within the military-industrial complex and questions the necessity and management of ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. - He recounts the moment of taking command of a battalion and witnessing a helicopter crash, describing the grim realities of war and the reaction of coalition forces. - Intelligence reform and career advancement - Flynn emphasizes reforms to intelligence in Afghanistan, referencing a 2010 report titled a blueprint for making intelligence relevant in Afghanistan, which he authored as a senior intel officer. - He explains his appointment to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Senate confirmation process, highlighting the opposition from the existing intelligence establishment (SES) and the resistance within Washington. - He notes how his leadership and intelligence work were both celebrated by some allies and targeted by others who wanted to push him out. - Personal and family impact - Flynn’s wife, Laurie, is described as a stabilizing force; the couple recounts decades of marriage, raising a family, and the toll of public life on their private lives. - He discusses the stress and trauma inflicted on his family during investigations, including the impact on his son and grandchildren, and describes the emotional and financial burdens of legal battles. - Transition to politics and Trump - Flynn relates how his experience and reputation led him to work with Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, where he became a trusted adviser and ally. - He recounts meeting with Trump in 2015, the several-month collaboration, and his view of Trump as someone who could fundamentally change U.S. policy away from endless wars. - He describes the 2016 presidential transition, his offer to be national security adviser, and the initial endorsement by Trump, followed by a White House shake-up. - National security adviser role and the Russia narrative - Flynn explains the circumstances around his appointment as national security adviser and the opposing views within the White House about Russia and sanctions. - He recounts briefing the president and key figures in foreign policy, and the subsequent disputes and accusations that led to his resignation beneath a cloud of controversy, including claims that he had lied about sanctions. - Investigations, FARA, and prosecutorial conduct - Flynn details the scrutiny around his contacts with Russian officials and later the Flynn Intel Group’s work in Turkey, explaining that he was accused of violating FARA for actions tied to a private businessman rather than government-directed activity. - He discusses the narrative of being accused of being a Russian or Turkish spy, the portrayal of his son as a target, and the role of Covington & Burling in his legal defense. - He charges that the government used off-the-books deals and pressured plea agreements to pressure him into pleading guilty, including allegations of a “deal” that would protect his son from prosecution. - The courtroom and legal process - Flynn describes the high-profile court hearings led by Judge Emmet Sullivan, who publicly accused him of treason, stirred dramatic tensions, and threatened prison time for lying to the FBI. - He recalls the shock of the judge’s behavior, the break in proceedings, and the eventual decision to delay sentencing as he faced immense legal and financial strain. - Sidney Powell, exculpatory evidence, and defense strategy - Flynn’s legal team changes: Covington & Burling is replaced by Sidney Powell, who uncovers conflicts of interest and unveils Brady material and exculpatory evidence that had not been disclosed. - Powell’s involvement is described as a turning point that allowed Flynn to challenge government misconduct and pursue the truth rather than simply accepting a guilty plea. - Public support, family resilience, and the pardon - Flynn and family describe a groundswell of support from ordinary Americans through letters, gifts, and fundraising, including a legal defense fund that helped sustain them through financial hardship. - They describe the eventual decision by President Trump to issue a pardon of innocence in November 2020 after the government moved to dismiss the case, noting that Flynn did not seek the pardon initially and that Sidney Powell advised against accepting a plea in order to secure full vindication. - Flynn reflects on how the pardon, while welcome, carried mixed feelings given the years of damage and public misunderstanding. - Reflections on power, governance, and the future - The narrative frames a broader critique of entrenched agencies, media influence, and political storytelling, alleging the intelligence and justice systems have been weaponized and corrupted by political agendas. - The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, resilience, faith in family, and public accountability, arguing that Flynn’s story should illuminate issues of governance, the integrity of institutions, and the need for reform to restore trust in the republic. - The closing messages stress ongoing commitment to fight for reconciliation and reform, with Flynn characterized as a persistent presence who, despite wounds, remains engaged in public life and the defense of the republic. Throughout, the speakers present Flynn as a figure who faced relentless pressure from political and bureaucratic forces, endured personal and family hardship, and ultimately sought redress and vindication through a combination of legal advocacy, public support, and a historic presidential pardon. The narrative centers on themes of duty, betrayal, reform, and perseverance in the face of systemic challenges.

General Flynn refused to answer whether he believed the violence on January 6th was justified morally, invoking the 5th Amendment. However, he stated that he believed it was justified legally. When asked about the peaceful transition of power in the United States, he confirmed his belief in it.

Are you here for tours or meetings? Is this about January 6th? What about the pardons for the Biden family? No focus on that? What about the murderers and rapists Biden pardoned? The obsession with January 6th is absurd. People are tired of it. Biden pardons serious criminals while there’s outrage over those who walked through open doors on January 6th. There’s a lack of attention on the Antifa and BLM individuals who faced no consequences. The media keeps fixating on January 6th while ignoring real issues like the economy, border security, and energy. People are frustrated with the media and the hypocrisy in politics. I'm not going to engage in this line of questioning anymore. I appreciate your questions, but I think it’s important to focus on what really matters to the public.

The speaker was asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including some Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker refused to comment and denied any interaction with their son and brother's foreign business associates, calling it a bunch of lies.

Flynn criticized the media, specifically the AP, for a false story that impacted the stock market. He refused to talk about his brother's involvement in the January 6th insurrection and vowed to never speak to AP again due to the interview. Despite this, Flynn continues to speak publicly.

NBC News reported popping noises during the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Savannah Hernandez confronts Kristen Welkner from NBC, questioning their faulty reporting. No response is given. Hernandez plans to question other mainstream media outlets like CNN and MSNBC about their reporting accuracy.

During an interview, Flynn criticized the media, specifically mentioning an alleged false story by AT that caused the Dow Jones to drop. However, the AP never wrote such a story. Flynn also expressed frustration when asked about his brother, General Charles Flynn, and his involvement in the response to the January 6th insurrection. He claimed that the AP wrote about it, leading him to vow to never speak to them again. Despite this, Flynn continues to make public statements.

Speaker 1 insisted that a story should be aired because it is "bad for Biden," while Speaker 0 refused because it "can't be verified," specifically referencing a laptop. Speaker 1 claimed the laptop story is "one of the biggest scandals" and that the family is in hiding. Speaker 1 accused the media of being "fake" and said social media is the only way to get his voice out. Speaker 0 claimed Speaker 1 once said the media was discredited to ensure negative stories would not be believed. Speaker 1 denied this. Speaker 1 contrasted the interview with what he characterized as "softball" interviews given to Joe Biden. Speaker 1 took issue with the interview beginning with the interviewer stating there would be "tough questions." Speaker 1 then ended the interview.

General Michael Flynn has publicly claimed that he and his team have investigated Speaker Mike Johnson, and that Johnson’s refusal to investigate corruption in Minnesota and other states is connected to Johnson’s financial networks, specifically alleging that Johnson’s PAC is receiving money from Somali child care centers. Flynn, a retired Lieutenant General and former National Security Advisor, stated that his private investigation into the alleged robbery of American taxpayers led him directly to the door of House leadership. Flynn stated that he began looking into the lack of federal movement on the Minnesota daycare fraud cases. He pressed Johnson directly, asking, “Speaker Johnson, what are you gonna say about this? What the hell is going on, speaker Johnson?” He suggested that if Johnson truly considers who has subpoena and investigation power more than anyone else, it would be the House of Representatives, and questioned why they aren’t taking action. Flynn asserted that the inaction is due to financial concerns, claiming, “But I’m not shocked because if you really think about it, who has subpoena and investigation power more than anyone else? The house of representatives. Why aren’t they doing anything about it? Because that will hurt their money.” He extended the accusation beyond Minnesota, stating that “there are snakes everywhere.” Flynn concluded that if the allegations are true, Mike Johnson needs to go to prison, and offered, “God bless you. I’ll keep you updated. Stay tuned.”

The media has reached a new low. Many are fake journalists who avoid talking about the corruption that Doge is uncovering. They'd rather attack Elon Musk. This is the biggest story ever, bigger than Watergate. Any decent journalist would be all over this. It's disturbing to see groups like AP wanting to boycott the White House because they refuse to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of Mexico. Now other outlets want to join them and boycott the press pool. The mainstream media keeps asking the same questions instead of asking about what we found when we dug into USAID, the Department of Education, or the Department of Defense. Instead, they're pushing a narrative by attacking Doge and Elon. I hope we start asking the questions that the American people want answered.

Fauci and the media are criticized for their handling of the pandemic. The media refuses to admit any wrongdoing and sticks to their narrative. Real journalism has been replaced by propaganda in outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC, and CNN. The media ignores important stories like the Archer testimony, where President Biden's involvement in business dealings was discussed. Hunter Biden's questionable art sales are also mentioned. The conversation questions if the art sales were a form of money laundering.

President Trump's ally, the National Enquirer, accused Michael Flynn of being a Russian spy. Trump has a history of supporting the Enquirer and has a close relationship with its CEO. This could make Flynn nervous, considering Trump's frequent mention of the Enquirer. The Enquirer's attack on Flynn is significant because it aligns with Trump's past use of the publication to target his opponents.

The speaker is asked about polling data that suggests a majority of Americans, including Democrats, believe they acted illegally or unethically regarding their family's business interests. The speaker denies these allegations, stating that they did not interact with their son and brother's foreign business associates. They dismiss the claims as lies.

During a conversation, the speaker expresses their frustration with Juan and mentions that Flynn was involved in setting up the events on January 6th. They claim that Flynn is connected to the FBI and that he handed over an insurrection agreement to Trump. The speaker believes that they were kept separate from Trump by the FBI and that Flynn sent people to threaten them. They also mention a deal involving Flynn replacing Trump and talk about Nino and Juan's actions after their conversation, including Nino making a video about Trump's lawyers discussing immunity and the potential assassination of Trump.

The speaker describes a shift in perspective about January 6, recounting that he did not initially suspect U.S. law enforcement or military involvement or a false flag. He notes an interview with Capitol Police Chief Stephen Sund, who he says stated that “that guy was filled with federal agents,” a claim Sund would know from being in charge of security. He observes that, two and a half years later, core claims about January 6 appear to be lies, arguing that when someone is caught lying about one thing, it prompts questions about what else they are lying about. The speaker emphasizes he is not a conspiracist and grew up in a country with low belief in obvious conspiracies, but he asserts that “the amount of lying around January 6” is distressing and that anyone covering for those lies should be ashamed, including portions of the American media and Fox News. He acknowledges Fox News allowed him to air material, for which he expresses gratitude, but notes that some people there were angry at him for doing so and challenges critics to point out cherry-picking or miscontextualization. He clarifies that he did not claim the events were entirely peaceful; police officers were injured, recognizing that injuries occurred in other protests as well. He emphasizes that his point is to ask obvious questions and scrutinize the narrative. He discusses Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, noting that surveillance footage had been hidden until he aired it, showing Capitol Police attempting doors and escorting Chansley into the Senate chamber, where he wandered and offered a prayer thanking the Capitol Police, before leaving. He argues there are many conclusions one could draw from this footage, but asserts that Chansley cannot be called an insurrectionist, labeling that designation a lie. He defines insurrection as a very specific meaning and remains pedantic about words, insisting the incident was not an insurrection, not armed, and not intended to overthrow the government but a “spasm of rage” that Trump helped inspire. Regarding the election, he states he does not support leaders inciting anger, but asserts the event was not an insurrection. He condemns the prosecution of Chansley, a Navy veteran and American citizen, who was imprisoned for years after being let into the Senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Police, and he rejects the portrayal of Chansley as an insurrectionist. He condemns the lack of remorse in those who cover up or excuse what he views as lies, and quotes anger at the idea of imprisoning someone for something he believes was misrepresented.