TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they were charged with sales murder without ever speaking to a detective, police officer, or DA. They claim Kamala Harris appeared at the two most pivotal times in their first trial: conviction and sentencing, suggesting it felt like a celebration for her. The speaker recounts that people describe their story as the worst nightmare, akin to dying. When confronted with a quote from Kamala Harris's book about the role of a progressive prosecutor, the speaker says it sounds like Kamala Harris as a senator now, but it was the polar opposite of what they and their community felt when she was the district attorney of San Francisco.

The speaker claims they are portrayed as a villain on social media but cannot discuss the case due to legal restrictions. They assert their innocence, stating they did nothing wrong. The speaker references people seeking jobs, enrolling children in schools, and standing in food lines. They highlight the struggle to find opportunity in the community, emphasizing the risks taken by those who set foot in this city.

Speaker 0 outlines concerns about governance and patient safety, stating that “the governor” is ultimately over the issues, with nurses and the medical board implicated. He recalls that the medical board “came in and Please please do from letting insurance are being abused,” noting that complaints would take up to eight months to be contacted back or would “vanish into a black hole.” He emphasizes that staffing was blamed despite unspent staffing funds and asserts the governor is ultimately responsible. He mentions that his staff queried the possibility of being an Israeli spy and calls for immediate hearings, adding that discussions have been ongoing and something will be done. He references news that Josh Shapiro, a Kamala Harris vice-presidential contender, was queried by her staff about being an Israeli spy, and contrasts this with the lack of questioning about Walsh being a Chinese spy or having a predilection to fraud. He references antisemitic lines of credit and notes receiving massive inquiries, saying they will host a seminar on how to fight back, including defamation lawsuits as a recourse for public figures, though acknowledging the difficulty of such actions. Speaker 2 states she does not know the person but notes a predilection for people close to the others, insisting the person is “not part of the club.” Speaker 0 recalls a podcast with a Christian podcaster and expresses that to do this line of work, one must believe God drives it because they do not make money. He remarks on being disliked for not chasing popularity and invites others to examine their Twitter feeds. He describes the harassment they face, including lawfare, stalking, threats, and the desire to “kill me,” recounting examples like Carrie Donovan. Speaker 2 agrees on the intensity of threats and emphasizes the importance of truth and accountability in their reporting, not wanting to be deterred by intimidation. Speaker 0 adds that belief in a higher purpose is necessary to endure the profession, noting that after October 7 his faith was shaken but returning to the idea that God orders their steps. Speaker 2 adds that the local community deserves to know when someone is not who they claim to be or has a criminal record, and that elected officials deserve scrutiny. Speaker 1 introduces Adam with Accuracy in Media, saying he is dealing with three defamation suits from wealthy individuals’ families and has faced 13 swatts and daily death threats, sometimes requiring off-duty police at college campuses. He highlights the value of anti-SLAPP laws and tort reform, noting North Carolina lacks an anti-SLAPP law, which would help dismiss frivolous defamation suits protecting free speech, and criticizes legislators for lobbying for lawyers. Speaker 0 announces a good development: a story they broke on Thursday prompted Brendan Jones, head of the real bulldog in North Carolina’s oversight committee, to request appearances before his committee in Winston-Salem. They plan to discuss the Winston-Salem event, North Carolina A&T, and the Western North Carolina story, which Margo finds triggering. Speaker 3 from the city notes DEI support and discusses terminology changes since the FBI’s ban, and Speaker 1 comments on leadership differences between states, suggesting better governance in other legislatures and hoping for improved leadership locally. The exchange ends with remarks about leadership and governance comparisons.

Jake Lang describes his experience surrounding January 6 and the aftermath of his detention. - Lang was never sentenced or found guilty of a crime, yet he spent four years and six days in prison. He says the Biden administration canceled the constitution, and asserts the FBI had embedded 274 agents to rile up a peaceful protest into a domestic extreme event to harm President Trump’s 2024 run. - He claims the event was staged to be used against Trump, and that the domestic terrorism frame and Patriot Act were used to suspend constitutional rights, with trials repeatedly kicked off. - Lang states that many detainees, including himself, spent years in solitary confinement without access to bond, having no criminal record. He contrasts this with cashless bail reforms in D.C., Chicago, and New York, where "career criminals" with numerous arrests were released quickly. - He says he was never afforded the same level of justice as those individuals, describing his time as a gulag and saying he prayed and kept faith during incarceration. He was released after 1,467 days to his fiancé Rachel, his father, and thousands of supporters outside the DC gulag. - To cope, Lang joined activities such as push-ups and reading the Bible; he hosted a political prisoner podcast with the Gateway Pundit featuring guests like General Flynn and Dinesh D’Souza, and occasionally appeared on Newsmax to share his story. - He maintained faith that whatever a judge—referred to as “wicked activist judges in DC”—decides would not be his fate, believing a higher plan was in store. - Lang is now running for the U.S. Senate in Florida to take Marco Rubio’s seat. He references a lawsuit alleging that Christopher Wray lied before a congressional panel about having knowledge of undercover agents at the Capitol on January 6; he claims Kash Patel indicated there were 274 agents, an overreach of normal procedures. - He states that the lie led to destroyed families, home raids, gunpoint confrontations, and fear nationwide. He notes red dot gun sights, long periods away from family, and visible dehumanization, including a photo of him with a beard and ponytail during imprisonment. - Lang points to the perceived double standard of justice, noting a Doge staffer who appeared with Elon Musk received a light punishment for assault, while Jan Sixers faced harsher consequences. He closes by highlighting efforts to rebuild lives for Jan Sixers through j6rebuild.com, urging support for those affected. Notes: Lang mentions ongoing activities, his Senate campaign, and calls for support for those impacted by January 6.

I was forced to watch children being raped in the woods. I have proof. The elite are involved. I don't care if they try to stop me. I will release the evidence. They can't touch me because I have God on my side. I don't care about the consequences. I will expose everything. Thank you for your prayers. Alex Jones has been saying the same things. They are trying to silence me, but I have divine authority. It's over for everyone.

Speaker describes sending a life insurance policy of sorts—a package of text messages, emails, private communications, videos, and private legal documents—to trusted people so that, if anything happens to him, they will know exactly who it is that has been making my life a living hell over the past couple of years. He says those behind it are trying to bankrupt me and my family, threatening us to sue us. He notes Everything that Kanye said was so real. He says Just leave me alone. Let me say what I believe, and you say what you believe. Fight fair. He claims he has explicit permission to release it all, detonate it all, expose all of these people in politics and in the movement who behave like this behind the scenes. It's necessary. He says to send everything around to about eight people that you trust and that he sent it to journalists, text messages, screenshots to people ranging from Max Blumenthal to Andrew Tate.

Speaker says he sent around a "life insurance policy of sorts"—a package filled with text messages, emails, private communications, videos, and private legal documents—to people he trusts, so if anything happens to me, you guys will know exactly who it is that has been making my life a living hell over the past couple of years. "People that are trying to bankrupt me, trying to bankrupt me and my family, that are threatening us to sue us." "Everything that Kanye said was so real." He adds, "man, Kanye was right. He was really saying something about what it takes to leave, you know, to fight for custody of your own soul. Just leave me alone. Let me say what I believe, and you say what you believe. Fight fair." "Why do you always have to make this threat to bankrupt people?" He says those people, if anything happens to me, have my explicit permission to release it all, detonate it all, expose all of these people in politics and in the movement who behave like this behind the scenes. It's necessary. He urges every person with a platform who is scared to "send everything around to about eight people that you trust." He concludes, "And, I mean, I I've ranged it. I sent it to journalists, text messages, screenshots to people ranging from Max Blumenthal to Andrew Tate. They won't know where it's coming from."

We sued CNN for defamation after they falsely reported that Twitter suspended Project Veritas for spreading misinformation, when it was actually for publishing private information. CNN argued in court that there's no difference between promoting misinformation and revealing private information, but the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. A circuit judge even noted his disbelief that a major news organization would downplay the importance of truth. This legal victory is overshadowed by Project Veritas firing me, in part, for spending the money to fight these battles. It's difficult when the organization is now celebrating a victory that they were against, and suing me for the actions that led to it.

Tom states he feels good despite being incarcerated since October in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, which he considers an occupational hazard for a citizen journalist. He claims that since he started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs 16 years ago, he has faced relentless attacks from the British state, which uses lawfare to silence him. He asserts that he has never been convicted by a jury and that every one of his convictions have been...

This is a continuation of what I believe is the greatest witch hunt of all time. The judge in this case has ruled that my properties are worth much less than they actually are. The attorney general who brought these charges against me is a racist and a failure. She used this case to try to get me before she even knew anything about me. My financial statements are actually better than what was reported. The banks were not affected and were paid back on time. There was no crime committed. This is all an attempt to damage me in the election. Our country is in serious decline and I'm running to fix it. Thank you.

People reacted strongly, demanding action, but the speaker says they have sacrificed for two years, facing ostracization, harassment, and threats. The speaker states that while others lived normal lives, they risked everything. The speaker emphasizes that nobody got hurt on their watch, and the allegation concerns something from six years ago that was hidden from them. The speaker also claims the alleged victim wasn't even harmed.

The speaker identifies as a January 6th defendant who was held pretrial for four years. They claim the government wanted them to make a false statement about Roger Stone's involvement, and that they were offered no charges in exchange for the statement. The speaker alleges torture of pretrial American citizens and contrasts their situation with the handling of BLM and Antifa rioters, claiming those rioters received lighter sentences. They mention a $30,000,000 settlement in the Ashley Babbitt lawsuit. They state they have 5,000 pages of documentation available open source. As a result of their experience, the speaker says they lost their wife, child, house, job, and name, but anticipates being "stupid paid" by the government.

The speaker describes a coordinated smear campaign against him, asserting that after he announced he would challenge Trump, a lineup of public figures began attacking him or being described as “feds.” He cites Ian Myles Chong, Tucker Carlson, and Milo as examples, saying the criticism revolves around insinuations that he is connected to or controlled by federal agents. He argues that these accusations are part of a broader effort to silence the American people and dismiss his voice. He contrasts the public’s reaction to his campaign with what he regards as a coordinated “fed” narrative, claiming that Tucker Carlson has insinuated he is a fed, and noting that Carlson’s father was a CIA agent who ran Voice of America for forty years, along with Carlson’s collaborations with people he labels as CIA assets. The speaker provides a cascade of biographical and investigative claims about people connected to Carlson and others: - Eric Prince, described as a CIA asset, appeared in a group chat with Tucker Carlson; Carlson had on Joe Kent, a green beret, who is described as intelligence. - Curtis Yarvin is described as the son of an American diplomat who works with Peter Thiel, who is described as a federal informant. - Peter Thiel is claimed to be an FBI informant; Thiel’s Palantir is said to have contracted with the CIA for almost ten years (2001–2008) and now contracts with the NSA and FBI. - Thiel funded JD Vance’s Senate campaign, giving $15,000,000 to help him secure the Trump endorsement; Carlson allegedly helped persuade Trump to make Vance the vice president. - Carlson is said to have invited Kevin Spacey, described as a close friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, on a Christmas interview. - The speaker contends that a social media ecosystem includes many who see nothing suspicious about these connections, including CIA involvement, green berets, and intelligence ties that push certain candidates on Trump. He asserts he's been demonized for years: banned from social media, banks, airlines, and credit card processors; subpoenaed; and money frozen. He claims this is because he has grown a substantial, loyal following and uses it to organize and mobilize swing-state voters rather than taking advertising or sponsorships. He says his followers are genuine and committed, which frightens those who want influencers who can be paid to push narratives. The speaker reflects on Charlottesville and white anxiety, suggesting others only recently acknowledge these issues. He asserts he would appear civil in an interview with Tucker Carlson and asks for a platform to “clear the record.” He contends he is being targeted for standing up to the GOP establishment and for criticizing both the right-wing establishment and the left. He predicts he will be “patsied” and that those opposing him will try to take him down, leaving him to be the “dark MAGA” guardian, not the hero, who nonetheless confronts the country’s problems and fights for real change. He closes by declaring he will be the villain if necessary, stating that the country will never give him the credit he deserves, but that he performs this role out of duty, not glory.

For the past 20 years, my wife and I have been victims of criminal activities by a network of people aiming to destroy us personally, professionally, and financially. This network is manipulating the banking and criminal justice systems to sabotage our credit and credibility. We're not criminals or fugitives, just artists being targeted. I believe there's a malignant group in Hollywood. I personally know eight actors who died suddenly and mysteriously in the past five years, including Heath Ledger and Chris Penn. I believe these actors were "whacked," and others like Britney Spears and Mel Gibson are being exploited for their money. Google profits by promoting negative stories about celebrities. I've earned $40 million in my career and I'm being embezzled from by accountants, estate planners, and lawyers who are trying to destroy my career and possibly murder me for my royalties.

A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.

Everyone is eager to hear your story, especially regarding the 2024 election. You have firsthand experience, which gives you authority on the matter. Can you share what's causing you to lose sleep? I received a text from a lawyer who previously tried to remove me from the ballot ten years ago. He threatened to send a cease and desist if I don’t stop speaking out. This has caused me significant anxiety. Courage is about facing fear, so I'm trying to push through it. It's concerning that individuals within the system are legally threatening you. I reached out to him to clarify what I said that was untrue, and we discussed it. Ultimately, everything I stated was accurate; he just didn't want it presented in a clear way.

The speaker explains he is trying to navigate possible collaboration with federal authorities while maintaining personal integrity. He says he has a statement that is “completely true” that he’s “never been in contact with any federal authority,” and he’s torn about how to start working with DHS to address threats he faces as a national figure. He claims “the Yemenis, a million of them came out into the streets” and that they want to kill him, with a fatwa on his head. He asserts he would need DHS to make a statement that “the Houthis and their fatwa that they placed on my head will not be stood,” and that “American citizens exercising our rights will not be, you know, subject to to Muslim murder, rituals.” He describes hundreds of thousands of death threats in his DMs and says, to deal with them, he would need to walk into an FBI building and give them a printout, but he “don’t fucking trust the FBI.” He accuses the FBI of having “destroyed my life,” pointing to past raids on his and others’ homes and references to the Mar-a-Lago search, stating he is trying to figure out how to navigate this situation without claiming contact with Harmeet or making contacts he “don’t want to.” He notes that when he and others exercised their rights in Dearborn, he views it as a civil rights hate crime, saying “the Muslim oppression of Christians in Dearborn” was a civil rights hate violation and that “they punched me in the face because I’m white” and “they punched me in the face because I’m Christian, not for anything else.” Harmony Dillon is described as wanting to prosecute this as a hate crime, with others subjected to spit, food thrown, assaults, pepper spray, etc. He mentions the Trump administration’s purported interest in bringing these people to justice, but he expresses a wish not to feed into it, citing personal integrity and caution. He questions whether the rank-and-file FBI officer’s motives are aligned with his interests, contrasting a year ago with a “grandma that walked through the capital” to now a Muslim who punched a Christian, implying hypocrisy or moral decline. He asserts there are “deep state embedded figures in the DOJ, in the FBI, in DHS,” who were involved in actions like the raid on Mar-a-Lago and other “schemes.” He says he needs assurance that these agencies have “our best interest” and that they are not “deep state shills.” Ultimately, he states he has refused to make contact because it’s “too risky” and he cannot be associated with people he deems “un American.”

The documentary you're about to see is about the weaponization of court buildings to silence people, from Trump to Hopkins, who speak out against the mainstream narrative. As a journalist who stands for freedom of speech, I failed when I was bankrupted and silenced by a gagging order. But I won't fail again. This film exposes the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians to suppress free speech. It shows how a playground incident was spun into global news, ignoring the truth and abusing the law to silence dissent. It asks if the media is accountable, if the legal system is fit for purpose, and if our politicians can be held accountable. The film serves as a tutorial on journalism.

It was an emotional time seeing his baby get ripped from him, and it wasn't right. You never went through what I went through. You didn't endure all the things I had to endure. You weren't sleeping on a couch trying to raise a hundred bucks here, a thousand bucks here. I'm invoking the constitution here. Every defendant has the right to a fair trial, and no justice can be done in Ferguson or New York City if a fair trial cannot be had. You didn't sleep on a mattress in Louisiana. You weren't falsely accused by the federal government, not once but twice. You didn't go through three jury trials. James O'Keith is facing federal felony charges, charges that carry up to a quarter million dollar fine and ten years in prison. You didn't bleed and sweat and cry the way that I did for fourteen years. And you come into my institution and you have the gall to tell me that you're not the bad guy. This was never about you.

- and say that she forgives the assassin who killed her husband, Charlie Kirk. - The people standing next to me also wept. - the only solution is exposure, journalism, sunlight as the best disinfectant. - Please note, this isn't about him or Glenn Prager. - There are many more out there like Glenn Prager. - Be a hero and do the right thing. - But these reports are going to continue coming out and they will not be partisan or political. - They're gonna cut across the political divide because this is not a political mission, and I am not a political person. - It is my mission to clean up society through transparency, accountability, and the truth. - Charlie Kirk's last words to me were, James, you should be a journalist first.

I can't explain because the judge is corrupt. His ruling is a disgrace. Everyone saw what happened. I'm innocent, but held by a corrupt judge who's conflicted. It's a disgrace to New York and the country. I need to get back to the campaign trail. Thank you.

He recounts being told, while offline at the synagogue, that Candice is really going after him, and he describes the effect of turning his phone on to see all the notifications and messages. He says he was up until 3AM local time dealing with the barrage of messages and emails. He distinguishes this experience from ordinary pushback, stating that this is not a response to a legal theory or a constructive debate about the two-state solution, but rather “picking a Jewish person and calling him subhuman filth and sinking your band of millions and millions of neo Nazi zealots on a Jewish person who happens to be a … husband and father to a young child.” He emphasizes the severity and ugliness of the harassment, characterizing it as “awful, awful stuff.” He then shifts to his own perspective, noting publicly (as far as he believes) that he is talking to lawyers about the matter. As a lawyer with a background that includes clerking for a federal appeals judge, he states that he “knows a thing or two about United States constitutional law.” He says there is “potentially serious case here for defamation” and that he is “very much speaking with lawyers,” with the outcome still to be determined—“we’ll see what happens.” He frames the situation as a confrontation that goes beyond typical professional disagreement, involving targeted hatred toward a Jewish individual who is described as a husband and father. Throughout, he underscores the personal toll of the online harassment, contrasting it with his professional experience and legal considerations. He communicates a sense of urgency and concern about the legal and reputational implications, while indicating he is actively seeking legal counsel to assess possible defamation avenues. The overall message centers on the severity of the targeted harassment, its anti-Jewish intensity, and the potential legal response he may pursue.