TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker asserts that hospitals are not allowed to vaccinate patients without their knowledge, yet an alarming shift is occurring inside the medical system. They claim the word vaccine is quietly disappearing from hospital consent forms and is being replaced with a broad, vague category: biologics or biogenics. Under this new classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or other biological products without explicit patient consent. Insiders are reportedly observing that new surgical and hospital consent forms no longer list specific treatments. They allegedly do not say vaccine or injection; they simply say biologics or biogenics, a category so wide it can include almost anything made from living organisms and their byproducts. The scariest part, according to the speaker, is that most people sign these forms without reading them because they trust the system, because they are in pain, overwhelmed, or seconds away from being put under anesthesia. This creates a setup where a patient can enter for a routine procedure, sign a consent form filled with vague terminology, go unconscious, and wake up having received something they did not directly approve. The speaker emphasizes that no medical system should be allowed to hide procedures behind intentionally unclear language. They urge spreading the message because, in their view, most people are unaware that this is happening.

The speaker discusses the use of mRNA in food and mentions a presentation about genetically engineering mosquitoes to deliver vaccines through mosquito bites. They mention that the Gates Foundation is funding this research, although they don't have proof of its viability. The speaker clarifies that they are not suggesting that the mosquitoes are currently injecting anyone with anything, but they have evidence that efforts are being made to enable mosquito injections.

There is a concerning loophole in the law regarding the food supply. If a cow or pig receives an mRNA gene therapy, they can still be labeled as organic. This means that organic food can potentially contain these therapies. The issue arises if the therapy alters their DNA, can be transmitted to humans, or remains in their system. These factors make it possible for consumers to unknowingly consume these substances in their organic food.

House Bill 1894 in Tennessee classifies any food containing a vaccine or vaccine material as a drug under the Tennessee Food and Drug and Cosmetic Act. Vaccine material is defined as a substance intended for use in humans to stimulate antibody production and provide immunity against disease, authorized or approved by the FDA. An example of a food that's a vaccine is lettuce, as the University of California Riverside has perfected the ability to put human vaccines into it. Tomatoes also have the ability to do that, according to UC Berkeley. RJ Reynolds has perfected the ability to put a human vaccine in tobacco products.

I support my amendment to prevent funding for transgenic edible vaccines. This concept is not far-fetched; research is underway to turn plants like lettuce and spinach into mRNA vaccine producers. The goal is for individuals to grow these plants in their gardens, which raises safety concerns. Past incidents, such as vaccine contamination in corn meant for livestock, highlight the risks of cross-contamination. We need to prioritize food safety and ensure the public knows what’s in their food. Contaminating our food supply with foreign DNA poses unknown dangers. Given recent experiences, we should be cautious about funding this research. I urge support for my amendment.

mRNA technology, used in COVID vaccines, raises ethical concerns about potential control. Multiple genes and regulatory elements can be inserted, allowing for different vaccinations and antigens to be regulated. This could lead to unknown protein expression when consuming certain foods. S. Matthew Liao, a philosopher, suggests using human engineering to address global issues like meat consumption. By making people intolerant to certain proteins, it could reduce meat consumption and benefit the planet. Doctor Christina Parkes expresses ethical concerns about the regulation of genetic information through hormones, airborne substances, and the food supply. These discussions highlight the potential dangers and ethical implications of mRNA technology and human engineering.

Technology is being rapidly advanced and implemented in humans, particularly messenger RNA vaccines. These advancements are being fast-tracked, and it's important to acknowledge that our food species will also be affected by these vaccines.

UC Riverside and UC Berkeley have developed vaccines in lettuce and tomatoes, while tobacco companies have done so in tobacco products. The concern is about proper dosing and labeling of these products to ensure consumer safety. The bill aims for transparency in grocery stores selling vaccine-containing produce. The technology is still in development, but the goal is to prevent issues like improper dosing seen in the cattle industry. The discussion highlights the need for consumer awareness and regulation in this emerging field.

A person knows a kid who works at a feedlot in Nebraska. The feedlot was bought out by a company, leading to an increase in vaccine use. The company plans to implement mRNA vaccines for cattle, which was trialed on pigs. The pigs experienced negative effects, with some dying and traces of the vaccine found in their meat. This raises concerns about the potential impact on humans.

Genetically modified food is not labeled in the US due to FDA regulations, as it's considered equivalent to unmodified food. Consumers are kept in the dark about GMO ingredients to prevent confusion. The FDA relies on safety assessments from the patent-holding companies like Monsanto, Pfizer, or Syngenta, without conducting independent studies. FDA scientists have expressed concerns about this practice, urging against allowing GMO foods on the market due to unknown consequences.

A bill in Tennessee proposes labeling food with vaccines, while Idaho has a similar bill. Edible vaccines are being studied at UC Riverside, where scientists are exploring the use of plants like lettuce to produce mRNA vaccines. Traditionally, vaccines are grown in eggs or animal cells, but plant-based vaccines are being developed. Genetic editing is being used to create edible vaccines in plants like bananas, potatoes, tomatoes, lettuce, rice, wheat, soybeans, and corn. Medicago is using gene editing to turn plants into mini bioreactors for vaccine production. There are concerns about mRNA vaccines being used on livestock, with the potential for transference to humans through meat consumption. Transparency laws are being debated to inform consumers about genetically modified products in livestock.

The speaker attempted to defund research on transgenic edible plant vaccines in the ag approves bill, arguing that taxpayer dollars are funding research into vaccines grown in lettuce and spinach. The concern is that people will be vaccinated when they eat these plants. The speaker believes there should be tighter regulations due to the risk of pollen escaping and contaminating neighboring farms that do not intend to grow vaccines in their food. Although the speaker was able to initially stop taxpayer spending on this research in the ag approves bill, the bill was discarded in favor of an omnibus bill, resulting in another year of funding for transgenic edible plant vaccine research.

A Kentucky representative introduces an amendment to prevent funding for grants related to transgenic edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer dollars are being used to fund research at the University of California, Riverside, where scientists are studying the possibility of using plants like lettuce and spinach to produce mRNA vaccines. The representative expresses concerns about the potential risks and contamination of food sources, citing past incidents where crops were contaminated with vaccines meant for animals. He emphasizes the need for a safe food supply and urges adoption of his amendment. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

Scientists from the University of California, Riverside are studying the possibility of creating transgenic edible vaccines using plants like lettuce and spinach. These vaccines could be used for both livestock and humans. However, an amendment passed by the House of Representatives may temporarily prevent the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Agriculture from using their budgets to fund edible vaccines. While this amendment does not completely forbid the practice, it restricts government funds from directly supporting these studies. The amendment raises concerns about the potential for vaccinating people through food. Representative Massey celebrated the victory of the amendment, highlighting the existing use of tax dollars to fund research on transgenic edible plant vaccines. The future of vaccines could involve consuming them through food, such as salads, rather than receiving injections.

A congressman from Kentucky introduces an amendment to prevent funds from being used for grants related to transgenic, edible vaccines. He argues that taxpayer money is being used to fund research at the University of California, Riverside, where scientists are studying the possibility of turning plants like lettuce and spinach into RNA vaccine factories. He expresses concerns about the potential risks and contamination of food supply, citing past incidents where corn vaccines for pigs contaminated soybeans and caused recalls. He emphasizes the need for a safe food supply and urges adoption of his amendment. The amendment is ultimately agreed to.

The video discusses the concept of edible vaccine therapy for combating human diseases, particularly COVID-19. It explains that this technology has been available for decades and differs from traditional vaccines. Instead of introducing a pathogen to stimulate the body's immune response, edible vaccines program the body to produce specific substances. These vaccines can be created by injecting fruits, vegetables, or farm animals with the desired pathogen, which is then packaged as a vaccine. The speaker also mentions the potential benefits and challenges of this approach. Additionally, they briefly mention the idea of COVID mRNA making humans superhuman.

Vladimir Putin has passed a law in Russia considering anyone who grows or sells genetically modified foods as a terrorist. He is encouraging Russians to grow organic, non-GMO food by giving away land. The speaker agrees with Putin's view that the West is over-vaccinated, overmedicated, and overfed with nutrient-deficient food. They mention that Monsanto's power prevents GMO labeling in Australia and the US. To ensure non-GMO food, the speaker suggests buying organic and growing your own. Organic tomatoes are said to have nine times the iron of conventionally grown ones. Genetically modified food involves splicing the DNA of different species, but it can have unknown effects on the body.

A speaker discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the debate surrounding their safety, mentioning a petition signed by 17 Nobel laureates asserting their safety. The speaker says that while millions have consumed GMOs without apparent harm, the context is important. The speaker explains that GMOs are often engineered to resist glyphosate, and glyphosate is used heavily. Glyphosate is described as an antibiotic, patented for antibiotic use, that kills microbiota around plants. The speaker claims that glyphosate is the most prescribed antibiotic on Earth, especially in rice farming, and that the consequences of its widespread use are unknown.

We are unaware of what we are consuming in our food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018, creating transmissible mRNA that can be passed on to those who consume it. Without informed consent laws, those who have refused mRNA vaccines may unknowingly receive them through their food. This technology could be used in plants and animals, leading to unintended vaccination through food consumption.

Lobbyists for cattlemen and pork associations will use mRNA COVID vaccines on livestock. Attorney Tom Rens warns there are no laws requiring informed consent for vaccinated food, nor are there laws requiring disclosure of food being vaccinated with the spike protein clot shot. The UK passed the Genetic Technology Precision Breeding Bill of 1990 to exclude references to precision bred organisms, another term for gene edited. Gene edited food can be legally marketed in the UK and can be labeled non-GMO in America. If butchered in America, it can be labeled Product of USA.

Some of the biggest food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used Synomics to create flavor enhancers originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue. These companies are not required to disclose this information. Natural flavors can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. Processed food loses its flavor, so biotech companies develop flavor enhancers. Synomics found that HEK293 cells react to flavors like human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, they created additives that made processed food better, which were then rebranded as natural flavors. Even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed using undisclosed biotech processes. The food industry uses loopholes to keep consumers in the dark for profit, not health. Consumers should check labels and demand transparency from food giants.

The speaker claims mRNA is in the food supply. Merck has been injecting mRNA into pigs since 2018 with a product called Sequebiti. They claim to be able to make transmissible mRNA, meaning they can put it in an animal so that it transmits to whoever is ingesting it, effectively vaccinating them. The speaker suggests this could be engineered into plants and animals. Without informed consent laws, people who refused mRNA vaccines may get them through their food.

House bill eighteen ninety four classifies any food that contains a vaccine or vaccine material as a drug under the Tennessee Food and Drug and Cosmetic Act, defines vaccine or vaccine material as a substance intended for use in humans to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against disease that is authorized or approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Chairman, I answer questions. Can you give me an example of a food that's a vaccine? Uricus. University of California Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now. Also, to me also, tomatoes has the ability to do that also for UC Berkeley. And then our big tobacco, RJ Reynolds and stuff has perfected the ability to put a human vaccine in in the tobacco products.

Transgenic lettuce is being developed to produce mRNA vaccines. The idea is to genetically engineer lettuce and spinach so that consuming them can provide vaccination against biological threats. However, there are scientific problems and potential health risks associated with this proposal. Moreover, it is part of a broader plan to bypass informed consent by incorporating mRNA gene technology into food. Another concerning concept is self-spreading vaccines, where respiratory viruses carry the vaccine and infect others. These proposals are seen as dangerous, reckless, and ethically and scientifically unsound.

Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.