TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Members of the German Bundestag will vote on five proposals regarding a general vaccination mandate. However, it is important to consider the following points. The Covid-19 vaccines are not safe, as the Paul Ehrlich Institute has received more relevant side effect reports in the past twelve months than for all other vaccines in the last twenty years combined. Additionally, these vaccines no longer provide significant self-protection or protection against the Omicron variant. Therefore, they are only beneficial for certain high-risk patients. Overall, this means that a vaccination mandate is unnecessary, inappropriate, and unconstitutional. Every patient should have the right to freely decide for or against vaccination after receiving individual counseling.

Hello, my name is Brenich Springer. I am a spokesperson for the AFD party in the German Bundestag. We just finished a special session on the Infection Protection Act. The process surrounding this law has been chaotic. Last week, there was a hearing that was scheduled so last-minute that the experts invited couldn't properly review the draft. Today, we were only given two minutes to speak, which is not enough time to address the issues with this law. It infringes on fundamental rights that need to be discussed and debated. To make matters worse, last-minute amendments were submitted, making it impossible for anyone to properly analyze them. This is an attack on parliamentary democracy, and we will fight against it. We will have a debate on Wednesday at noon, and I encourage everyone to join us in front of the Reichstag to show the coalition government that this is not how politics should be done in our country.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Krankenhausbelegungen und keine außergewöhnlichen Atemwegserkrankungen. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021 an. Schweden schnitt ohne Masken und Lockdowns besser ab. Die Politik reagierte mit übertriebenen Maßnahmen, isolierte Alte und verursachte Existenzschäden. Gerichte und Medien versagten bei der Überprüfung. Es gab eine Kriminalisierung von Kritikern und eine Verharmlosung von Impfschäden. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung während der Pandemie gestellt. Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist Aufklärung wichtig. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020 and no extraordinary respiratory diseases. Mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better without masks and lockdowns. The government responded with exaggerated measures, isolating the elderly and causing economic damage. Courts and media failed to review. There was a criminalization of critics and a downplaying of vaccine injuries. Questions are being raised about government action during the pandemic. Bestsellers reflect the mood. An inquiry was rejected, so clarification is important.

Wir hatten historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen in Deutschland 2020, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen, und die Sterblichkeit stieg erst 2021. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Pandemie basierte auf Massentests mit schwankenden Ergebnissen. Politik reagierte mit Lockdowns, Schulschließungen, und isolierte Alte. Kritiker wurden kriminalisiert, Medien folgten dem PCR-Narrativ. Es gab keine Gefahr, aber die Politik schürte Angst. Warum die Kehrtwende zu Massnahmen? Warum Zwangsimpfungen? Bestseller reflektieren die Stimmung. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wäre angemessen gewesen. Vielen Dank. Translation: We had historically low hospital occupancy rates in Germany in 2020, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and mortality only increased in 2021. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The pandemic was based on mass testing with fluctuating results. Politics responded with lockdowns, school closures, and isolating the elderly. Critics were criminalized, media followed the PCR narrative. There was no danger, but politics fueled fear. Why the turnaround to measures? Why forced vaccinations? Bestsellers reflect the mood. An investigative committee would have been appropriate. Thank you very much.

Currently, there is too much convergence between the government, the National Assembly, and the general press, which is unhealthy. There needs to be checks and balances, debates, and many decisions being made are authoritarian and lack scientific substance. For example, forcing people to take an experimental vaccine without giving them a choice is unethical and goes against the principles of medical experimentation. In the future, we will look back and question how such things were allowed to happen. The communication world is starting to collide with reality, whether it's about vaccines or other issues. The vaccines were rushed and not properly evaluated, and there have been adverse effects reported. The number of complaints against the vaccines will continue to rise. It's important to understand the risks and benefits and not exaggerate the severity of the disease.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

Starting Saturday, Berlin will enforce a mandatory FFP2 mask policy in all areas, including the German Bundestag. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting people in the Bundestag and expects the same from everyone else. They mention that some factions in the Bundestag oppose the measures, but it is necessary to control the pandemic. The speaker supports the actions taken by the parliamentary president.

In this video, the speakers discuss a proposed law that included the idea of an immunity documentation, similar to a vaccine passport, for COVID-19. Speaker 1 expresses opposition to this concept and explains that they removed the original plans from the law. The original plans involved issuing a pass to individuals who had either recovered from the virus or had antibodies, allowing them certain privileges. Speaker 1 emphasizes that this would create a two-tier society and was a bad idea. They criticize the former Health Minister, Spahn, for suggesting it. However, Speaker 1 acknowledges that the current version of the law contains reasonable rights and that removing the immunity documentation was the right decision. They conclude that it would not have been effective in combating the pandemic.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

There is a debate about implementing a vaccine mandate, but the speakers have different opinions. Speaker 0 is against it, while Speaker 1 believes it cannot be enforced. Speaker 2 thinks it is proportionate, but Speaker 3 emphasizes the need to increase vaccine willingness without mandating it. Speaker 4 mentions the right to refuse vaccination and the government's promise against a mandate. Speaker 2 reiterates that there will be no vaccine mandate, and Speaker 0 insists on the need for one. However, Speaker 2 clarifies that not using the vaccine won't result in losing basic rights. They believe a solution leading to a vaccine mandate will be found.

Conservative sites are concerned about vaccine mandates, fearing that the government or UN soldiers will force vaccinations. However, currently, no one is discussing mandates. Vaccines can prevent asymptomatic transmission and offer better and more durable immunity compared to natural infection. As people witness the benefits of vaccination, acceptance is likely to increase.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your interest. It seems that a so-called "Megalockdown" is being prepared in the Chancellor's Office, without informing the public or the parliament. We find this situation unacceptable. The Chancellor must inform the public and the parliament about her intentions. We demand information on the data and scientific facts that form the basis of the upcoming discussions. We are particularly interested in knowing if there are alternatives being considered that would allow people more freedom. These are the questions that need to be addressed openly and not discussed behind closed doors.

Speaker 0: I ask all citizens to hold on a little longer. But until everyone is vaccinated, there will be no easing of restrictions, that is not the path we are aiming for. Speaker 1: Yesterday, you said that as long as not everyone can be offered a vaccine, there will be no new freedoms, we are talking about old freedoms. How do you plan to keep the vaccinated, let's say, in check, so that they don't start traveling, meeting up, or partying again? How long do you intend to enforce this strictly? Speaker 0: Well, I was asked about the wrong word, which I have already used, privileges, you didn't mention that. Because we must not get used to the normal life, as we know it with other freedoms, that life is no longer normal. That's where we want to go back to. These are fundamental rights that everyone has. But at the moment, even if someone is vaccinated, it is not clear whether they can still infect other people. And as long as that is not clarified, we cannot have any special measures or rights in addition to the normal rights for which the wave of lawsuits is demanding, and they are right. Look, there are now many lawsuits from people who want to be vaccinated in the highest priority group. There are lawsuits about the fairness of the measures. There will be lawsuits about the question of rights for the vaccinated, that is part of the rule of law and as politicians, we must argue why we are doing something, why we are not doing something. I believe that if we have been able to offer vaccination to a large number of people later on, and then some people say, we don't have mandatory vaccination, now I don't want to be vaccinated, then maybe we have to make such distinctions and say, okay, if you don't want it, then you may not be able to do certain things. Speaker 1: Chancellor, you explicitly mentioned the 21st of September yesterday. By then, there should be a vaccination offer for everyone. That is, if you look at the calendar, five days before the federal election. That date was not a coincidence, right? Speaker 0: Look, that is the meteorological beginning of autumn.

In Deutschland gab es im Jahr 2020 und 2021 weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen als üblich. Die Sterblichkeit stieg erst ab 2021 an. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland. Die Regierung reagierte mit Lockdowns und Zwangsmaßnahmen, während Kritiker kriminalisiert wurden. Es gab eine Kehrtwende in den Maßnahmen, obwohl keine besondere Gefahr bestand. Die Politik zwang die Bevölkerung zur Impfung mit experimentellen Impfstoffen. Es gibt Bestseller, die die Ereignisse kritisch beleuchten. Ein Untersuchungsausschuss wurde abgelehnt, daher ist es wichtig, dass wir zur Aufklärung beitragen. Translation: In Germany, there were fewer severe respiratory illnesses in 2020 and 2021 than usual. Mortality only increased from 2021 onwards. Sweden performed better than Germany. The government responded with lockdowns and mandatory measures, while critics were criminalized. There was a turnaround in the measures, despite no significant danger. The government forced the population to get vaccinated with experimental vaccines. There are bestsellers that critically examine the events. An investigative committee was rejected, so it is important that we contribute to clarification.

The speaker questions the sincerity of governments claiming to have the people's interest at heart, stating that throughout history, political elites have never genuinely cared about the well-being of regular people. They advise not to trust any government blindly and always question their motives. The speaker expresses their refusal to be vaccinated with an untested drug, emphasizing the lack of scientific evidence regarding its benefits and long-term side effects. They assert that no one can grant them freedom, as they are already a free person. They challenge the European Commission and the German government, stating that they will not be coerced into getting vaccinated.

This work is challenging due to the abundance of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories surrounding the pandemic agreement and IHR. Some claim that the agreement will give WHO the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries, but these claims are false. The agreement, written by us, will not cede sovereignty to WHO. We need your support to counter these lies and assure your citizens that the agreement safeguards national sovereignty while enhancing global health security. It is negotiated and implemented by countries in accordance with their own laws.

The speaker addresses the issue of fake news and conspiracy theories about the pandemic agreement, clarifying that the WHO does not have the power to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or restrict travel. These claims are false, and the WHO is not seeking such authority.

Speaker 0 expresses shame in being German and accuses others of betraying the country. Speaker 1 argues that there is no such thing as a nation or knowledge, and therefore no betrayal of the nation. Speaker 2 asks Speaker 1 about their knowledge on a specific topic. Speaker 1 reiterates their support for mandatory vaccination. Speaker 2 reminds Speaker 1 of their promise of no mandatory vaccination. Speaker 1 defends their stance, stating that it is about public health and being truthful. Speaker 2 argues that being liberal often leads to political downfall. Speaker 1 clarifies that they support mandatory vaccination but believe it should be proportionate. Speaker 2 calls for mandatory vaccination in Germany. Speaker 1 assures that there will be no forced vaccination or violation of rights. They believe a solution will be found through a process that may lead to mandatory vaccination.

Speaker 0: Mandatory vaccination is nonsense. No one in Germany will be forced to get vaccinated against their will. The idea that those who choose not to get vaccinated should lose their basic rights is also absurd and malicious. Let's remember the experiences we've had in Germany and reject such claims. Personally, I am open to technological and medical advancements. If German authorities approve a vaccine, I would be one of the first to get vaccinated. However, I will also advocate for the freedom of those who choose not to, as they should not be forced into it.

Wir hatten in Deutschland im Jahr 2020 historisch niedrige Klinikbelegungen, weniger schwere Atemwegserkrankungen und keine erhöhte Sterblichkeit. Schweden schnitt besser ab als Deutschland laut WHO. Die Regierung reagierte mit harten Maßnahmen, während Gerichte, Medien und Wissenschaft versagten. Es gab Kriminalisierung von Maßnahmenkritikern, fehlende Prüfung der Verhältnismäßigkeit der Maßnahmen und Panikmache. Es werden Fragen zur Regierungshandlung in der Pandemie gestellt, wie die Verabreichung experimenteller Impfstoffe und das Fehlen eines Untersuchungsausschusses. Bestseller-Bücher reflektieren die Stimmung der Bevölkerung. Anklagen gegen die Regierung werden erhoben. Translation: We had historically low hospital admissions, fewer severe respiratory illnesses, and no increased mortality in Germany in 2020. Sweden performed better than Germany according to the WHO. The government responded with harsh measures, while courts, media, and science failed. There was criminalization of critics of the measures, lack of examination of the proportionality of the measures, and fear-mongering. Questions are being raised about government actions during the pandemic, such as the administration of experimental vaccines and the absence of a parliamentary inquiry. Bestselling books reflect the mood of the population. Charges against the government are being made.

There are still people who deny the importance of masks and social distancing. Misinformation is widespread. Experts like Dr. Fauci, who have dedicated their lives to studying viruses, should be trusted. Vaccination, mask-wearing, and social distancing are crucial in preventing the spread of the virus. Personal freedom should not be prioritized over public health and responsibility.

Last month, Joachim Küs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding concerns about the arrival of vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization, not for infection control, prevention, or reduction. The EMA also highlighted a lack of data on contagion and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's massive vaccination campaigns, aimed at protecting others, were not authorized and lacked factual basis. The EMA emphasized the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccinations. The government's policy of not reporting complaints within the first 14 days of vaccination was seen as deliberate endangerment of human life. The speaker called for an end to vaccination campaigns and accountability for the government's lies and deception.

In a video released on June 16, 2023, Dr. Christian Haffner shares the protocols of the German government's Corona Expert Council, which shed light on the experts' prioritization of their scientific ideology over citizens' well-being. The protocols reveal the council's involvement in the government's decision-making process regarding a general vaccination mandate, which was ultimately rejected by the Bundestag. The transcripts also highlight the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of measures like masks and lockdowns, as well as the importance of communication and increasing vaccination rates, particularly among children. The video further discusses the risk-benefit ratio of vaccination, potential long-term effects of myocarditis, and the need for clear and transparent communication. It emphasizes the experiences of individuals affected by the virus and the significance of reliable information. The role of experts and the government in managing the pandemic is examined, with a call for an independent commission to evaluate the measures taken. The video concludes by addressing the impact of the pandemic on society and the necessity of a global effort to combat the virus.

Scientists, medical experts, and researchers worldwide recognized that vaccination was crucial in overcoming the pandemic. While not mandatory, I ensured that incentives and protections were in place to encourage Canadians to get vaccinated. As a result, our vaccination rates surpassed those of our peer countries, leading to a less severe pandemic. However, there are dissenting voices in the comment section of this livestream. It is important to find ways to protect and address their concerns while fulfilling my duty as prime minister to preserve lives, safety, and democracy.

There is a proposal to change the immunity law in Germany, specifically regarding the testing period for medications before they are released in the country. The plan is to introduce a vaccine requirement indirectly. If you choose to get vaccinated with the medications provided by the Berlin Milley Gates Foundation, you can continue with your activities. However, if you refuse to get vaccinated, you may lose many of your basic rights. This change effectively establishes a vaccine requirement through the backdoor. Not getting vaccinated with these medications, which have not undergone sufficient testing, could result in being unable to work in certain professions or travel to certain countries. The decision-making power lies with Bill and Melinda Gates. Angela Merkel is promoting a conference to fill a funding gap of 8 billion euros for the development of a vaccine by the Gates Foundation.