reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Revolution necessitates killing; it's a revolutionary act. We haven't called for the killing of white people—at least not yet. I can't predict the future, but with things escalating as they are, a revolution in this country is inevitable. The statement that we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now, implies that we might in the future. We're not ruling out that possibility. Whether or not we will, at some point, call for the slaughter of white people, remains to be seen. It's a question for a future date.

Donald Trump is calculated, not just a fool, and is speaking to a specific voter id. When he calls out Detroit, Philly, and Atlanta, he is referencing the states he lost in 2020: Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan, which led to his indictment for attempting to steal those races. He's telling his extreme MAGA voters that Black people are stealing the election, that Black Haitians are violent cannibals, and that Black people are the enemy. Trump's language permits his followers to do violence to Black people if necessary to stop another peaceful transfer of power because he understands that he is not winning the election.

I express extreme frustration and anger towards white individuals, suggesting that they should all perish. I advocate for a global elimination of their genetic presence, using any means necessary.

I recall attending a convention where the debate centered around whether it was a revolutionary duty to kill newborn white babies to prevent them from perpetuating oppression. One person questioned the morality of this idea, but was met with disapproval from the group.

A revolution demands killing as part of a revolutionary act. It was stated that there has been no call for the killing of white people, at least for now, but there are no guarantees about the future. If things continue as they are, there will be a revolution. When asked for clarification, it was confirmed that "we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now" means that at some future date, there may be a call for the slaughter of white people. It was stated that this may very well happen in the future. The phrase "shoot to kill Hamazah. Kill the poor, the farmer" was also stated.

One month ago today, I witnessed my friend of ten years, someone who I considered a brother, a loving husband, a devoted father, a generational leader, get assassinated on a livestream by a left wing radical. Approximately one year ago, I witnessed the president of The United States get shot in the head by a left wing radical who also took the life of a transporter in front of his daughters and wife. Two months ago, Christian children kneeling and praying in a church Were slaughtered. By a left wing extremist. If it's happening every single week, is it that extreme, or has the Democrat party mainstreamed violence as a political tool? Violence has been mainstreamed by the Democrat Party. It is not extremist. Is any Democrat courageous enough to disavow violence? The Trump administration making America safe again. God bless them.

Professors across various universities make controversial statements about white people, advocating for their harm or criticizing white privilege. Some suggest mass suicide, genocide, or giving money to black people. Others equate white people with racism or criticize white masculinity. One professor was hospitalized for threatening to kill white people. Slides in classrooms depict white tears, colonization, and white privilege. These statements reflect a range of extreme views on race and society.

We, the black majority, must fight for our freedom by reclaiming our land, seizing the means of production, and redistributing everything equally in a society that prioritizes black people. Peaceful methods have failed, and we are already at war, as our people are under attack on farms. White people are land thieves with no stake in our society, and we will respond accordingly. We have been patient for over 400 years of colonialism. We don't want your pity, we are coming to take what you owe us. Farm murders are gruesome. Attackers intend to kill. Victims endure torture, with cases of nails being pulled out, and hands being removed. A 12-year-old boy was drowned in boiling water. These real-life horrors surpass the worst movies.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

South Africans are concerned about issues like potholes, job shortages, and daily power outages. Crime is rampant, and farm murders involve extreme violence, including the gang rape of elderly women. Some believe external forces stir up racial tensions, contributing to the destruction of the country. White farmers face brutal attacks, including rape, torture with boiling water or hot irons, and being dragged behind vehicles. Children are murdered in front of their parents, sometimes without any theft occurring. Political figures incite violence with slogans like "kill the farmer, shoot the farmer," and one leader, Julius Malema, has said "slit their throats," while gesturing the action. He stated he is not currently calling for the slaughter of white people, but cannot rule it out in the future.

If a white teen had killed a black teen, there wouldn't be a GoFundMe set up for him. However, the inverse is happening now, with fundraiser comments showing hatred against white people and rewarding the killer. This situation is a precursor to race wars and societal breakdown. Racial conflict reveals an ugly truth: black people have felt this way forever. Growing up in an all-black neighborhood, there was hatred towards white people, with wrongdoings by black individuals often justified by slavery and Jim Crow. White criminals who commit crimes against police officers never get GoFundMe support, unlike George Floyd and others. Black people have an ingrained racial hatred towards white people that surfaces during incidents like this. Supporters of the white victim aren't motivated by race but by the fact that he was murdered in cold blood. This underbelly of racism from the black community always emerges in such situations. Many black people want to believe the white kid was a bully, which isn't true. Black people have vitriolic behavior against whites that will always surface.

The speaker presents articles and videos depicting violence against white South Africans, claiming white South Africans are fleeing due to violence and racist laws. They cite attacks on white South African couples and the burning of white farmers. The speaker references President Trump's reaction to the situation, mentioning Trump asked about a jet that was given. The speaker claims officials are saying, "kill the white farmer and take their land." They state that friends who left South Africa warned that people there want to take land and kill.

The speakers discuss a GoFundMe for a black teen who killed a white teen, contrasting it with the hypothetical reaction if the races were reversed. One speaker says the GoFundMe comments reveal hatred against white people and that it feels like rewarding the killer, which could lead to societal breakdown. Another speaker says racial conflict reveals an ugly truth: many black people harbor ingrained racial hatred towards white people due to historical injustices. He says this surfaces during incidents like this, as seen in the GoFundMe comments. He contrasts this with support for the white victim, which he attributes to the tragedy of his death and potential. He says this underbelly of racism from the black community will always emerge in similar situations, regardless of who is right or wrong.

Professors from various universities make controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their mass suicide, calling for their deaths, and labeling them as racist. Some professors equate beliefs like hard work and math with white ideology and privilege. One professor even suggests that white people are a plague to the planet. These statements reflect a trend of anti-white sentiments and calls for violence in academic settings.

South Africans don't understand white people. Science shows white people are inferior, with Neanderthal blood. White populations are shrinking, along with their leadership and wealth. We are dealing with the weakest whites ever. We expect humanity, but whites are below human. It's like negotiating with a wild dog – you can't expect it to guard your house. We seek justice for stolen land and butchered people, but we're not out for blood. Why don't white people understand Ubuntu? They don't have a heart because they're incapable. You can't expect human behavior from a dog.

As South Africans, we don't understand white people. Science, even studies conducted by white eugenicists, shows they're an inferior species with Neanderthal blood. Their population is shrinking, and their leadership and wealth are dying out. We're dealing with the weakest whites ever. We expect humanity from them, but they're barely human. It's like negotiating with a wild dog, expecting it to guard your house. We ask for justice for stolen land and butchered people. We're not seeking their blood, yet they lack ubuntu and heart. But they're incapable of it. You can't expect human behavior from a dog.

Canada has been slow to recognize white hate groups as a domestic terror threat and their connection to gun violence. Indigenous peoples have been targeted and killed by white supremacists, like Lialashant. Rural racism is a problem, as seen in the case of Colton Bushey, who was unarmed and shot point blank. Instead of addressing the issue, some rural farmers responded by advocating for more weapons and violence. This kind of incitement to violence is concerning, as it leads people to do things they wouldn't otherwise do without the support of their community. Canada should prioritize this issue instead of focusing on the US.

When I spoke to a mother who lost her daughter, it highlighted the rise of Neo-Nazis and white supremacists in America, reminiscent of the 1930s in Germany. After her daughter was killed, the then-President Trump responded by saying there were "very fine people on both sides." This motivated me to run for office because democracy is at stake. The events of January 6th, the attack on the Capitol, further confirmed this. Trump has indicated he would pardon those involved, showing support for extremist groups. Unlike the past, when the Ku Klux Klan hid their identities, they now feel emboldened to come out openly, knowing they have an ally in the White House.

Speaker 0 asserts that Joshua Zimmerman is “the Jew” who is a traitor and an enabler to murder, claiming that Jews engineered the destruction of South Africa and the rise of the African National Congress led by the convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela, whom Speaker 0 says “was in jail for acts of terrorism.” They state Mandela “was not an angel or humanitarian.” The speaker then condemns Julius Malema, alleging he is inciting crimes, and warns of “Genocidal Jews” across Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Speaker 1 introduces Joshua Zimmerman as the person present in Ward 72 at Glen Hazel, saying they are there with fellow fighters to “conscientize the minds of those in the suburbs that the EFF is an all inclusive party regardless of race, class, or status,” and that “Slowly but surely, we are going to start winning more in the suburbs.” Speaker 2 leads chants: “Long live the commander in chief. Long live. Long live. Long live the commander in chief, Julius Malema. Long live. Long live. Viva EFF. Viva. Viva. Aman Clark. Away to.” Speaker 3 describes a crowd of “just under 100,000” chanting “kill the boar.” They identify the Boers as the remnant white South Africans who built South Africa, and say Julius Malema is leading the genocidal chant as head of the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). They claim the Boer community was betrayed by liberal whites decades ago. They describe South Africa as once prosperous, now suffering under majority black rule, with unreliable electricity and a collapsed agricultural sector, labeling it an economic basket case of savagery typical of failed African states. They claim white people face daily violence and live in a state of siege, particularly those who did not leave after Mandela and the ANC took power. Speaker 3 provides context on the EFF as a South African far-left pan-Africanist and Marxist party founded by Julius Malema and allies in 2013, noting Malema serves as president and that the party is the third largest in both houses of Parliament and growing. They state the party “hasn’t yet started the mass killings of whites, but it will if Malema is to be believed.” They reference an October 2022 speech in which Malema told branch members they should “never be scared to kill.” They cite a 2018 rally where Malema urged supporters to “go after the white man” and proclaimed, “we are cutting the throat of whiteness.” They mention a 2016 rally where Malema said, “we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.” Speaker 3 notes that after Robert Mugabe’s death, Malema tweeted quotes hostile toward white people, including “the only white man you can trust is a dead white man,” and asserts that Malema has given warnings of white genocide. They claim that white people who acquiesce to replacement, mass immigration, or intercultural guilt narratives will face death, insisting: “Death follows. Be warned if your current white majority nation has adopted multiculturalism, diversity, and inclusion policies. It won’t end well.” The speakers claim the media hides the truth, leaving whites “supine and docile as they’re killed,” and reiterate Melena’s call: “Kill the whites.” They conclude with a call for whites to be racialists, meaning to defend their own kind.

Speaker claims, "Brother Charlie got murdered, assassinated a few days ago, but the truth is he was assassinated a few years ago." They argue that electing people who demonize their political opponents leads to violence, adding, "So you might have pulled the trigger yourself." The speaker asks, "Who demonize political opponents? Who call political opponents enemies, Hitler, a threat to democracy, who say because we disagree, if you see someone, walk up to them and if they're eating in a restaurant, tell them they're not welcome, get in their face." They warn, "When you start saying stuff like that, calling your political opponents Nazis, fascists, stuff like that. Well, sooner or later, a kook is gonna hear that. A crazy person is going to hear that, and they're going to act on it."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are ruling out the possibility of calling for the slaughter of white people in the future. Speaker 1 responds by saying they don't know what will happen and it may or may not be them. Speaker 0 clarifies that it could be Speaker 1 and asks what would necessitate that. Speaker 1 doesn't know and questions why they would do that. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to pledge to never call for the slaughter of white people, but Speaker 1 refuses to make that pledge. Speaker 0 understands.

The speaker asserts that the mayor of DA in PE is a white man, and that targeting white men inflicts significant pain on "these people." The speaker states that while Mashaba and Soli will also be targeted, the focus is currently on "whiteness," which they are "cutting the throat of." The speaker expresses a willingness to condemn murder, but not when the victims are white. They refuse to play into the hands of white supremacists, and makes an extreme statement: "Shoot to kill your mother."

If elected, we won't tolerate being killed anymore. We're not afraid to stand up. A race war is looming. People like Trump must go. We may not love Biden, but we have no choice. We must get him in office and then make sure he delivers.

Speaker 0 expresses a strong desire to challenge National Geographic and urges the audience to join in killing all white people. They emphasize the importance of fighting against the white man, regardless of personal opinions or others' perceptions. The speaker firmly believes in the death and destruction of every white person, regardless of age or innocence.

We currently have a white supremacist in the White House, supported by others with the same ideology. The majority of violent crimes in the country are committed by white supremacists, yet they continue to hold positions of power. These individuals were involved in the January 6th attack on our democracy and are now undermining it from within.