reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"Can you clarify what kind of protest, president Trump does support or find acceptable?" "President absolutely supports peaceful protest." "He supports the first amendment." "He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard." "He does not support violence of any kind." "He does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their job." "It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not." "Unfortunately, for Democrats, that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and this violence to continue, and the president has had to step in." "What question?" "So if there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the militant parade, president Trump would allow that?" "Of course, the president supports peaceful protests." "What a stupid question. Raquel."

"I had the pleasure of talking with both Nick Sorter, the journalist who was attacked in Portland yesterday and then arrested there, oddly enough." "And also the attorney general, Pam Bondi, my boss, about what is happening in Portland and the urgent need for federal civil rights investigation over there." "we promptly moved to open up that federal civil rights investigation." "Portland is already under a federal consent decree for its failed police practices." "our very detailed demands for information are requiring body cam information and details about why, multiple journalists have been attacked there in Portland and the police seem to do nothing about it." "National Guard is being activated in Portland, thanks to our president's leadership." "So, follow along and we will keep everyone posted as we go forward in this situation."

Speaker asserts that the displayed events are not January 6 but include 05/31/2020 in front of the White House, when the president was ushered into a bunker; 07/27 in Portland, described as Antifa rioting; more rioting in Salt Lake City; and 06/01/2020 on the streets of DC. "Where was the hotline?" The speaker argues, "This is what domestic terror looks like." Noting "This is not a school board meeting," they say "There is no hotline for any of these rights, and we are gonna have a hotline that's going to report parents for caring about their children's education." They claim, "the DOJ would rather investigate a thousand more people from January 6 than any single person in these photos. What a shame." Concluding, "This is no longer the department of justice. It is the department of subjective justice."

Your party supports law enforcement, but if released prisoners commit crimes, should Trump be held accountable? No more than Biden should be for his policies. If Biden charges offenders who reoffend, he bears responsibility. Why can't your party admit when Trump is wrong? If offenders like the Proud Boys reoffend after being released, isn't Trump responsible? If judges are Trump-appointed, they face consequences; if Biden-appointed, they often walk free. During the Black Lives Matter protests, many offenders weren't prosecuted. You claim there's no coverage of riots, but that’s not true. I left the White House during a riot, and my life was threatened, yet there's no coverage of that. If they break the law, they go to jail. I asked you to acknowledge if you think the pardons are wrong. Those released under Soros-backed DAs often commit worse crimes without punishment. Thank you for your time.

"It's been ninety days of protest at the ICE facility in Portland where tensions are high, neighborhoods resemble war zones, and the line between order and chaos is razor thin." "We've had multiple assaults on federal officers ever since early June." "Our mission here is to exactly that is to protect the federal facility, protect the employees, protect visitors." "We've had since June, every single night, we've had protesters." "They are twelve hour shifts, and but we're twenty four seven." "The guillotine was abandoned property from Monday night. It was rolled out as part of the protest, and then after the crowd left, it was left in the middle of the street. So we removed it and and brought it in until the rightful owner comes to claim it." "We would love for people to join our agency." "this story is far from over."

Speaker Harmit Dillon discusses the current situation in Portland. He notes that the United States Department of Justice is under shutdown orders like the rest of the government, but those responsible for law and order remain on the job. He mentions a conversation with Nick Sorter, the journalist who was attacked in Portland yesterday and then arrested there, and with Pam Bondi, his boss, about what is happening in Portland and the urgent need for a federal civil rights investigation. Dillon states that they promptly moved to open a federal civil rights investigation. He explains that Portland is already under a federal consent decree for its failed police practices, in place for over a decade. Their very detailed demands for information are requiring body cam information and details about why multiple journalists have been attacked there and why the police seem to do nothing about it. He recalls litigating in Portland about journalist Andy Ngo being viciously attacked there while the police again did nothing about it. Dillon notes that the National Guard is being activated in Portland, attributed to the president's leadership. He says they will ask folks to stay tuned and have faith. He emphasizes that the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division is extremely aggressive in protecting the rights of American citizens, protecting the First Amendment, and ensuring that police practices in the United States are not discriminatory in violation of federal law. He asserts it is about time that Portland residents and people in Oregon felt safe from the scourge of Antifa and from lax and unacceptable police practices, and invites people to follow along as they go forward in this situation.

Marxists, Islamists, and the administration have convinced a Washington DC jury to convict 5 pro-life activists who now face up to 11 years in prison for protesting. Meanwhile, individuals with different political beliefs are being sentenced to 10, 15, and even 20 years in prison. Antifa and other groups have caused chaos in cities like Portland, Minneapolis, and Seattle, engaging in violence, looting, and even taking over parts of the city. This political repression is immoral, un-American, and dangerous. If elected, the speaker promises to appoint a special task force to review the cases of unjustly persecuted political prisoners and sign their pardons or commutations on day 1.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

Speaker 0 has reported on Antifa for nine years, noting the prior administration didn't acknowledge it and the current one pledges to treat the militant violent extremists as the domestic terrorists that they are. They “organize under the banner of Rose City Antifa,” are decentralized and not a singular organization, with autonomous chapters and propaganda encouraging direct action. In 2019, while reporting on a Portland protest, he was ambushed in a beating and suffered a brain bleed. In 2021, he was chased through downtown, tackled, in a choke hold, as a mob pounded hotel windows and drivers drove away. No one was held responsible; a judge dismissed Rose City Antifa as not a registered entity, and Portland police closed cases for lack of identification. He says Democrats control Portland and Antifa act as shock troops for them; “I wasn't the first to be beaten” and “somebody... assassinated in 2020.”

"There's a concern that there were agents of the government or assets of the government present on January 5 and January 6, during the protests." "I'm need afraid I can't see that at all." "Alright. You have you have those images there, and they're captioned. They were from January 5 and January 6." "As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he'll probably go to jail, he'll probably be arrested, but he wants every but they need to go into the capital the next day, is then the next day directing people to the capital." "And as far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything." "One of the norms of the justice department is to not comment on impending investigations and particularly not to comment about, particular scenes or particular individuals." "So I'm not gonna violate this norm of, of of, the rule of law. I'm not gonna comment on an investigation that's ongoing."

- Speaker 0 explains that there is a delicate balance between First Amendment rights and allowing cars to move through; protesters are not a one-way situation, and there are corridors to move traffic. As of now, theyare not enacting measures to prevent people from being in the roadway while practicing their First Amendment right, and they are asking protesters to avoid the street if possible. This could change, but currently protesters are allowed to occupy street space because they are exercising their personal right to protest, and there are ways for people to get around them. - Speaker 1 asks about past policies, recalling that during 2020 riots and after Trump’s 2016 election there were hard-line arrests for stepping off sidewalks. Speaker 0 responds that people could not be arrested for being in the street at present, and if arrests were to occur they would make an announcement; anyone who wants to leave the street can leave without arrest. This is not considered a major roadway, and there are corridors protesters provide to move traffic. - Speaker 1 asks who is making the day-to-day decisions; Speaker 2 clarifies that the decisions are made day by day, minute by minute, by our CMIC (incident commander). Speaker 1 asks for the name; Speaker 0 does not know the person by name but confirms the CMIC is in charge on site and relays information to the chief. - Speaker 1 asks whether Bob Day is involved; Speaker 0 confirms that everyone answers to the chief (Bob Day) at the end of the day, since the chief is the head of the city. Speaker 2 confirms that the mayor is at the top of the hierarchy for decisions. - Speaker 2 and Speaker 1 discuss whether if the mayor ordered protesters not to be in the street at all, the responders would carry that out and arrest accordingly, with Speaker 0 indicating they would figure out the most equitable way to do so. - Speaker 1 recalls a prior incident in Portland involving a women’s rights free speech event and expensive permits/insurance, and asks whether Antifa has a permit or insurance; Speaker 0 responds that they wouldn’t call these people Antifa and that they have not identified themselves. - A subsequent speaker (Speaker 3) interjects with a rant; the group continues with a chaotic exchange about evaluating arrests and jaywalking, with Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 discussing arrest priorities and past enforcement patterns, including reference to "jaywalking" as a focus. - Overall, the discussion centers on current policy allowing street occupation by protesters, day-to-day decision-making by the CMIC under the mayor and chief, and the potential for changing enforcement depending on instructions from city leadership.

In the video, someone asks if the cop who pushed them is from Portland and associated with Antifa.

"It doesn't feel like America... it feels like a third world country." "police have been totally infiltrated by a leftist militant group." Downtown Portland looks postapocalyptic—graffiti, vandalism, boarded-up windows, no people. "Police there aren't actually allowed to be police." I was assaulted; Antifa thugs coordinated—one swung on me, broke my camera, and threw me in a hole. I was charged with disorderly conduct too; video shows me telling the person to back away. Officers couldn't explain my charges for over forty-five minutes. Portland police relegated traffic control to Antifa militants and wouldn't open the road to the spaghetti factory. DA dropped the case after we demanded discovery relating to Rose City Antifa and the Portland Police Department. A Secret Service agent was fired for saying Charlie Kirk had it coming. DOJ investigation aims to expose rot within Portland PD; the findings could inform other cities.

The Trump administration is committed to maintaining law and order in the face of anarchy in Portland. A video showing violent threats was shown, prompting Fox News to cut away.

The election was totally fraudulent as we all knew. 100% it was stolen. January 6 was just, you know, mom and dad who were mad about what they saw to be an election that they thought was unfair. During 02/2020, rioters caused about $3,000,000,000 worth of damage and killed about two dozen people over the course of eight months. This is David Dorn in his very last moments on Earth. He's a former police captain protecting a store. I happen to believe that a lot of the ways they treated rioters that were left wing. Kamala Harris was working to help the instigators, the criminals, get out of jail. Giving the narrative that there's no consequences for acts of violence even on federal grounds, cases being dropped from the federal siege in Portland by leftist rioters. I believe that was part of setting a narrative to gaslight the right wing into thinking that they could riot too and get away with it. This is mostly a protest. It is not, generally speaking, unruly. Show me where it says that protest was supposed to be polite and peaceful. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protesters. Too many see the protest as the problem. No. The problem is what forced your fellow citizens to take to the streets.

The transcript presents a highly inflammatory, pro-immigration-enforcement narrative centered on recent unrest in Portland and Chicago, with broad claims about law enforcement, media, and politics. - In Portland, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, is described as visiting “Rip City,” inspecting what is framed as Antifa’s “mini confederacy,” and interacting with an undocumented migrant in a way likened to a dramatic arrest, with wording implying removal from the country. - The situation at protests is depicted as chaotic and violent, with ICE vans “busting through barricades” and targeting a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, and pedophiles “all iced in Oregon.” Protesters are accused of throwing rocks and using lasers and dye, while Democrats are described as saying it’s all “smoke and mirrors.” - Protesters are described as peaceful on the surface but with videographers behind them to create a perception of chaos; a tone is set that the media is biased, and there is contempt for mainstream outlets, including a claim that “Legacy Media doesn’t have any reporters filming the riots.” - Chief Bob Day is introduced as a police chief who is also a DEI consultant, previously working for a DEI nonprofit, and accused of coaching Antifa to avoid arrest. The narrative suggests that Day prioritizes positive media coverage and that his actions reflect a broader strategy to reimagine policing. - The piece asserts a strained relationship between people of color, police, and a broader social order, with speakers claiming that bias and racism within policing have not been adequately addressed and that challenges will increase unless something changes. - There are repeated claims that Antifa is attacking immigration officers for an extended period, while Portland is described as aiding Antifa and resisting ICE. A meeting between Kristi Noem and Bob Day is described as unfavorable to law enforcement, with Day allegedly dissatisfied by the outcome. - Chicago is portrayed similarly: federal agents’ operations are described as being hampered by a stand-down order, with a female rioter who allegedly doxxed ICE agents and rammed a car later described as extremely dangerous; prosecutors reportedly characterize the individual as dangerous, while the left is accused of prioritizing “micro confederacies” to protect alleged criminals. - The transcript ties these events to political figures and themes: mentioning Mayor Johnson and “no ICE zones,” referencing violent crime, and portraying actions by Democrats and certain judges as lenient toward criminals. A Latin King calls for a $10,000 hit on a border patrol commander. - There is a recurring narrative about the 2024-2025 political climate: immigration, crime, media bias, and political power. Claims include that illegal crossings have declined to the lowest level since 1970, that the FBI has arrested thousands in crime sweeps, and that political operatives hope to deploy troops to polling places to “protect the vote.” - The piece ends with criticisms of Kristi Noem and others, accusing them of sensationalism and of inciting actions, and portraying discussions about immigration and policing as deeply adversarial, with calls for stronger enforcement and political maneuvering to influence elections.

Speaker 0: We have a problem with the CIA and FBI in Washington. Speaker 1: What's your plan to start over and fix them? Speaker 0: They've gotten out of control, with weaponization and other issues. The people need to bring about change. We were making progress, but more needs to be done.

I think Elon Musk should be held accountable for his actions, he essentially organized a fascist coup. He spent millions to get Trump into office, who is now acting as his puppet. How is that different from what George Soros does? Soros isn't trying to slash federal benefits. Electing an incompetent, insurrectionist, fascist, idiot like Trump isn't going to help our problems in Oregon. Are you saying protesting Trump and Musk is more important than what's going on here in Oregon? Everything we have here in Oregon is going to be jeopardized by the loss of our democracy at the federal level. What did Elon Musk do to break the law? Look at what he has done in the last month. Each and every one of those things is something that we would have been arrested for. I'm hoping you could tell me something specific.

Can you clarify the presence of federal agents or assets on January 5th and 6th? Specifically, how many were there, did they encourage people to enter the Capitol, and did any actually go inside? I can't comment on an ongoing investigation. Two years ago, you were asked the same question. Can you provide an answer now? I don't know the answer. So you don’t know how many were present or if there were any at all? I have no knowledge of that. You’ve had two years to find out.

Nick says Portland doesn’t feel like America, "it doesn't feel like America... it feels like a third world country." He cites infiltrated police and a downtown that’s "post apocalyptic." He was assaulted by Antifa, but "the Portland police arrested me instead when I got assaulted." The charge was "disorderly conduct" while violent acts occurred; "the DA refused to go through with the case" and video shows him "telling the person to back away" as Antifa blocked cameras with an umbrella. He describes police failing to explain charges for 45 minutes and a sergeant ordering the arrest. They claim police allow Antifa to control traffic; a restaurant owner's access was blocked. DOJ plans investigations into Portland PD; "a can of worms has been opened here" and talks of a "forensic look" and possible federal power or overhaul. He also mentions a fired Secret Service agent and broader national concerns.

A report portrays Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem visiting Portland, inspecting Antifa's confederacy and arresting a migrant—'No. Not let you out. You're under arrest.' ICE vans break barricades; 'a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, pedophiles, all iced in Oregon.' Protesters described as peaceful, with videographers filming chaos: 'peaceful, but they have videographers behind them, and then they start throwing down pepper balls and tear gas to film it.' Chief Bob Day, a DEI consultant, is accused of coaching Antifa; 'We have a good reason why we actually need them, so that's why we're asking people to get out the street.' 'Antifa's spitting on officers, and Bob is coaching them not to get arrested.' Chicago features 'no ICE zones' and rioters ramming agents; a University of Chicago sociology professor is named; 'Latin king shock caller' offers a $10,000 hit. National Guard deployment, marathon, and tensions frame the piece.

The transcript presents a highly charged, partisan monologue-style coverage of urban unrest, immigration enforcement, and political rhetoric. It centers on claims about Portland, Chicago, and national figures, presenting multiple viewpoints and sensationalized language. Key points include: - In Portland, Kristi Noem, described as the secretary of homeland security, allegedly visited “Rip City,” inspected Antifa’s activities, and interacted with immigration enforcement, with claims that ICE is removing individuals described as fentanyl traffickers, murder suspects, sex predators, and pedophiles in Oregon. The narration asserts that the city’s law enforcement and political leadership are hostile to ICE, while depicting protesters as rioters with reporters filming to amplify chaos. The segment alleges a dissension within Antifa and portrays the police as anxious about media coverage and influencers at the riots. - Chief Bob Day of Portland is depicted as both a police chief and a DEI consultant who allegedly spent time with a DEI nonprofit called the Red Door Project, whose mission is described as “Reimagine policing.” The narrative contends Day has coached Antifa in avoiding arrest and blames “the selfie-stick guy” at riots for problems, while suggesting Day’s actions reflect a broader city stance toward ICE and immigration enforcement. - The text quotes various protesters and media commentators, including assertions that mainstream outlets avoid fair coverage of riots, while protesters are accused of using videographers to manufacture impressions of chaos. There are criticisms of media bias and claims that left-leaning voices minimize violence or downplay confrontations with police. - In Chicago, the account claims Mayor Johnson created “no ICE zones” after incidents in which Antifa allegedly rammed agents with cars, leading to a stand-down order and prosecutions that were described as undermined by locally connected judges. A University of Chicago sociology professor involved in a case is noted, with the narrative highlighting a broader claim that advocates for immigration enforcement face danger and doxing on social platforms. - The transcript links these events to a national narrative: opposition figures argue for stronger police funding and training, assert that the left pressures businesses not to cooperate with ICE, and claim that criminals and illegal crossings have been down, with references to national guard deployments in Chicago and to immigration enforcement as a political instrument in elections. - The piece ties in multiple sensational claims about specific individuals’ loyalties, alleged threats, and contemplated political moves, including overtones about Nazi-era comparisons, and allegations that figures like Trump could deploy troops to influence voting or polling-place security. It also references internal political arguments, apologies from politicians for past statements, and debates over media portrayal and accountability. - Throughout, the speakers attribute intentions and motives to political actors (Democrats, Republicans) and to various law enforcement and media figures, repeating the refrain that liberal or left-leaning factions intentionally hinder immigration enforcement, public safety, and election integrity. The overall arc presents a narrative of conflict between immigration enforcement, local policing, media representation, and political power, with emphasis on clashes in Portland and Chicago, critiques of City leadership and media, and calls for heightened enforcement and political repercussions.

Portland doesn’t feel like America; Speaker 0 says police are infiltrated by a leftist militant group, and downtown is post-apocalyptic with graffiti, vandalism, and boarded-up windows. He asserts police aren’t protecting residents and that conservatives are treated as criminals. He was assaulted and then arrested for disorderly conduct after Antifa militants allegedly attacked him, breaking his camera and throwing him into a hole; the DA later dropped the case. He and about 12 officers waited 45 minutes for charges to be clarified, then were driven to jail. Rioters attack cars and are not arrested; police allegedly defer to Antifa to control traffic. He cites a DOJ investigation, Harmeet/Harmit Dillon, Rose City Antifa, and the possibility of federal control over Portland Police to reform it; a Secret Service agent was fired for praising Charlie Kirk’s assassination. He hopes for a forensic review and warns this could spread to other cities.

"That's happening in The United States Of America. Masked men jumping out of unmarked cars, people disappearing, no due process, no oversight, zero accountability happening in The United States Of America today." "People ask, well, is authoritarianism you're being hyperbolic? Bullshit. We're being hyperbolic." "If you're a black and brown community, it's here in this country." "I'm deeply proud that I had the privilege of signing the nation's first bill to address the issue of masking." "some guy jumped out of an unmarked car in a van with a mask on tried to grab me, I mean, by definition, you're gonna push back." "these are not just authoritarian tendencies. These are authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government." "That's happening in The United States."