reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as human error is always a factor. The Wuhan lab in China may have been conducting research on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an infection that spread to others. The scientists are currently analyzing the data to determine the validity of these claims. It will take time to thoroughly examine the genetic evidence.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden officials now acknowledge the COVID lab leak theory, which was previously dismissed as a conspiracy. Experts and scientists have consistently debunked the idea that the virus originated from a lab in Wuhan, asserting it likely came from a wildlife market where bats were present. The scientific consensus is that the virus was not man-made or genetically modified. Claims suggesting otherwise have been labeled as misinformation, with many emphasizing the dangers of spreading such theories, which can lead to xenophobia and panic. Investigations into the lab leak theory have been deemed unnecessary by the WHO, as the origins of the virus are believed to be natural.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the virus was not isolated. Live animal samples are irrelevant. The speaker suspects the origin is different than originally thought. China's government is presenting the city where the virus emerged as the city that defeated it in a new patriotic film.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
During the early stages of the pandemic, a group of virologists were consulted by the NIH. Some believed that the virus could not have occurred naturally, while others thought it was a 50/50 chance between a lab or natural origin. However, only one narrative was publicly discussed. Later, a paper titled "Proximal Origins of the SARS CoV-two Virus" was released, claiming that the virus was natural. This paper referenced a 2014 article about a 2020 outbreak, which seemed odd considering the years in between. Additionally, a grant proposal called the "diffuse grant proposal" was discovered, stating that experiments were being conducted to test the infectivity of similar viruses and even insert a furin cleavage site, which is present in the virus causing the pandemic. These findings raise concerns about the origins of the virus.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The data hasn't been shared because the virus wasn't isolated. Live animal samples testing positive don't provide useful information. It seems the source of the virus is not what we initially believed.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The data hasn't been shared because the virus wasn't isolated. Testing live animal samples doesn't provide useful information if they only show positive results. I don't believe the virus originated from what we initially thought.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID world 10/09/2022 reports estimated extra deaths of 31 million and estimated serious adverse effects of 1.9 billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people, making the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effects/reported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Source tomia.org April 2024. Why deflate the parasitic system? Because the parasitic destructiveness oversized states and corporations always leads to decay, corruption, injustice to the destruction of its many hosts, the people, the working and creative people, the maimed and dying slaves of the elites. See examples below. Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, Crimes Against Humanity. If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 I get in total thirty six million excess deaths since the Covid Vax rollout. Adding the nine million from the Covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of forty five million for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons Considering the estimated forty five million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for four point five years of Covid killing protocols and deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons the words bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of the mass propaganda corrupted science lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms thus the elites many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes, PRRA, HIVGP120 are much too large and too many and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. Since the GenTech covid vaccines make the human body cells produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two. In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness just cold like symptoms. These Gentech covid vaccines are of course themselves bio weapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. Source2mia.org, please like and follow.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Il y a eu une manipulation du virus, avec des séquences ajoutées, notamment du VIH. Ce n'est pas un processus naturel, mais le résultat d'un travail minutieux de biologistes moléculaires. Les raisons de cette manipulation ne sont pas claires, mais il est possible qu'il s'agisse d'une tentative de créer un vaccin contre le sida en intégrant des séquences du VIH dans le coronavirus. Le matériel génétique du virus contient des segments de VIH qui pourraient modifier des sites antigéniques, permettant ainsi de modifier la protéine pour un vaccin. Bien que des rumeurs sur une origine humaine aient circulé, elles ont été largement réfutées, mais il existe une volonté d'étouffer ces recherches, comme l'a montré un groupe de chercheurs indiens qui a été contraint de se rétracter. --- There has been manipulation of the virus, with sequences added, including from HIV. This is not a natural process but the result of meticulous work by molecular biologists. The reasons for this manipulation are unclear, but it may involve an attempt to create an AIDS vaccine by integrating HIV sequences into the coronavirus. The virus's genetic material contains segments of HIV that could modify antigenic sites, allowing for changes to the protein for a vaccine. Although rumors of a human origin circulated, they have been largely refuted, yet there is a desire to suppress this research, as evidenced by a group of Indian researchers who were forced to retract their findings.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists are investigating the possibility of the COVID-19 virus originating from a lab in Wuhan. They are analyzing data to determine the accuracy of claims that the virus matches a genetic sequence patented by Moderna for cancer research. The hypothesis of a lab escape is being considered, as human error is possible. It is speculated that the Wuhan lab may have been working on virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an accidental infection. The analysis of genetic sequences is a time-consuming process, but the scientists are diligently examining the evidence. The work being done by the scientists is crucial in understanding the origins of the virus.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
New peer-reviewed studies suggest a connection between 5G radiation and the creation of viruses, including coronaviruses. These studies, published on the National Institute of Health website, challenge the mainstream narrative. Conspiracy theories surrounding COVID-19 have been vindicated, such as the lab leak theory and doubts about the effectiveness of COVID vaccines. The mainstream media and fact-checkers have been proven wrong on many topics. They dismissed concerns about 5G's impact on COVID-19 victims, banned discussions on YouTube, and smeared celebrities who expressed worry. However, scientific studies, like the one titled "5G Technology Action of Coronavirus in Skin Cells" on the US NIH website, reveal that 5G can trigger the body to produce viruses.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A Chinese lab in Wuhan conducted mad science experiments, partly funded by the American government. The experiment went astray, leaked, and caused havoc. China is now claiming the U.S. is to blame, which is considered ridiculous. The Chinese were responsible for allowing these experiments to happen in a low-security lab. The lab leak occurred, and they covered it up.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A Chinese lab in Wuhan conducted mad science experiments, partly funded by the American government. The experiment went astray, leaked, and caused havoc. China is now claiming the U.S. is to blame, which is considered ridiculous. The Chinese were responsible for allowing these experiments to happen in a low-security lab. It leaked, and they covered it up.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Evolutionary virologists analyzed viral sequences from the current outbreak and in bats. They determined that the mutations required for the virus to jump from an animal to a human are entirely consistent with its evolutionary path. A paper detailing this research will be made available, although the authors are not currently named.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 50% of French people believe the government is hiding information about the coronavirus. The video discusses theories circulating on social media, such as the virus being created in a laboratory. However, there is no evidence to support these claims. The problem with conspiracy theories is that they are difficult to disprove without evidence. The possibility of the virus originating from a lab and infecting the population is still being considered, but most scientists believe it is unlikely. However, some scientists argue that manipulating the genome of potentially pathogenic viruses in labs is a common practice, and this possibility cannot be completely ruled out.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 is believed to be a man-made pandemic, specifically the SARS-CoV-2 virus created in the Wuhan Institute of Virology through a US-Chinese collaboration. The virus was engineered with the goal of developing a vaccine.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab after a tiny DNA fragment matching a sequence patented by Moderna was found in the virus. The possibility of an accidental lab escape is being considered, as humans make mistakes. It is being analyzed to determine its authenticity. The team is examining whether the genetic sequence is genuine, which will take some time.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The Daily Mail reported that COVID may have been manipulated in a lab, with a DNA sequence matching Moderna's patent. Scientists are investigating this claim to determine its accuracy. The possibility of a lab accident leading to the virus's release is being considered. The team is carefully analyzing the genetic sequences to verify the information. Stephane Bonsal is leading the research on this matter.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 symptoms are from man-made poisons, not a bat virus. Chinese researchers analyzed Wuhan patients' blood and found the source of the coronavirus pneumonia was venom from the king cobra and Chinese krait snakes. Big Pharma has been using venom proteins from snakes, scorpions, starfish, cone snails, wasps, and spiders for drugs and vaccines for the last 100 years. The NIH published a document stating that COVID spike proteins are identical to snake venom neurotoxins.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There are conspiracy theories surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak, including connections to the military games in Wuhan and vaping in America. Another theory involves a closed medical research laboratory in the US. The facility was working on developing resistance to SARS, COV, and MERS viruses. They were testing different products to prevent infection in a nearby town. The facility was found to have containment protocol violations. Around the same time, there was a sudden increase in vaping illness cases, which had similar symptoms to COVID-19. The timing and similarities are noteworthy.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The belief is that the virus originated from a lab near the National Institute of AID Laboratories, not from bats in the Everglades as some suggest. This theory challenges the idea that the virus came from a market.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists are investigating claims that COVID-19 was manipulated in a lab. They are analyzing data to determine the accuracy of these claims. The possibility of a lab accident cannot be ruled out, as humans make mistakes. It is being examined whether the Wuhan lab in China was conducting virus enhancement or gene modification, leading to an accidental infection. The team is carefully examining a genetic sequence that matches one patented by Moderna for cancer research. This analysis takes time.

Johnny Harris

Did COVID escape a lab?!
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Johnny Harris discusses the origins of COVID-19, presenting two main hypotheses: the spillover hypothesis, which suggests the virus jumped from animals to humans, and the lab leak hypothesis, which posits it may have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. While the spillover theory gained traction due to historical precedents, it lacks direct evidence, as no animal carriers have been identified. Conversely, the lab leak hypothesis, initially dismissed as conspiracy, has gained credibility, especially after reports of sick researchers at the lab in late 2019. Harris emphasizes the need for thorough investigation into both theories, highlighting political influences on scientific discourse and the importance of remaining open to all hypotheses.

The Origins Podcast

Matt Ridley | From Science Journalism to Politics, and the Origin of COVID-19
Guests: Matt Ridley
reSee.it Podcast Summary
In this episode of the Origins Podcast, host Lawrence Krauss interviews veteran science journalist Matt Ridley, who discusses his latest book, *Viral*, co-authored with Alina Chan. The book explores the origins of COVID-19, emphasizing that the true source remains unknown. Ridley highlights the importance of skepticism towards claims made by the scientific community and the Chinese government regarding the virus's origins. He notes the role of internet sleuths who uncovered significant evidence, including master's theses detailing COVID-like symptoms linked to a bat cave far from Wuhan. Ridley critiques recent claims from scientists suggesting the virus originated at the Wuhan seafood market, pointing out the lack of direct evidence linking animals at the market to the virus. He stresses the need for understanding the virus's origins to better prepare for future pandemics. The discussion also touches on Ridley's background in zoology and his transition to science journalism, influenced by figures like Richard Dawkins and John Watson. The conversation delves into the nature of scientific communication and the challenges faced by journalists in conveying complex scientific ideas. Ridley reflects on his upbringing and early interest in science, particularly through birdwatching, which sparked his curiosity about the natural world. As the dialogue progresses, Ridley discusses the implications of government funding for scientific research and the potential for private sector involvement. He expresses concern about the over-centralization of scientific institutions and the need for more transparency in research funding and outcomes. The podcast also addresses the role of whistleblowers in uncovering information about the pandemic and the importance of open communication in science. Ridley emphasizes that the lack of transparency can hinder scientific progress and public trust. In the latter part of the discussion, Ridley and Krauss explore the concept of gain-of-function research, which involves altering viruses to study their potential impact on humans. Ridley clarifies that while such research can be controversial, it is not inherently aimed at creating biological weapons. He discusses the significance of the furin cleavage site found in SARS-CoV-2, which raises questions about the virus's origins and the research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The episode concludes with a reflection on the lessons learned from the pandemic, particularly the need for transparency and collaboration in scientific research to prevent future outbreaks. Ridley expresses hope that the truth about the origins of COVID-19 will eventually emerge, emphasizing the importance of understanding these events to improve global health responses.

The Dr. Jordan B. Peterson Podcast

Viral: The Origin of Covid 19 | Matt Ridley | EP 310
Guests: Matt Ridley
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Matt Ridley and Jordan Peterson discuss the origins of COVID-19, emphasizing the need for truth in understanding its emergence. Ridley initially accepted the conventional zoonotic origin theory but became intrigued by anomalies suggesting a potential lab leak, particularly due to the geographical coincidence of the outbreak's location and the Wuhan lab's research on similar viruses. He highlights the virus's unusual adaptations, such as a furin cleavage site, which may indicate engineering rather than natural evolution. Peterson raises concerns about the motivations behind dismissing the lab leak hypothesis, suggesting that fear of damaging international relations and the reputation of science may play a role. Ridley notes that some virologists privately expressed doubts about the virus's natural origins but later downplayed these concerns in public statements. He points out that the Chinese government has not been transparent about the data from the Wuhan lab, which could clarify the virus's origins. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of the pandemic, with Peterson arguing that totalitarian responses to COVID-19, such as lockdowns, pose a greater threat than the virus itself. Ridley agrees, emphasizing the need for open inquiry into the pandemic's origins to prevent future outbreaks and to uphold the integrity of science. They discuss the philosophical underpinnings of scientific inquiry, with Ridley expressing admiration for the spirit of curiosity that drives scientists. Peterson argues that this pursuit of truth is akin to a religious quest, emphasizing the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths. Both agree that the pursuit of knowledge should transcend political considerations and that the integrity of science is vital for societal progress. In conclusion, Ridley and Peterson advocate for a commitment to truth in science and the necessity of investigating the origins of COVID-19, not only for practical reasons but as a fundamental principle that upholds human dignity and freedom.
View Full Interactive Feed