reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker acknowledges the concern about Canada and offers to provide an explanation. They clarify that they are not trying to create controversy or trap anyone, but rather want to move on to their next point. They also mention that being a lawyer requires caution, while expressing respect for the lawyers present.

Boeing's issues extend beyond the 737 model. An inspector found 300 defects at Spirit AeroSystems, but only 50 were reported on a subsequent visit due to time constraints. The rushed inspection process led to crucial issues being overlooked.

Mr. Washington, can you tell me what airspace requires an ADS-B transponder? I'm not sure I can answer that right now. What are the six types of special use airspace on FAA charts? Sorry, I cannot answer that. What are the operational limitations for pilots under basic med? I'm not a pilot, but I think there are restrictions like high blood pressure. What causes an aircraft to spin or stall? Again, I'm not a pilot. What are the three aircraft certifications required by the FAA? One priority is to implement the certification act. What is the minimum separation distance for landing and departing airliners during the daytime? I don't want to guess on that. Are you familiar with the difference between part 107 and part 44809 for unmanned aerial standards? Yes, but I cannot explain the difference.

We're uncertain about the details, but Boeing, Rolls Royce, and the US government possess significant knowledge about the situation. The most advanced sensors in the US defense department are located in the Middle East.

Workers at a Boeing factory in South Carolina express doubts about the quality of the 787 Dreamliner they assemble. Out of 15 workers, 10 admit they would not fly on the plane due to concerns about declining quality. An employee, who remains anonymous, shares worries about problems being ignored and workers lacking skills or being under the influence of drugs. Al Jazeera's investigative unit was contacted to shed light on the situation. Translation: Employees at a Boeing factory in South Carolina are worried about the quality of the 787 Dreamliner they are building. Many workers refuse to fly on the plane due to concerns about declining quality and issues with worker skills and drug use. An anonymous employee reached out to Al Jazeera for help in exposing the situation.

Speaker 0 argues that in the last four years there have been four “once in a century storms,” naming hurricane Helene, the Maui fires, and California wildfires. They claim these events are part of a pattern of engineered weather, stating that “they openly admitted at Davos, and our government is geoengineering” and that chemicals such as nickel ion are sprayed into the sky from aircraft to soak up moisture. The white trails seen across the sky are described as absorbing water, expanding, and then being guided with frequencies and directed energy weapons to create these storms. The speaker asserts that there will be “undeniable…proof that our government engineered this storm,” and asks how long it would take before someone is imprisoned for poisoning a road with water that freezes and causes deadly accidents, using an analogy about a steep hill and a road turned to ice. They claim the coming storm will kill American citizens and wonder when those responsible will be held accountable, inviting viewers to check out the video for proof of government geoengineering. Speaker 1 responds by stating the elephant in the room: the flight path is not normal. They note four different planes, including a Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, flying highly unusual patterns right before the historic ice storm. They explain that the Stratotanker is typically used for aerial refueling, but these patterns suggest otherwise, mentioning that the KC-135 Stratotanker “could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes, such as stratospheric aerosol injection,” which releases reflective particles to cool the planet. They imply the United States Air Force is seeding clouds before the storm, calling it a coincidence yet suggesting it is related to geoengineering. They describe “the produce, the chemtrail” of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles over the Front Range. Speaker 0 adds that not only is there fumigation across nearly every state ahead of the historic ice storm, but in Tennessee there are visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped into the atmosphere ahead of the storm, while suggesting it is not a coincidence. They note Texas appears cloudy, followed by Indiana, and then claim to observe “frequency waves.” Speaker 1 reiterates the focus on Oklahoma, underscoring the widespread pattern and the associated frequency waves as part of the atmospheric manipulation preceding the storm.

This is not just a problem with the 737, but with the entire airplane due to reduced inspections. Boeing removed inspection steps in 2012, leading to concerns about overall quality. The 737 and 787 programs prioritize speed over quality, resulting in issues being overlooked. Inspectors found 300 defects at a supplier, but were praised for finding only 50 defects on a later visit due to rushed inspections.

The speaker suggests that Boeing may be intentionally cutting corners due to pressure from DEI initiatives, potentially leading to its downfall. They mention a whistleblower who died before testifying about Boeing's alleged misconduct. The speaker also points out that China's new jet, the COMAC c 919, could benefit from Boeing's decline in the market. This raises questions about the role of international business in these events.

Speaker 0 denies the claim of owning a private jet and finds it ridiculous. Speaker 1 challenges this statement, presenting an article stating that the John Kerry family private jet was sold due to accusations of climate hypocrisy. Speaker 0 clarifies that while their wife owned a plane, it was not theirs. The conversation ends there.

The speaker expresses concern about the overall condition of Boeing airplanes, particularly the 737 and 787 models. They mention that Boeing started removing inspection operations in 2012, leading to potential issues with job completion and inspections. The speaker worries that the focus on reducing quality as overhead in these programs may result in safety concerns, like the recent door plug blowout on the 737.

Speaker 0 argues that billions of people were injected with an experimental vaccine, stating “it wasn't a bloody just no. It wasn't.” He rejects the notion of it being definitive or perfect, emphasizing that “it wasn’t” in terms of being a flawless solution. Speaker 1 counters, asserting “It was no one isn’t,” suggesting confusion or contradiction in the prior claim and challenging the certainty of the statement. He adds that there is a lack of a 100% success rate and questions the ultimate aim, asking what the core purpose is when it comes to giving your body a training of the immune system and technology. Speaker 0 reinforces the complexity, noting that there were “different types” to contend with and that the fact that they weren’t the same technology matters. He agrees there are various types of vaccines or approaches, indicating there is diversity in the technology or formulations used. Speaker 1 concedes the existence of different types and technologies, acknowledging that “there are different types of” vaccines, and that “There are different technologies.” He identifies mRNA as a type of vaccine but Speaker 0 interrupts, insisting “No. It was” and continuing his line of reasoning about the distinctions between the technologies and their evolution. Speaker 1 acknowledges change, saying “like this, and now it's like this,” recognizing a progression or shift in the approach. Speaker 0 rejects the suggestion that the transition is simple or uniform, insisting “No. No. No. It was like this, and now it's like this.” He asserts that the mRNA technology represented a radical, qualitative leap forward in technology, a claim about the significance of the development. Speaker 0 contends that naming the technology as mRNA can be acceptable only in a limited sense; he says “You can call it if if you want to, but it bears very little resemblance to anything that went before that.” The rationale for the term mRNA is tied to branding: “The reason it was called a scene was because was a brand name that had a track record of safety, and shoehorning it in that was one of the ways to make sure that people weren't terrified of the technology.”

This is a Boeing issue, not just a 737 problem. While inspecting a section at Spirit AeroSystems, 300 defects were found. When the senior manager went on the next trip with two inspectors, only 50 defects were reported. The inspectors were rushed and kicked off the plane, leading to suspicions of a cover-up.

Workers at a Boeing factory in South Carolina express doubts about the quality of the 787 Dreamliner they assemble. Out of 15 workers, 10 admit they would not fly on the plane due to concerns about declining quality. An employee, who remains anonymous, shares worries about under-skilled and drug-using workers. Al Jazeera's investigative unit was contacted to shed light on the situation.

Speaker 1 clarifies that when talking about climate change, they used metaphors to convey their message. They did not mean for people to literally panic, but rather wanted to evoke a sense of urgency. There was no specific scientific study that led them to this conclusion.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

Speaker 0 discusses what he calls the elephant in the room, noting that the flight paths in question are highly unusual for the United States Air Force. He points out that four different planes were involved, all following these abnormal flight patterns just before a historic ice storm. He identifies the aircraft as Boeing KC-one 135 Stratotankers, and observes that, while Stratotankers are typically used for aerial refueling, the flight patterns imply that this was not the case in these instances. He acknowledges a potential coincidence but highlights that the KC-one 135 Stratotanker “could potentially be adapted for geoengineering purposes such as stratospheric aerosol injection, which involves releasing reflective particles into the atmosphere to cool the planet.” He adds, “Call me a conspiracy theorist, but doesn’t it seem a little odd that the United States Air Force is flying multiple Stratotankers seeding the clouds right before this historic ice storm?” Speaker 1 reiterates the observation, stating that the flights are “the chemtrail produce of USAF Stratotankers flying in circles in patterns over this part of the Front Range,” emphasizing the circular and abnormal flight paths attributed to the Stratotankers. Speaker 0 continues by asserting that not only is most of the country appearing to be fumigated ahead of the historic ice storm, but he also points to Tennessee as a location where there are “very visible signs of a massive amount of electromagnetic energy being pumped in and infused into the atmosphere ahead of this storm.” He closes by again casting doubt on the situation, saying, “I’m sure it’s just all a giant coincidence.”

Speaker 0 mentions the expensive aircraft and helicopters they have, including a $50 million airplane and a $29 million Borges helicopter. They have various types of helicopters, some of which are brand new. They question whether it is cheaper to leave the aircraft there or fill it up with gas and fly it to Pakistan or back to their country. They realize they were foolish for thinking it was cheaper to leave it there.

The speaker expresses concerns about the quality of Boeing airplanes, particularly the 737 and 787 models. They mention issues with inspections and job completion due to removal of inspection operations in 2012. The speaker shares a personal experience of finding defects in airplane parts from a supplier, only to have the number of defects downplayed by management. This raises doubts about the overall quality control processes in place.

The video discusses the delivery of parts from the Netherlands for the F35, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter, to Israel. It is mentioned that these parts are used in airstrikes on Gaza. The speaker confirms that the F35 is indeed being used in these bombings, along with the F15 and F16. The use of the F35 is not a point of debate, and it is acknowledged that there is a risk of human rights violations. Given the evidence of the devastation on the ground, it can be assumed that the F35 is being used in these airstrikes.

Dr. McCulloch is asked to weigh in. Speaker 1 responds that he has presented at FDA advisory meetings and advised companies for decades on regulatory science. He states that when a product definitely results in death, and there are thousands of peer-reviewed papers on this, the COVID vaccines in some people sadly result in death—some on the very first day they take the shot. He argues that this must be a black box warning on the product immediately. He says he checked the package inserts for the currently available products, noting that the ones Senator Blumenthal wants to pursue, and what the Governor still wants to pursue, and what the FDA still wants administered, do not have the word “death” in the package insert. He asserts that Americans are not fairly informed. Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 doubts that the COVID injection caused some deaths, and asks for his view on the numbers listed on VAERS (thirty-seven thousand, six hundred seven, per the prompt) and whether he has any science to back up his opinion. Speaker 1 replies that the best data are autopsies. He references the largest autopsy series published to date and notes that he is the senior author. He says they examined deaths after vaccination, had an adjudication committee and methods of arbitration to decide whether the vaccine caused death, and that in these autopsy cases, seventy-three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. He mentions Holsher and colleagues, who are right behind him. Speaker 0 reiterates the FDA’s own laws, asking that this be included in the package insert, correct? Speaker 1 confirms, noting that in 2021 Dr. Carol Tocetta, working with the Daily Cloud, wrote about Peters’ marks in 2023 and asked, “where’s the black box warning? Where is it?”

Why is there a classified briefing about hobbyist drones if they aren't military? I can't speak for Congress on that. We're sharing as much information as possible, but I don't have the details of the briefing to clarify what is classified. Rest assured, we are providing all the information we can based on what we know.

Speaker 0 describes witnessing a rapid sequence of explosions and the collapse of the World Trade Center. “Floor by floor instead of popping out. But was it if if they had detonated. Yeah. And then what did take down a building. All of a sudden, it was like bang bang bang bang like bullet shots. I saw from the corner, boom boom boom boom boom boom boom Just like 20 straight hits just went down.” As the bombs were gone, people began running; the witness sat there and watched a few of them explode, then turned around and started running for life because, in the witness’s view, “World Trade Center was coming right down from the corner.” The sounds continued with, “Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom.” The entire building “just went,” and again, the witness states, “as the bombs were gone, people just started running. And I sat there and watched a few of them explode.” Speaker 1 asserts a technical claim about how a building can collapse rapidly. “Only way that a building can accelerate as it collapses is by having pre engineered, precisely timed, and precisely placed explosives. In other words, controlled demolition.”

Speaker 0 emphasizes the media’s important role while acknowledging that many public assertions were not accurate. He notes that the media can provide editorials and that editorial boards can have stances. He says there were claims based on information he was not privy to and that he wondered why. He accepts that information at a classification above his level might exist, citing the Communications Security Establishment of Canada, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, or the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team. From his perspective as commander of Hendon and the joint force operation, he did not see information that substantiated what was said publicly and in the media. He argues that subjective assertions were sensationalized and exacerbated conflict.

Speaker 0 asks if the descent in the air is straight or if there is a dip. Speaker 1 confirms it is straight but suggests a slight adjustment with the nose. Speaker 1 then asks if there is any curvature while up in the air, to which Speaker 0 replies no, it's all flat. Speaker 2 confirms that the pilot believes the Earth is flat. Speaker 2 questions the speed of the ground's movement and its relation to landing direction, but Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 dismiss it, stating that the ground appears still. Speaker 2 mentions the possibility of seeing landmarks from Kansas, but Speaker 0 explains visibility depends on weather conditions. Speaker 1 interrupts to ask if they adjust for curvature while flying, and Speaker 0 replies that they fly slightly over a curved surface.

I want to emphasize that the recent aviation incidents will likely raise concerns about FAA and air traffic control staffing. Even though a recent incident occurred in a Canadian air traffic control tower, the discussion about potential staff cuts at the FAA, under the previous administration, is relevant. The FAA has been expressing concerns about being understaffed in critical positions, particularly air traffic control, for years. While air traffic control may not be affected by staff cuts so far, other positions related to maintaining critical equipment may have been cut. All of these recent incidents will feed into concerns about the safety of the air traffic system going forward, at least on this side of the border.