reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A journalist argues against the state controlling who can report and who can't, calling it fascism. They accuse Sky News of taking the side of Hamas and using propaganda from them. The journalist questions the police about their actions and accuses them of supporting terrorists. The police ask the journalist to disperse, but they refuse, claiming they have the right to report freely. The journalist argues that they are not causing alarm or distress. They criticize the police for following orders from Sadiq Khan and Mark Rowley, accusing them of two-tier policing. The journalist is eventually dispersed and expresses their frustration.

Tommy Robinson is not the freedom fighter many in America believe him to be. He has a criminal record, including convictions for violence, fraud, and contempt of court related to defaming a Syrian refugee. While he has highlighted issues with grooming gangs, his methods and character are deeply problematic. The conversation shifts to the UK government's failure to address these grooming gang scandals, which has led to public outrage. Some argue that this creates a narrative where Robinson is seen as a whistleblower, but it's essential to separate his actions from the broader issues of government accountability. Understanding Robinson's legal history and the context of his convictions is crucial for forming an informed opinion. Political correctness may have influenced the handling of these cases, but that doesn't excuse Robinson's behavior or misrepresentation.

The documentary alleges the weaponization of court buildings against those who speak out, citing examples from Donald Trump to Katie Hopkins. The speaker claims to have been silenced by a gagging order and bankrupted after losing a court case, preventing the release of a film exposing a lie. The film centers on a playground incident involving a white boy and a Syrian refugee that became global news. It questions the media's role in manipulating narratives and suppressing dissenting voices. The documentary claims the media, justice system, and politicians conspire to suppress free speech, pervert democracy, and deceive the public with a poisonous agenda. It asks if the media is accountable, if the legal system is fit for purpose, and how politicians can be held accountable when inconvenient truths are silenced. The speaker aims to prove he was the only journalist who told the truth about the incident, alleging the Syrian boy was not an innocent victim and that the event was not a racist attack. The film uses hidden cameras to reveal the truth, claiming people are too scared to speak openly. It alleges a cover-up involving non-disclosure agreements and taxpayer money to silence witnesses. The speaker accuses the media and politicians of inciting hatred and violence against the white boy and his family, leading to threats, relocation, and mental health issues.

The speaker questions if the media and courts are shaping false narratives to serve political agendas. They raise concerns about bias in the justice system and the manipulation of information by government-funded groups. The involvement of the chief justice in political narratives is seen as problematic.

This documentary explores the manipulation of news stories, the consequences faced by truth-seekers, and the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians. It focuses on a playground incident between two boys, Bailey and Jamal, which became a global news event. The film questions the accountability of the media, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. It reveals testimonies that contradict the mainstream narrative and highlights the threats and hate comments received by both boys. The video also exposes the involvement of lawyers and activists, including Antifa, in targeting the speaker's family. The speaker expresses distrust towards a company associated with Farouk Basula's son, accuses them of covering up information and lying, and discusses incidents of lost documents and threats towards their family. They emphasize the importance of free speech, criticize the media, government, and judiciary for suppressing dissent, and ask for support to continue their work and protect their family.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to suppress free speech, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee and a British boy. The narrative was twisted to portray the British boy as a racist bully, while the truth was buried under political agendas and media sensationalism. The documentary highlights the dangers of a biased media, the exploitation of legal systems, and the consequences faced by those who dare to speak out. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, emphasizing the need for transparency and truth in reporting. Ultimately, it calls for the protection of free speech and the importance of standing against oppression in society. This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to suppress free speech, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee and a British boy. The narrative was twisted to portray the British boy as a racist bully, while the truth was buried under political agendas and media sensationalism. The documentary highlights the dangers of a biased media, the exploitation of legal systems, and the consequences faced by those who dare to speak out. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, emphasizing the need for transparency and truth in reporting. Ultimately, it calls for the protection of free speech and the importance of standing against oppression in society.

Tom states he feels good despite being incarcerated since October in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, which he considers an occupational hazard for a citizen journalist. He claims that since he started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs 16 years ago, he has faced relentless attacks from the British state, which uses lawfare to silence him. He asserts that he has never been convicted by a jury and that every one of his convictions have been...

Outside Westminster Magistrates Court, Tommy Robinson reports that "Only accredited journalists by when they say accredited, only government supported journalists were allowed to report on the second half of trial," meaning access was restricted. Ezra from Canada was gagged today. He alleges he was detained under the terrorism act and that "the reason for detaining me wasn't in order, it just made up so they get went along." He describes a forty-minute gap and an hour-and-a-half gap with no disclosure, noting "there's no evidence of it. There's no paperwork trial. There's no email trial." He says the proceedings used Islamophobia as justification: "Islamophobia. Islam what what even is Islamophobia?" He predicts tomorrow's verdict and accuses police of fabrications. A second commenter says the court's mission is "simply to get Tommy Robinson." He praises citizen journalism growth, mentions BBC interference, and cites "43,000 jihadis" under surveillance. For support visit tommytrial.com.

I recently watched a 2010 interview of Tommy Robinson by Jeremy Paxman. Paxman, an educated presenter, confronted Robinson, a working-class man who initially fought against the system through the EDL but later distanced himself from it. Despite his past, the media continues to highlight it while ignoring serious issues like child abuse by individuals in powerful positions, such as the BBC's Jimmy Savile. Robinson is currently in jail for contempt of court, a victimless crime, while others with similar offenses receive lighter sentences. The systemic failures that allowed Pakistani grooming gangs to operate unchecked are alarming. Robinson attempted to raise awareness about these issues, and I view him as a political prisoner facing harsh treatment for speaking out against a corrupt system.

The speaker claims mainstream media outlets prioritize attention and profit over truth, and they harass, smear, and lie about individuals and their families. A personal anecdote describes a journalist contacting his young daughter. A former News of the World employee admits to mocking and destroying people for the paper. The speaker cites a Daily Mail headline falsely accusing Ant Middleton of assaulting a female police officer and the media falsely claiming Joe Rogan took horse dewormer. JK Rowling won court cases against the Daily Mail for lies and invasive photos of her children. The speaker accuses Panorama of lacking integrity and calls a journalist a liar, fraud, racist, and homophobe. The speaker discusses threats and violence he and his family have faced, including death threats and Osman warnings from the police. He accuses the Daily Mail of endangering his family by publishing their location while on holiday and inciting violence against him by falsely claiming he instigated riots. He shares a message from his daughter expressing fear for their safety. He faces prosecution and a potential ten-year prison sentence for allegedly threatening journalists. He asks for support at fightthemail.com.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the justice system and media to silence dissent and control narratives. It highlights a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee, Jamal, and a British boy, Bailey, which was sensationalized by the media, leading to severe consequences for Bailey. The documentary questions the accountability of the media and legal system, revealing how they can distort the truth for their agendas. It discusses the repercussions of this incident, including threats against Bailey's family and the broader implications for free speech in the UK. Ultimately, it calls for public awareness and accountability, urging viewers to support the fight for truth and freedom of expression.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. It discusses how these buildings have been used to silence individuals who speak out against the mainstream narrative. The video raises questions about the accountability of the media, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. It also highlights a case involving a school fight and the biased reporting surrounding it. The speaker criticizes the manipulation of truth to fit a certain narrative and the severe consequences for those involved. Additionally, a man named Tommy Robinson accuses a journalist of promoting violence against him and his family, expressing distrust towards the legal system and media. He emphasizes the importance of free speech and urges public support.

A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.

Tommy Robinson was sentenced to 18 months in prison not for posting false information, but for ignoring a court injunction against discussing a specific incident. The judge acknowledged Robinson's work as a journalist and did not comment on the truth of his claims. Despite mainstream media narratives, multiple witnesses supported Robinson's account, while the judge dismissed their testimonies. The case involved a Syrian refugee with a troubling history, and the judge's ruling contradicted the testimonies of respected community members. The media aims to portray immigration as harmless and demonize Robinson. Viewers are encouraged to watch Robinson's film "Silence," which has garnered significant attention, to form their own opinions rather than relying on mainstream media.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his personal experience of being silenced by a gagging order after losing a court case and criticizes the mainstream media for manipulating stories and pushing certain narratives. The documentary also examines a playground incident between two boys, Bailey and Jamal, revealing evidence that challenges the media's portrayal of the incident. It highlights the role of politicians, media, and the justice system in suppressing free speech and perverting democracy. The video raises questions about media accountability, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. Additionally, a man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury of promoting violence and inciting threats against his family. He criticizes the court's handling of a case involving a Syrian refugee, questioning the credibility of witnesses and the media's biased reporting. He argues that free speech is being suppressed and calls for support in his legal battle, urging the public to sign a petition against his imprisonment.

The trial finished today, Tommy. "Turn the camera off for second." In a post-trial exchange, the speaker questions the claim that the case is contempt of court, insisting "There's no jury. That's only for juries. That's not contempt. That's a lie." They accuse the press of failing to report police unlawful conduct and say "Not one of them has reported any of the unlawful stuff the police done." They claim someone else "went to the judge to make sure Ezra will stop reporting" and that "He was the grass," acting as a journalist to silence reporting so "the only narrative you get is from them." They reference "fast car, cash in the cash in his car" and explain "I can't bank in The UK" after a demonstration. They remark that "They make you do vague answers" and note "He asked me one question. Where are you going? Benedum."

The documentary you're about to see is about the weaponization of court buildings to silence people, from Trump to Hopkins, who speak out against the mainstream narrative. As a journalist who stands for freedom of speech, I failed when I was bankrupted and silenced by a gagging order. But I won't fail again. This film exposes the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians to suppress free speech. It shows how a playground incident was spun into global news, ignoring the truth and abusing the law to silence dissent. It asks if the media is accountable, if the legal system is fit for purpose, and if our politicians can be held accountable. The film serves as a tutorial on journalism.

In London, a 15-year-old girl was fatally stabbed. The speaker criticizes the police for focusing on social media instead of solving crimes. They also claim that the surveillance cameras outside of London are a scam, with no scientific evidence to support them. The speaker accuses Sadiq Khan of rewriting evidence to serve his own agenda and warns of the beginning of a surveillance state. The transcript ends with the speaker mentioning spending their day in the Clink.

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his own experience of being silenced by a gagging order and criticizes the mainstream media for manipulating stories and pushing certain narratives. The video discusses a case involving two boys, Bailey and Jamal, and how the media portrayed their altercation. It questions the accountability of the media and the effectiveness of the legal system. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and his connection to Antifa is highlighted, demonstrating biased reporting and a disregard for the truth. A man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and lawyer Mohammed Akanji of endangering his family and colluding with Antifa. He questions the integrity of the legal system and media, expressing concern for the safety of witnesses and his family. He calls for support in his legal battle, emphasizing the importance of free speech.

In this video, the speaker, a journalist reporting on an anti-Semitism rally in London, shares their personal experience of being arrested and violently attacked by the police. They raise concerns about the state of freedom of the press, assembly, and speech in the UK, suggesting that the country is heading towards becoming a totalitarian state. The speaker highlights instances of biased policing, politicized judiciary, state control of media, and surveillance of citizens. They argue that the government and security services are manipulating the public through fear and propaganda. The importance of independent journalism and the need to protect freedom of expression is emphasized. Additionally, the speaker discusses their concerns about the government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, terrorism, immigration, and societal changes. They believe that dissenting voices are being silenced and call for accountability and transparency from the government. The rise of progressive ideologies and the potential loss of freedom of speech are also discussed, with a call to action for people to stand up, speak out, and demand the resignation of Mark Rowley. The audience is encouraged to visit resignmarkrowley.com and join an event in London on July 27th to support the cause of protecting freedom of speech.

This documentary is about the weaponization of court buildings against the public and the suppression of free speech by the media, justice system, and politicians. It centers on a playground incident involving a white boy and a Syrian refugee that was spun into global news, burying the truth beneath agendas and opportunism. The film questions the media's accountability, the legal system's fitness, and how politicians are held accountable when inconvenient truths are silenced. The speaker highlights the unholy alliance between media, justice, and politicians suppressing free speech and perverting democracy. The film exposes media deception, abuse of law, and fear-driven political leaders jumping on stories without knowing the truth. The film raises critical questions on accountability, legal systems, government integrity, and the importance of defending free speech.

A group of Antifa individuals, led by a well-known journalist, attempted to incite violence for a TV documentary in Culop. The journalist, connected to mainstream media, was caught communicating with agitators to cause trouble. This coordinated attack on working-class people highlights media bias and manipulation. The public is urged to be aware of these tactics and hold media outlets accountable for their actions.

The UK, the country of the Magna Carta, is allegedly sentencing people to jail for disagreeing with the government online or protesting against open border policies and mass immigration. People are reportedly being tried and jailed for months or years for disagreeing with the government. The speaker questions what options remain for UK citizens to disagree with their government without facing imprisonment. They cite the case of David Springer, a 61-year-old train driver caring for his sick wife, who was allegedly sentenced to jail for attending a protest, possibly shouting at the police. The speaker argues that the UK has a two-tiered justice system and is no longer a free nation because citizens lack democratic options to express disagreement. They cite the case of a mother of five sentenced to 26 months for throwing a can at the police and a man jailed for a Facebook post inciting racial hatred. The speaker concludes that the message is clear: disagreeing with the government results in imprisonment.

Daysly's article in The Guardian calls for media censorship in Britain, citing Germany as a model. He suggests that certain voices, like Tommy Robinson's, should be deplatformed. In Germany, tweets commenting on censored content are also censored. A notable case involves Manahal Al Mokbel, a Saudi refugee who faced sexual abuse after seeking help from a corrupt organization. Despite reporting the abuse, authorities failed to investigate. The organization pressured her and her sisters to remain silent. This censorship reflects a broader issue of how German authorities handle stories of abuse, particularly against ex-Muslims. The aim appears to be silencing victims rather than protecting them. Manahal shares her traumatic experiences, emphasizing the ongoing threats she faces for speaking out.

This documentary reveals the manipulation of the legal system and media against individuals who challenge mainstream narratives, focusing on a playground incident involving a Syrian refugee, Jamal, and a British boy, Bailey. The media sensationalized the event, portraying Bailey as a racist bully while ignoring Jamal's violent behavior. The film exposes how politicians and journalists, driven by agendas, distorted the truth, leading to severe consequences for Bailey and his family, including threats and relocation. It questions the accountability of the media and the legal system, highlighting how dissent is suppressed in a society that claims to value free speech. Ultimately, it calls for public awareness and action against the erosion of truth and freedom.