reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The Premier is questioned about a bill granting him broad powers without legislative approval, raising concerns about bypassing democratic processes similar to executive orders issued by the US President. The Premier responds that the bill mandates legislative ratification of orders and includes sunset clauses. He argues the legislation is necessary to respond swiftly to potential crises, such as the US terminating the Columbia River Treaty and cutting off electricity access. The Premier states the bill is emergency legislation, not routine, designed to minimize economic and social damage from unpredictable actions by the US President.

The speaker believes a dying government is most dangerous in its final months, anticipating unreasonable policies if reelection seems unlikely. These policies would be difficult to undo and could negatively impact the investment community. The speaker is particularly concerned about COP 2029 in Baku, fearing the federal government will grandstand internationally to gain favor with environmental groups, boasting about their actions in Canada. The speaker asserts the federal government lacks constitutional authority over resource management and production pace, which are provincial responsibilities. The speaker suggests taking action now to counter potentially "ridiculous policies" expected to be announced in Baku.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

The speakers discuss a dangerous and divided world, citing threats from Iran, Russia, and China, as well as changing security and commercial relationships with the United States. One speaker mentions having obtained top secret security clearance within three weeks to be informed and make decisions. He then points out that another speaker has refused the opportunity to obtain top secret security clearance for 950 days. The other speaker explains that while he previously held top secret clearance as a minister, he refused the recent offer because it would have gagged him under security law, preventing him from speaking freely about foreign interference without fear of prosecution. He claims Canada has experienced Chinese interference in two elections. He says that refusing the clearance allowed him to speak freely about issues such as a candidate who allegedly threatened a political opponent, and a quarter billion dollar loan obtained in China. The first speaker responds that robust debate has occurred despite the situation, and observes that China is not the only country accused of foreign interference.

Canadians are preparing for war with the U.S., a fact many Americans remain unaware of. I recently spoke with well-connected individuals in D.C. who were shocked to hear this. Prime Minister Trudeau's recent comments, caught on a hot mic, confirmed the seriousness of the situation. The threat is real; jokes about a U.S. invasion are not funny. Canadians are actively boycotting the U.S. and seeking alternative business partners. British Columbia, a province larger than most U.S. states, is canceling U.S. government contracts. Other provinces are following suit. My video on this topic has 80,000 views, yet I've received no American comments. The lack of awareness in the U.S. is deeply concerning; Americans need to understand the imminent threat of war.

The speaker believes that something suspicious is happening behind the scenes, but is unsure of the details. They feel that the Canadian government is not protecting its citizens and is prioritizing other countries over its own people. Speaker 1 asks about the possibility of receiving funding through a grant, and the speaker confirms that they were offered up to $1,000,000 for a project. The speaker expresses concern about the government's intentions and emphasizes the need to protect Canadian values and principles. They also mention the influence of left-wing ideologies in schools and universities. The speaker concludes by urging everyone to stand up for freedom and for the country. Speaker 1 comments on the ease with which the grant was offered and the subsequent threats made when the speaker questioned their intentions.

Speaker 0 asserts that Alberta is a wealth of natural resources, but they won't let them build a pipeline to the Pacific. They argues we should let them come down into the US, and that Alberta is a natural partner for the US. The Albertans are very independent people. There are rumors that they may have a referendum on whether they wanna stay in Canada or not. People are talking. People want sovereignty. They want what The US has got.

Speaker 0 notes that Trump used the Davos stage to demand Greenland back, warning allies to back off or face massive tariffs, calling Greenland “a piece of ice.” Speaker 1 says the goal is a piece of ice for world protection; the U.S. could have kept the land but chose not to, giving Greenland a choice to say yes and be appreciated or no and be remembered. Greenland is reportedly protesting in the streets, saying “hands off our country.” Speaker 0 adds that Trump has struck a deal framing a future agreement on Greenland and the Arctic, posted on Truth Social, stating that based on a productive meeting with the Secretary General of NATO, Marruta, a framework for a future deal with respect to Greenland and the Arctic has been formed, and that tariffs scheduled for February 1 will not be imposed. Speaker 2 challenges the claim, noting NATO doesn’t own Greenland, and questions whether Marruta can make such a deal. Speaker 0 continues the exchange, joking about not wanting a Met Gala, and suggests the post hints at the U.S. taking control of Canada as well because of Arctic interests. Canadian Prime Minister Carney responds by saying Canada will invoke Article 5 and support NATO to protect Denmark, with Denmark also unwilling to cede sovereignty following the framework. Speaker 2 adds that two people are deciding the fate of Greenland, and another participant begins to speak. Speaker 0 provides population context, saying about 57,000 people live in Greenland. Speaker 0 then mentions Putin’s response, quoting a brief remark that he’s “kinda behind this idea.” Speaker 2 notes Ravasi’s commentary and asks for a referendum, which Speaker 3 says would give Greenlanders a semblance of deciding for themselves, though it’s unclear how such a referendum would impact broader strategic interests. Speakers turn to Ralph Schulhammer, who is in Austria, to assess European reaction. Speaker 3 says Trump’s rhetoric in Davos was “very Trumpian” but contained carrots as well as sticks: he highlighted ancestry, support for a strong Europe, concerns about migration and energy policy, and suggested that Europe must strengthen itself to be a true partner; otherwise, the U.S. may retreat. The discussion acknowledges sentiment that Europe’s elites tend to frame issues as global rather than addressing national needs, with Speaker 3 arguing that policy-wise there can be shared interests, but communication strategy differed from Trump’s approach. The panel considers whether Greenland’s referendum would matter, noting that many peoples pursue autonomy but that Greenland’s outcome would not necessarily alter large strategic interests. They discuss historical precedents of land acquisitions and acknowledge the Greenland dispute sits at the intersection of Arctic strategic interests and great-power competition, including China and Russia’s activity in the region. Speaker 3 emphasizes that the future of Europe should be anchored in defending European territory and citizens, not only global agendas, and critiques the perception that Europe should always prioritize global issues over internal concerns. In closing, Speaker 0 references Macron’s overture to meet in Paris, noting Trump’s remark that Macron won’t be in power much longer. Ralph Schulhammer is thanked for his insights, with recognition of his Hammertime podcast.

An Alberta lawyer named Jeffrey Rath is leading a group exploring the possibility of Alberta joining the United States. Rath claims hundreds of Albertans are volunteering to join their delegation. The group intends to meet with representatives appointed by President Trump to explore Alberta becoming an independent sovereign nation with economic union of the U.S., a U.S. territory, or pursuing full statehood. Rath says Albertans are fed up with being governed by politicians from Quebec and Ontario. He claims a carbon tax increase is an insult to hardworking Albertans. He believes Albertans are culturally more closely affiliated with Montana than with Ottawa. Rath's message to Donald Trump is to support Alberta's self-determination as he promised to Greenland. He says Alberta would be an excellent partner to the United States.

Speaker 0: He's one of the greatest I've ever seen. Speaker 1: Don't mess with Whitey, I'm crazy. Speaker 2: Trudeau announced a 3-year exemption on carbon tax reform. Speaker 3: Will there be penalties or jail for not paying carbon tax? The government expects everyone to work. Speaker 1: We need to find ways to extract and use oil and gas with minimal emissions and carbon capture. Speaker 2: I demand the same carbon tax exemption for Saskatchewan families as others. It's only fair. Hopefully, it will be provided.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

The speaker claims Canada is in dire straits, citing Maxim Vermeer as the "Trump candidate" in their upcoming election, despite media focus on Mark Carney. Pierre Pauliev is described as a "Libtard" who opposes Trump's tariffs. Canada's economy is allegedly failing with zero GDP growth in ten years. Alberta and Quebec are reportedly considering referendums to secede, potentially joining the United States. The speaker criticizes Canadians for being too passive, particularly regarding the prosecution of a trucker convoy participant. The speaker suggests Canada's only hope is for Alberta to secede and become a U.S. state, with other provinces following suit. Trump's endorsement of Mark Carney is interpreted as a strategic move to destabilize Canada and pave the way for its annexation by the U.S., preventing it from becoming communist.

The speaker wrote "No Other Option" in 2021, arguing for Alberta's independence. After its publication, readers suggested fixing Canada before pursuing independence. This frustrated the speaker, who felt Albertans had long tried to improve Canada. The speaker argues that "the time to leave" is now, because Alberta has been trying since the early 1980s to have its voice heard within Canada, but all efforts have failed. This failure isn't due to lack of effort, but because political power in Canada is concentrated in Ontario and Quebec. These central provinces are uninterested in Alberta's concerns because they already hold the power and can ignore Alberta without consequence, which they have done.

Mark Harney allegedly advised the liberal government to enact the Emergencies Act on protesters in Ottawa. According to the speaker, Harney advised Trudeau for a very long time. The speaker claims the Act was deemed unconstitutional and unreasonable, violating the Charter of Rights. The speaker says the government is appealing the decision. The speaker believes the protesters occupying Ottawa are not patriots but are inciting anarchy and should face consequences. Anyone funding the convoy is funding sedition. Foreign funders interfered in domestic affairs and should be punished. The speaker insists foreign governments involved should be exposed.

Speaker 0 warned that if any ally tries to help the ICC, they will be sanctioned. They said, "we're gonna sanction you," and that "we should crush your economy because we're next." They referenced Justin in Canada and his position, asking, "What should the penalty be?"

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

Alberta has had enough of Ottawa trampling over provincial jurisdiction and ignoring the Canadian constitution. The province is tired of meaningless virtue signaling climate policies that impoverish Canadians and threaten energy security, as well as Ottawa's "screw the West, we'll take the rest" mentality. Alberta is also fed up with soft-on-crime policies that allow repeat offenders to roam the streets on bail. The province is also against unsafe supply, open border policies, and censorship laws.

The recent events in Canada are shocking. A peaceful movement of truckers, workers, and families protesting for their rights has faced violent repression. Their assets have been frozen, and they have been labeled as Nazis, racists, and terrorists. Many have been arrested on false charges and accused of foreign loyalties, despite their clear love for their country. They are being treated worse than serious criminals. A critical line has been drawn: you either support the peaceful truckers or align with the oppressive forces against them. We stand with the truckers and the Canadian people in their fight for freedom. Thank you.

The speaker claims former British colonies are becoming tyrannical, North Korean-style governments influenced by biased science. They allege Canadian news is propaganda, contrasting it with American news. A Canadian political YouTube channel was allegedly shut down by the CBC for expressing dissenting views. Canadians are supposedly blocked from viewing certain American content. Fluoride is being reintroduced into Calgary's water supply despite European bans, based on Health Canada's recommendation. Banks can allegedly close or reduce credit lines, reminiscent of actions during trucker protests. The speaker claims the Canadian government interferes with private property. The speaker alleges criminals are protected, and the MAID program is offered to children, the depressed, and those who can't afford to live. The CBC allegedly misrepresents Canada's economic performance, which is claimed to be the worst in the G7. The speaker suggests Alberta should separate from Canada.

If enough citizens sign a petition within 60 days, Alberta must hold a referendum on forming its own country. Once independent, Alberta could negotiate joining the U.S. or remain sovereign. One speaker felt Alberta's laws made obtaining 600,000 signatures in 60 days impossible, considering the voting adult population. Another speaker stated the population is 4,200,000, with 750,000 rural voters, suggesting obtaining 500,000 rural signatures is possible, with the remainder from urban centers. One speaker believes Alberta would separate if Mark Carney wins the 2025 election. They also suggest Donald Trump may have suspected this, as Canada doesn't want to join the U.S., but Alberta might, followed by Saskatchewan within a year.

Many Canadians want a federal election this year instead of waiting until 2025. In Alberta, there is a desire for an immediate change in the environment minister, Stephen Gebow. The speaker has good relationships with some federal ministers, including Chrystia Freeland, whom they consider a champion for their province.

According to a recent poll, the number of British Columbians wanting BC to leave Canada has grown from 20 to 28% in a little over one year. The Premier said he hates this discussion and wants it to stop. Concerns may continue to grow with the election of Mark Carney. The Premier is excited to work with Mark Carney regarding trade corridors, energy corridors, supporting clean energy, support for Alberta to decarbonize, support to the Yukon, support to major projects to reduce carbon pollution, growing the economy, critical minerals and mining, training, and standing on our own two feet. The Premier has done nothing to address the greatest threats to unity: political interference by the Chinese Communist Party, the fragmentation of BC by over 200 bands each asserting its own sovereignty, and the strangulation of the economy by powerful US funded environmental groups and other hostile powers. The Premier stated that the member's posturing is racist against indigenous and first nations that do in fact have rights and sovereignty in this province and that she promotes residential schools denial and denies the sovereignty of first nations.

An independent Alberta would eliminate federal income tax, GST, excise tax, carbon tax, and equalization payments. Alberta sends over $70 billion annually to Ottawa but receives less than $35 billion back. Independence would allow Alberta to control immigration, addressing infrastructure strains. Alberta would no longer be subject to arbitrary federal regulations. Take-home pay would more than double, and diesel prices would be halved. The speaker is going to Washington to seek US support for Alberta independence, hoping President Trump will support self-determination for Alberta, similar to his stance on Greenland. Independence would secure a US energy supply, free from federal regulations and emission caps. Alberta would no longer be subject to the "idiotic whims" of Ottawa politicians influenced by the World Economic Forum. The current Alberta government recognizes strong support for independence, potentially leading to a referendum this year with clear conditions for remaining in Canada. The goal is a free and independent Alberta.

Trudeau announced that the Canadian Armed Forces can now be deployed against civilians, a move criticized by some. This action would not be accepted in the United States. Spread the word about this concerning decision.