reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The goal is to establish a one-world government with centralized control. The speaker argues that sustainable development is not about recycling or resource allocation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and impoverishing large portions of the population. They emphasize the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to protect personal freedom.

Speaker 0: United Nations agenda 21, sustainable development. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. And so many of us around the world think that a sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implement it on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, nongovernmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

The video explores the concept of sustainable development and its connection to Agenda 21, a non-binding action plan signed by George H.W. Bush in 1992. It discusses how Agenda 21 aims to address issues such as overpopulation, resource depletion, and environmental degradation through the implementation of zoning laws and regulations at various levels of government. However, concerns are raised about the potential impact on individual freedoms and property rights. The video also highlights the role of NGOs in embedding sustainable development concepts into government programs and the United Nations' use of climate change to justify central planning and gain control over resources. It mentions organizations like ICLEI operating in the US to implement Agenda 21 without public knowledge or consent. The speaker argues that sustainable development may lead to a global police state and universal poverty.

Economic force because Canada and The United States, that would really be something. You get rid of that artificially drawn line and you take a look at what that looks like, and it would also be much better for national security. Don't forget, we basically protect Canada. The United States and Canada may become one simplifying border controls, or Canada might keep its hydropower causing energy problem in The US. Now we all know that Trump wants to take Canada and Greenland. These points frame a possible future relationship between the United States, Canada, and Greenland, touching on security, energy, and border policy.

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. It aims to establish a totalitarian state with control over land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, information, and human beings worldwide. Contrary to popular belief, Agenda 21 is not about recycling or resource allocation for all. Instead, it focuses on relocating populations to concentrated city centers and achieving centralized control. The plan's three pillars are economy, ecology, and equity, but social equity is used to impoverish large portions of the population and weaken developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and fight for freedom.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

This is about Agenda 21, a United Nations plan for total control over land, resources, and people. It aims for a one-world government and moving populations into city centers. The mainstream media won't cover this, so people need to educate themselves and fight for personal freedom. We must work together as individuals to resist this totalitarian state and protect our freedom.

The transcript discusses the United Nations Habitat I Plan from the 1976 Vancouver Convention, which it says relocates people from farms and rural “wild lands” to cities or human settlements. The goal, it claims, is to concentrate populations in specific zones to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage, so people stay in their homes and may work there, minimizing car use, energy consumption, and water use. It asserts that the UN, being opposed to property rights, will first phase out single-family homes, pushing We the People into apartments and condos in mega cities near railroad tracks. The envisioned living would involve high-rise, “stack and pack” dwelling units built to UN-specified building codes, with guidance from Ickley, COGS, the ADA, and various NGOs aligned with sustainable development. The narrative contrasts this with “animals” roaming continental corridors, while humans live in transit villages and smart cities. Smart growth or new urbanism is described as ideology that questions the need for excess space, suggesting that a two-person couple in a three-bedroom house doesn’t need that extra space. The speakers claim there is a coordinated effort to make private transportation and home ownership as miserable as possible, portraying it as the duty of individuals to exist as global citizens with minimal private life. The plan is depicted as featuring high-rise, stacked living with smart meters and smart heating, enabling energy use to be tightly controlled. If energy use is high, “the energy police,” aided by neighbors and street surveillance, will intervene. A speaker emphasizes that concentrating people in a thousand-person buildings makes monitoring their behavior, location, and thoughts easier than in rural or suburban settings, with smart meters measuring all life activities via smart appliances. Water usage is targeted, with statements that those maintaining gardens or single-family homes—consuming more than a minimal daily water allowance—are unsustainable and should be removed from single-family residences. A participant argues that people with a couple of acres and their own water supply who can grow their own food are a threat to a collectivist society, implying that they will not rely on politicians for basic needs. The transcript ties these ideas to Agenda 21, claiming the plan aims to remove people from the country so corporations can grow all food, while simultaneously denying private living. It concludes by describing human settlements and food sheds as modern-day concentration camps, suggesting that with no cars or parking, all will walk and bike, becoming fit and healthy only insofar as the GM foods they are compelled to eat allow.

Speaker 0 argues that money controllers make all rules and that America has become a socialist communist country, not capitalistic, because of a central bank. He says a central bank prevents capitalism and that prosperity is created by printing dollars or injecting digits into the economy, which results in an infusion of credit rather than real manufacturing or prosperity. Speaker 1 summarizes as a money planned economy. Speaker 0 asserts that with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, the government became dependent on private banks for money, and began taxing people. He states Social Security started in 1935, issuing Social Security cards with numbers on them and deducting money from paychecks under the belief it would fund retirement. He says income tax followed, enabled by Social Security, and notes the government now takes money out automatically, implying distrust of public willingness to pay. Speaker 1 comments that the government now controls the tax payment itself and that people are effectively slaves because taxes are taken automatically. Speaker 0 contends that through the Federal Reserve System, the government has become vested in bankers who profit from taxation, and that the bankers have taken control of the government, making Republicans and Democrats essentially the same since neither party proposes shutting down the Fed or stopping taxes or addressing major American issues. Speaker 1 introduces a personal connection: Nick Rockefeller, of the Rockefeller family, who, through an attorney, discussed with Speaker 0 the banking industry’s ultimate plan. Speaker 0 claims they discussed a global banking network, asserting that central banks exist worldwide, including in Germany, England, and Italy, and that central banking is part of the Communist Manifesto. He argues that two major planks—central banking and a graduated income tax—have been adopted in the United States as part of the Communist Manifesto, integrated via the Federal Reserve System. Speaker 0 then outlines the ultimate goal: to create a one-world government run by bankers, implemented in sections via the European currency, the euro, and the European constitution. He claims there is an effort to establish a North American Union in the United States and to create a new currency called the AMERO, all contributing to a worldwide government. Speaker 0 describes a future where every person is chipped with RFID, and all money exists in those chips. He claims money could be deducted digitally from the chip by authorities, eliminating cash, effectively giving total control to the authorities. He says protesters could have their chips turned off, leaving them unable to buy food or do anything, equating this to total control over people. Speaker 1 adds that the chip would be connected to a database containing purchasing records and other personal data. Speaker 0 reiterates the goal of a one-world government controlled by the banking industry, with everyone chipped and all money stored in chips, allowing control over every financial transaction and making people slaves or serfs to the bankers.

Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan from 1992 that aims to control and inventory everything, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The plan involves non-governmental organizations, corporations, and governments working together to regulate and dictate global affairs. The ultimate goal is to establish a one-world government with total control. This implementation is done through public-private partnerships, which is essentially fascism. It's important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.

"This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century." "It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world." "The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three e's." "Social equity is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the nations." "Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies." "The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press." "You need to be your own press."

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim that it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being about impoverishing large portions of the population. The speaker believes that major corporations support this plan to have unrestricted movement of workers and goods, reduce wages, and increase control. They emphasize the importance of educating oneself and others about this agenda and working together to preserve personal freedom.

Agenda 21 is a real plan to remove humans from rural and suburban areas. It has been implemented in the US and supported by every president. It is a global plan implemented locally in every city and town. It aims to control all aspects of life, including land, water, plants, animals, and human beings. The plan is called communitarianism, which balances individual rights with the rights of the community. The individual always loses in this philosophy. Agenda 21 is a stealth plan happening in plain sight. It includes smart growth and wildlands, which restrict mobility and shift land ownership from private to public. This is a takeover of our nation and an administrative coup d'etat. It is sold as an economic driver but is designed to fail.

Speaker 0 contends the US Forest Service Agency is added again, targeting "half a million acres" of Cimarron And Comanche National Grassland and, importantly, "coming after your private property land." The process began in 2023 under Biden administration guidelines; "we have new guidelines now," and "the secretary of ag ... has the power to stop it." "'Drivers and stressors is code for why they need your land." "Herbivory, which is code for cattle grazing." They claim "Land ownership is a stressor on what the US Forest Service Agency wants to accomplish here with this new assessment so they can take this land from the public and so they can take private land." They state "Land ownership patterns in the Cimarron And Comanche National Grasslands are highly fragmented" ... "This fragmentation poses challenges to us taking over the land is what they wanna say, but they can't." "The private landowner is in their way." "They take land from ranchers, and once they perfect the process, they go after anyone that's in their way." "You're in their way." "Please share this. This must stop. We gotta get the word out. We gotta stop this crazy crap."

The discussion revolves around the concept of a North American Union, which aims to merge Canada, the United States, and Mexico, similar to the European Union. This idea gained traction in the 1990s, with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) seen as a precursor to this political and economic integration. Additionally, the Club of Rome, established in 1968, has advocated for centralizing power under the guise of addressing climate and environmental concerns. They proposed dividing the world into regional groups that would ultimately be governed by a world authority, including the fusion of the United States, Canada, and Greenland.

Speaker 1 describes a scenario in which troops are on the streets in Los Angeles and Washington DC, with Trump saying he will deploy troops in other cities and aiming to unseat Maduro in Venezuela due to oil, while disregarding stated justifications. He notes these developments as examples of what he has warned about, arguing that in the United States these moves come from a leader who claims to oppose them. He contends that Alex Jones is promoting the same policies that he says Trump is introducing, including a plan to use troops to intervene in Venezuela and to deploy troops into Mexico against the Mexican government, citing drug cartels as a pretext. Speaker 1 then connects these events to a broader historical pattern, tracing them to technocracy and the concept of a technate—an intended global government run by appointed technocrats and bureaucrats rather than elected politicians. He asserts that Elon Musk’s grandfather, Holderman, supported technocracy in the United States and that the technate movement in the 1930s aligned with Adolf Hitler. He references maps from the 1930s showing a technate extending from Venezuela through Central America, Mexico, the United States, and Canada, ending in Greenland. He claims this vision of technate relates to efforts to position Greenland as an American territory and to the idea of reshaping North American governance into a non-elective, globally coordinated structure under a world government. Speaker 1 asserts that moves to intervene in Venezuela, deploy troops into Mexico, and the push for Greenland as a territory fit into the unfolding technate plan. He emphasizes that, from his perspective after decades of analysis, these elements “fit together,” and that even people who oppose some aspects may still be supporting components of the same global dystopia conspiracy. He notes that his synthesis has become clearer over time, contrasting it with how the same ideas seemed bewildering in earlier years. Speaker 0 briefly shifts to directing readers to the video description for further reading and to obtain his latest book, which is positioned as streamlining these interconnections. He mentions his new book as designed to demonstrate how the various elements align into a single conspiracy framework.

The speaker discusses the Agenda for the 21st Century, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They explain that sustainable development is not about recycling and resource creation, but rather about moving populations into concentrated city centers and controlling all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, and human beings. The speaker emphasizes that social equity is not about providing clean water and air, but rather about impoverishing large portions of the population and bringing down developed nations. They argue that major corporations want unrestricted movement of workers and goods to reduce wages and exploit and control populations. The speaker urges individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together for personal freedom.

The discussion centers on Venezuela through a lens of technocracy, arguing that the US intervention and the political dynamics around Nicolas Maduro cannot be explained solely by drug enforcement, oil interests, or traditional geopolitics. Instead, the argument presented is that a technocratic project is driving the actions and plans in the region. Derek Brose explains that while there are oil connections and corporate interests (for example, BlackRock owning stakes in some companies that could benefit from US involvement in Venezuela), the larger frame is technocracy. He defines technocracy as a movement from the 1930s–1950s that proposed replacing the political and business classes with engineers and experts to run society, allocate resources, and micromanage all aspects of life, potentially at the expense of privacy and personal freedoms. He notes that the technocrats envisioned a continental plan—called the North American Technate—that would extend from Greenland to parts of Central and South America, including large portions of Venezuela, with the US as the leading power in that unit. He references a 1940 Technocrats map supporting this vision and compares it to later concepts like the North American Union. Brose argues the technocratic project is relevant today due to ties among Trump-era figures and technocrats. He points to Peter Thiel-connected circles, Elon Musk and his family background, and adviser Stephen Miller, who has advocated US expansion into Greenland and Venezuela. He mentions Katie Miller, Stephen Miller’s wife, and notes her connections to tech-advisory circles, including work with Elon Musk. He claims that individuals around Trump—across the Trump administration, the Bilderberg Group, the World Economic Forum, and Young Global Leaders—are following the technocratic blueprint that seeks to control resources and territories across the Western Hemisphere and beyond. The conversation also touches on sovereignty and the perception of legitimacy. The guests discuss how protests and support for Maduro exist within Venezuela, acknowledging that public opinion is not monolithic and that foreign media often portrays a simplified narrative. They compare the situation to other countries, noting that opposition or support for leaders in places like Iran and Mexico can be amplified or manipulated to justify intervention. The broader point is to ask who benefits from US bombing, intervention, and saber-rattling in Venezuela, Iran, Colombia, Cuba, and elsewhere, suggesting that the technocratic framework would view such actions as aligning with a continental resource control strategy and a global technocratic order. Towards the end, the speakers reflect on the current geopolitical moment as 2026 begins, emphasizing that the same agendas tied to technocracy and resource control persist across administrations. They reiterate the importance of examining the technocracy angle as part of understanding Venezuela, Greenland, and broader Western Hemisphere complicities, and encourage readers to review Derek Brose’s article for a detailed account.

Speakers allege that figures like Bill Gates are driving farmland consolidation toward large blocks controlled by government or private consortia, with policies favoring non-animal proteins and the removal of stockyards and poultry farms. They claim small and medium farms are being gobbled up by corporate mega-farms due to mounting regulations, a trend seen in China where mechanized mega-farms displace family plots. They warn the globalist agenda involves expropriating farmers and taking over parliaments and governments. They point to 20 countries comprising 80% of emissions and argue money must be used to pull them to the table. They describe a global bureaucratic script with the same policies, tripled farming costs, and rising prices, predicting shortages. The end goal is total consolidation of agriculture and food supply; if you control the food, you control the people.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

The speaker discusses the idea of an invasion of the United States and its impact on global sovereignty. They claim to have information from a source who infiltrated a globalist cult at the UN level, revealing discussions about bringing 100 million people into the US to establish a regional government with Canada and Mexico. The plan involves pushing people out of Latin American countries and pulling them into the US, eventually proposing a regional government for ease of travel and a better life. The speaker also mentions that the right to migrate has been recognized as a human right by the UN, superseding sovereign rights. They criticize the Biden administration and open border ideologues for implementing this policy.

Speaker 0 discusses the public misunderstanding of what it means for humans to integrate with AI, noting that many imagine only using chatbots more, but the concept is a mixed reality existence where it’s hard to distinguish digital from real. They reference documents describing a future where people won’t leave their lounge rooms, with loved ones appearing as holograms and the sensation of hugging them in the skin, including dopamine and endorphin release, even though the contact is with a hologram. This is presented as part of a broader push into a digital world since COVID. Speaker 1 responds by connecting this to the idea of a societal digital nervous system, where everything is based on electricity and emotions, and life is governed by electrical processes like fight or flight. They describe a state-run institution in which AI would be the teacher, and emphasize that the spectrum of digital integration would form a pervasive nervous-system-like infrastructure. Speaker 0 calls the future horrific to contemplate and points to aggressive data-center expansion, NDAs shielding big tech from communities, aquifers being drained, and people losing access to water. They argue the situation will worsen as the push continues. Speaker 1 adds that the flooding in Texas highlighted the strategic importance of the Edward Aquifer and notes that many natural underground water stores are being taken over by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Commerce, with involvement from the Interior and State Department. They describe a broader pattern of resource control, mentioning the Tennessee Valley Authority and the involvement of the Department of Defense and the Army Corps of Engineers in a large-scale, fifteen-minute city grid, including water resources and nuclear power being confiscated. Speaker 0 warns that declaring national security needs could justify eminent domain, a notion Sam Altman has suggested in relation to AI, and asserts that this would normalize the appropriation of resources. They argue this is why legislative action is needed to protect communities and prevent such takeovers. The discussion expands to concerns about water poisoning through data-center pollution, EMF exposure, noise, health impacts, and other environmental harms accompanying the data-center push. Speaker 1 concludes by offering a personal course of action: a heartfelt recommendation to pray and to build a relationship with Jesus, stressing the importance of prayer and faith in navigating these concerns.

In this video, the speaker discusses various entities and their alleged control over different sectors. They mention Carnegie, JPMorgan, and Rockefeller as individuals who supposedly bought up universities and the medical industry in the 1930s. The speaker claims that organizations like the WHO, Red Cross, USDA, EPA, and FDA are designed to keep people unhealthy. They also bring up Planned Parenthood, eugenics, and the founder of the organization, mentioning sterilization. The speaker questions why the Department of Defense is in charge of the CDC and the National Institute of Health, and mentions "agenda 21" as something to research.

The United Nations, funded by the Rockefellers, has been acting as a global government since 1945. They aim to control land under the guise of climate conservation through Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. The UN plans to seize 30% of land by 2030, displacing millions. In Europe, direct confiscation is working, but in America, the government had to adapt after the Bundy family protest. The Rockefeller Foundation's America 2050 plan involves depopulating certain areas and creating mega regions. Train derailments and chemical spills are suspicious, potentially used as an excuse to evacuate people and seize land. The EPA has the authority to control private lands during toxic disasters. The UN and its allies are persistent in their agenda.