TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Port Hedland passed a motion urging government officials to address concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, leading to a debate on November 29, 2024. Premier Roger Cook declined to attend, increasing public frustration. Professor Ian Breithope expressed alarm over synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, linking it to rising cancer rates and other severe health issues. He criticized health authorities for not monitoring cancer trends post-vaccination and proposed a five-point plan to address the crisis, including monitoring cancer trends and halting contaminated vaccine distribution. Breithope emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in public health, warning that failures could lead to a long-term health crisis. He concluded by urging prioritization of human life over profits and politics, calling for immediate action to protect future generations.

The government is being questioned for covering vaccine injuries inadequately. Concerns were raised about mRNA vaccines being contaminated with DNA fragments, making them genetically modified organisms. Professor Delglish warns that these vaccines may cause cancer relapses. He calls for a halt on mRNA vaccines and demands full disclosure of data. The speaker urges for transparency and ethical principles in pandemic management. The debate emphasizes the importance of following scientific evidence.

Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.

Australians were shocked by Professor Angus Dalglish's segment on Sky News, where he discussed the controversial mRNA vaccines. As a prominent oncologist, he criticized the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and highlighted Sweden's better approach. Dalglish expressed serious concerns about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, labeling them as harmful gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines. He warned of potential long-term effects, including a rise in cancers, particularly affecting children. He called for an immediate halt to these vaccines and accountability from health authorities, likening the situation to historical medical negligence. The urgency for public health oversight was emphasized, with a reference to the need for accountability in the future.

Health authorities and the media have been accused of misleading the public about the safety of COVID injections, with evidence suggesting they concealed adverse event data. Recent emails from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that officials acknowledged the potential for DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines to integrate into human genomes, contradicting their public statements. Despite this, the TGA focused on dispelling public fears rather than investigating risks. Concerns have been raised about the lack of testing for DNA integration and the overall safety of the vaccines. Senator Gerard Renick criticized the TGA for its poor quality assurance and lack of accountability, highlighting the need for greater scrutiny of vaccine safety and the political failures that allowed these issues to persist. The situation reflects broader frustrations with government transparency and public health decisions in Australia.

A peer-reviewed study led by Nicholas Hulscher and others has found compelling evidence for the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 organizations have called for this action due to significant safety concerns. The CDC has reported 19,028 vaccine-related deaths in the U.S., with global reports exceeding 37,500, far surpassing recall thresholds. Issues such as excess mortality, negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and a lack of proven reduction in transmission or hospitalization raise serious doubts about the vaccines' benefits. These findings highlight critical failures in data monitoring and risk management, emphasizing the urgent need for accountability and the removal of these vaccines to prevent further harm.

The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain fragments of DNA, which can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of the cell. This poses a potential risk of autoimmune attacks and future cancer. The DNA contamination occurred during the production process, where a plasmid vector was used to scale up the production of the RNA template. The regulatory threshold for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this new type of vaccine. The speaker believes that DNA sequencing should be done on vaccinated individuals' stem cells to determine if this theoretical risk has occurred. Informed consent is necessary, and the lack of transparency regarding the DNA contamination is concerning.

In 2022, Australia had over 10 million COVID cases, with over half the country infected despite vaccination efforts. The excess deaths in 2021 were higher than expected, and there were over 140,000 reported vaccine injuries, three times higher than previous years. The TGA, responsible for monitoring vaccine injuries, ignores these signals. The head of the organization, Professor Skerritt, has a conflict of interest as it is funded by Big Pharma. The chief health officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, hadn't read the non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine and made incorrect statements about it. The law in Australia states that vaccination cannot be coerced and individuals must be properly informed about the vaccine's contents.

I urge the British, Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, and US governments to recognize the global health crisis linked to the mRNA vaccine platform, which has been used for COVID-19, RSV, flu, and tetanus. During the pandemic, we were constantly updated on COVID cases, yet now we face a significant health crisis affecting potentially hundreds of millions due to this mRNA technology. While it is known to be cost-effective and profitable, it is also causing injuries to millions, with potential generational effects. Governments must acknowledge this serious issue, as ignoring it raises concerns.

Mr. Kevin McKernan, a former leader at the Human Genome Project, discussed DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He highlighted the risks of insertional mutagenesis and integration into the genome, contradicting regulators' claims of little consequence. The DNA, found in lipid nanoparticles, can enter cells and potentially contribute to cancer. McKernan emphasized the inadequacy of current monitoring methods and called for a review of regulatory practices. The presence of DNA in these vaccines challenges existing safety standards and raises concerns about long-term effects.

The speaker discusses DNA contamination found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, highlighting regulatory agencies' failure to address the issue. They mention potential risks of DNA integration and cancer development, urging for a review of regulatory practices. Concerns are raised about DNA levels exceeding limits, potential cell integration, and long-term presence in the body. The speaker emphasizes the need for better monitoring tools and the unique nature of DNA contamination in these vaccines.

A significant debate took place in Port Hedland on November 29, 2024, addressing concerns over the Australian government's handling of COVID-19 vaccine safety. Key speaker Professor Ian Breithope highlighted alarming findings of synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which he claimed could lead to serious health issues, including cancers and autoimmune diseases. He criticized health authorities for not monitoring cancer trends post-vaccination and proposed a five-point plan to address the crisis, including monitoring cancer trends and halting contaminated vaccine distribution. Breithope emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in public health, urging that the health of future generations depends on today's actions. He concluded with a call for prioritizing human life over profits and politics.

Pfizer was criticized for marketing practices, and there are concerns about excess deaths in Australia possibly linked to the vaccine rollout. The vaccines may have systemic harm due to spike protein use. Dr. Tindall warns of potential harm to the immune system and increased cancer risk from disrupting DNA. There are suspicions of hidden cancer-linked DNA in vaccines. A study in Japan suggests a link between vaccines and increased cancer rates. The speaker urges an inquiry into vaccine safety and efficacy and calls for the government to suspend the vaccine rollout.

The government is criticized for not adequately addressing concerns about mRNA vaccine contamination with oncogenic material. Professor Angus Delwych warns that mRNA vaccines should be banned due to safety risks. The loss of trust in pharmaceutical companies is highlighted, calling for transparency and data disclosure. The importance of ethical medical science in pandemic management is emphasized. The need for societal coordination, human rights respect, and adherence to scientific principles is stressed. The speaker questions the government's handling of vaccine safety and urges for accountability in the face of potential risks.

The Port Hedland Council in Australia has voted to suspend the Moderna and Pfizer COVID vaccines due to concerns over synthetic DNA contamination. They found levels of residual DNA in the vaccines up to 145 times above legal limits, raising fears of health risks such as cancer and immune disruption. The council plans to inform all local councils in Australia and health practitioners about these findings. This follows independent testing and pressure from federal MP Russell Broadbent, who has sought government accountability. The council aims to inspire other local governments to demand proof of vaccine safety from federal authorities, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability regarding COVID-19 vaccinations.

I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it increases production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who accidentally discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA. They criticize Pfizer for testing vaccines from one process and then vaccinating billions of people with vaccines from another process, which were contaminated with DNA. The presence of DNA in the vaccines raises risks, including potential cancer development. The speaker believes it is misleading to claim that the vaccines have undergone clinical trials when they have not been properly studied. They call for more rigorous research before commercializing vaccines.

The recent conference in Perth highlighted serious concerns about messenger RNA vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer, which are reportedly contaminated with SV 40, a substance previously used in tumor research on mice. It's shocking that these vaccines are being administered to humans for a disease that hasn't caused any deaths in two years. Additionally, a deal was announced in Australia for the purchase of $2 billion worth of Moderna vaccines over the next decade, targeting various diseases and intended for children. This raises ethical questions about the motivations behind such decisions, as it seems irresponsible to prioritize profit over the safety of children. The actions of companies like Moderna and Pfizer are seen as deeply troubling, and there is a call for accountability.

Synthetic DNA contamination in Biogen and Moderna's COVID-19 vaccines poses a national crisis for Australia. Research confirms excessive levels of synthetic DNA, with findings indicating potential integration into human DNA and self-replication, raising concerns about long-term health risks. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) dismissed these findings as misinformation, but this has been challenged by experts. Mortality rates have risen post-vaccination, correlating with booster shots, and there is a disturbing trend of aggressive cancers emerging after vaccination. Despite over 60 million doses administered, health authorities have not monitored cancer trends, creating a critical oversight. Immediate action is needed to halt the distribution of contaminated products and prioritize public health over profit. The truth must prevail for the sake of future generations.

Australian lawmakers and officials are admitting they were misled into enforcing coercive vaccine mandates, citing rising deaths and evidence of harm. They are calling for an urgent inquiry and the suspension of mRNA vaccines globally. A New South Wales health minister admitted a link between COVID-19 vaccines and a surge in hospitalizations and heart problems. A lawmaker highlighted synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, up to 145 times higher than safety limits, potentially causing cancer and other health risks. Each vaccine shot tested contained trillions of synthetic DNA fragments, including SV40, known to cause cancer. It is claimed that using biological weapons to harm people violates the Geneva Convention. An Australian judge, Helen Rife QC, who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer, allegedly failed to disclose her ties to the company. Senator Malcolm Roberts is pursuing those responsible for what he calls the "greatest crime" of the 21st century.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to over 20 million people. Despite this, governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends, and have failed to make post-vaccination cancer trend data publicly available, which is a critical oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This is a potential long-term health crisis. This matter must be taken seriously. We must advocate for immediate public health responses and monitoring of these trends. Without action, Australians are vulnerable to preventable diseases that may devastate families and strain our healthcare system. These gene-based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing coronavirus infections and was unsafe long before 2021.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to more than 20 million people, yet health authorities have not monitored cancer trends post-vaccination. The lack of publicly available data on these trends raises concerns about public health oversight. Given the contamination levels of residual DNA in the vaccines, there is a potential for an increase in cancers and genetic disorders, posing a long-term health crisis. Immediate public health responses are necessary to monitor these trends and protect Australians from preventable diseases that could overwhelm the healthcare system. The use of gene-based vaccines raises questions, as their effectiveness in preventing coronavirus infections had not been proven, and safety concerns existed prior to their use in 2021.

Speaker 0: Twelve months ago, my local government in Port Hedland, Western Australia moved and passed a motion demanding the prime minister, the state leaders, health ministers across the country validate what is now verified science, and we demanded a suspension of the mRNA injections that Australians' mRNA COVID injections are dangerously contaminated with foreign DNA contaminations and foreign DNA fragments. Now this Australian local government action has now been successfully followed and replicated in towns and cities all across Australia. We've also had over 200,000,000 views on our on social media of our council meeting. This put some serious pressure on the Australian TGA, which is Australia's drug regulation body akin to Europe's EMA or the FDA in The USA. For those of you who don't know, the Australian drug regulator, the receives around about 95 of its funding from big pharma. It's like regulatory capture on steroids. To make matters worse, the unelected bureaucrats who approve or deny applications for new drugs or medical interventions have no legislative requirement to declare any conflicts of interest. So when over 90% of the TGA's budget is supported by industry it regulates and when the conflicts of interest of those marketing drug approval decisions is hidden, is it any wonder in the West that we've lost our faith in our health institutions? Only in Australia could a regulator funded by the industry it regulates still call itself impartial with a straight face. I tell you this story to point out the inherent risks that we all face in speaking truth to power. Last month, my entire local government in Australia was sacked and dissolved and we had our elections canceled. Why? Because as a tier of Australian government, we dared to ask uncomfortable questions that embarrassed the Australian federal government and their cozy relationship with big pharma.

A new peer-reviewed study calls for the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines, citing significant evidence of harm. Over 81,000 medical professionals and officials have raised concerns about excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination linked to the vaccines. The CDC has reported over 19,000 deaths in the U.S. potentially related to the vaccines, with estimates suggesting the actual number may exceed 580,000. Historical comparisons show that the reported vaccine deaths far exceed the thresholds for recalls. Studies indicate vaccinated individuals may face a higher risk of reinfection, and contamination levels in the vaccines surpass regulatory limits. The study concludes that the vaccines have not proven effective in reducing serious health outcomes and calls for their immediate removal to prevent further loss of life.

The Pfizer vaccine contains DNA contamination in addition to mRNA. The DNA comes from the DNA vector used as a template for making the mRNA. Sequencing analysis of the vaccine revealed the presence of DNA, which could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells. This poses risks such as autoimmune attacks and potential future cancer. The DNA contamination likely occurred during the production process. It is important to investigate if this DNA has integrated into the genomes of vaccinated individuals. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. The regulatory limit for DNA in vaccines is outdated and not suitable for this type of vaccine. It is necessary to address this oversight and ensure the safety of the vaccine.