TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I support Robert Kennedy Jr.'s call to restore the middle class and expose the power held by the matrix that has been built while we were unaware. The vast number of cell towers and satellites, many of which have been hacked, pose a threat as they can transmit directed energy weapons. It is crucial to be aware of this technology and learn how to protect ourselves. As a clinical scientist for 40 years, I have studied this at the cellular and molecular level. Directed energy weapons have been known since the 70s and 80s, but radiating people with microwave radiation at 2 gigahertz is a new development. This is equivalent to 4G technology and can be extremely harmful, like being placed in a microwave oven.

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer, was the physicist and lawyer for Dr. Robert In fact, he was the guy that made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines and found out that they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and Becker found that there was a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with Wallace on sixty Minutes, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded. And remember, this guy was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves, because remember, nobody back then had a salt on and nobody had a microwave oven, only the red. K? And just so you know, this was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. So Marino was the guy, the physicist in his lab, who actually in congressional testimony in the early seventies, actually told the government, leading the congress, this is published in the archives. You can go read it yourself, satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere, 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. So the proof is there, my friend, but they've ignored it. So if you read his book, it's called Going Somewhere written by Andrew Marino. When I hear scientists tell me that non ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. The other thing I would say, his Roland Van Wyck’s book is beautiful to lay out all the stuff about biophotons and the stuff that the Russians have found and the biophoton research done by the Japanese and the Europeans. It's well researched. All the stuff about quantum mechanically has happened in biology from 2007 to current. We know that it's operational in photosynthesis. You now have books out written by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden. The Life at the End where you'll learn about the Klitschko's experiment with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing libido reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptochromes. In other words, this science is well laid out. The problem is, it's not well known. And in your podcast, I'm laying out the reason why it's not well known because if you really knew what's really published, you probably wouldn't put he Jobs iPhone up to the side of your head and then you'll read Isaacson's biography and realize why Jobs didn't let his own kids use it. Why? Remember, every time Steve Jobs went to an iMac conference, everybody remembers his worn out popular Levi's. Remember that he died from a retroperitoneal camp. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever forget the story of the iPad that had an infrared detector based into it that Apple never marketed. Do you know why that was in there? Because when a child got an iPad and it touched its leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. So that tells you that Apple knew exactly what was going on. But they never marketed it because you would ask the question, why do you have an infrared turn on? The reason is simple, my friend. All the people listening to this, most of the young people, their digital babysitter is their iPhone and their iPad that they hand kids. And they're causing brain damage in every single child because that blue light is ruining the melanopsin sickling everywhere in their body. But the reason why that's good is because you're creating obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

- My concern about five g is that the RF radiation from five g is dangerous. - It penetrates the it it disrupts the blood brain barrier. - It also is associated with glioblastomas and other cancers. - And there are literally thousands and thousands of studies in that. - I've litigated on that issue, and I've won in the Federal Court of Appeals. - Other countries regulate it much better than us, and we need to protect our children. - We should not be having these antennas on elementary schools. - We should be warning people appropriately. - Do not put that cell phone next year ahead. - Oh, you know, we're we're seeing this epidemic now of glioblastomas, and almost all of them are connected to the year that you favor the cell phone with. - There are study after study that shows that, and I'm in litigation on that issue right now.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

The speaker discusses the difference in radiation exposure between Switzerland and the US, stating that the Swiss use significantly less radiation and have no excess deaths. They claim that 5G is a weapon of mass destruction and can cause mass casualties within minutes by depriving people of oxygen. The speaker emphasizes the need for understanding this technology and taking steps to protect oneself. They suggest taking back power and electing honest individuals to positions of authority while shutting down complicit agencies.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

The speaker raises concerns about the dangerous levels of electromagnetic radiation (EMF) from Wi-Fi and mobile phone boosters in the Vienna International Center. They urge the Secretary General to remove these devices and halt the rollout of 5G until an independent health and safety assessment is conducted. They highlight the potential global health catastrophe and the need for more protective EMF guidelines. The speaker also suggests using the UN office in Vienna as a case study to investigate any abnormal health consequences caused by EMF exposure. The Secretary General admits his ignorance on the issue and promises to raise it with the World Health Organization (WHO).

The speaker believes 5G RF radiation is dangerous, disrupting the blood-brain barrier and causing glioblastomas, other cancers, and dramatic health effects. They claim there are thousands of studies supporting this and that they have litigated and won on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. They also won a case against Monsanto regarding glyphosate and Hodgkin's lymphoma, which was also called a conspiracy theory. The speaker asserts 5G is under-regulated in the US compared to other countries. They advocate for protecting children by not placing antennas on elementary schools and warning people about cell phone usage, citing an epidemic of glioblastomas linked to the ear favored for cell phone use. They state there are many studies showing this and that they are currently in litigation on this issue.

The speaker discusses a conspiracy theory about powerful individuals wanting to reduce the population by 95%. They claim that a silent war is being waged using invisible radio frequency emissions that people are addicted to. Specifically, they mention that these emissions at 60 gigahertz, which is the absorption spectrum of oxygen molecules, can affect the orbital properties of electrons and the ability of hemoglobin to bind oxygen. The speaker expresses concern about health decisions being made by elected bureaucrats who ignore warnings and trust the wireless industry.

Speaker 0 explains how to switch from 5G to LTE: Settings, then cellular data, five g plus or five g, turn that to LTE or four g; it takes less than five seconds. He claims, "you'll start feeling better, you won't have headaches, you'll probably get your sense of smell better, you won't be dizzy anymore, have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five gs is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." "But they're not gonna tell you that because that gets censored." He adds, "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." There were people who testified in front of Congress asking, "do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now." "Happy to visit with you as to what opportunities you think there needs to be more studies, and we're always for more science." "We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "Let me follow-up with you, senator. To my knowledge, there's no active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff. That's why I don't use AirPods and smartwatches and all the other stuff because you don't know what you're putting into your body or doing to your body. That's for sure." Speaker 0: "And they're gonna sell it as safe because they tested it on a plastic dummy. So you gotta ask yourself, do you wanna be the plastic dummy? I don't want to. That's for sure."

The speaker describes a legal victory, stating that they won a major suit against the Federal Communications Commission in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation and cell phone safety. He claims that, as a result, the FCC must go back and redo all of its regulations concerning cell phones. He presents this as a corrective action prompted by the truth about radiation and safety, implying that prior rules were incorrect or misleading. Moving to specific cautions, he asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head, and you should not let the phone be carried in a front pocket. He adds that, if the user is a girl, you should not allow the cell phone to be carried in a breast pocket. He further warns against carrying the device anywhere near the ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head when you are talking, the better off you are, framing distance as a key factor in reducing exposure. The speaker reinforces his position by claiming a vast body of scientific support, stating that there are tens of thousands of studies that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. He contends that these dangers are not receiving adequate attention from the public. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he urges listeners not to allow this practice. He asserts that this proximity at night is a common and troubling habit that increases exposure. Finally, he offers a practical nighttime precaution, suggesting that you should try to get the phone away from children at night so they can obtain eight hours of sleep without the device near them. He frames this as an important safety measure, implying that reducing overnight exposure is a simple and essential step. Throughout, the overall message is presented as a safety-focused stance grounded in legal action and cited studies, urging immediate adherence to the proximity and placement guidelines to minimize cell phone radiation exposure.

After her husband experienced symptoms following the installation of a new router, the speaker questioned mobile phone safety. She discovered that mobile phones are tested for safety using a plastic dummy called SAM (Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin). This has been the standard testing method since the mid-1990s. The speaker claims the testing method is flawed because SAM is not comparable to a human being. During testing, a spacer is placed between the dummy's ear and head, and thermal effects are measured for about six minutes of a call. The dummy lacks skin, organs, cells, and DNA, making it a non-biological test. Research indicates that children absorb 150% more radiation than SAM. The dummy is based on the top 10% of military recruits from the late 1980s, representing only 3% of the world's population: strong, fit, six-foot-two adult males with five-kilogram heads.

The speaker claims to have won a suit in the court of appeals against the FCC, alleging the agency lied to the public about cell phone radiation and safety, and asserts that the FCC must redo its regulations on cell phones. He asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head and should avoid carrying it in front pockets; for girls, he says not to carry the phone in the breast pocket and to keep it away from ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head during a call, the better. He asserts, “there are tens of thousands of studies” showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation and claims that people are not paying attention. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he advises against that. He recommends removing the cell phone at night so that children can get eight hours without it and stresses that this is really important.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss headphones and potential thyroid health concerns. They note they no longer wear Bluetooth and now prefer wired headphones; Speaker 0 says they use wired headphones plugged into the phone, and they are “just Amazon products. Nothing’s fancy, and they work just as well.” Speaker 1 expresses relief that Speaker 0 moved away from wireless, mentioning that they had shared information for years and kept sending content until Speaker 0 switched. Speaker 2 introduces a shift in how people view wireless headphones. They acknowledge that wireless is convenient, but say it’s moving from outside the Overton window toward inside it. They reference a recent analysis (epidemiology) showing a strong or significant association between Bluetooth headphone use (AirPods, Beats, wireless) and an increased incidence of thyroid nodules, noting this applies to both men and women. They describe the thyroid as a master gland and explain that thyroid nodules can be precancerous. They emphasize proximity to a hormonally sensitive gland and RF EMF exposure from a device worn near the neck, asserting they can measure RF with a meter and that earbuds emit RF energy. They compare the RF exposure to that of microwaves, stating the measurement units are microwatts per meter squared and that the RF band of Bluetooth is essentially the same as that of a microwave. They describe the headphones as “a small microwave in your head” for hours a day and note that readings can be obtained by placing the RF meter near a microwave. Speaker 1 agrees with caution, saying they won’t put a cell phone to their ear and questions why anyone would wear earbuds all day, feeling “spidery” about it. Speaker 0 reports returning to wired setups (Apple 1/1Point0) and values conversation without wireless interference, calling it nostalgic and safer long term. Speaker 1 discusses reasons for pushback: tradition, fashion, or fear of changing habits. They mention they once bought olive-colored Apple headphones as a fashion statement and acknowledge that appearance can distract from the health discussion. Speaker 0 clarifies they aren’t “tin hat” about everything but notes that people who sounded alarms often get vindicated later. They prefer alternatives if there’s even a slight chance of risk. Speaker 1 shares a light parenting anecdote: their five-year-old confessed briefly wearing wired headphones for five minutes, illustrating the challenge of managing kids’ exposure. They reflect on broader concerns about kids, screen time, and technology exposure, referencing a recent guest’s emphasis on limiting screen time. Speaker 0 ends with a Casino-like caution: if there’s a better alternative that works as well, why take the chance?

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

The speaker expresses concern about the dangers of 5G radiation, stating that it disrupts the blood-brain barrier and is linked to cancer. They mention winning a case on this issue in the Federal Court of Appeals. The speaker believes that 5G is under-regulated compared to other countries and calls for better protection, especially for children. They argue against placing antennas on elementary schools and advise against holding cell phones next to the head. The speaker claims that there is an epidemic of glioblastomas connected to cell phone use and mentions ongoing litigation. They reject the idea of blindly trusting experts, emphasizing the importance of individual research and questioning in a democracy.

The speaker discusses the use of radio frequency technology to manipulate the human body and control the immune system. They explain how the body's biofield is connected to wireless communication and how this technology has been used for decades. The speaker criticizes the lack of awareness and transparency surrounding these technologies and urges people to educate themselves about the potential dangers. They also mention the use of synthetic telepathy and brain-to-brain interfaces. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the need for honesty and accountability in discussing these issues.

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

- The speaker discusses a potential connection between electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and diabetes, noting that there has been a slight increase in diabetes rates associated with the rapid expansion of cellular towers, such as after Bill Clinton’s policy changes. - They acknowledge that EMR is not claimed to be the sole cause of diabetes, but suggest that historical data and curves make it tempting to believe EMR could be a significant factor. - The speaker points out that the topic has been present in scientific literature since at least 1931, and asserts that conventional medicine would push back against this viewpoint, with medical education focused on sugar and other factors. - They emphasize that they are not naive and do not claim EMR is the only cause; rather, the implication is that EMR could contribute to diabetes risk. - The argument culminates in a warning: if power systems and telecommunications infrastructure are not designed more carefully, there will be health and national budget costs, implying broader consequences for public health and economic burden.

"This is a small sample of uranium." "five g radiation is nonionizing radiation and has a wavelength in the millimeter range, very close to what microwave range frequencies just like Wi Fi and microwave ovens give off." "So technically, the main damage we need to worry about with five g is if it's giving enough power to heat your body up like in a microwave." "Let's see how strong the signal is from my phone." "Woah. 89." "you actually get way more radiation holding your phone to your head than being near a tower." "it's orders of magnitude lower than the amount that could cause heating to your body." "the battery warming up in your phone is gonna cause more heating on your body than the five g radiation is." "Aren't you glad cell phones don't use uranium?"

Speaker 0 urges switching from five g to four g: "Takes less than five seconds. I guarantee you'll start feeling better." He asserts benefits and adds: "You won't have headaches. You won't be dizzy anymore. Have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five g is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." He states: "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." He asks: "There were people who testified in front of congress and asked them, do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1 replies: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now. Happy to visit with you... we're always for more science. We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "No active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0 concludes: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff... AirPods and smartwatches..."

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Today’s discussion centers on Elon Musk and the technocrat, claiming that "Matt from Cultivate LV lacks medical credentials on five g, and there's no link of any dangers of five g or WiFi," and that AI has been programmed to say this. It references "the studies done by the US Navy in 1971 of 2,000 studies on the biological responses to radio frequencies, five gs wireless, and microwave radiation." It lists side effects: "impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, hallucinations, sleepiness, insomnia, restlessness, chest pain, no side effects," plus "hair loss." It notes that in 1996, "Bill Clinton signs an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits," and claims "No dangers," including that "insurance companies don't cover cell phone companies." It adds that "cell phone safety testing is done on a plastic dummy" and that "The safety standard in The US, Canada, and Australia ... is off the charts, while in other countries, actually very low." It links "the rollout of five g" to the "root cause of the pandemic" and ends with "Here you go."

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.