TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.

The speaker questions the government's decision to continue with mRNA vaccines despite evidence suggesting they may not be effective for respiratory diseases. They mention the partnership with Moderna to build a manufacturing plant in the UK, capable of producing 250 million vaccines annually. The speaker also highlights Moderna's pipeline of 48 products, including ongoing trials for cytomegalovirus, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus. They raise concerns about the contradiction between the vaccines' effectiveness and the push for more mRNA vaccines. The speaker wonders if this is a result of deception by big pharma.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but did not benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

The speaker questions the lack of transparency regarding the sharing of royalties by officials at the CDC, NIH, and FDA who are responsible for approving drugs and vaccines. They mention that Congress needs to enforce full disclosure to eliminate conflicts of interest. The speaker reveals that NIH researchers have received significant amounts of money, but the details are not disclosed. They also highlight their unsuccessful attempts to obtain nonclassified records of NIH grants. The lack of action from the Department of Justice and Democrats further complicates the situation.

The speaker questions the independence of regulatory agencies like the TGA, suggesting that they may be influenced by pharmaceutical companies that fund them. They criticize the quick adoption of COVID vaccines and the authorization for their use in young Australians, even before approval in the US and Europe. They argue that a Royal Commission is needed to investigate these issues and hold those responsible accountable. The speaker also mentions the Pfizer trials, claiming that there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than in the placebo group. They highlight the large amount of money spent on vaccines and the lack of transparency regarding contracts and terms. They believe that mandating vaccines violates international human rights.

The Australian government is accused of suppressing COVID vaccine adverse reactions and deaths. Excess deaths in 2022 are around 26,000, but no questions are being asked. Doctors are not reporting adverse effects or deaths, with only 14 deaths officially attributed to the vaccine out of over 1,000 reported. Doctors fear losing their livelihoods if they report accurately. The spike in deaths after COVID was attributed to the vaccine, leading to anger over the situation.

In this video, the speaker discusses the COVID situation in Australia. They mention that despite a high vaccination rate, over half the country has contracted COVID. They also talk about excess deaths in 2021 and a high number of vaccine injuries. The speaker criticizes the Australian health department for not addressing these issues and accuses the head of the organization of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. They also mention that the chief health officer hadn't read a report on the Pfizer vaccine.

Big Pharma spends heavily on media propaganda, influencing public perception and political campaigns. A recent vote in Idaho ended funding for COVID-19 vaccines, reflecting growing skepticism. Studies show vaccines may harm natural immunity, with significant increases in severe health issues among vaccinated individuals. The pharmaceutical industry is a major advertiser on networks like CBS and MSNBC, with top drugs linked to companies like Pfizer. In the 2020 election, a large portion of Congress received funding from pharmaceutical companies. Since 2011, digital ad spending in healthcare has surged, with billions spent on advertising and censorship efforts. The COVID-19 response is viewed as a significant wrongdoing, and there’s a call for accountability and a return to health. It's never too late to seek justice for those affected.

The speaker discusses the alleged cover-up surrounding the origins of COVID-19. They claim that the US government, led by Anthony Fauci, funded dangerous gain-of-function research in China, which involved combining viruses to create a new super virus. They highlight the lack of transparency and exemptions given to this research, as well as the reopening of the door for it to continue. The speaker emphasizes the need for access to the deliberations and funding decisions. They also criticize the actions of Peter Daszak, who allegedly funneled money to Wuhan and continues to receive grants. The speaker believes there has been a significant cover-up and calls for a ban on further funding.

Speaker 0 describes a study on the hepatitis B vaccine, stating it is loaded with mercury during the first thirty days of life and comparing infants who received it in that period to those who did not or who received it later. He claims that the relative risk of smoking a pack a day for twenty years leading to lung cancer is ten, with a figure of 11.35, and attributes this to Thimerosal. Speaker 1 asks if the claim is about Thimerosal, and Speaker 0 confirms, then recounts a story that motivated his involvement: a “secret meeting” held to avoid on-campus exposure to freedom of information requests. The meeting occurred at Simpson Wood, a remote Methodist retreat center on the Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia. Over two days, 52 attendees included major vaccine companies, regulatory agencies (WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS), and leaders in academic vaccinology. Megan recorded the first day, and Speaker 0 says he obtained the transcripts in 2005, calling them horrific. He invites listeners to read them on the Children’s Health Events site to judge for themselves, arguing the transcripts reveal “panjarums of the American healthcare system” and that regulators claimed the science was bulletproof while suggesting vaccines cause autism. Speaker 1 notes that Speaker 0 has previously claimed the conference revealed that vaccines cause autism and that data should be buried, referencing a January 2011 Rolling Stone article and a Salon piece that later withdrew the article. He mentions an eighteen-month US Senate committee investigation that found allegations of CDC misconduct unsubstantiated and concluded there was no cover-up. Speaker 0 clarifies it was a two-year committee hearing led by Senator Burton at the Governmental Oversight Committee, and asserts that vaccines do cause autism, while encouraging listeners to research the science themselves rather than trust him or the organizations cited. Speaker 0 then attacks the credibility and funding of CDC, NIH, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, claiming they are “bought and paid for,” with statistics he cites: FDA is funded 45% by the pharmaceutical industry; the AAP allegedly gets 80% of its money from industry; and the CDC spends 4,900,000,000 of its 12,000,000,000 annual budget. Speaker 1 pushes back by noting that parents within these organizations vaccinate their own children against vaccines that include thimerosal, asking rhetorically whether they are willingly harming their children, and suggesting a broader government conspiracy. Speaker 0 then directs Speaker 1 to the movie Dopesick for further context, contrasting it with opioid prescriptions, and asserts that doctors treated patients and their own children with opioids because they believed FDA guidance. Overall, the dialogue centers on thimerosal in early vaccines, alleged hidden meetings and data suppression, controversial media coverage of vaccines-autism links, and critical claims about regulatory agency funding and conduct, culminating in comparisons to pharmaceutical and medical industry dynamics.

The speaker describes a committee conflict investigated by the office of inspector general and Congress, who urged change, but nothing happened. They claim medical malpractice by this group is evident in the approval of vaccines. The speaker states that in 1986 there were 11 vaccines, which increased to 69, then 92. They assert that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had a pre-licensing safety trial involving a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the risk profiles of these products. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

The vaccine contract awarded to a single supplier is under scrutiny for potential political influence. The Liberal party criticized the Harper government for jeopardizing the health and safety of Canadians by relying on one supplier. The original contract, awarded by the Liberal government, was for 10 years to Shire Biochem, which later became owned by GlaxoSmithKline. The contract, valued at over $323 million, was signed in 2001 before any vaccine was produced. Additionally, Shire Biochem donated $56,000 to the Liberal Party in the same year they secured the contract.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

An Australian woman has chronicled the money trail showing universities receiving millions to create messenger RNA factories. Messenger RNA vaccines are not needed, will never be better than existing vaccines, and bring huge, unsorted adverse events. However, they are patented and allow for creating new vaccines yearly, like the latest RSV vaccine. The speaker hopes to see a proper assessment of its value. Pfizer's messenger RNA flu vaccine failed, which the speaker sees as a good thing because messenger RNA vaccines for flu are frightening.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

During the pandemic, Australian governments spent $577 billion on COVID response, including $247 million on tests and over $18 billion on vaccines. They bought 267 million vaccine doses, with 126% used and 35% wasted. The Department of Health posted 19,000 times on social media about COVID, while 4,000 posts were censored as misinformation. 2,662 complaints were made to the Australian Human Rights Commission about COVID policies. This raises questions about accountability and competence in handling the pandemic.

Almost all panel members, including you, are accepting significant contributions from the pharmaceutical industry. I ran for president too and received substantial contributions, but they did not come from executives. Out of 200 million, I received 1.5 million. You still haven't answered my last question.

The speaker raises concerns about the COVID response and the involvement of the Medical Countermeasures Consortium, a partnership between Australia, Canada, the UK, and the US. They question the military's role in vaccine development and the use of fraudulent information. The speaker criticizes the dismantling of the COAG system and the creation of a secretive national cabinet. They highlight the military's involvement in COVID operations in Australia, the UK, and Canada. The speaker accuses Pfizer of fraud in their clinical trials and suggests a cover-up of COVID's origins. They call for a Royal Commission to investigate these issues.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't receive the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, leading to perpetual crises that serve the interests of the elite rather than ordinary people.

I'm committed to making America healthier than other countries. Will you guarantee the same healthcare coverage that other major countries provide? Corruption isn't just in federal agencies; it's in Congress too. Many members here, including you, accept millions from the pharmaceutical industry to protect their interests. I ran for president and received millions in contributions, but none came from pharmaceutical executives or PACs. My support comes from workers, not corporate interests. You were the largest recipient of pharmaceutical donations in 2020. No, I received support from workers across the country, not from corporations. You still haven't answered the last question.

Speaker 0: Twelve months ago, my local government in Port Hedland, Western Australia moved and passed a motion demanding the prime minister, the state leaders, health ministers across the country validate what is now verified science, and we demanded a suspension of the mRNA injections that Australians' mRNA COVID injections are dangerously contaminated with foreign DNA contaminations and foreign DNA fragments. Now this Australian local government action has now been successfully followed and replicated in towns and cities all across Australia. We've also had over 200,000,000 views on our on social media of our council meeting. This put some serious pressure on the Australian TGA, which is Australia's drug regulation body akin to Europe's EMA or the FDA in The USA. For those of you who don't know, the Australian drug regulator, the receives around about 95 of its funding from big pharma. It's like regulatory capture on steroids. To make matters worse, the unelected bureaucrats who approve or deny applications for new drugs or medical interventions have no legislative requirement to declare any conflicts of interest. So when over 90% of the TGA's budget is supported by industry it regulates and when the conflicts of interest of those marketing drug approval decisions is hidden, is it any wonder in the West that we've lost our faith in our health institutions? Only in Australia could a regulator funded by the industry it regulates still call itself impartial with a straight face. I tell you this story to point out the inherent risks that we all face in speaking truth to power. Last month, my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections canceled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government, we dared to ask uncomfortable questions that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with big pharma.

The speaker brings up the fact that the pandemic created many new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry. They mention that pharmaceutical companies funded the 2020 election and made huge profits, with Pfizer alone making $100 billion. They also highlight that the public funded the development of vaccines but didn't benefit from the profits. The speaker questions the economic system where companies benefit from crises, suggesting it perpetuates a divide between the interests of ordinary people and the elite.

One Queensland community is being updated on the committee inquiry for a Royal Commission into SARS COVID-19. The deadline for submissions is set for January 12, 2024, and anyone can make a confidential submission. The origin of COVID-19 is discussed, with claims that it was engineered through gain of function research funded by America's National Institute of Health and Anthony Fauci. Vaccine indemnity is also mentioned, with concerns about taxpayers paying for damages caused by vaccines. The contract with Pfizer and the increasing number of adverse events and deaths related to vaccines are highlighted, calling for further investigation.